New Mexico bill would criminalize abortions after rape as "tampering with evidence"

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

forced birth new cartoon new mexico abortion choice

Another day, another dangerous Republican nutcase. This time it's a female lawmaker in New Mexico who introduced a bill that would legally require rape victims to carry their pregnancies to term. Why? Because she wants the fetus to be used as evidence in a sexual assault trial.

This insane bill will probably not pass since Dems hold the majority in both chambers of the New Mexico state legislature, but the fact that it was even introduced is beyond disturbing. Unfortunately, this kind of extremism is becoming more commonplace (and/or perhaps more widely reported), and is not only appalling, it's downright scary.

So to those of you who need even more proof that there is a War on Women, here it is, perplexingly brought to you by a woman, via HuffPo:

House Bill 206, introduced by state Rep. Cathrynn Brown (R), would charge a rape victim who ended her pregnancy with a third-degree felony for "tampering with evidence."

Pat Davis of ProgressNow New Mexico, a progressive nonprofit organization opposing the bill:

The bill turns victims of rape and incest into felons and forces them to become incubators of evidence for the state,” he said. “According to Republican philosophy, victims who are ‘legitimately raped’ will now have to carry the fetus to term in order to prove their case.

Davis called the bill "blatantly unconstitutional."

When it comes to rape, Republicans have yet to learn to keep their big mouths shut. Their bizarre, backward attitudes have never served them well, as Richard Mourdock, the guy who says rape pregnancies are “intended by God“ and Todd "Legitimate Rape" Akin can attest, and have spotlighted their insensitivity and ignorance.

But to try to force birth by criminalizing rape victims is beyond the pale.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare
  • labman57

    Extending that logic, if somebody poisons or shoots you, then you should not be permitted to seek treatment, as the procedure would "tamper" with the evidence.