So much for Romney's "bipartisanship" claims

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Michael Wines at the New York Times has a thing or two to say about a thing or two regarding Willard M. Romney's boasts about how well he played with Democratic others while he was governor of Massachusetts.

Not so fast, Willard. If by "working across the aisle" you meant "clashing," then yes, you're correct. Not only is your political tone deafness is showing, so is your proclivity for lying:

But on closer examination, the record as governor he alluded to looks considerably less burnished than Mr. Romney suggested. Bipartisanship was in short supply; Statehouse Democrats complained he variously ignored, insulted or opposed them, with intermittent charm offensives. He vetoed scores of legislative initiatives and excised budget line items a remarkable 844 times, according to the nonpartisan research group Factcheck.org. Lawmakers reciprocated by quickly overriding the vast bulk of them. 

The big-ticket items that Mr. Romney proposed when he entered office in January 2003 went largely unrealized, and some that were achieved turned out to have a comparatively minor impact. A wholesale restructuring of state government was dead on arrival in the legislature; an ambitious overhaul of the state university system was stillborn; a consolidation of transportation fiefs never took place.  [...]

[H]is own education reforms went mostly unrealized. His promise to lure new business and create jobs in a state that had been staggered by the collapse of the 2000 dot-com boom never quite bore fruit; unemployment dropped less than a percentage point during his four years [...]

But in contrast to his statements in the debate, many say, Mr. Romney neither mastered the art of reaching across the aisle nor achieved unusual success as governor. To the contrary, they say, his relations with Democrats could be acrimonious, and his ability to get big things done could be just as shackled as is President Obama’s ability to push his agenda through a hostile House of Representatives.

More here.

Democrats say Romney lied during debate — and it is going to cost him.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare
  • David G

    Either Biden and Obama clear the air of these lies, or they roll over and take it like the republicans have been counting on.  It's the POTUS's call.  Either stand up and fight, or start packing because the easily swayed public is starting to buy into Romney's lies.  DG