Banks flood Mitt Romney’s campaign with donations, 3 times more than to Pres. Obama, most skewed to one party in decades

Google GmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInStumbleUponRedditFarkDiggTumblrBlogger PostDeliciousFriendFeedNewsVineGoogle BookmarksGoogle ReaderMultiplyPosterousEmailBookmark/FavoritesWordPressShare

Big Banks overwhelmingly support Willard Romney as the GOP presidential nominee, but that was to be expected. After all, the guy bathes in cash and eats hundred dollar bills for appetizers (and he doesn’t care who he hurts making his zillions). What’s even more disturbing are the numbers, not to mention who they favor.

Via The Miami Herald:

Employees at the five largest U.S. banks by assets, including Bank of America Corp. and Wells Fargo & Co., had given Romney about $600,000 through the first three quarters of 2011, according to the most recent filings available from the Federal Election Commission.

The second-largest recipient of bank employee contributions, President Barack Obama, had far less, about $200,000, the Observer analysis showed.

Financial institutions really, really, really do not want to be regulated, which, of course, is why they should be. Doing away with financial reform, specifically repealing Dodd-Frank, has been a GOP mantra this election season, as Big Banks are doing all they can with their enormous donations to influence who does what:

Donations from commercial bank employees and PACs to Republican candidates for president and Congress made up 68 percent of the total so far. Should that pattern continue, it would mark the most skewed to one party the spending has been in more than two decades. For all of the 2008 cycle, bankers gave 52 percent of their money to Republicans. [...]

In Congress, commercial bank employees and PACs have given $5.4 million to Republican candidates, while giving $2.4 million to Democrats, according to the latest data from the Center for Responsive Politics. That’s a 69 percent edge to Republicans so far.

According to the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, between 1999 and 2008, the financial sector spent more than $1 billion on campaigns.

And now that the Supreme Court has gifted us with their lovely 2010 Citizens United decision, the Republican nominee’s slogan should be, “You ain’t seen nothin’ yet!”

Google GmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInStumbleUponRedditFarkDiggTumblrBlogger PostDeliciousFriendFeedNewsVineGoogle BookmarksGoogle ReaderMultiplyPosterousEmailBookmark/FavoritesWordPressShare
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Photographs on The Political Carnival:
Please read our policy on images from non-TPC sources in the sidebar to your right.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

  • http://twitter.com/BAdetiba Bab W. Adetiba

    What does it matter who they give to?Correct me if I’m wrong but Obama second biggest contributor was Goldman Sachs PAC…right? Banks have their hand in both parties – to differentiate parties does a disservice to readers. Both parties are beholden to big banks.

  • http://twitter.com/HarrysFodder Harry.Fodder

    I think the banks should dump a few billion in Uncle Mitty’s campaign to nowhere. I love a big bon fire!

  • http://twitter.com/HarrysFodder Harry.Fodder

    Birds of a feather will go down together, so I hear.