Rep Paul Ryan’s Medicare plan scares even loyal hometown voters

Google GmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInStumbleUponRedditFarkDiggTumblrBlogger PostDeliciousFriendFeedNewsVineGoogle BookmarksGoogle ReaderMultiplyPosterousEmailBookmark/FavoritesWordPressShare

A step too far even for people who voted for him seven times? Hmm. The article is too long and too many instances to excerpt properly so go read it at the site, but here are some “choice bits”.

JANESVILLE, Wis. — Brian Krutsch has been long one of many automatic votes here for Rep. Paul Ryan. The unemployed warehouse manager, along with a solid majority of other Janesville voters, has helped elect Ryan seven times and watched with pride as he became one of Congress’ leading authorities on the federal budget. But this week, admiration has been tinged with apprehension as one of Ryan’s signature ideas — ending Medicare’s status as a full, guaranteed benefit for senior citizens — suddenly took a step toward reality.

“I think that’s one of the things they should probably leave alone — you know — unless it’s absolutely necessary,” Krutsch said as he took a break from reviewing job openings at the Rock County Job Center. “Old people need help with medical bills. There’s too many people under-insured right now — especially people like myself right now who don’t have insurance.”

Seven time voter worries about what “has to be done”? Someone tell him it doesn’t have to be this way-

His plan is dubbed the “Path to Prosperity.” In Janesville, there’s some anxiety.

Howard Gage, a 74-year-old Medicare recipient who owns a three-person video-production company, said he has voted for Ryan in all seven races, still supports the congressman and likes him as a person. But, he added, it’s hard to accept that fixing the budget should mean that his family wouldn’t receive the same Medicare benefits that he relies on.

“It bothers me that my kids or grandchildren might be affected by whatever has to be done” to curb spending, he said.

And the bottom line-

“Costs are a major problem,” McDonald said. “If the government gives vouchers but does nothing about the costs, who knows how high they’ll go? You could end up with vouchers that don’t cover the expenses.”

A cookie for Mr McDonald.

Google GmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInStumbleUponRedditFarkDiggTumblrBlogger PostDeliciousFriendFeedNewsVineGoogle BookmarksGoogle ReaderMultiplyPosterousEmailBookmark/FavoritesWordPressShare
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Photographs on The Political Carnival:
Please read our policy on images from non-TPC sources in the sidebar to your right.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

  • Naksuthin

    You are right.  They can fix any problems with medicare making people pay their fair share of taxes.
    Why should rich americans get a tax break while the rest of Americans are suffering with high unemployment.
    Why should corporations like oil companies make huge profits and get a taxpayer subsidy
    Why should big corporations like GE make huge profits and pay NO INCOME TAX.
    Why should we keep reducing the corporate income tax rates while increasing the deductions that corporations can take.
    Our problem isn’t that Americans are spending too much.  It’s that the government is taking in less and less with each passing year as tax rates are reduced.
    Yet the same Americans who want to cut taxes still want a strong 750 billion dollar a year military, a 40 billion dollar a year drug benefit program for seniors, increased border security, more prisons, support for NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND, 2 wars foreign wars that have cost over a Trillion dollars so far, a war on drugs and crime, more police protection, more money for natural disasters etc.  In short….they want a lot but don’t want to pay for any of it.

  • Naksuthin

    The problem with Ryan’s program is that it creates more problems for seniors.  Right now medicare covers the vast majority of our medical bills…even as medical costs rise.
     With Ryans plan we are going to get a voucher but eventually the value of the voucher will be outstripped by medical inflation and we will be stuck paying higher premiums and bigger copays or get less coverage.
    Private insurance companies dislike seniors.  They use more medications, visit the doctor more and spend more time in the hospital than any other segment of the population.  It’s conceivable that  insurance companies will want to limit their exposure to catastrophic medical costs of aging seniors by passing more and more of the costs over to their customers, raising premiums, raising copays or denying coverage for certain illnesses.
    The problem we face is rising medical costs.  And unemployed seniors are the ones least able to deal with them.

    If medicare needs fixing, fix it.  Don’t throw the seniors to the mercy of the private for profit insurance companies.

  • http://twitter.com/SusieMadrak Susie Madrak

    What they’re selling are Groupons. Fifty percent off for a restaurant is a good deal. For a course of chemotherapy? A possible death sentence.

  • http://twitter.com/SusieMadrak Susie Madrak

    What they’re selling are Groupons. Fifty percent off for a restaurant is a good deal. For a course of chemotherapy? A possible death sentence.

  • Tom Johnson

    Paul Ryan plan calls for voucher program , ending Medicare as we know it. Voucher will never cover health care cost to seniors and disabled , no insuruance company will cover them , at least at cost they could afford. His program does all this while increase tax breaks for upper 2% from 35% to 25%. Thats right , kill medicare to give the very richest more tax breaks, to hell to the elderly and disabled and poor , the rich need more tax breaks. What is happening to the morality of our country. As a Desert Strom Vet. who gave his leg for this country I am in shock! Paul Ryan’s plan and the Republican radical agenda is not the America I fought for. The America I fought for takes care of it elderly and disabled and yes even it’s poorest citizens, the America I fought for does not keep giving tax breaks to millionares and large corporations and subsides to oil companies ,tax breaks they pay for by going after the middle class elderly etc. Wake up and fight this call Paul Ryan, Call Speaker of the House etc tell them you do not want this (Capitol switchboard 202-224-3121)

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_7AHMDE5XJIKV3QHEBURKBVTGEQ Smartalek

    In situations like this, I honestly don’t know whether to laugh, cry, or go postal.
    Publican / Teabeggar / “Conservative” voters only get it when it happens to them.
    I really don’t want anything bad to happen to any American, ever — but we’re not likely to see any change in the right-wing community’s understanding of what their “public servants” are doing to them — to all of us — until large numbers of them wind up majorly harmed, or at risk of harm.
    It might be time to update that old line:
    Old definition of a “liberal:” a conservative who’s been arrested.

    New definition of “liberal:” A Teabeggar whose Social Security and/or Medicare might get cut.

  • Anonymous

    The dupe” people will start realizing, no not really. By November 2012 Ryan will no longer be the darling he is around conservatives. Medicare is something that people take for granted and if it works it’s not broken. Imperial over reach by the corporate toady.

  • Anonymous

    These people that voted for Ryan should be very afraid, What good will the voucher be if you have pre-existing conditions?