Archive for WTF moment

What I will not write about today

frustrated9

Sometimes I get so frustrated and/or disheartened and/or annoyed by some of the news stories of the day that I can’t bring myself to write about them. Here are a few recent reports that made my blood pressure hit the roof. I am avoiding delving into them at length out of concern for my physical and mental health.

See if you sense a theme (I couldn’t even bring myself to add commentary this time):

 

See what I mean? So who’s up for a couple of Margs or a trough of wine?

not drunk honest

“New definition of a consensus nominee is someone who Republicans like, Dems can stomach…”

wtf moment in progress

 

Judicial nominations have been moving at a snail’s pace, and of course, Republicans have blocked the president every step of the way. The courts have been overloaded, backed up, cannot function properly, and so they are unable to handle cases as judges are unavailable to preside over court proceedings. Trying to get your day in court has become as challenging as passing Democratic legislation in our current Congress.

 

To make matters worse, many Bush judges are already in place, which explains so many decisions that make Progressive heads explode.

 

Which brings us to the good news and bad news.

 

The good news: President Obama has found himself a judicial nominee that appeals to Republicans.

 

The bad news: President Obama has found himself a judicial nominee that appeals to Republicans.

 

Via the Los Angeles Times:

 

President Obama, who has seen court nominees run into Republican roadblocks, may have found a winning strategy for putting a judge on the powerful U.S. appeals court here: He chose a highly regarded corporate lawyer whose resume suggests he could have been a Republican nominee.

Sri Srinivasan, 46, was a law clerk for two Republican-appointed judges after graduating from Stanford University, and he worked in the George W. Bush Justice Department for five years before joining the Obama team as deputy U.S. solicitor general.

 

This man, per the Times, is likely to be confirmed. Bush’s guy. From the Bush Justice Department, which, by the way, is an oxymoron.

 

More bad news: Senator Ted Cruz likes him. He and Srinivasan were law clerks in Virginia and at the Supreme Court together.

 

More good news: He would be the first South Asian native to serve on a U.S. appeals court.

 

More bad news:  He could be a leading candidate for the Supreme Court if and when a vacancy opens up.

 

More good news: He’s a good listener and open-minded, per a colleague.

 

More bad news:

 

Liberal activists, unions and human rights groups refused to support him. Most of them say they decided to remain silent, not wanting to upset the White House or stand in the way of an Obama nominee…. The strongest opposition to Srinivasan has come from human rights advocates who have sued multinational corporations.

 

Are you getting nervous yet? No? Let me nudge you along:

 

Marco Simons, legal director for Earth Rights International, wrote to the Senate Judiciary Committee complaining of Srinivasan’s “propensity for pro-corporate, anti-human rights judicial activism.” As a lawyer in Washington, Srinivasan has “built a practice around defending powerful multinational companies against allegations of human rights abuses such as war crimes, torture and summary execution,” Simons wrote… “The new definition of a consensus nominee is someone who the Republicans like and the Democrats can stomach because they don’t want to defy the president,” he said.

 

There’s your “liberal” president, GOP.

WTF Moment: Sen. James Inhofe to #Newtown families: Gun debate has nothing to do with you.

wtf moment

Yesterday, President Obama was in Connecticut speaking on common-sense measures to reduce gun violence:

“What’s more important to you, our children or an A grade from the gun lobby?”

“Shouldn’t we make it HARDER, not easier for domestic abusers to get their hands on a gun?”

“If you believe those killed by guns deserve a vote.. Stand up. Stand up.”

All great points. He also quoted Newtown victim, six-year-old Dylan Hockley‘s mom, Nicole:

Every night I beg for him to come to me in my dreams so that I can see him again. And during the day, I just focus on what I need to do to honor him and make change.” Now if Nicole can summon the courage to do that, how can the rest of us do any less?

Now wouldn’t you think Nicole Hockley and others who were directly affected by the Sandy Hook massacre (or any other mass shooting, for that matter) might be relevant to the gun debate we’re having in this country? After all, they are voluntarily and passionately lobbying Congress members to expand background checks, get tougher on gun trafficking and increase school safety.

Which brings me to Senator James Inhofe who is one of the 14 senators below who have threatened to block gun safety legislation:

gop senators filibuster gun laws 2

Now Inhofe is revealing exactly how delusional and cold-hearted he really is. Via HuffPo:

“See, I think it’s so unfair of the administration to hurt these families, to make them think this has something to do with them when, in fact, it doesn’t,” Inhofe said.

When it was suggested that the families of Newtown victims actually believe the gun debate pertains to them, Inhofe said, “Well, that’s because they’ve been told that by the president.

Yes, President Obama made them do it. They are clearly incapable of thinking for themselves, of feeling so much pain that they are driven to act on behalf of their slain loved ones, of drawing obvious conclusions, and taking action on behalf of their murdered family members in order to help prevent this from happening again.

blame obama

Think Progress:

The Oklahoma senator has an A+ rating from the NRA and Gun Owners of America. He has taken at least $19,800 from the former since 1998.

If I go on, I won’t be able stop at simply referring to Inhofe as an insensitive, gun-sucking, self-serving, cowardly prick. I’ll stop now.

Meet “sovereign citizens”: Domestic terrorists who defy gov’t. authority. Some are violent, some are even hypocrites!

sovereign citizenship

Once upon a time, there was this defiant 55-year-old man in Florida who decided to drive a car with a phony license plate and then refused to show a driver’s license after being stopped by the police. He even threatened to sue the officer who pulled him over.

Then he was suspected of felony counterfeiting, and when officers tried to serve him with warrants, he locked himself in his garage saying that he wouldn’t be “a servant of the king,” broke out windows with his handgun, aimed at the officers, and was then shot and killed by them.

Mr. Defiant was a self-described “sovereign citizen.” Other sovereign citizens like him have killed at least six police officers since 2000, according to a report in the Los Angeles Times.

The FBI refers to these loons as a “domestic terrorist movement;” there are somewhere between 100,000 and 300,000 sovereigns who refuse to obey laws, refuse to produce drivers licenses when stopped, and when stopped, demand that officers recite oaths of office and fill out long questionnaires. They also believe they owe no income taxes.

Det. Rob Finch of the Greensboro, North Carolina police department said, “To them, a police officer is just a man in a Halloween costume.” Maybe so, but instead of handing out candy, they shoot bullets.

Sovereigns assert that the U.S. Treasury has set up a secret money account for every American, which can be reclaimed through a bizarre set of legal filings known as redemption. They say everything from taxes to traffic tickets can be disposed of by drawing on the secret Treasury accounts through elaborate legal claims and mountains of paperwork.

Many sovereigns file invoices with police or judges, demanding hundreds of dollars an hour for time spent stopped by officers or when in court to answer charges. [...]

Finch and Flowers now train agents of the FBI, DEA, ATF and Homeland Security — as well as district attorneys, clerks of court, judges and registrars nationwide. [...]

They teach police to recognize sovereigns by their convoluted legal jargon and “mouthy” defiance. “Sovereign citizens are more likely not to obey their commands and more likely to commit violence during a traffic stop,” Finch said.

Here is a helpful “Recognizing Sovereign Citizens” website that features this image:

sovereign citizens

And Sovereign-Citizenship.net is, um, interesting.

In addition to the violent types, there are the sovereigns who rely on “paper terrorism.” For example, they use photos of silver dollars to pay for phony deeds for foreclosed homes that they live in, because they believe U.S. currency has no value. Instead, they rely on precious metals. And, apparently, photos.

This is where an abundance of hypocrisy comes in. Many sovereigns hold seminars on tax avoidance… for which they charge people money.

You pay them in cash for them to tell you money has no value,” Finch said.

One sovereign citizen told his audience that our money is worthless, but then he went on to explain “how to redeem millions of dollars from secret U.S. Treasury accounts, and how to use the courts to evade government control and taxes.”

That guy was– wait for it– a government worker employed by the U.S. Postal Service who justified his own hypocrisy by saying he “needed the money to live out his ideology.”

It’s a good thing the government was there to help him achieve his unAmerican dream.

VIDEO– Chris Matthews: “Is that something women really worry about? Men being brutal? In the home.” Uh, yes.

are you kidding me

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

As they have non-stop, the talking heads on MSNBC have been discussing a Hillary Clinton run for president in 2016 (enough already!). Chris Matthews is no exception:

And while many may think this was Hillary’s coming out party for 2016, it was Biden who may have stolen the show, many say.

He and Andrea Mitchell– who sounded nearly as flabbergasted as I felt– were having a conversation about it when this jaw-dropping Moment of WTF happened:

Matthews:

Is that close to the bone? The idea of wife beating some old f… or beaters?

Mitchell:

It was part of it.

Matthews:

Is that something women really worry about?

Mitchell:

Yes.

Matthews:

… Men being brutal?

Mitchell:

… The Violence Against Women Act–

Matthews:

…In the home. In the home.

Mitchell:

Yes. domestic violence.

wtf girl

Yes, Chris, domestic violence. As in the Violence Against Women Act that you covered last May and as late as March 21st of this year:

MATTHEWS: What does he think he`s accomplishing the minute people notice that the wine tastes like the old stuff or they notice that whatever it is, it`s still what it was? What are they going to do? They`re not going to join the Republican Party.

SCHRIOCK: No, they`re absolutely not, particularly — you talk about young people, you know, we talk about women — there`s been a continuing growing gender gap. And they still are just pushing policy after policy — the Ryan budget, devastating to women and families, Violence Against Women Act — it took a year-and-a-half to get it reauthorized.

Yes Chris, domestic violence is real and it really worries women. And yes, Chris, “men are brutal in the home, in the home.” I can personally attest to that, as can millions of other women. You didn’t know that? Seriously? That’s news to you? Because if it is, then you’re in the wrong business.

Here is the entire segment:

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

I do not want to see George W. Bush naked

wtf smaller

Bear with me here, I’ve been nearly completely out of the loop for the past few days, so I’m very late to the game and only just catching up on recent news stories. The one about the Bush family being targeted by a hacker was one of them. But the part about Bush 43′s artistic endeavors made my eyes pop out of my  head:

The leaked photos included intimate moments: a snapshot of George H.W. Bush that appeared to have been taken during his recent stay at a Houston hospital, a shot of George W. Bush posing with a cardboard cutout of himself wearing a beret, and paintings by the younger Bush of himself showering and in a bathtub.

Assuming George W. Bush has a brain– which is being generous– what the heck was he thinking? Who– especially a former United States president– paints (really bad) naked pictures of themselves in the bathtub and shower? And why would Bush sign his artwork with “43″ instead of his own name– discounting the possibility that he forgot how to spell his own name, of course.

Who the hell does all that? It’s terrifying to remind myself that this child-man was actually responsible for the safety and security of our country, for life and death decisions (some of those decisions being the worst in recent memory), for being a calming voice of reason and wisdom (let me know when you’ve stopped laughing… and crying). And this same child-man painted these:

george w bush paintings nudes via Gawker

I made my living as an artist for years, I studied pictorial arts at UCLA under some of the finest artists in the United States, and I graduated cum laude, so I feel qualified to appraise what my poor eyes have been subjected to, and I agree with this assessment from Gawker’s arts blogger Greg Allen:

It doesn’t look like he’s studied anatomy, perspective, shading, drawing from live models, color theory, brushes, nothing. He just jumped in there and started painting, how hard could it be?… Except for the whole looking-at-yourself, shower/bathtub solitude thing, I don’t see GWB probing any real psychic depths here.

If you follow the link, you’ll see that Allen actually dignifies these “works” with serious analysis. I’m unable to do that, because if there is one word I do not and cannot associate with GW Bush, it’s dignity.

VIDEO: Voter registration volunteer: “We’re out here in support of Romney, actually… We’re working for the county clerk’s office.”

Published on Sep 21, 2012 by

El Paso County, Colorado employee Voter Registration

Category:

Comedy

A Twitter pal, @blindrighteye, sent this video to me.

“We’re out here in support of Romney, actually… We’re working for the county clerk’s office.”

I asked if there was any confirmation, if this was for real, and why it was listed on YouTube under the category “comedy.”

Regarding verification, the answer I got was this:

Since I can’t confirm what exactly took place, all I can do is post without comment other than to say, if this is really happening, it needs to be reported immediately.

UPDATE: Per HuffPo, the county clerk denies it, the Romney campaign gave her a talkin’ to (what’d they say, “Be more careful next time”?), and the GOP is blaming the Dems, who responded the way you would think.