Archive for workplace

What I will not write about today

frustrated21

Sometimes I get so frustrated and/or disheartened and/or annoyed by some of the news stories of the day that I can’t bring myself to write about them. Here are a few recent reports that made my blood pressure hit the roof. I am avoiding delving into them at length out of concern for my physical and mental health.

See what I mean? So who’s up for a couple of Margs or a trough of wine?

drunk drink more wine

VIDEO: TX Gov. Rick Perry demands apology over cartoon depicting his disregard for worker safety

oops rick perry smaller

The Sacramento Bee is standing by a political cartoon about Rick Perry and the West, Texas fertilizer plant explosion, noting that it was commentary on “Perry’s disregard for worker safety, not an attempt to disrespect the victims.” That seems pretty obvious to anyone who harbors no guilt feelings about their position on deregulation.

Maybe Rick Perry should watch the episodes of “All In with Chris Hayes” in which he reveals that the last safety “inspection of the West fertilizer plant happened in– 1985” and exposes Dick Cheney’s son-in-law who de-regulated the chemical industry. Nobody can seriously suggest that Rick Perry would have insisted on more oversight. Au contraire.

In fact, Gov. Ricky says more inspections weren’t needed:

He said that he remains comfortable with the state’s level of oversight and suggested that most Texas residents agree with him.

Under the circumstances, it appears that Jack Ohman’s cartoon was political commentary based on obvious facts and the truth. And the truth hurts, right Ricky?

Here is an excerpt from Perry’s letter to the Sacramento Bee:

It was with extreme disgust and disappointment I viewed your recent cartoon. While I will always welcome healthy policy debate, I won’t stand for someone mocking the tragic deaths of my fellow Texans and our fellow Americans… The Bee owes the community of West, Texas an immediate apology for your detestable attempt at satire.

It would be more accurate and truthful to say that it is Rick Perry who owes SacBee and Ohman an apology.

Here is an excerpt from the response from the editorial page editor for the Bee:

What he finds offensive is a governor who would gamble with the lives of families by not pushing for the strongest safety regulations. Perry’s letter is an attempt to distract people from that message.

Here is the cartoon in question (which you can also see in the video), and here is Ohman’s blog about the matter.

VIDEO– “All in with Chris Hayes”: Dick Cheney’s son-in-law de-regulated chemical industry

Bush deregulator

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

cheney son in law epa chemical plants

Chris Hayes has been all over the West, Texas explosion and the egregious lack of oversight. The last safety “inspection of the West fertilizer plant happened in– 1985.”

Chris:

Two Bush administration officials, Christine Todd Whitman, who was head of the Environmental Protection Agency, and Tom Ridge, who was head of Homeland Security, came up with a plan to deal with the vulnerability. Whitman believed the EPA was already empowered to expand her agency’s oversight of chemical plants under a section of the Clean Air Act, and she and Ridge worked out a deal to do so.

That is until the son-in-law of former vice president dick Cheney walked into the room, a guy by the name of Phillip Perry, who was at the time the general counsel of the White House Office of Management and Budget.  And he made it clear the Bush administration was not going to support granting regulatory authority over chemical security to the EPA.

Basically, the Bush administration, from above, pulled support for that bill because the chemical industry did not want to be regulated by the EPA.

Fast forward a few years to 2007, and Phil Perry, again dick Cheney’s son-in-law, is now over at the Department of Homeland Security as the department’s general counsel.

And what he manages to do in an uncontroversial bill, an appropriations rider, is slip in industry friendly language into the bill that moves the task of regulating chemical plants from the Environmental Protection Agency to the Department of Homeland Security. But– DHS is given none of the tools it would need to actually do that.

So let’s recap. The Bush administration’s own cabinet secretaries come up with plan to regulate these chemical plants. It is stymied by Phil Perry once. The Bush administration sides with the chemical industry when it’s brought before the Congress and then basically in a back room maneuver, Perry does the chemical agency’s bidding by moving the oversight of this from the EPA, which the chemical industry hates, to DHS, which the chemical industry thinks they can more easily manipulate.

Now, go ahead to six years. The West Fertilizer Company is storing more than 1300 times the amount of ammonium nitrate that would normally trigger safety oversight by DHS.

It does appear now not only did DHS literally have no idea that the West Fertilizer Company was storing ammonium nitrate, but according to Congresswoman Betty Thompson, a democrat from Mississippi, DHS did not know the plant existed until it blew up.

Now, here’s what makes this incredible. In 2006, when a bill was introduced in the Senate to make chemical plants safer, a bill that was blocked by Republicans, the young Senator who introduced that bill was this man:

obama 2008 chemical plant regulation

VIDEO: The last safety “inspection of the West fertilizer plant happened in– 1985.”

chart deaths terrorists v workplace v firearms guns

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Chris Hayes:

Records from the Federal Occupational Safety Administration shows the last agency’s inspection of the West Fertilizer plant happened in– 1985. For a few violations OSHA considered serious, the company was fined, wait for it. $30.

If twenty-eight years seems like a very long time between OSHA inspections for an inherently risky workplace, keep this in mind: According to the New York Times, while the number of inspectors has grown under the Obama administration, OSHA still just has 2400 responsible for overseeing roughly 8 million work sites. Roughly one inspector per 60,000 workers, a ratio that hasn’t changed since 1970

We talked last night about fatalities from terrorism and gun deaths. There’s a category we didn’t mention, which is workplace fatalities. From 2000-2010  3,033 Americans died from terror attacks. During that same time. 335,000 Americans died from the hands of a gun while there were over 60,000 workplace deaths.

Then Rachel Maddow covered it this way:

fertilizer explosion texas

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Supreme Court to consider workplace harassment rules

On Monday, the Supreme Court will hear a case that could have an impact on workplaces galore, because it will be deciding whether or not a company is liable for harassment by its employees. The magic word will be “supervisor” and its legal definition will be key. The outcomes of racial, religious or sexual harassment claims hang in the balance:

(Reuters) – Under previous Supreme Court rulings, an employer is automatically responsible if a supervisor harasses a subordinate. The employer is not liable if the harassment is between two equal coworkers, unless it was negligent in allowing the abuse.

Since those rulings, a rift has developed between federal appeals courts over exactly who is a supervisor. On one side, three circuits say supervisors are those with the power to hire, fire, demote, promote or discipline. Three other circuits have adopted a broader standard, one that also includes employees who direct and oversee a colleague’s daily work.

To no one’s surprise, business groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, have filed briefs supporting the narrow definition of supervisor.

PhotOH! Women According to Mitt

I get emails. This one’s from Ultraviolet, and it rocks, plus it directly relates to my previous post, Mitt Romney appears to be in a bit of a bind… er:

Did you see the part in the debate where Mitt Romney refused to endorse equal pay protections but said that women needed to get home early to cook dinner?1

Or the part where he blamed single mothers for gun violence?2

Or when he said there weren’t enough qualified women to serve in his cabinet so he had to have his staff go out and create a “binder full of women?” (A story that actually isn’t even true.)3

Or when he lied about birth control–when the truth is that he thinks employers should be able to take contraception coverage away from women?4

Women have to know what happened at last night’s debate.

So we put together a cute infographic that just about sums it all up. Can you take a moment to share it with your friends? Studies are showing that people trust the information they get from their friends on social networks and catchy infographics like the one we created are a great way to engage your friends around information that is important for them to have.

Sources:

1. Mitt Romney’s ‘binders full of women’, Washington Post, October 16, 2012

2. Stop Gun Violence: Get Married, The American Prospect, October 17, 2012

3.Mitt Romney’s Answer To Pay Equity: ‘Binders Full Of Women’ Lie And ‘Flexibility’ To Cook Dinner, Mediaite, October 17, 2012

Mind the Binder, The Phoenix, October 16, 2012

4.Romney clarifies stance on Blunt Amendment: “Of course” I’m for it, CBS News, February 29, 2012

Mitt Romney appears to be in a bit of a bind… er.

The second presidential debate is already being dissected to death, and since I’m on the west coast, I’m coming in late to the discussion. But that won’t stop me from having a little fun with it. Better late than never, right?

My take: A well-prepared, strong President Obama brought out Willard M. Romney’s defensive, inept, testy, and of course, elitist and out of touch sides. Then again, he has no other sides, so those were a given.

But anyway….

When Mitt Romney was governor, he was, what, in his mid-fifties, and that’s apparently when he had an epiphany. He finally discovered the problems of women in the workplace, and no matter how hard he tried to present himself as pro-woman, he put himself in a bit of a bind… er.

Sidebar: Why does Mitt feel the need to quantify everything? Rhetorical.

So it turns out that whole binder story he told wasn’t exactly true, per David S. Bernstein at the Boston Phoenix (please read the whole thing, it’s well worth it):

What actually happened was that in 2002 — prior to the election, not even knowing yet whether it would be a Republican or Democratic administration – a bipartisan group of women in Massachusetts formed MassGAP to address the problem of few women in senior leadership positions in state government. [...]

They did the research and put together the binder full of women qualified for all the different cabinet positions, agency heads, and authorities and commissions. They presented this binder to Governor Romney when he was elected… Secondly, a UMass-Boston study found that the percentage of senior-level appointed positions held by women actually declined throughout the Romney administration

This didn’t exactly help his case either:

So much for his take on women’s equality. I mean other than that whole reproductive rights thing. And that equal pay thing. Other than that…

And finally, someone shared this tweet with me and I must share it with you, paraphrased: Mitt Romney’s favorite song, “You Make Me Feel Like a Natural Binder.”

Oh but we kid Elder Willard…