Archive for Voter ID Law

VIDEO- Iowa Sec. of State, tea partier: Tell “your friends and neighbors that you love voter ID” because Dems will “cheat”

jim crow smaller jimmy

Think Progress:

At a social conservatives’ conference this week, Iowa’s Secretary of State argued that Republicans need to pass voter ID in order to advance their top policy goals, including banning abortion and same-sex marriage.

Presenting tea partier and Iowa Secretary of State (and elections official!) Matt Schultz, who spoke at the Iowa Faith and Freedom Coalition. He got out there and pushed for– ta-daa!– voter ID. Because, see, by disenfranchising all the ickiest, leftiest voters, you can finally ban abortions and marriage equality.

He also accused all those icky, lefty Democrats of cheating in order to win elections. But oops! Remember when it was Republicans who got busted for voter fraud? And when Mitt Romney's WI co-chair said that Romney would have “absolutely” won state with Voter ID law? And when former McCain senior strategist Steve Schmidt said, “Voting fraud, that doesn’t really exist… It’s part of the [Republican] mythology”?

Me too!

Of course, Tea Party Matt had no proof, no evidence, no facts to support his accusations, because there is no proof, evidence, or support for what he said since voter fraud is rarer than getting struck by lightning:

Schultz:

There are a whole lot of issues that we care about, abortion, gay marriage, a whole lot of social issues that we care deeply about. But you have to start caring about voter ID and election integrity as well, because if you don’t have that, you’ll never be able to make a difference in any other issue you care about. Never. Because they will cheat! They’ll cheat. And we need to make sure we stop them. So what do I need you to do? I need you start telling your friends and neighbors that you love Voter ID. You love Voter ID.

That's right, folks, tell your friends that you heart Voter ID! Suppressing the vote is the only way to win! (If you're a Republican, that is.)

tell a friend

If new GOP laws pass, it will literally be easier to legally buy a firearm in Virginia than it will be to vote

voter id cartoon 2

Via Rev. Al Sharpton’s Politics Nation:

New legislation passed by Republicans Tuesday is set to further restrict the list of acceptable documents voters may use to cast ballots in Virginia, changing voting rules in Virginia for the second time in just two years.

Andy Marquis, reporter for RACE22.com, is our guest blogger of the day. He used to consider himself a Republican but not any more.  He changed his voter registration to Independent in 2011 and says that’s how it will remain.

Here’s his latest post:

So, a government issued ID is required to vote in Virginia, and was in the last election. President Obama won Virginia, so, now, the Virginia legislature is limiting the forms of government issued identification cards that are acceptable to those with only photo IDs. And they’re even considering another bill that even further limits the forms of acceptable ID.

Now, if we use the logic of the gun idiots about the Constitution prohibiting any and all regulation on gun ownership, the Constitution also prohibits any and all regulation on voting rights and anyone over 18 has an ABSOLUTE right to vote.

If these news laws pass, it will literally be easier to legally buy a firearm in Virginia than it will be to vote.

VIDEO– Republican consultant: Voter ID laws, long lines “help our side.”



 

Former Florida GOP leaders, including Charlie Crist, recently said that voter suppression was the reason for new state election laws.

In fact, former Florida Republican Party chairman Jim Greer came right out and said that state Republicans tried to suppress the black vote and called his fellow GOPers “whack-a-do, right-wing crazies.”

Via HuffPo, Republican campaign consultant Scott Tranter was on a panel hosted by the Pew Center and came right out and said this:

“A lot of us are campaign officials — or campaign professionals — and we want to do everything we can to help our side. Sometimes we think that’s voter ID, sometimes we think that’s longer lines — whatever it may be.”

Or as those on the right would put it, “How dare you accuse us of voter suppression! You’re just imagining things.”

Good grief, what more do voters need? This party is admitting out loud what bottom feeders they are. They’ve told Americans over and over again that they’ll lie, cheat, and steal in order to win, because they sure can’t on their policy positions. So dirty tricks it is then.

However, per Reuters, things may very well change. Attorney General Eric Holder said in a speech in Boston that U.S. election officials should register eligible voters automatically and take steps to reduce the same long lines that the GOP claims to relish.

Just do it already.

Wisconsin voter suppression alert

Wikipedia:

Robin J. Vos is a Republican Party member of the Wisconsin State Assembly, representing the 63rd Assembly District since 2004. Vos is a member of the American Legislative Exchange Council, ALEC, serving as Wisconsin state leader.

In case you had forgotten, ALEC  (American Legislative Exchange Council) is an organization of state legislators which favors federalism and conservative public policy solutions. They literally write legislation for Republican Congress members, who then do whatever they can to pass it. The Nation:

Of all the Kochs’ investments in right-wing organizations, ALEC provides some of the best returns: it gives the Kochs a way to make their brand of free-market fundamentalism legally binding.

All that was just to give you a little background on who’s behind the Voter I.D. laws in Wisconsin.

Via WisPolitics:

Incoming Assembly speaker Robin Vos told Sunday’s “UpFront with Mike Gousha” that requiring a photo ID for voting will be a priority in the upcoming legislative session.

“Having photo ID is something that is broadly supported by the public. It is something that I really hope we will have in place by the next general election,” he said about the law that has been hung up in the courts. [...]

He added a swipe at same-day registration, under fire from many Republicans.

Governor Scott Walker supports this, of course. Anything to make it harder for voters to, you know, vote, right Republicans?

Same-day registrants tended to vote Democratic, including minorities and students. And Walker and his pals might want to pay attention to WI county clerks who say, “There’s no way we’d be in favor” of eliminating same-day voter registration.

Even though the Justice Department already examining ways to make voting easier, that doesn’t seem to deter voter suppressionists like Vos. Only a few weeks ago, Romney’s Wisconsin co-chair said he would have “absolutely” won the state with the Voter ID law. There’s your motive, not faux concerns over Voter I.D. fraud.

Again, it’s the Republicans who have tried to suppress the vote in several Republican-run states, and from the reports I’ve seen, it’s Republicans who have been caught committing voter fraud.

Voter I.D. fraud is nearly non-existent, and, of course, the GOP-generated Voter I.D. laws affect mostly Democratic voters.

Justice Department already examining ways to make voting easier

 

Amanda Turkel at HuffPo has some hopeful news for people who like to exercise their right to vote without having to stand in endlessly long lines, at the cost of lost time, often money and/or jobs, and even physical discomfort. Some people waited as long as nine hours. And don’t get me started on all the confusion, misleading information about Election Day being on Wednesday, the threatening-but-inaccurate Voter I.D. billboards, and cutting early voting days/hours:

Here’s to hope and change:

The Department of Justice is already exploring ways to “fix” the long lines and confusion voters faced when going to the polls this year…

Tom Perez, the assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s civil rights division, said this at the George Washington University Law Review symposium:

“The Justice Department is considering whether we need to propose concrete solutions, such as a national standards for counting provisional ballots for federal elections, to ensure that voters are not disenfranchised by moves close to an election, by appearing at the wrong polling place, or by simple poll workers’ errors.” [...]

Perez also said it was time for the United States to rethink its system of partisan state and local election administration, which often leads both Democrats and Republicans to question officials’ motives behind election decisions.

He also embraced same-day voter registration and a system where individuals are automatically registered to vote by the government.

Then there’s Section 5 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act which says, per Turkel’s post, that states and localities with a history of suppressing the rights of minorities must obtain “preclearance” from the Justice Department or a federal court before making changes that affect voting. But never fear, the Supreme Court will soon fix that!

“Section 5 continues to be necessary, and Section 5 is not over inclusive,” Perez said. “And that is why we will continue to vigorously defend Section 5 in the Supreme Court.”

My personal hope is that we the people won’t take much of a post-election breather and will continue to stay organized and pro-active. We simply can’t afford not to.

VIDEO– Maine GOP chairman on black voters: “Nobody in town knows anyone who’s black. How did that happen?”

“In some parts of rural Maine, there were dozens, dozens of black people who came in and voted on Election Day. Everybody has a right to vote, but nobody in town knows anyone who’s black. How did it happen? I don’t know. We’re going to find out. I think it’s a problem.”

You heard that right, the chief Republican poo-bah in Maine finds it odd that mystery “blah people” in rural Maine turned out to vote. Why, those pesky “urban” voters! Who do they think they are, and where do they get off thinking they can cast ballots like white people? How dare they? WHO are they? Where’d they come from?

Dun-dun-dunnn!

Besides, everyone who’s anyone knows that President Obama got black people to vote by giving them all kinds of free “gifts” or they’d never have turned out. He “wooed” them! With free stuff!

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

And whoa Nelly! Justwaitaminutethere! Maine’s not 100% lily white? Why didn’t anyone notify GOP state chairman Charlie Webster?!

Think Progress:

GOP state chairman Charlie Webster aims to find those who committed the alleged fraud fraud by sending thank you cards to voters, and seeing if they are returned to sender… [A]nd having a piece of mail bounce back is not proof that voters intentionally lied about their address.

UPDATE via Tagean. Here’s his defense. Oy:

Said Webster: “There’s nothing about me that would be discriminatory. I know black people. I play basketball every Sunday with a black guy. He’s a great friend of mine. Nobody would ever accuse me of suggesting anything.”

Again: Voter I.D. fraud is nearly non-existent, and, of course, the GOP-generated Voter I.D. laws affect mostly Democratic voters.

VIDEO– Romney WI co-chair: Romney would have “absolutely” won state with Voter ID law

As I’ve written previously, it’s the Republicans who have tried to suppress the vote in several Republican-run states, and from the reports I’ve seen, it’s Republicans who have been caught committing voter fraud.

Voter I.D. fraud is nearly non-existent, and, of course, the GOP-generated Voter I.D. laws affect mostly Democratic voters.

Yet here is Team Romney’s Wisconsin co-chair, GOP state Sen. Alberta Darling going on about how Willard would have won her state if only those voter ID laws had been, you know, constitutional.

Via Think Progress:

ABC affiliate host:

“Do you think photo ID would have made any difference in the outcome of this election?”

Alberta Darling:

“Absolutely, I think so.”

There is a simple answer to Darling’s question about why voter ID cannot exist in Wisconsin — the state constitution does not allow it.  [...]

President Obama currently leads in Wisconsin by more than 200,000 votes. So Darling is suggesting that 200,000 people somehow managed to vote twice without anyone noticing — or perhaps that one person voted 200,001 times.

There’s that abysmal Republican arithmetic again.