Archive for united states of america

Report: U.S. health and life expectancy is lousy compared with peer nations. Guns are a factor.

new yorker cover kids guns

chart deaths in US v other countries- intentional

We the People suck at staying alive, let alone healthy, compared to our peer nations around the world, according to a report from the National Research Council and the Institute of Medicine.

We live shorter lives and are in worse health than those in other wealthy nations. USA! USA!

L.A. Times:

The analysis of international health data, available here, determined that American men had the lowest life expectancy among men in 17 countries, including wealthy European nations, Australia, Canada and Japan. U.S. women had the second-lowest life expectancy (only Danish women fared worse.)

The study listed nine health areas in which Americans came in below average: infant mortality and low birth weight, injuries and homicides, adolescent pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections, HIV and AIDS, drug-related deaths, obesity and diabetes, heart disease, chronic lung disease and disability.

But chin up! Turn that frown upside down! The U.S. has low cancer death rates and did well when it came to controlling blood pressure and cholesterol levels. Let’s hear it for those incessant Big Pharma Tee Vee ads, ladies and gents!

But here’s the part that stuck out like a very sore thumb:

Gun use emerged as a factor: Americans were seven times more likely to die in a homicide and 20 times more likely to die in a shooting than their peers.

D’oh! Someone get the NRA on the phone, stat! We need to let them in on this! Oh, but I kid. Especially in light of proof that carrying a gun won’t protect you in a crisis, a factoid which falls on deaf NRA ears, because they want guns in every single school in ‘Murika!

Again, the U.S. has the highest gun ownership per capita in the world. Instead, we have far more gun-related killings than any other developed country.

Marketing and selling more guns (thank you NRA) is not the solution.

Here’s an interactive graphic where you can compare the U.S. ranking with the peer countries on specific causes of death.

_____________________________

It’s fundraising time again! It’s just the two of us, with Lucian handling the tech stuff, doing this whole shebang, 24/7/365. We love it and love interacting with ya’ll, but we must pay for the server and other expenses.

If we somehow brighten your day, educate or even irritate you at times, please consider a donation, big or small, to keep us bumping along. If everyone who dropped by on a daily basis dropped a coin in the bucket, we’d be done in no time.

If you’d like a snail mail address, email me at paddy at thepoliticalcarnival dot net. Thank you.



WePay Donate

In U.S., Latinos outliving whites and blacks

Someone get the smelling salts ready for Buchanan.

U.S. Latinos can expect to outlive whites by more than two years and blacks by more than seven, government researchers say in a startling report that is the first to calculate Latino life expectancy in this country.

The report released Wednesday is the strongest evidence yet of what some experts call the “Hispanic paradox” — longevity for a population with a large share of poor, undereducated members. A leading theory is that Latinos who manage to immigrate to the U.S. are among the healthiest from their countries.

A Latino born in 2006 could expect to live about 80 years and seven months, the government estimates. Life expectancy for a white person is about 78, and for a black person, just shy of 73 years.

Researchers have seen signs of Latino longevity for years. But until recently, the government didn’t calculate life expectancy for Latinos as a separate group; they were included among the black and white populations.

Video- Attention Kelly O’Donnell & Media: A Naturalized Citizen IS THE SAME As A Natural Born Citizen

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy


Pertinent part starts about 2:50.
Mitchell- And the chairman of the committee, Joe Lieberman, Kelly, also suggested that he thinks it’s time to strip someone who’s under such a watch list of their citizenship.* Strip them of their citizenship, we heard Senator John McCain saying earlier today that there should not have been any Mirandizing so there’s going to be a lot of focus on what some critics of the administration are going to be saying, republicans are raising a whole lot of issues.**

O’Donnell- All about how you would then proceed, if someone is, especially a naturalized citizen as was the case in the Times Square incident, could you pull away the citizenship to deny them some of the rights that we as American citizens would have. That’s part of what is prompting Lieberman’s comments. And if you were even a natural born*** citizen and commit what they said could be an act of treason would you then forfeit your citizenship benefits. And there was a discussion today that went into the fact that a citizen could be determined to be an enemy combatant, a classification that gives the government some different avenues to go through prosecution. So, these are really tough issues because they go right to the heart of the constitution, and right to current day events that have everyone on edge.

Ms O’Donnell, I see that you graduated from Northwestern, so you really can’t be this stupid. Are my parents and sister less American than you****? Or is the fact that they’ve been “naturalized” longer a factor? Craig Ferguson’s only been naturalized about as long as Shahzad, so maybe Craig should be careful not to be accused of anything? How long do you have to be naturalized for it to really stick? Can you make me a graph showing the different levels of American? Is it like the wedding anniversary thingie? I mean, if I’ve been naturalized for 5 years I get Free Speech, 10 years the Right to Bear Arms? I’ll be waiting for your reply.

* Mitchell stumbles around too much for me to type every damn word she says, I tightened it up.

** Is there ANYONE that is paid to be on television that cooks up a bigger word soup that Mitchell? It’s bloody painful.

***Note the emphasis on “born”.

**** I dare you to say that to her U.S. General husband.

BBC poll-itics: World warming to U.S. under Obama

By GottaLaff

No, that doesn’t say global warming up there in the title, read it again. The world is warming up to the United States under President Obama’s watch. Imagine.

Now that’s the kind of global warming we like:

For the first time since the annual poll began in 2005, America’s influence in the world is now seen as more positive than negative.

2005. … … 2005. Now who was in charge then? I remember! BushCo! Is it me, or did they negatively affect everything they got within inches of?

No, it’s not me.

Of course, the Party of No will see this as another component of big scary commie pinko liberal French abortionist fascist Jew Marxist Obama’s “Old Europe” evil socialist agenda. How unAmerican of him to get the rest of the world to like us again.

And work with us again.

And cooperate with us again.

And communicate with us again.

And support us again.

What a traitor.

Chart- Health care spending: U.S. v. Abroad

By GottaLaff

Tech issues fixed… Now, take a gander at this:

(click on image to enlarge)

H/t: Jdkidd81

Haaretz Poll: Most Israelis see Obama as fair and friendly


I thought the Israelis didn’t trust President Obama? Another right wing meme imploded.

Some 27 percent of Israelis believe that U.S. President Barack Obama is anti-Semitic, according to a Haaretz-Dialog poll conducted this week.

Anpther 56 percent questions said they don’t believe politicians who call Obama anti-Semitic or hostile to Israel, or who say he is “striving to topple Netanyahu.”

On the whole, Obama’s popularity may be declining in American public opinion, but a sweeping majority of Israelis think his treatment of this country is friendly and fair.

Prison population to have first drop since 1972


Of course, it’s because of the economy, not any sort of sensible sentencing.

DALLAS – The United States may soon see its prison population drop for the first time in almost four decades, a milestone in a nation that locks up more people than any other.

The inmate population has risen steadily since the early 1970s as states adopted get-tough policies that sent more people to prison and kept them there longer. But tight budgets now have states rethinking these policies and the costs that come with them.

“It’s a reversal of a trend that’s been going on for more than a generation,” said David Greenberg, a sociology professor at New York University. “In some ways, it’s overdue.”