Archive for U.S.-Mexico border

Report: Tougher border security actually backfires, does not deter deported immigrant re-entry

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

immigration protest l.a.

Say it with me now: More border “security” is not the answer. Think Progress has a fascinating report that tells us why:

Even with border security spending at astronomical highs, deported immigrants are still finding their way back into the U.S., according to a new study from the University of Arizona. According to interviews with 1,000 detainees caught by Border Patrol agents in Tucson, AZ, 43 percent planned to cross the border again.

Detainees were most likely to attempt the grueling and often deadly crossing again if they had friends or relatives in the U.S., had a job, or had more education than other detainees.

Even though we’ve had way fewer border crossings under President Obama’s watch, some of that is due to our weak economy. Jobs aren’t easy to find, so why bother to sneak into a country that may not have them? But some still try.

No matter what the reason for coming here, the report states that “the need to come to the United States is greater than any deterrent.” And by deterrent, they’re referring to abuse, rape, long work hours, no health care, beatings, solitary confinement… you know, welcome matty stuff like that.

Apparently, Romney’s brilliant “make them so miserable that they’ll self-deport” solution isn’t quite taking hold.

But this is the sentence that struck me:

Another study from the University of Arizona found that tougher security has actually backfired and encouraged more permanent migration.

That link leads to this post: Immigrant Women Face More Abuse And Family Separation, Study Finds. Please give it a read:

For the past decade, tougher borders have pushed workers to remain in the U.S. rather than risk another crossing. Meanwhile, women and families are beginning to make up a larger proportion of migrants, leading to more permanent migration.

But the GOP keeps insisting that 90% of the border must be airtight before they’ll entertain the notion of a path to citizenship for immigrants already living here. Via the L.A. Times, in an article titled, “Rubio wants stronger border security in immigration reform bill”:

As the legislation is now written, the Department of Homeland Security would be required to develop a plan to achieve effective control of 90% of the border with Mexico before immigrants in the U.S. illegally would be allowed to gain permanent legal status. Rubio’s emerging alternative would shift the responsibility for creating that plan to Congress.

Typical GOP m.o.: Push a plan that is doomed to fail, and then blame Obama when nothing gets done.

frustrated8

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

AK Rep. Don “Young’s Republican Party should not think that Americans like myself will be swayed by outreach.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

outreach my ass reach out inclusive

For the back story, see this previous post: VIDEO: The “stupid party,” er, Republicans blast GOP Rep. Young for his “wetbacks” comment.

don young wetback comments immigration

And with that, here is today’s L.A. Times letter to the editor, because our voices matter:

Re “Republican apologizes for slur against Latinos,” March 30

As an American with a Hispanic last name, reading the story of the Alaskan member of Congress using the term “wetback” brought back childhood memories.

I grew up in San Antonio, a predominantly Hispanic city, on the mostly white north side of town. Any time I heard “wetback,” it made me uncomfortable because of the view underlying it: I and the people like me were less than everyone else. Passing off using the term as just the common vernacular of a bygone era doesn’t fool anyone.

For Don Young (I don’t respect him enough to call him a congressman) to speak in those terms so easily betrays an ingrained view of Hispanics. Young’s Republican Party should not think that Americans like myself will be swayed by outreach.

Andrew Ximenes

Los Angeles

All our other GOP “outreach” posts can be found here.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

VIDEO: The “stupid party,” er, Republicans blast GOP Rep. Young for his “wetbacks” comment

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

gop stupid party jindal don young wetback comments immigration

Alaska Rep. Don Young:

“My father had a ranch; we used to have 50-60 wetbacks to pick tomatoes.”

House Speaker John Boehner, per CNN:

“Congressman Young’s remarks were offensive and beneath the dignity of the office he holds. I don’t care why he said it – there’s no excuse and it warrants an immediate apology.”

Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus:

Our party represents freedom and opportunity for every American and a beacon of hope to those seeking liberty throughout the world. Offensive language and ethnic slurs have no place in our public discourse.”

Is Priebus kidding? Does he have no awareness of what his party has said and done to diminish the dignity and rights of not-white people and how all too many conservatives still refer to them (scroll)?

Rep. Young:

I used a term that was commonly used during my days growing up on a farm in Central California. I know that this term is not used in the same way nowadays and I meant no disrespect.

Psst! Don! It’s 2013.

Psst! Don! Your statement, excuses, and non-apology have now been documented and will be available for review forever.

CNN:

The word is widely considered an ethnic slur and generally refers to those from Mexico who come to the United States illegally by crossing the Rio Grande River. It was used by the government in the 1950s for “Operation Wetback,” a massive crackdown on illegal immigration along the U.S.-Mexico border.

Let’s take a gander at the ol’ GOP playbook, shall we?

1950s mentality:

check mark smaller

 

 

 

Slurs:

check mark smaller

Massive crackdown on immigrants:

check mark smaller

How’s that reachy-outy thing workin’ for ya?

outreach my ass reach out inclusive

UPDATE via Think Progress:

By Friday afternoon, Young had issued a full apology:

“I apologize for the insensitive term I used during an interview in Ketchikan, Alaska. There was no malice in my heart or intent to offend; it was a poor choice of words. That word, and the negative attitudes that come with it, should be left in the 20th century, and I’m sorry that this has shifted our focus away from comprehensive immigration reform.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

“Is it just Mexicans whom people want to stop?”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

do i look illegal

Today’s L.A. Times letter to the editor, because our voices matter:

Re “Is the border secure?,” March 10

Supporters of building a nearly impenetrable fence along the U.S.-Mexico border say such a barrier would go a long way toward stopping illegal immigration.

However, an estimated 40% of the illegal immigrants already in the United States (more than 4 million of the total) are visa abusers. These are people who came to the United States with a valid visa (tourist, student or others) and stayed past the expiration. Many of them don’t look like Mexicans, and they blend into our society. They work as physical therapists, accountants and other middle-class professionals.

So how will the United States stop the flow of illegal immigrants to this country? Or is it just Mexicans whom people want to stop?

Odille Hansen

Culver City

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

VIDEO- Gingrich: Republicans hate President Obama, so his immigration plan is D.O.A.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

gophate

ABC’s Jonathan Karl gets a twofer today. First we saw him call out Paul Ryan’s hypocrisy on the sequester. Now we see him get Newt to say that the GOP will turn down any immigration reform by President Obama simply because they don’t like him.

Yes, Newton Leroy Gingrich had no problem describing how Republicans hate Obama, so no way will they pass his immigration plan, despite what’s good for the country and the people in it, despite the similarities in Republican ideas and the president’s, despite his party’s Big Political Reinvention based on a dire need for Latino voters, and despite the economic benefits of passing such a bill.

Marco Rubio poo-pooed it in pretty strong terms by calling the president’s ideas “dead on arrival”:

If actually proposed, the President’s bill would be dead on arrival in Congress, leaving us with unsecured borders and a broken legal immigration system for years to come.”

Who won’t compromise again, Marco? Who’s been obstructing since Inauguration Night 2009? Oh that’s right, your party. And under whose watch have illegal border crossings plunged? Oh that’s right, our current president’s.

Paul Ryan claimed that President Obama “seems to be looking for a partisan advantage and not a bipartisan solution.” (The segment is at the beginning, the first two minutes of the video.) Project much?

 

Here’s Newt Ginrich telling Karl that GOP disdain for Obama takes precedence over getting something accomplished for the good of the nation:

Newt:

“I think there’s a very important part of this that the Obama administration probably can’t bring itself to deal with: an Obama immigration plan is not going to pass the House… Just as a Bush Social Security plan after ’04 was dead because it was the Bush Social Security plan. So if you want to actually get legislation…”

Jonathan Karl:

“Can I ask you, will a Rubio immigration plan pass the House?”

Newt:

“No, but I think a Rubio, the House Republicans and House Democrats have been meeting on immigration. I mean, I think there will be a House immigration bill that has a very substantial support that Boehner and Cantor and others will be supporting, and I think that negotiated with a Senate immigration bill that has to have bipartisan support could actually get to the president’s desk. But an Obama plan led and driven by Obama in this atmosphere with the level of hostility towards the president and the way he goads the hostility, I think is very hard to imagine that bill, that his bill is going to pass the House.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

VIDEO: AZ Gov. Jan Brewer: “I know if President Obama is elected in November, which I hope he is…”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

I know if President Obama is elected in November, which I hope he is, he will be able to come together with all of us and come up with a solution. I believe he will secure our borders. And therefore, we can resolve all of the other issues as a simple matter.”

Thank you Tommy Christopher at Mediaite! I was watching the GOP convention coverage and saw Brewer say this last night. Then I thought, no, no I didn’t, I must have misheard her.

Turns out I heard correctly!

And she was right about securing our borders. Border crossings have plunged.

Brewer for Obama! Looks like it’s our turn to wag our collective finger in her Papers Please face.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

CNN fails to post video of Rick Perry floating idea of raising Medicare age to “69 or 70″

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

This morning I watched as the moderator lobbed softballs at Rick Perry at a town hall meeting in Conway, South Carolina that CNN televised. I couldn’t wait to share the video with you, and have been refreshing CNN’s video page all day, hoping they’d post segments.

Here’s what what they ended up posting. One video, less than a minute and a half long (not counting the 30 second AT&T ad) of Perry bragging about his “job creation.”

They failed to so much as mention Perry claiming outright that President Obama lied about illegal crossings at the U.S.-Mexico border sinking to record low levels. I guess the L.A. Times recent report about that was a lie too, huh Ricky? Hey CNN, did you correct the record? No, you didn’t.

They also failed to so much as mention Ricky’s little bombshell in which he floated the idea of raising the Medicare eligibility age to “69 or 70.” The New York Times at least hinted at it:

On Medicare, which he once again called a Ponzi scheme, Mr. Perry offered no specifics other than to say that the age minimum for receiving benefits ought to be raised. “That’s a good conversation to have,” he said.

The Houston Chronicle came closer, printing this quote, but still omitted the specifics about the ages Perry mentioned:

“No matter where you are in America, if you’re already getting your Social Security or are approaching that age, you’ve made a lot of decisions about retirement. … You have no worries at all about your current Social Security. What we do need to have a conversation about is kids my children’s age. … We shouldn’t lie to them and tell them that system we have in place today will be there for them.”

I heard these things, saw Rick Perry say these things, but nobody is reporting these things.  CNN, you should be ashamed for not posting the entire video so that Americans can be informed and choose their candidates wisely.

Instead, once again, the media chose to dumb down voters and slant their stories to suit their own corporate needs.

This is unacceptable, but this is what we’re stuck with unless we the people start speaking out loudly and clearly, calling out this kind of shoddy reporting and blatant media bias.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email