Archive for u.s. chamber of commerce

Supreme Court to consider workplace harassment rules

On Monday, the Supreme Court will hear a case that could have an impact on workplaces galore, because it will be deciding whether or not a company is liable for harassment by its employees. The magic word will be “supervisor” and its legal definition will be key. The outcomes of racial, religious or sexual harassment claims hang in the balance:

(Reuters) – Under previous Supreme Court rulings, an employer is automatically responsible if a supervisor harasses a subordinate. The employer is not liable if the harassment is between two equal coworkers, unless it was negligent in allowing the abuse.

Since those rulings, a rift has developed between federal appeals courts over exactly who is a supervisor. On one side, three circuits say supervisors are those with the power to hire, fire, demote, promote or discipline. Three other circuits have adopted a broader standard, one that also includes employees who direct and oversee a colleague’s daily work.

To no one’s surprise, business groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, have filed briefs supporting the narrow definition of supervisor.

U.S. Supreme Court Rules in U.S. Chamber’s Favor in EVERY CASE DECIDED So Far This Term

The Constitutional Accountability Center has the details.

This headline speaks volumes: U.S. Chamber of Commerce “promises vigorous campaign ads despite court rulings”

Court rulings, schmourt schmulings, nobody’s gonna stop what we do, nohow, nowhere, no way, says the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Bring it on, right Tom Donohue? That’s tellin’ ‘em. Who do these appeals courts think they are, anyway?!

Damned activist judges.

The Hill:

Court rulings that require the disclosure of funding for campaign “issue” ads will not change the U.S Chamber of Commerce’s political program, officials with the business group insisted Monday.

Chamber President and CEO Tom Donohue promised a vigorous campaign program despite a U.S. Court of Appeals ruling last week upholding an earlier judgment that the Federal Elections Commission was wrong not to require disclosure of funding for issue ads.

Per Think Progress, Tom Donahue announced this morning that his corporate lobbying group would spend even more than the $50 million previously reported.

Ain’t Citizens United swell?

Chamber president to the court:

Boyoboy, he sure showed them.

Video- Occupiers Roll Out Human Red Carpet At Chamber of Commerce Holiday Party

Brilliant. Via Think Progress.

Dep’t. of Duh: U.S. Chamber of Commerce kicks off attack ads early, wants a more business-friendly Congress

It’s swell that President Obama is raising more money than any GOP candidate and plans on competing in all 50 states, but there’s always that pesky “however” looming overhead. And that “however” is spelled C-I-T-I-Z-E-N-S U-N-I-T-E-D generally, and U-S  C-H-A-M-B-E-R- O-F- C-H-A-M-B-E-R O-F C-O-M-M-E-R-C-E specifically. Via the L.A. Times:

The chamber’s power has grown enormously in the last decade under Chief Executive Tom Donohue, who has emphasized political engagement and building the organization’s membership and treasury. Because it is a nonprofit trade association, the chamber can accept unlimited contributions from corporations and then use them in independent political ads — giving it an advantage over the strictly limited donations to candidates. Like other trade associations, the chamber does not release details of the donations and it has resisted efforts to require donor disclosure.

The new ads are so-called issue ads that do not explicitly endorse or oppose a candidate, but instead urge viewers to call the official.

They’re airing ads earlier in the campaign cycle than ever before. Why? Simple. They want a more business-friendly Congress.

It’s hard to believe a more business-friendly Congress is even possible.

[They] expect to use a grass-roots organization, “Friends of the Chamber,” to actively target 10 to 12 Senate races and 50 or more House seats, a record number. They also expect to see a boost in the number of state and local chamber affiliates becoming active politically. [...] The Friends of the Chamber program was the brainchild of the chamber’s recently departed political director, Bill MillerThe organization now boasts 7 million members who have generated more than 2.3 million letters and emails to members of Congress since 2008.

Of course, their overall theme is “economic growth versus big government.” I would add to that, “undisclosed donor growth versus transparency and campaign finance reform.”

VIDEO: Occupy Protesters “Mic Check” Chamber Of Commerce Event

I love the fact that…

  1. The first reader sounds like Kathy Griffin.
  2. They seamlessly pass the “mic” baton when one vocal leader gets silenced.
  3. This took place at a Chamber of Commerce event.
  4. It took two goons to finally deter one persistent, agile Kathy Griffin Girl.
  5. Kathy Griffin Girl played “Keep Away” with her script so successfully without skipping a beat.
  6. The protesters stayed on message peacefully and calmly, but the Chamber of Commercers were visibly annoyed.

Think Progress has details.

VIDEO: GOP civil war begins. Tea party “fiscally conservative freshman”: US Chamber CEO comments “outrageous.”

U.S. Chamber of Commerce CEO Tom Donahue recently patted The Boehner on the head for “growing into his shorts” and “putting on his big boy pants”, and loves him some GOP to boss around. There’s nothing like a steaming hot pile of corporate power to throw in everyone’s faces, right?

However, Donahue also warned the GOP that if the debt ceiling wasn’t raised, “we’ll get rid of you.” What a sweetheart. Of course, he said that was all just a big joke, see. Ha. Ha. Ha.  What a card.

Well, Rep. Joe Walsh (R-IL) would have none of that .

Via Think Progress:

A Chamber spokesman later said that Donohue was joking and that the comment was merely part of “pleasant and humorous banter going back and forth” between Donohue and his audience. But Walsh said during the interview that he wasn’t buying it. And many other GOP freshmen aren’t either.

Stay tuned for the next episode of “Republicans Eating Their Own.”