Archive for tweet

Bill Maher puts “Benghazi!!!!!” mania into perspective

bill maher

There are times when Bill Maher makes me cringe, times when he makes me laugh, times when he makes me think, times when he makes me scream, and times when he makes me proud.

Neither of these tweets made me cringe, but they made me do everything else on that list:

tweet maher benghazi impeach

bikini graph animated gif

tweet maher susan rice benghazi

Of course, anyone with a functioning brain knows this is all about Hillary Clinton 2016, and of course, destroying President Obama. But all the GOP Benghazi hysteria was debunked by Rachel Maddow. For one, Congress had the revised talking points for months.

tv benghazi

FBI investigating relationship between Va. Gov. Bob McDonnell, his wife, and major campaign donor

bob mcdonnell legal trouble gifts

Time for a refresher course on Bob McDonnell’s excellent adventures: Gov. “Ultrasound” McDonnell’s “improper use of government money, facilities, power for personal enrichment of friends”! That post was all about who paid for his daughter’s wedding at the governor’s mansion and questions about a possible (read: probable) quid pro quo. Rachel Maddow:

Specifically, the former chef’s catering company ended up doing the $15,000 dinner when Governor McDonnell hosted his daughter’s wedding at the governor’s mansion… The campaign contributors secretly paying for the daughter’s wedding at the mansion in Virginia, then blaming the daughter, saying it was her relationship with this guy that was under investigation now

Ruh-roh!

And now, the FBI is looking into the relationship between the McDonnells and the campaign donor. This can’t end well.

Ruh-roh squared!

WaPo:

FBI agents are conducting interviews about the relationship between Virginia Gov. Robert F. McDonnell, his wife, Maureen, and a major campaign donor who paid for the food at the wedding of the governor’s daughter, according to four people familiar with the questioning.

The agents have been asking associates of the McDonnells about gifts provided to the family by Star Scientific chief executive Jonnie R. Williams Sr. and actions the Republican governor and his wife have taken that may have boosted the company, the people said. [...]

Now, federal officials are trying to determine whether to expand that investigation into a broader look at whether McDonnell or his administration took any action to benefit Star Scientific in exchange for monetary or other benefits, according to the four people familiar with the interviews. [...]

The focus of the FBI interviews has been to determine whether any of those actions constituted a quid pro quo — McDonnell using his office to promote the company in return for anything of value for him or his family

If enough evidence is found, they could open a formal public corruption inquiry. Stay tuned.

tweet maddow mcdonnellLink

H/t: @Gr8RDH

UPDATE, via The Roanoke Times, where there are many more details:

RICHMOND — Gov. Bob McDonnell said today his administration never gave special treatment to a dietary supplement company that is under a federal securities investigation, despite more than $100,000 in political contributions from its chief executive and thousands of dollars more in gifts to McDonnell’s family.

McDonnell said on WTOP radio he and first lady Maureen McDonnell have been friends with Star Scientific CEO Jonnie Williams for four or five years. He acknowledged receiving gifts from Williams, including a $15,000 check to his daughter to help her pay for her June 2011 wedding.

Williams’ gifts to McDonnell and to state Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, both Republicans, have come under growing scrutiny in the past two months. It intensified after the Executive Mansion chef was charged with stealing food from the mansion and alleged that his prosecution by Cuccinelli was politically motivated.

New Mexico GOP official to 19-year-old labor advocate: “Nice hat Working America chick but damn you are a radical bitch”

tweet kush calls 19 yr old bitchLink

As his Twitter bio tells us, Steven Kush (@snkush) is “Executive Director Republican Party of Bernalillo County, Albuquerque, NM.” He has 53 followers. To put that into perspective, I have about 28,000 and I’m not executive director of anything.

Per HuffPo, he posted the above tweet Tuesday night after that 19-year-old “Working America chick” testified in favor of raising the minimum wage before the county commission. Working America is a labor movement advocacy group.

It gets worse. Here’s what’s on his Facebook Page:

kush fb page

Kush thought that line was so clever, he made sure to post it on Facebook and Twitter! He also referred to Democrats as “the gestapo” in another tweet.

He must be trying to reach out, as the GOP has promised they would. How’s that workin’ for ya so far, Steve?

Pat Davis, executive director of ProgressNow New Mexico, a progressive advocacy organization, picks right up on that Republican makeover thing:

“If the Republican Party wants to know why they have such a hard time connecting with young women, they should start by examining the very public way their leaders feel about young working women.”

ding ding dingSee the comment by Bob Cornelius in the Facebook screen grab? He was apologizing for this:

Bob Cornelius, the county Republican party’s former executive director, replied to Kush’s “nice boots” remark Tuesday by insinuating that Evans is a prostitute. “Maybe she uses those shoes to walk Central,” he wrote under Kush’s post, referring to a street that is notorious for prostitution. “Even in this economy she can exchange bumper cables for boots.”

Republican War on Women? Nahhh.

They might want to take an anti-bullying course, while they’re at it.

HuffPost has more.

extreme makeover my ass

Stupid Twitter Tricks, Gun Nut Edition

stupid twitter tricks

It’s time for today’s Stupid Twitter Tricks, gun nut edition, brought to you by Think Progress.

Seriously, this is about as stupid and insensitive as you can get. I’d express my outrage, but the replies to these tweets saved me the time and risk of lapsing into an unprintable rant.

Presenting Arkansas State Rep. Nate Bell (R):

tweet boston liberalsLink.

Here are a few of the replies that came his way:

  1. @CopyCurmudgeon @saberback @NateBell4AR let’s all agree to ignore “Ms” Bell and let “her” go polish her barrel while watching teebee.

  2. @janeroper I think @NateBell4AR is joking. Nobody is actually that stupid

  3. @NateBell4AR First things first: Bostonians don’t cower. This isn’t Arkansas.

  4. @NateBell4AR You’re like the gestalt of an overflowing toilet and a bag of dicks.

  5. @NateBell4AR We don’t need machine guns. We have police officers who are putting themselves in harm’s way to keep us safe. You?

  6. Human garbage. MT @NateBell4AR I wonder how many Boston liberals spent the night cowering in their homes wishing they had an AR-15

  7. @danigrrl @NateBell4AR Bacon and beer. Is it too early for beer? Could really use a drink after the past 12 hours. #watertown

  8. @tomecurran Yeah and I still can..what do you know about “AR 15′s”. That they are scary?? Sorry about the spelling mistakes. No editor!

  9. @mama2fluffs @NateBell4AR Hell no. Reprehensible people should be held responsible for their actions, and being a woman is not an insult.

  10. @neocMatt @NateBell4AR Oh my goodness, how I’d love a beer right now. Have to settle with tea. #Watertown

  11. @NateBell4AR So they can shoot a guy loaded with a bomb? That seems like not the best move in the situation.

  12. @JeanTerranova I know, I know. We’re staying strong, though.

  13. @maggieserota It warms my heart that my deeply sarcastic tweet about awful human @NateBell4AR is quickly approaching 400 retweets.

  14. That didn’t take long. “@NateBell4AR:…how many BOS liberals spent the night cowering…wishing they had an AR-15 w/hi-capacity magazine?”

  15. @maggieserota maggie how many Arkansans you think are cowering in their homes wishing they had MA’s schools and obesity rates? @NateBell4AR

  16. @NateBell4AR Boston liberal here. Seriously? You just tweeted this. I can tell you that we never felt this way.

  17. .@NateBell4AR Breathtaking douchebaggery.

  18. @NateBell4AR I’m saddened by pitting people against each other that this tweet generated rather than a rational, educated discussion.

  19. @NateBell4AR Dear Heartless Gun Nut: Please keep making Heartless Gun Nut statements. Thanks, the USA.

Follow the link for more replies. But, hey, he apologized. Not for what he said, but for when he said it. Via Facebook:

I would like to apologize to the people of Boston & Massachusetts for the poor timing of my tweet earlier this morning. As a staunch and unwavering supporter of the individual right to self defense, I expressed my point of view without thinking of its effect on those still in time of crisis. In hindsight, given the ongoing tragedy that is still unfolding, I regret the poor choice of timing. Please know that my thoughts and prayers were with the people of Boston overnight and will continue as they recover from this tragedy.

There now, all better.

And now for the sequel from none other than– wait for it– Herman Cain’s Cain TV account!

tweet cain guns boston This reply will suffice:

Georgia Liberal@Georgia_Liberal:

@CainTV No.

Howard Dean: “If this passed I would have to reevaluate if I belong in the Democratic Party.”

howard dean

tweet howard dean obama budget change partyLink

Points off for misspelling "independent," but anyway…

As BuzzFeed notes, Howard Dean is none too thrilled about the president's budget proposals, specifically over the increased defense spending and those wrongheaded Social Security cuts by way of the chained CPI plan. Here are all our posts about how such policies would negatively affect the elderly and disabled (scroll).

How about lifting the cap on taxable earnings, Mr. President? Or at least try to? Or at least voice support for those of us who would like some debate about that instead of contradicting your own vice president's 2012 campaign promise? Here’s what “chained CPI” would do.

I'm not sure I'd go as far as Howard Dean, but I would be very disappointed.

Dean:

"I just think that's unacceptable… If this passed I would have to reevaluate if I belong in the Democratic Party. If this were passed with Democratic votes, I think it would be impossible to be Democrat…. I would have to oppose any Democrat that is supportive of this… If the businessweek.com article I sent you is correct, it means the Prez proposed chain CPI cutting SS benefits while asking to restore Pentagon spending. He would never get that through either chamber… What the hell are they thinking or is BW wrong?… I don't think Democrats will vote for it… I can't imagine Republicans voting for this in swing districts."

More at BuzzFeed.

Rep. Steve Stockman (R-TX) campaign: “Our campaign bumper sticker: If babies had guns, they wouldn’t be aborted”

steve stockman twitter bio

tweet babies guns conservative rep. steve stockman

Via

 

 

 

Apparently “the most conservative Congressman in Texas” thinks fantasizing about a fetus killing the mother is “pro-life.”

right to life my ass pro life

 

Here’s a screen grab of his website front page:

steve stockman web page

 
It is the House companion to Sen. Rand Paul’s “Separation of Powers Restoration and Second Amendment Protection Act.” Stockman and Paul are working together on the joint effort.

As you can see, he has introduced legislation that would stop “Obama’s Executive Orders,” which of course are constitutional. Did he wish the same for George W. Bush?

 

How reassuring to see the Republican Party’s busy little conservative bees trying to improve their image. That War on Women is clearly a thing of the past. See all those women voters swarming in support of the GOP, right along with Latino voters and gay Americans?

 

Me neither.extreme makeover my ass

H/t: Taegan

We have right to liberty, pursuit of happiness “just so long as the specific type of happiness is older than mobile telephones.”

gay rights prop 8 marriage equality

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Rachel Maddow last night, the night before the oral arguments that the Supreme Court heard today (audio here) on California’s Prop. 8:

“…The politics surrounding this legal matter are increasingly weighty and predictable on the left. And on the right, they are increasingly incoherent and low-rent and even occasionally pathetic.”

Well that was prescient. As The Maddow Blog tweeted today:

tweet maddow blog SCOTUS prop 8

Justice Samuel Alito:

“Traditional marriage has been around for thousands of years. Same-sex marriage is very new. I think it was first adopted in The Netherlands in 2000. So there isn’t a lot of data about its effect. And it may turn out to be a — a good thing; it may turn out not to be a good thing, as the supporters of Proposition 8 apparently believe.

But you want us to step in and render a decision based on an assessment of the effects of this institution, which is newer than cell phones or the Internet? I mean we — we are not — we do not have the ability to see the future. On a question like that, of such fundamental importance, why should it not be left for the people, either acting through initiatives and referendums or through their elected public officials?”

Steve Benen at The Maddow blog:

Alito’s argument seems to be one focused on the calendar. Perhaps, the theory goes, millions of Americans can be denied equal rights for an indefinite period of time, and jurists can revisit the issue in the future. At that point, they can revisit whether or not allowing two consenting adults to get married is “a good thing.”

Remember the fine print in the Declaration of Independence? We have an inalienable right to liberty and the pursuit happiness, just so long as the specific type of happiness is older than mobile telephones.

These are rights we’re talking about. Equality. Civil rights, equal rights, marriage equality.

Wiki:

The phrase “tyranny of the majority” (or “tyranny of the masses“), used in discussing systems of democracy and majority rule, envisions a scenario in which decisions made by a majority place its interests so far above those of an individual or minority group as to constitute active oppression, comparable to that of tyrants and despots.[1] In many cases a disliked ethnic, religious or racial group is deliberately penalized by the majority element acting through the democratic process.

Please read Benen’s entire post.