Archive for This Week – Page 2

VIDEO– Paul Krugman destroys Fiorina talking points: “Don’t think about bureaucrats….We’ve laid off 100s of 1000s of school teachers.”

doonesbury jobs smaller

In my post Bikini Graph time! Once again, jobs were ADDED, revisions way up. #BlameObama, I quoted Steve Benen at The Maddow Blog:

The unemployment rate was effectively unchanged at 7.9%, and as is often the case, austerity measures undermined the employment landscape

— while America’s private sector added 166,000 jobs in December, the public sector lost 9,000 jobs. Indeed, over the last three months, the nation’s private sector added 624,000 jobs, while 24,000 government jobs were lost.

It’d be easy for Washington to improve the latter number and lower the unemployment rate, but congressional Republicans won’t allow it

As I’ve previously written, check out public sector job numbers under both Bush and Obama. Somehow under W, rising public sector employment was okay with the GOP, but if the Dems want to hang on to those jobs, it’s some kind of Kenyan Marxist commie union thug plot to destroy America:

chart bush v obama jobs private, public sector

The GOP wants government to shrink, aka firing government workers. Which of course means firing employed people who bring home paychecks that are used to pay for things, which, in turn, boost the economy.

That would make President Obama look good, and Republicans can’t have that.

If all those public sector workers had not lost their jobs, there would be over a million more people employed, which of course would bring the unemployment rate down substantially.

That said, check out this video and transcript, courtesy of Think Progress:

CARLY FIORINA: I think it’s important to remember, when we talk about the economy, that a private sector job and a public sector job are not the same things. They’re not equivalent. I’m not saying public sector jobs aren’t important. But a private sector job pays for itself. A private sector job creates other jobs. A public sector job is paid for by taxpayers. [...]

PAUL KRUGMAN: But when we say public sector jobs, it is not a bureaucrat in Washington, D.C.

FIORINA: Oh, it is, actually.

KRUGMAN: When we talk about public sector jobs — when we look at the ones that have been lost in large numbers in this — it’s basically school teachers. Don’t think about bureaucrats. It’s school teachers. What we’ve laid off hundreds of thousands of school teachers.

And when we talk about the cuts in public spending that have happened, they are not, you know, some god awful who knows what. It’s actually public investment. It’s largely fixing potholes and repairing bridges.

So, you know, you have this image of these wasteful bureaucrats doing god knows what. What we’ve seen is an incredible drought of basic infrastructure, and laying off hundreds of thousands of school teachers.

FIORINA: It is a fact that virtually every department in every organization in Washington, D.C. has seen its budget increase for the last 40 years. That money is being paid to hire people. The number of people who are — of course there are some teachers…

KRUGMAN: The vast bulk of public sector employees are at the state and local level. They are largely school teachers plus police officers plus firefighters. And your notion that it’s all these bureaucrats — that’s a myth that’s used…

FIORINA: It’s not a myth, it’s a fact. It’s not a myth, it’s a fact. We don’t have enough private escort job creation.

Krugman 1, Fiorina 0.

VIDEO– Jennifer Granholm to Rick Santorum: “Deer don’t wear armor. Why do you need an armor piercing bullet?”

santorum big gun

Regulations? We don’t need no stinkin’ regulations! Public safety? Pffft! At least that what failed GOP presidential candidate Rick Santorum thinks. Did I say thinks? My bad. It’s not clear he’s capable of any kind of mental activity, let alone the kind that takes real effort, intelligence, or skill.

When I saw this “This Week” segment this morning, I mistakenly thought he said, “avenge” instead of “defend.” Thing is, sadly, it wouldn’t be surprising if he had said “avenge.” But he did say he prioritizes restricting violent Hollywood movies and video games over regulating actual instruments of death, the ones that are sold with the sole intent of killing people.

Despite being on a panel that, like others on Sunday talkers that feature far right extremists without balancing them with those on the far left, former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm took care of business:

Via Think Progress:

Police departments and prosecutors across the country supporting restricting access to such ammunition. As Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta asked troops at the U.S. Army Garrison Vicenza in Italy this week, “I mean who the hell needs armor-piercing bullets except you guys in battle?”

Apparently Rick Santorum does:

GRANHOLM: Why do you need armor-piercing bullets, why do you need that?

SANTORUM: Because we’re talking about a particular type of bullet that is and can be available –

GRANHOLM: Deer don’t wear armor. Why do you need an armor piercing bullet?

SANTORUM: Criminals could and having, having…

GRANHOLM: And police officers certainly do…

SANTORUM: And having the ability to defend yourself is a right in our country.

Video- Rick Santorum: President Obama a ‘Sore Winner’

As always, Little Ricky just regurgitates neo-con word salad. Sorry so video heavy this morning, but there’s not even a good cartoon so far.

VIDEO– Peggy Noonan: “People are buying guns like crazy now. Not because they’re nutty…”

condescendingVia

Good grief, speaking of “nutty,” can Peggy Noonan sound any more sanctimonious? Her level of “concern” and condescension is only surpassed by her phony sincerity and inability to stick to facts.

Thankfully, Paul Krugman was there to counter all that with reality checks and reason.

From the ABC transcript:

NOONAN: I think it should be noted that we have a president. I think it should be noted that he should be sitting down and talking with those who would move — attempt to move forward on spending. I consider it unusual that this president can never make a deal with those folks.

KRUGMAN: But this is not something you negotiate over. You do not negotiate with hostage-takers. That’s the White House position. They’re right about that. You just don’t negotiate on this. You can negotiate on the sequester, you can negotiate on taxes, but not on someone who is threatening to blow up the world economy if he doesn’t get his way.

NOONAN: My goodness. That appeared to be the White House attitude on the fiscal cliff just a month or two ago.

KRUGMAN: It’s very different.

NOONAN: Why can nothing ever be worked out? We do have a president. We do have legislative leaders. We do what should be noted, have a spending crisis in America. It is not an eccentric thing to worry about the amount of spending that America does. The income, the outcome and the long-term promises.

KRUGMAN: This is really — this is a doomsday — this is really saying I will blow up the world unless you give me what I want. And you don’t negotiate on that.

***

NOONAN: Yes, two things I’d like to say, one is that people are buying guns like crazy now. Not because they’re nutty, not enough because they’re angry, but because I really think they fear their country is falling apart.

It’s defensive and it’s something that I think we all have to be talking about. There’s so much anxiety out in America. And they also fear their government.

Second thing, I guess connected to that, leave gun control and gun reform issues in the Congress of the United States, the president should not be issuing executive orders in this area. It would really be unwise and it will cause great problems, I would think. [...]

STEPHANOPOULOS: It seems that the White House believes that if the president doesn’t move quickly, nothing is going to happen.

KRUGMAN: That’s right. This is the moment. And he certainly has to be seen to be doing something. And by the way, it is crazy to be out there buying guns right now. People are afraid, you know, the reality of life in America is that it’s safer than it has been in decades.

If we walk out of this studio and walk through Manhattan, your chance of getting mugged are less than they have been since, I don’t know, 1960. I mean, this is a — so this is an odd thing, this is a mental state, not about the reality of America.

NOONAN: No, no, no…

KRUGMAN: The big revelation here has been we’ve realized — I didn’t know, that the NRA is no longer about gun owners. It’s actually representing the firearms industry. And that’s something we’ve learned. So…

VIDEO: Sen. Bob Corker wonders about Chuck Hagel’s “overall temperament… numbers of staffers coming forth now”

temper temper anger

Via ABC.

Has anyone else ever heard anything about Chuck Hagel’s temperament before today? This is the first I’ve gotten wind of the issue, and from the way George Stephanopoulos responded, he was surprised, too. But on “This Week,” GOP Sen. Bob Corker, ranking member of the Foreign Relations Committee, seemed to think we should be concerned about it:

“… Just his overall temperament and is he suited to run a department or a big agency or a big entity like the Pentagon.”

“I think there are numbers of staffers who are coming forth now just talking about the way he has dealt with them. I have, certainly questions, about a lot of things.”

However, despite the alleged complaints from staffers, Corker doesn’t necessarily feel this could disqualify Chuck Hagel.

He went on to say:

“I begin all of these confirmation processes with an open mind.  I did have a good relationship with him.  I had a good conversation with him this week.  But I think this is one where people are going to be listening to what he has to say, me in particular … especially some of the positions he’s taken generally speaking about our nuclear posture.”

Has Bob Corker ever wondered aloud about fellow Senator John McCain’s temperament“? Just asking.

Video- ABC’s Stepanopoulos Fact Checks McConnell: We’ve Already Confronted The Spending Problem

Via TP.

Video- Rep. Raul Labrador: Slams Democrats Over Fiscal Cliff Negotiations- They’re ‘Like Bank Robbers’