Today's L.A. Times letters to the editor, because our voices matter:
Re “Obama again: Swing states seal second term,” Nov. 7
I worked as a poll worker in Santa Fe Springs for 15 hours on election day.
I was elated to see the young and middle-aged men and women, senior citizens and the physically challenged with their wheelchairs, walkers and canes — all taking the time to come to the precinct and vote.
I translated in Spanish for about 30 people, some first-time voters. Some were immigrants who had recently become U.S. citizens. One woman from Ecuador had tears in her eyes and thanked me for assisting her in voting.
Near the end, an older gentleman arrived with two young men. He told me: “They have to stop playing their games or watching TV. They need to come to vote. They are the ones who will inherit this country.”
Santa Fe Springs
I am a Republican and have been for the last 30 years. However, I am an American first. This year I voted Democrat. Why?
Because the Republicans became the “Republi-cants” and “the party of no.”
I expect the Republicans to work with the Democrats. Not doing so is anti-American, and I am an American first. So if they want to know why they lost — it was their attitude.
It was with a deep sense of shame that I watched fellow Americans have to wait two to three hours to cast their votes. I waited five minutes to vote. This is a problem easily fixed by adding polling stations.
Doubly shameful is the use of the electoral system — antiquated and unfair to voters of all parties, a system that makes the votes of those in “swing states” more valuable than the rest of the country.
I suspect that these issues will not be dealt with until the day before the next election.
Though I'm not ready to accuse the mainstream media of contriving a too-close-to-call presidential contest in order to bolster audience attention, I will affirm that my faith in American democracy has been fortified by the reelection of President Obama.
After all, how could anyone who has been awake the last four years not be aware of our president's hard-earned accomplishments?
As the campaign slogan said: Osama bin Laden is dead; General Motors is alive. One doesn't have to be a fastidious fact-checker to acknowledge that truth.
Indeed, with 303 electoral votes compared with Mitt Romney's 206, this contest wasn't even a particularly close one. Thank goodness.
Now the president can get back to the business of governing our nation without the distraction of a seemingly endless, often inane campaign.
Cheerleading for the failure of an American president and just saying no in Congress are not winning political strategies.
The silent majority spoke, and Republican/“tea party” extremism was rejected soundly. This is not a center-right country.
Some claim Romney lost because of the 47% remarks and Superstorm Sandy. During his concession speech, I could see the real reason he lost — there was no diversity among his supporters.
More than the dismal economic and social policies he wanted to implement, failing to recognize that the time of white control of government and politics is over alienated the new majority.
If the GOP continues to be led by the nose by the tea party, it will be as irrelevant nationally as it is in California. That's just fine with me.
If there were ever a case to be made for campaign finance reform, the amount of money spent on this election is it.
How many homeless shelters could have been provided? How many Head Start programs could have been funded? How many unsafe bridges could have been repaired or replaced? How many college scholarships could have been funded?
What a waste of money on all that campaign literature that went straight from my mail box directly into the recycle bin, unread.
The time for meaningful campaign finance reform is now. And it should come from a citizens committee because the politicians have no objectivity or interest in making meaningful changes.