Archive for taxes

Veterans livid over “shameful” WI GOP limits on disabled vets tax credits

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

thank a veteran

Leave it to those compassionate, caring, reachy-outy Republicans to enrage disabled veterans. That takes real talent.

In Wisconsin, the GOP has the upper hand in the legislature, as well as in the governor’s mansion, meaning they run the show. Whatever they want, they get, and it’s not pretty. For example, there’s yesterday’s video of Senator Mike Ellis doing his best Bill O’Reilly impression: How WI GOP legislators “debate” women’s reproductive rights.

Now they’re screwing over one of the most respected– if not the most respected– groups of people in the country. Apparently, those on the right live by the motto, “When in doubt, go after the heroes.”

Via the Journal Times:

Veterans groups are rising up against what they consider a “shameful” move by Republican state lawmakers to strap limits on a popular tax credit for 100 percent disabled veterans and surviving spouses. [...]

Apparently, some Joint Finance Committee members feel the sacrifices made by severely wounded, injured and ill veterans are just another budget item,” said Al LaBelle, legislative director of the Disabled American Veterans of Wisconsin. “Balancing the budget on the backs of these severely injured heroes is shameful.”

The limits were introduced by committee co-chairs Sen. Alberta Darling, R-River Hills, and Rep. John Nygren, R-Marinette, and passed 12-4 on a party-line vote, said Rick Olin, a fiscal analyst for the Legislative Fiscal Bureau who provided the panel with alternatives for changing the credit.

reinvention my ass

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Report: Majority of WI GOP-backed income tax cuts would go to those making over $100K

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

walker world

Day after day, post after post, it becomes more and more obvious that Republican have no intention of “reinventing” themselves, only their superficial, fake “image.” The party may think nobody’s noticing what’s behind the curtain, but apparently young voters (among others) are. They see the GOP as “closed-minded, racist, rigid, old-fashioned,” and not “open-minded, caring, or co-operative.”

Here’s something else they are: Perpetually devoted to the wealthiest people and corporations at the expense of regular working people. Wisconsin Republicans have made that perfectly clear.

Via The Journal Times:

A Republican lawmaker’s proposal to expand income tax cuts beyond those initially proposed by Gov. Scott Walker would mostly benefit taxpayers making more than $100,000, a nonpartisan analysis released Monday found.

The average tax cut for 2015 under the proposal would be nearly $300, compared to the $83 average for an average taxpayer under Walker’s plan, according to the analysis. [...]

The report came as Republicans who control the Legislature wrangled over major budget items in closed door meetings, negotiating last-minute deals on cutting income taxes, expanding private voucher school programs, funding public schools and rejecting a federally funded Medicaid expansion.

So what else is new, right?

Please proceed.

same old

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Cartoons of the Day- Apple & Taxes

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

appletax

Nate Beeler

May 26, 2013

Adam Zyglis

appletax2

Kevin Seirs

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

“The Tea Party versus the IRS: A fight between stinky and yucky.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

IRS tea party cartoon Horsey

Today’s guest post by the one, the only, Will Durst:

THE TANGLED TANGO

As part of the brash rash of wire- brush scouring on the Teflon coating that routinely seals the Obama Presidency, a large heavy- duty cast- iron deal has been made of the IRS conducting audits on Tea Party affiliated organizations. But scratch the surface and it makes a sort of perverse sense.

Tea Party and Associates are what you might call… anti- tax. Like meringue is anti- diet. So much so, they eschew the easy road by denying their name was taken from the early tax rebellion, but rather claim it an acronym of “Taxed Enough Already.” These guys are strict.

On the other hand, the IRS is, for lack of a better phrase, less anti- tax. You could go so far as to say the IRS is pro- tax. Although employees undoubtedly consider their task following the letter of the law rather than the grisly art of squeezing blood from 300 million turnips. Type AB Rh negative preferred please.

These ornery combatants are mortal enemies along the lines of the mongoose and the cobra. Sheep and wolf. Electric vehicles and Oklahoma. Sarah Palin & The Learning Channel. Irish skin and Equatorial Guinea. The guy from IT support and everybody else in the fricking office. Panty hose and coffee table corners. Cheese and cat hair.

Nobody wants the government targeting dissenters: that’s way too Aleksander Solzhenitsyn. Uncomfortably reminiscent of Burma and that doesn’t mean the romantic Pindaya caves either. The 1984 Orwellian nightmare of Winston Smith revisited. But neither should we forget the Tea Party’s stated goal is to shrink the government and get rid of the IRS. Then ostensibly teach the rest of us how to pave our own roads by making mud bricks in our ovens.

How difficult is it to understand that people whose philosophy preaches something is evil might garner a bit of extra scrutiny from the folks whose very jobs they are threatening? Just like a “Legalize Pot” bumper sticker might prompt a cop to sniff the air inside a car after he stops it. The same way you don’t mock the stewardess’s hairstyle within earshot then expect extra peanuts.

That’s not profiling, its human nature. A reflex. Common sense. Besides, this isn’t two beloved groups we’re talking about here. The Tea Party versus the IRS. It’s a battle for the bottom. The disdained versus the detested. A fight between stinky and yucky. With anybody caught in the middle destined to emerge with a few of the sticky bits on their shoes.

Out of 296 applicants not one Tea Party organization was denied non- profit status. Admittedly, some had to wait. And that’s what the major charges boil down to: the IRS making things difficult. Imagine that. An inconvenient interaction with the government. Next thing you’ll try to tell me that insurance companies employ delaying tactics. Can’t wait for ObamaCare to kick in, right?

But for now, the party has been put back into the Tea Party. They’re waving their flag of victimization wild and high and are once again protesting like its August of 2009. A Reenergized Tea Party: the last thing the Obama administration needs. As a matter of fact the only people dreading it more would have to be the entire rest of the Republican Party.

Recipient of 7 consecutive nominations for Stand Up of the Year, Will Durst’s new one- man show “BoomerAging: From LSD to OMG” is presented every Tuesday, at the Marsh, San Francisco. Go to… themarsh.org for more info. Use code “boomer” for discount tix.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

“Rep. Darrell Issa runs his House Oversight and Gov’t. Reform Committee the same way as the IRS”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

drunk license place CA

Today’s L.A. Times letters to the editor, because our voices matter:

Re “Issa tested by the spotlight,” May 22

The IRS did what it was supposed to do regarding 501(c)(4)s, but in a way that strongly suggested partisan bias by investigating “tea party”-related groups during the Obama administration and liberal churches such as All Saints in Pasadena during the Bush administration.

Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Vista) runs his House Oversight and Government Reform Committee the same way as the IRS, not bothering to go down investigative roads that might lead to answers that can’t be used to partisan advantage.

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Burbank) has requested that the IRS’ conduct under both Obama and Bush be looked at. If Issa’s Fast and Furious investigation was any indication, Schiff’s request will be denied. Issa’s motivations are stockpiling power and influence to support his rise in the GOP.

Linda Kranen

Carlsbad

***

The IRS “scandal” is an attempt by conservatives to create an Obama Watergate.

Nonprofit groups that are nonpolitical can apply for 501(c)(4) tax-exempt status. Political nonprofits can file for 527 tax-exempt status. The difference? Donors can give to 501(c)(4) groups anonymously (and, apparently, these groups can be political).

Those groups applying for 501(c)(4) status that were questioned by the IRS claim they were targeted in an effort to silence their voices during an election year. If the groups were nonpolitical, what difference would it make to them if it were an election year?

Putting “tea party” in the name of a group seeking a tax exemption and then expressing utter bewilderment over questions about having a political agenda is as sensible as getting personalized license plates reading “IMADRNK” and then complaining about harassment by the Highway Patrol.

Betty C. Duckman

Long Beach

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

“The politicians should be embarrassed — but to be embarrassed, one first has to have a conscience.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

I see hypocrites

Today’s Los Angeles Times letter to the editor, because our voices matter:

Re “Apple execs grilled over tax strategy,” Business, May 22

I don’t know whether it’s funny or hypocritical for politicians to grill Apple executives on business ethics. After all, these are the people who, for years, have regularly taken bribes disguised as campaign contributions and generally enriched themselves at the public trough, all with impunity.

The politicians should be embarrassed — but to be embarrassed, one first has to have a conscience.

Joe Martin

Long Beach

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Memo to GOP: Federal deficit shrinking at surprising rate, long-term debt stabilized for next decade #BlameObama

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

chart budget deficit shrinks 4 year low Steve Benen Maddow Blog Oct 2012

Another Republican talking point is biting the dust in a big way. Previously I posted U.S. budget surplus biggest in 5 years; federal deficit is down 32% so far this fiscal year and Congressional Budget Office: Federal budget deficit declining; $231 billion less than 2012 #BlameObama.

Now, the Los Angeles Times has two reports that buttress those. It’s good news for President Obama and America, bad news for GOP whiners and obstructionists:

The federal deficit is shrinking more quickly than expected, and the government’s long-term debt has largely stabilized for the next decade, the Congressional Budget Office said Tuesday in a report that could strengthen the Obama administration’s hand in the budget battles with congressional Republicans. [...]

The deficit projection for this year — $642 billion — is almost 25% less than the deficit the budget office had forecast as recently as February. At the new level, the annual deficit would be back to where it was before President Obama took office. It would continue to fall for the rest of Obama’s tenure, the budget office now projects.  [...]

By 2015, the budget office forecasts, the deficit will fall to just over 2% of GDP, a level that most economists would consider relatively insignificant.

What?! Why, that’s positively unpatriotic! Here are the reasons for the shrinkage:

1. A better economy. Let’s repeat that: A better economy.

2. The rate of medical inflation is slowing down — which reduces the cost of Medicare and Medicaid.

3. Congress approved higher taxes, remember? That was when the dreaded “fiscal cliff” was the topic du jour.

I appreciated this very clear, concise explanation of the deficit and debt:

The federal deficit is the gap between what the government spends each year and its revenue, mostly taxes. The government has run a deficit almost every year for the last half-century. The federal debt represents the accumulated money that the government borrows to cover that deficit. [...]

Underscoring the political dynamic, Republicans, who trumpeted news of higher deficits during Obama’s first term, fell largely silent in reaction to the new figures.

 Of course they did. They always do when their political attacks get destroyed by pesky facts.

And then there’s this, also from the L.A. Times:

American families reduced their debt load in the first three months of the year by 1%, bringing it down to pre-recession levels after an uptick in the last quarter of 2012, the Federal Reserve said Tuesday.

What a scandal!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email