Archive for tax cuts – Page 2

Report: Majority of WI GOP-backed income tax cuts would go to those making over $100K


walker world

Day after day, post after post, it becomes more and more obvious that Republican have no intention of "reinventing" themselves, only their superficial, fake "image." The party may think nobody's noticing what's behind the curtain, but apparently young voters (among others) are. They see the GOP as “closed-minded, racist, rigid, old-fashioned,” and not “open-minded, caring, or co-operative.”

Here's something else they are: Perpetually devoted to the wealthiest people and corporations at the expense of regular working people. Wisconsin Republicans have made that perfectly clear.

Via The Journal Times:

A Republican lawmaker’s proposal to expand income tax cuts beyond those initially proposed by Gov. Scott Walker would mostly benefit taxpayers making more than $100,000, a nonpartisan analysis released Monday found.

The average tax cut for 2015 under the proposal would be nearly $300, compared to the $83 average for an average taxpayer under Walker’s plan, according to the analysis. [...]

The report came as Republicans who control the Legislature wrangled over major budget items in closed door meetings, negotiating last-minute deals on cutting income taxes, expanding private voucher school programs, funding public schools and rejecting a federally funded Medicaid expansion.

So what else is new, right?

Please proceed.

same old


What I will not write about today


frustrated smaller

This may become a regular feature.

Sometimes I get so frustrated and/or disheartened and/or annoyed by some of the news stories of the day that I can’t bring myself to write about them. Here are a few recent reports that made my blood pressure hit the roof. I am avoiding delving into them at length out of concern for my physical and mental health:

See what I mean? So who’s up for a couple of Margs or a trough of wine?

drunk happy


"People have figured out what Republicans want: Cut taxes for the rich and if the country goes to the dogs, it is Obama's fault."


blame obama

Today's L.A. Times letters to the editor, because our voices matter:

Re “Obama's dangerous experiment,” Opinion, Feb. 28

Rep. Howard P. “Buck” McKeon (R-Santa Clarita), the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, fails to mention that he himself voted for the “sequester” in 2011.

Two conclusions can be made: that he agreed with these cuts at the time, or that he negotiated in bad faith, planning to undo the cuts that he didn't like at a later date.

McKeon infers from President Obama's behavior that the administration wishes to “hollow out” the U.S. military.

I infer from McKeon's behavior that he wishes to protect a small number of defense contractors (that donated large sums to his campaign) at the expense of the large number of average citizens in his district who benefit from social programs.

Richard Olmstead
Van Nuys


McKeon mentions the president's proposals to avert sequestration, then goes on to blame Obama for all the ills that sequestration will visit on the military. Huh?

He also whines about previous cuts to the military budget, despite the fact that one GOP-initiated war has been wound down and the second is in the process of being ended.

The Republicans can't have it both ways — either focus on the budget cuts and suck up the pain, or work with the president to find alternatives.

Enough with the hypocrisy.

Brent Vanderwood
Mission Viejo


Dear Congressman: You may be absolutely right about what may happen to the military and to civilian jobs because of the sequester. You may also be absolutely right that it really was a “dangerous experiment.”

But I did not think that Republicans would care so much for cutting budgets that they would rather destroy the country.

People have figured out what Republicans want: Cut taxes for the rich and, in that fight, if the country goes to the dogs, it is Obama's fault.

I am a small-business owner. Can you tell me what you have really done for us? If more people had money, I would have more customers. I do not make money when only the rich can afford my products and there are not enough people in the middle who can.

Sam Mookerjee
Canoga Park


If one were to look at the yea and nay votes in the House on the sequestration bill, one would see that McKeon voted in favor.

If civics were still taught in our schools, we'd see that the president can create no laws; that is the job of Congress — the Senate and the House of Representatives.

So now my elected representative is blaming the president for the sequestration problem? Doesn't sound to me like the party of “personal responsibility” is capable of taking any.

Doug Kimball


The sequester is wrong, but McKeon's solution is absurd.

The Republican bill passed in the last session would cut deeply into programs for the poorest in our country to maintain a level of military spending that dwarfs the rest of the world's.

Now, while we are in a recovery period from the recession, is not the time to be cutting spending. We should have a short-term stimulus package coupled with a long-term tax reform and spending package.

We do need to do something to control the cost of Medicare in the long term; the healthcare law is starting to address this issue.

Michael Ubell


Under Gov. Scott Walker, WI private-sector job creation "slowed markedly," and his income tax cut helps rich more


scott walker no jobs

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker made a major campaign promise that his state on his watch would add 250,000 private-sector jobs by the end of his term.

How'd that work out for you, Scotty?


Job creation in Wisconsin slowed markedly between July and September, according to the most recent available government data deemed credible by economists. [...]

Friday's report also contained the weakest reading since the 12 months of September 2009 to September 2010 - a period that overlapped with the last recession. [...]

The last time that Wisconsin appeared in a national ranking of the Quarterly Census, it was for the 12 months through June 2012. Then, Wisconsin ranked 42 out of the 50 states in private-sector job creation, a decline from a rank of 37 in the previous period, from March 2011 to March 2012.

That makes Wisconsin a laggard in job creation even by the glacial standards of the national recovery, which has moved far too slowly to absorb the millions of unemployed left over from the 2007-'09 recession.

See how well union busting and austerity work?

but wait there's more

According to the Wisconsin State Journal and an analysis by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy done for the Wisconsin Budget Project, Walker's full of crap. But then we already knew that. explains:

Gov. Scott Walker’s proposed income tax cut would give more money back to the rich than it would the poor, despite his billing it as a boon to the middle class, a new analysis shows.

promises promises smaller

Andrew Reschovsky, a UW-Madison professor of public affairs and applied economics:

"There is no evidence that the tax cut will do much to encourage growth and job creation.”

Mark Schug, a UW-Milwaukee professor emeritus who now consults in the area of economic education:

[S]uch a cut is not likely to be an economic boost. “I do tend to think that the income tax reduction is not sufficient."

Of course, even after all these stats and expert opinions, Walker's fellow Republicans will undoubtedly continue to march in lockstep, livelihoods of the 47%/99% be damned:

[T]he Republican-controlled Legislature will now take the next four months making changes before voting on it likely sometime in June.

They're nothing if not predictable. Be proud, Koch brothers.