Archive for suspension

VIDEO– 5-year-old girl: Ooo, let’s shoot bubbles! PA elementary school: You’re a terrorist. Suspended! No, I’m not kidding.

hello kitty bubbles gitmo

 

In one Pennsylvania elementary school, 5-year-old girls in kindergarten who suggest it might be fun to blast bubbles at other 5-year-olds using a small, pink, plastic Hello Kitty bubble blower get suspended.

And that suspension makes it impossible to be accepted into other schools. Because, see, toy bubble-shooters are now evil threatening weapons and tots who want to not-harm other children with a not-harmful, painless, floaty stream of bubbles are now “terrorists.”

Bubbles don’t kill people, people kill people.

ABC:

A 5-year-old girl was suspended from school earlier this week after she made what the school called a “terrorist threat.

Her weapon of choice? A small, Hello Kitty automatic bubble blower.

Did I mention that the child didn’t even have the bubbler with her at school?

Did I mention her weapon of choice was a doodad that blows bubbles?

deadly bubbles

Did I mention that the 5-year-old was ordered to undergo a psychological evaluation? 

Guess what the outcome of the evaluation was? You guessed right. The little girl was “deemed normal” and not a threat. Imagine that! She’s as harmless as a little (Hello) Kitty.

But now she’s got a “record” and has been turned down by another school because of her scary terrorist past. Before you know it, there will be drones tracking her and she’ll be on a watch list.

Why, soon there could be a Baby Gitmo at every neighborhood mall (So convenient!) where moms ‘n’ dads can shop to their hearts’ content after paying a visit to their Little Prisoner.

Hello Gitty?

Texas court suspends judge who was taped beating his teenaged daughter

After having to shield my eyes and ears every time a clip was aired about this sadist, I am very pleased to report that the judge who beat his challenged daughter has been suspended:

(CNN) — Judge William Adams, who made national headlines after the release of a 2004 video of him beating his then-teenage daughter, has been suspended by the Texas Supreme Court.

It’s a start. He deserves much worse.

Ohio Gov. Kasich’s anti-voter law suspended

Need some good news? Then I’ve got just the thing for you. Think Progress is reporting that a bill that made it harder to vote in Ohio, one that Republican Gov. John Kasich signed into law, one that made early voting and absentee/election day voters much more difficult, will be suspended.

Score one (even temporarily) for democracy:

Today, however, opponents of Kasich’s war on voting will submit over 300,000 signatures to the Secretary of State’s office — well over the 231,000 signatures necessary to suspend the law until it can be challenged in a referendum in November of 2012.

This means that the law that Kasich signed would not be effective during the 2012 presidential elections, and that must be driving the GOP crazy, considering it was intended to work against those (mostly early voters) who would likely vote for President Obama.

2009 AUDIO: Rush Limbaugh wonders why “no slut surcharge” in health bill.

As you know, Ed Schultz apologized profusely after calling Laura Ingraham a “right-wing slut”. However, regret, remorse, humility, and the ability to articulate the words “I’m sorry” do not typically  emanate from conservative hosts when they rattle off similar aspersions. They freely, and loudly, express ::gasp!:: shock and outrage at a commie pinko socialist Marxist fascist liberal MSNBC host’s poor choice of words, so why don’t they do that when one of their own is guilty of the same thing?

But wait! There’s more! We actually hold our side accountable for any number of offenses, right wingers do not. (Aside from TV and radio personalities, our instant disdain for — and support for legal action against– public officials like John Edwards comes to mind, as opposed to the GOP’s embrace of their David Vitters.) Where are the demands for firing conservative on-air voices when they hurl slurs and insults?

Here’s how Ingraham responded to Schultz on Facebook:

Re. the crude comments made about me by Ed Schultz on his radio program: First, I was surprised to learn that Ed Schultz actually hosted a radio show.  Is it only available online?  Second, I have to get back to recording the audio edition of my new book “Of Thee I Zing.” Now I’m tempted to insert one additional zing–about men who preach civility but practice misogyny.

Right wing hosts repeatedly compound their hypocrisy as they stomp their feet and howl about how certain words and attitudes are out of bounds, and that MSNBC had every justification to suspend Ed Schultz; but again, would they stomp those same feet and howl if one of their own squawking, offensive hosts were to be suspended for a week for, well, saying something like this? Laura, I’m talking to you:

Of course, the comeback will be that he didn’t single out anyone. Does that make it acceptable?

Calling Schultz “Special Ed” was okay with them, too, as was Ingraham herself mocking Meghan McCain’s body type. I’d like an explanation for the double standard.

What Ed did was wrong, he admitted it, and even volunteered to take a week off. But we won’t see that coming from the right. And that is unacceptable.

AUDIO ADDED: MSNBC suspends Ed Schultz- ADDED- Video On Air Apology by Schultz

Ed, you shouldn’t have used the word “slut”. No matter who makes sexist insults, it’s wrong, even if it’s about someone with whom we disagree strongly. Schultz said the following:

President Obama is going to be visiting Joplin, Mo., on Sunday but you know what they’re talking about, like this right-wing slut, what’s her name? Laura Ingraham? Yeah, she’s a talk slut. You see, she was, back in the day, praising President Reagan when he was drinking a beer overseas. But now that Obama’s doing it, they’re working him over.

Suspended:

MSNBC management met with Ed Schultz this afternoon and accepted his offer to take one week of unpaid leave for the remarks he made yesterday on his radio program. Ed will address these remarks on his show tonight, and immediately following begin his leave. Remarks of this nature are unaaceptable and will not be tolerated.

H/t: @Webber933, @Montesquieu

UPDATE- Ingraham responded on Facebook:

Re. the crude comments made about me by Ed Schultz on his radio program: First, I was surprised to learn that Ed Schultz actually hosted a radio show.  Is it only available online?  Second, I have to get back to recording the audio edition of my new book “Of Thee I Zing.” Now I’m tempted to insert one additional zing–about men who preach civility but practice misogyny.

ADDED BY PADDY-

Politico: MSNBC suspends Scarborough for campaign donations

Well, well, well:

MSNBC said Friday that it is suspending “Morning Joe” co-host Joe Scarborough for two days after he acknowledged giving eight previously unknown $500 contributions to friends and family members running for state and local offices during his tenure at the network, a violation of parent NBC’s ban on political contributions by employees without specific permission from the network president.

“I recognize that I have a responsibility to honor the guidelines and conditions of my employment, and I regret that I failed to do so in this matter,” Scarborough said in a statement. “I apologize to MSNBC and to anyone who has been negatively affected by my actions,” said, adding that after he was made aware of some of the contributions, he called MSNBC president Phil Griffin “and agreed with Phil’s immediate demand of a two-day suspension without pay.” [...]

Scarborough’s suspension, during which he will not be paid, will end Wednesday, Griffin said in a statement, adding “As Joe recognizes, it is critical that we enforce our standards and policies.”

After that whole Keith Olbermann brouhaha, and so many questions about how he got suspended while Morning Joe donated without being penalized, the Twitterverse was up in arms.

Speaking on behalf of my fellow tweeters, it’s about time.

For more, and to whom he donated, go here.

“I don’t suspect Fox News will suspend any of its ‘news’ people anytime soon.”

Today’s L.A. Times letters to the editor, Part 1:

Punishing the host

Re “Suspension ignites debate,” Nov. 6

This shows the difference between NBC standards and Fox News standards.

What Keith Olbermann gave to Democratic candidates is pocket change compared to all the free publicity and cheerleading the Fox News entertainers gave to candidates supported by the ” tea party.” I don’t suspect Fox News will suspend any of its “news” people anytime soon.

That is especially appalling since Karl Rove, the “architect” of the failed George W. Bush presidency, is allowed to be the middle man in the scheme to funnel tens of millions of dollars from anonymous business interests to Republican candidates.

Something is out of whack here.