Archive for suspension

Oh great, now we all have to go to prison. Thanks, Alec.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

lockup viewer discretion advised

alec baldwin apologyVia MSNBC :

I would like to address the comments I made this past week.

I did not intend to hurt or offend anyone with my choice of words, but clearly I have – and for that I am deeply sorry. Words are important. I understand that, and will choose mine with great care going forward. What I said and did this week, as I was trying to protect my family, was offensive and unacceptable. Behavior like this undermines hard-fought rights that I vigorously support. I understand “Up Late” will be taken off the schedule for tonight and next week.

I want to apologize to my loyal fans and to my colleagues at msnbc – both for my actions and for distracting from their good work. Again, please accept my apology.

To be honest, I didn't think Alec Baldwin's show on MSNBC would last, and to be honest squared, this is about how long I figured it would stay on the air. I'm surprised he's only going to be off the schedule for two weeks.

ABC:

Alec Baldwin's new weekly MSNBC talk show was suspended for two episodes after the actor was videotaped using an anti-gay epithet against a photographer during a New York street encounter. [...]

... Baldwin reportedly lost his cool again Friday when a reporter for a New York TV channel asked about the [stalker] trial and, according to Variety.com, Baldwin called him "dumb."

Baldwin has had well-publicized issues like this before, so nobody is surprised. It's really a shame, because he's talented, hilarious, and bright. None of that excuses his behavior in the least, nor was it an attempt to. Just lamenting out loud.

Anyway, thanks a bunch, Alec. Because of you, we're right back to this:

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Ivy League Justice for Sexual Assault -- A Wrist Slap.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

The conjuring

A few weeks back, my buddy Joe wanted to see a scary movie called THE CONJURING. Popular as it was, he couldn't find anyone who wanted to see it, so as a good friend, I agreed to go. We arrived at this strange theater we'd never been to before just moments from screen time . It was dark, the previews had started and surprisingly the theater was packed as we entered.

We had no idea of the adventure we were in for -- and I don't mean the movie.

I never had gone through anything like this since going to "THE ROCKY HORROR PICTURE SHOW" at a midnight screening years ago on the Sunset Strip in LA. For that, the audience participated. They sang the songs, flicked on their lighters during certain spots and some of the audience got up and danced during a few of the numbers. It was interactive movie going.

But this was THE CONJURING. A far cry from cult classic film. Suddenly from all corners of the theater Joe and I heard the audience talking back to the movie. They were shouting out things like, "Don't go in there, Bitch!" "Run!" Get your ass out dere!" "Grab a knife, arm yourself, idiot!" "Nooo. Don't open that door, Fool!"

I'd never experienced this before. Unruly to say the least. Very distracting and not the way I wanted to watch a film. Strange neighborhood. Strange audience. Strange experience. But what I did find amusing is so many of these people had ideas of what others should do. They had preconceived notions of what they would do if the same things were happening to them, not to the characters in the film. It's so easy to judge when you're not in a situation.

Today I read an equally frightening story, but in HuffPo. This story really happened.

Welcome to Yale

YALE STUDENT SAYS MAN WHO ATTEMPTED SEXUAL ASSAULT PUNISHED WITH 1-DAY SUSPENSION

The New Haven, Conn. university investigated the December 2012 incident and suspended the perpetrator for a semester after finding him responsible for both "sexual harassment" and "sexual misconduct in the form of intimidation." But because the punishment was handed down the last week of classes before spring finals, and the university gave the student 72 hours to leave campus, his punishment amounted to a one-day suspension, said Winnie Wang, a rising junior who was the victim of the attack.

It seems to me this was nothing more than a slap on the wrist for such an awful crime. A hollow and weak punishment like this really does more harm than good. It sends a message that might very well deter other victims from coming forward. And who knows how their silence will propagate further attacks.

Stephanie Spangler, Yale's Title IX coordinator and deputy provost of student affairs, insisted the university is doing all it can to assist victims, noting the school uses "very broad definitions" of sexual misconduct to take as many complaints as possible.

On the surface that sounds fair. But I did say surface. What about in fact?

Spangler said if a victim is not satisfied with the punishment, they can appeal. Wang (the victim) said she did seek an appeal, but never got a response from the school.

Now here is where the opening of this post ties into the Yale incident. Shouting at the screen.  Directing their attention, not to the accused, but to his victim--

During a hearing with the university committee that focuses on sexual violence, Wang said she was repeatedly asked why she didn't run away from her would-be assailant, who she said is far bigger than her. She broke down several times, she said.

That's like the shouting out to the movie, "Don't go in there, Bitch!" The problem isn't why this woman Ms. Wang didn't run, it's why this perpetrator attacked (he's no longer the accused but found guilty) in the first place. And then you have to examine why Yale thinks so lightly of it's student's safety that they'd give him such a light punishment for such a heinous crime.

The guilty dude's punishment is over in a day. Ms. Wang will carry this nightmare on for years. If a sexual attack is worthy of a hearing and a guilty finding, why isn't the punishment total expulsion?

Could it be that Yale has never had a situation like this before? Is this the first and they just used poor judgement in meting out their punishment? Hardly.

Yale changed its process for handling sexual assault complaints following a 2011federal investigation into the school's response to sexual assaults and sexual harassment on campus. The inquiry ended with a voluntary resolution in 2012, and Yale was fined by the Education Department for improperly reporting sex crimes.

I'm an Ivy Leaguer. I know what it takes to make it into a select school. And character is part of it. When that's breached, a slap on the wrist isn't enough.

The hearing adjudication group from Boola-Boola (Yale Whiffenpoofs) were not sounding like justices -- they were sounding like the unruly audience I witnessed at THE CONJURING At least I had the opportunity to ask for my money back. Ms. Wang can't be given her life back.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Cartoons of the Day- A Rod Suspended

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Major League Baseball logo

Bruce Plante

Clay Bennett editorial cartoon


Clay Bennett

arod2

Jimmy Margulies

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

VIDEO-- 5-year-old girl: Ooo, let's shoot bubbles! PA elementary school: You're a terrorist. Suspended! No, I'm not kidding.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

hello kitty bubbles gitmo

 

In one Pennsylvania elementary school, 5-year-old girls in kindergarten who suggest it might be fun to blast bubbles at other 5-year-olds using a small, pink, plastic Hello Kitty bubble blower get suspended.

And that suspension makes it impossible to be accepted into other schools. Because, see, toy bubble-shooters are now evil threatening weapons and tots who want to not-harm other children with a not-harmful, painless, floaty stream of bubbles are now "terrorists."

Bubbles don't kill people, people kill people.

ABC:

A 5-year-old girl was suspended from school earlier this week after she made what the school called a "terrorist threat."

Her weapon of choice? A small, Hello Kitty automatic bubble blower.

Did I mention that the child didn't even have the bubbler with her at school?

Did I mention her weapon of choice was a doodad that blows bubbles?

deadly bubbles

Did I mention that the 5-year-old was ordered to undergo a psychological evaluation? 

Guess what the outcome of the evaluation was? You guessed right. The little girl was "deemed normal" and not a threat. Imagine that! She's as harmless as a little (Hello) Kitty.

But now she's got a "record" and has been turned down by another school because of her scary terrorist past. Before you know it, there will be drones tracking her and she'll be on a watch list.

Why, soon there could be a Baby Gitmo at every neighborhood mall (So convenient!) where moms 'n' dads can shop to their hearts' content after paying a visit to their Little Prisoner.

Hello Gitty?

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Texas court suspends judge who was taped beating his teenaged daughter

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

After having to shield my eyes and ears every time a clip was aired about this sadist, I am very pleased to report that the judge who beat his challenged daughter has been suspended:

(CNN) -- Judge William Adams, who made national headlines after the release of a 2004 video of him beating his then-teenage daughter, has been suspended by the Texas Supreme Court.

It's a start. He deserves much worse.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Ohio Gov. Kasich’s anti-voter law suspended

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Need some good news? Then I've got just the thing for you. Think Progress is reporting that a bill that made it harder to vote in Ohio, one that Republican Gov. John Kasich signed into law, one that made early voting and absentee/election day voters much more difficult, will be suspended.

Score one (even temporarily) for democracy:

Today, however, opponents of Kasich’s war on voting will submit over 300,000 signatures to the Secretary of State’s office — well over the 231,000 signatures necessary to suspend the law until it can be challenged in a referendum in November of 2012.

This means that the law that Kasich signed would not be effective during the 2012 presidential elections, and that must be driving the GOP crazy, considering it was intended to work against those (mostly early voters) who would likely vote for President Obama.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

2009 AUDIO: Rush Limbaugh wonders why "no slut surcharge" in health bill.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

As you know, Ed Schultz apologized profusely after calling Laura Ingraham a "right-wing slut". However, regret, remorse, humility, and the ability to articulate the words "I'm sorry" do not typically  emanate from conservative hosts when they rattle off similar aspersions. They freely, and loudly, express ::gasp!:: shock and outrage at a commie pinko socialist Marxist fascist liberal MSNBC host's poor choice of words, so why don't they do that when one of their own is guilty of the same thing?

But wait! There's more! We actually hold our side accountable for any number of offenses, right wingers do not. (Aside from TV and radio personalities, our instant disdain for -- and support for legal action against-- public officials like John Edwards comes to mind, as opposed to the GOP's embrace of their David Vitters.) Where are the demands for firing conservative on-air voices when they hurl slurs and insults?

Here's how Ingraham responded to Schultz on Facebook:

Re. the crude comments made about me by Ed Schultz on his radio program: First, I was surprised to learn that Ed Schultz actually hosted a radio show.  Is it only available online?  Second, I have to get back to recording the audio edition of my new book “Of Thee I Zing.” Now I’m tempted to insert one additional zing–about men who preach civility but practice misogyny.

Right wing hosts repeatedly compound their hypocrisy as they stomp their feet and howl about how certain words and attitudes are out of bounds, and that MSNBC had every justification to suspend Ed Schultz; but again, would they stomp those same feet and howl if one of their own squawking, offensive hosts were to be suspended for a week for, well, saying something like this? Laura, I'm talking to you:

Of course, the comeback will be that he didn't single out anyone. Does that make it acceptable?

Calling Schultz "Special Ed" was okay with them, too, as was Ingraham herself mocking Meghan McCain's body type. I'd like an explanation for the double standard.

What Ed did was wrong, he admitted it, and even volunteered to take a week off. But we won't see that coming from the right. And that is unacceptable.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare