Archive for Susan Collins

The hypocrisy of GOP outrage over the IRS targeting conservative groups

Via aaateeshirts.com

Before I write another word about this, it’s important to clarify to those who seem to consistently miss so many similar points, that this isn’t about my defending the IRS. I’m not. It’s about the hypocrisy of some on the right.
 
Take Joe Scarborough for example. He asked the IRS to target the NAACP ten years ago. Now he’s objecting, on Twitter, to the IRS targeting conservatives:

@JoeNBC:

 
scarborough tweet IRS hypocrisy
 

Then there was GOP Senator Susan Collins who was outraged, outraged, by the IRS targeting conservative groups:

Senator Susan Collins, a Maine Republican, yesterday called for a more aggressive response from the administration, calling on Obama to personally condemn the IRS action.

“This is truly outrageous and it contributes to the profound distrust that the American people have in government,” Collins said on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

She termed it “absolutely chilling that the IRS was singling out conservative groups for extra review. And I think that it’s very disappointing that the president hasn’t personally condemned this and spoken out.”

But ten years ago, she and Joe asked the IRS to target the NAACP. Here’s the article mentioning the letter from Sen. Collins and  former Rep. Scarborough to the IRS, asking them to target the NAACP titled, “IRS audit of NAACP was asked“:

Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.’s chief fundraiser asked the Internal Revenue Service to investigate the NAACP’s tax-exempt status shortly after the 2000 presidential campaign, questioning whether the civil rights organization had inappropriately sought to influence the election. [...]

The other lawmakers included: Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, Sen. Susan M. Collins of Maine, Sen. Strom Thurmond of South Carolina, Rep. Jo Ann Davis of Virginia, Rep. Larry Combest of Texas and Rep. Joe Scarborough of Florida, now an MSNBC personality. Like Ehrlich, all are Republicans.

Did I mention that the IRS audited Greenpeace at the request of an ExxonMobil-funded group?

As I type this, Rev. Al Sharpton is reporting on this very thing. Good.

VIDEO– Is Kerry’s Senate seat real target of GOP Benghazi suicide squad? And GOP, about those embassy cuts…

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Your Daily Dose of BuzzFlash at Truthout, via my pal Mark Karlin:

To put it quite simply, if Obama backs down from appointing Rice due to the Republican Benghazi brigade, conventional wisdom has it that he is likely to appoint John Kerry to become Secretary of State.  If that were to be the case, Kerry’s seat would become vacant.  [...]

Enter Republican Scott Brown [...]

As BuzzFlash at Truthout reader Emiliano de la Fuente e-mailed us today: “If the GOP is successful in squashing the idea of Susan Rice for Secretary of State and the President nominates John Kerry, it will immediately eliminate a Democratic senator and will give Scott Brown a chance to wiggle into position… Since he just ran in 2012, his name will be fresh in many voters’ minds.”

In modern campaigns, political brand names are significant and Brown is one of those guys who even Democratic pundits and politicians in DC like to call in their village way “a very likeable person.”   

It may be Massachusetts, and this theory may be a stretch, but remember that Brown was elected to the Senate once already – and remember that not too long ago Massachusetts elected Mitt Romney as governor.

And remember that the Republicans are indicating that they would be prone to give Kerry a relatively easy confirmation hearing in the Senate.  That’s a scenario that will test Obama’s mettle and how many chits he wants to call in for Rice at a time he is trying to proceed with budget negotiations.

Please read the whole post here.  And Mark has added this post: Colin Powell’s Fabricated UN Iraq War Speech Was Fine With “Bomb, Bomb” McCain and Graham

And just for good measure, this L.A. Times letter from the editor, because our voices matter:

Re “Senators unswayed by talks with Rice,” Nov. 28

Isn’t there just one donkey willing to call out the elephant in the room when Republicans insist on ranting on and on about Benghazi? Simply put: Which party was responsible for the hundreds of millions of dollars withheld for embassy security improvements over the last few years, adversely affecting the work and safety of our diplomats abroad?

Perhaps the questions about U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice’s statements after the Benghazi attack should be aimed at Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and his Republican colleagues in Congress who refused to properly fund embassy construction and security.

Dean James Loomos

Venice

Video- Susan Collins is first GOP senator to oppose Ryan budget proposal

I’m sure she’s not going to be the last either, especially since congress is on vacation, so there’ll be plenty of opportunities for constituents to “communicate”.

VIDEO: Senate votes to overturn DADT. Susan Collins thanks gay service members.

In a landmark for gay rights, the Senate on Saturday voted to let gays serve openly in the military, giving President Barack Obama the chance to fulfill a campaign promise and repeal the 17-year policy known as “don’t ask, don’t tell.”

DADT Watch: 500,000+ signatures and counting

Greg Sargent is reporting that Organizing for America has collected more than half a million signatures supporting DADT repeal, and they will deliver it to Susan Collins’s office tonight.

There will be no vote on DADT tonight. It should take place tomorrow.

Why it’s difficult to allow equal rights to anyone in our military (or anywhere else) is beyond me.  Gays, lesbians and straights have been serving together until now, but suddenly they shouldn’t, because they can ::gasp!:: talk about it, be who they are, not have to lie?  The logic escapes me.

“Senior Senate Democratic aides are in a panic this morning about the prospects for repeal of don’t ask don’t tell”

At least President Obama is doing his phone thing, but this is not good news:

Senior Senate Democratic aides are in a panic this morning about the prospects for repeal of don’t ask don’t tell, because talks with Senator Susan Collins over her procedural demands have hit a wall, with the Democratic leadership dismissing her requests as unreasonable and counterproductive, a senior Dem aide close to the talks tells me.

The talks are continuing as we speak, so all is not lost yet. Indeed, the logjam in the discussions comes as Dem leaders have stepped up their efforts to get moderate Republicans to agree to vote for cloture on repeal, with President Obama personally calling Senators on both sides, the aide says. [...]

… Collins has demanded that Reid allow what’s known as “unlimited debate” on the bill in order for her to vote for repeal, the aide close to the talks says. Reid has rejected this demand, the aide continues. The problem is that this could allow any Senator to hijack the proceedings by introducing a “non-germane amendment,” thus holding the floor.

Reid said he’ll bring the Defense Authorization Bill to a vote tonight.  We need a win… badly. Stay tuned.

Greg Sargent has more details here.

H/t: Jamie Kilstein

Dueling GOP DADT votes: Collins v. Brown

Susan Collins’ press release:

“Like our closest allies, the United States’ Armed Forces should welcome the service of any qualified individual who is willing and capable of serving our country.

“After hearing powerful testimony from Secretary of Defense Gates and Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mullen, and reviewing the results of the Pentagon report, I remain convinced that the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy,” implemented under President Clinton, should be repealed. And, I agree with Secretary Gates that the issue should be decided by Congress, not the courts.

“As a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, I voted, last May, to include in the Defense Authorization bill language repealing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, subject to certification by the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff that there would not be a negative impact on combat effectiveness and military readiness.  It is especially reassuring to learn from the Pentagon report that, after extensive interviews and feedback from service members, nearly 70 percent say that having a gay service member in their unit would have a “positive, mixed, or no effect” on the unit’s effectiveness.

Once the tax issue is resolved, I have made it clear that if the Majority Leader brings the Defense Authorization bill to the floor with sufficient time allowed for debate and amendments, I would vote to proceed to the bill.”

As Jamil Smith tweeted, nothing like prioritizing partisan caveats over equality.

Scott Brown’s press release:

I have been in the military for 31 years and counting, and have served as a subordinate and as an officer. As a legislator, I have spent a significant amount of time on military issues. During my time of service, I have visited our injured troops at Walter Reed and have attended funerals of our fallen heroes. When a soldier answers the call to serve, and risks life or limb, it has never mattered to me whether they are gay or straight. My only concern has been whether their service and sacrifice is with pride and honor.

I pledged to keep an open mind about the present policy on Don’t Ask Don’t Tell. Having reviewed the Pentagon report, having spoken to active and retired military service members, and having discussed the matter privately with Defense Secretary Gates and others, I accept the findings of the report and support repeal based on the Secretary’s recommendations that repeal will be implemented only when the battle effectiveness of the forces is assured and proper preparations have been completed.

Tax cuts, schmax cuts.

So, Susan, equal rights and a strong military come in second to bonuses for the wealthy and higher deficits.

Just wanted to make sure I got that right.