Archive for slurs

Nate Silver: After all votes are finally counted, Pres. Obama likely to extend his lead to 3%-plus

Nate Silver has been mocked, insulted, and slurred by very angry, very humiliated, very small-minded, nasty conservatives, because he was right. The GOP and the truth haven’t been getting along too well, and this was no exception. Republicans *coughKARLROVEcough* believed their own polls, they reside in their own bubble, and they’ve literally ignored facts and figures.

But none of that could change the truth, and none of that has fazed Nate the Great at FiveThirtyEight, who has even more to say. And that “more” includes President Obama likely extending his lead to a healthy three percent.

Here are a few excerpts from Nate’s latest post titled “Turnout Steady in Swing States and Down in Others, But Many Votes Remain Uncounted“:

Initial accounts of last Tuesday’s presidential election contemplated what seemed to be a significant decline in turnout from 2008. Those reports may have been premature, at least in part. [...]

Even without these votes, turnout in the battleground states over all was generally near its 2008 levels. In contrast, it is down by about 9 percent in the other 40 states, based on ballots counted so far. Some of the shortfall will be made up in the coming days. In California, where most balloting is conducted by mail and where it can take weeks to certify the vote, about 3.4 million fewer votes than in 2008 have been reported so far.

As the rest of the votes come in from California, Mr. Obama could add about 700,000 more votes in his margin against Mr. Romney, assuming that the remaining votes are divided between the candidates in about the same proportions as the ones counted so far.

Those votes could be enough to push Mr. Obama’s margin of victory in the national popular vote, reported at 2.7 percent as of Monday morning, to slightly higher than 3 percent.

And just to rub snark to the GOP wound, here’s a treat from my hilarious buddy Andy Cobb:

To the extent that his proclivities are of importance to you please substitute “dudes” for “chicks” in all dialogue: Mr. Silver is gay. But in the popular imagination he’s suddenly become a heterosexual superhero–wonky, pragmatic, and able to steer through uncertain times. Suddenly girls wanna do him/men wanna be him. Good for him.

“Drunk Nate Silver” became a Twitter thing recently, which makes perfect sense. People intuitively know prophecy is a gift…and a burden. In the face of such relentless clarity he might well crave some oblivion–if you or I had to deal with that kind of insight we’d probably go straight to the bottle and get messy as Rasmussen.

So if the web wants to superimpose Charles Bukowski on Nate Silver, let it. I would personally rather fantasize that he’s a booze-hungry skirt-chasing seer of visions than learn all that fucking math.

And cm’on, if you don’t buy his book you’re going to have a much harder time pretending you’ve read it:

http://www.amazon.com/The-Signal-Noise-Predictions-Fail-but/dp/159420411X/ref…

Don’t be the last person at the party to act like you understand Bayesian processes vis-a-vis free market economics, you’re going to look like a real a-hole.

Written/Directed by Andy Cobb
http://www.twitter.com/AndyCobb
Producer/DP: Mike Damanskis
Co-writer: Eric R. Pfeffinger

Video- GOP Convention: Chris Matthews hammers Reince Priebus on “Race Card”

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

God FORBID Mika, the supposed DEMOCRAT would have Chris’s back as opposed to acting like a vaguely disturbed Mom whose kid just said the F word. Bite me Mika, all of Chris’s points were valid and you should have backed him up.

? Of The Day- Who is George Tierney, Jr. of Greenville, South Carolina?

Dunno, but he likes to whine. Moral of this story? Don’t mess with smart intertubians. Main Via. Via. Via.

UPDATE 5/25= Tierney has apologized all around, Tbogg is satisfied, so I am as well. But this did happen-

VIDEO: Eric Cantor, who must have selective memory, calls Occupy Wall Street protesters a “mob”.

It’s fundraiser time. Please donate if you can. We hate asking, but we must, in order to keep TPC going. Without you, we wouldn’t be here, and for that we thank you.

Thank you to Think Progress for the video in which Eric Cantor, fresh off his chaise lounge and mint juleps, refers to the Occupy Wall Street protesters as a “mob” that pits “Americans against Americans.”

Of course the video below isn’t mobby at all, especially the part where Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo) was reportedly spat on by a fellow American, right Eric? Did he let that slip his underdeveloped mind when he endorsed the tea party?

A staffer for Rep. James Clyburn (D-S.C.) told reporters that Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) had been spat on by a protestor. Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.), a hero of the civil rights movement, was called a ‘ni–er.’ And Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) was called a “faggot,” as protestors shouted at him with deliberately lisp-y screams. Frank, approached in the halls after the president’s speech, shrugged off the incident.

But Clyburn was downright incredulous, saying he had not witnessed such treatment since he was leading civil rights protests in South Carolina in the 1960s.

And hey Mr. House Majority Leader, how about the “lynch mob mentality” referred to in this post, 2008: Sarah Palin blamed by the US Secret Service over death threats against Barack Obama?

Or how about this tea party moment?

Or this? Right-Wing Harassment Strategy Against Dems Detailed In Memo: ‘Yell,’ ‘Stand Up And Shout Out,’ ‘Rattle Him’

Or this? Anti-Muslim rally at Ground Zero gets ugly. Wake up, America

Those mob mentality and/or “Americans against Americans” episodes apparently went right by him.

Audio- Charles Koch Refers To Obama As ‘Saddam Hussein’ To Be Defeated In ‘Mother Of All Wars’

Really. And the R’s have their panties in a bunch over Hoffa’s voting the “son of bitches” out bit? Via Think Progress.

(Brad) Friedman reports that audio he obtained from the conference reveals that Charles Koch alarmingly referred to President Obama as “Saddam Hussein,” saying that the right had to fight the “mother of all wars.” He rallied his guests to donate millions of dollars to help defeat Obama and boost other right-wing causes.

Video- Michael Steele accuses WHO of playing the victim?

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

I just heard Michael Steele accuse Rev Al and Bob Schrum of “playing the victim” in their outrage over the crap Rick Perry has been spewing the past few days. Oh really?

Is this the same Michael Steele that has made very inconsistent claims over an incident where he had Oreo cookies thrown at him, an action that implies a slur?

The Michael Steele that wondered if the media was tough on his time as RNC chair by asking “Is it because Michael Steele is the chairman, or is it because a black man is chairman?”? (Ed note- Dear Michael, it’s because you were incompetent.)

That’s only a couple of the instances out there where he claims victim with varying realities, but I really think Mr Steele is protesting too loudly. Video when I get it. Video added, relevant part starts at 13:00.

2009 AUDIO: Rush Limbaugh wonders why “no slut surcharge” in health bill.

As you know, Ed Schultz apologized profusely after calling Laura Ingraham a “right-wing slut”. However, regret, remorse, humility, and the ability to articulate the words “I’m sorry” do not typically  emanate from conservative hosts when they rattle off similar aspersions. They freely, and loudly, express ::gasp!:: shock and outrage at a commie pinko socialist Marxist fascist liberal MSNBC host’s poor choice of words, so why don’t they do that when one of their own is guilty of the same thing?

But wait! There’s more! We actually hold our side accountable for any number of offenses, right wingers do not. (Aside from TV and radio personalities, our instant disdain for — and support for legal action against– public officials like John Edwards comes to mind, as opposed to the GOP’s embrace of their David Vitters.) Where are the demands for firing conservative on-air voices when they hurl slurs and insults?

Here’s how Ingraham responded to Schultz on Facebook:

Re. the crude comments made about me by Ed Schultz on his radio program: First, I was surprised to learn that Ed Schultz actually hosted a radio show.  Is it only available online?  Second, I have to get back to recording the audio edition of my new book “Of Thee I Zing.” Now I’m tempted to insert one additional zing–about men who preach civility but practice misogyny.

Right wing hosts repeatedly compound their hypocrisy as they stomp their feet and howl about how certain words and attitudes are out of bounds, and that MSNBC had every justification to suspend Ed Schultz; but again, would they stomp those same feet and howl if one of their own squawking, offensive hosts were to be suspended for a week for, well, saying something like this? Laura, I’m talking to you:

Of course, the comeback will be that he didn’t single out anyone. Does that make it acceptable?

Calling Schultz “Special Ed” was okay with them, too, as was Ingraham herself mocking Meghan McCain’s body type. I’d like an explanation for the double standard.

What Ed did was wrong, he admitted it, and even volunteered to take a week off. But we won’t see that coming from the right. And that is unacceptable.