Archive for single payer

“One day a single-payer system will provide better care at less cost and aggravation.”

sign single payer health care smaller

Today’s L.A. Times letter to the editor, because our voices matter:

Re “Another surgery — while knee-deep in the red tape,” Column, Jan. 6

Steve Lopez asks, “Can’t we switch to a healthcare system instead of a paper-shuffling, profit-driven, CEO-bonus-building system?” Great question.

There are dozens of for-profit health insurance companies astride the U.S. healthcare “system.” Besides profits for their owners, their premiums must pay for exorbitant executive salaries and benefits, lobbyists in Washington, political contributions, marketing programs, lawyers and lawsuits, redundant computer systems and staffs trained to deny claims. These parasitical organizations contribute nothing to actual healthcare.

One day a single-payer system will provide better care at less cost and aggravation. As Winston Churchill said, “Count on Americans to do the right thing — after they’ve tried everything else.”

Ed Carstens

Santa Clarita

If SCOTUS rules against “Obamacare,” California groups plan a single-payer push

So if the Supreme Court strikes down part, or all, of the Affordable Care Act, then what? Well, here in California, the Courage Campaign will be sending out an email blast about its single-payer plan, but only if ACA falls.

We came close to such a plan in the past, but we still have work to do in order to get single payer passed.

WaPo:

Advocates outside of California have similar plans…  [...]

The state legislature twice passed single-payer bills, in 2006 and 2008, subsequently vetoed by then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Now Democrats control the governor’s seat – and think they may have found the “perfect storm” to move a single-payer bill.

Here’s how the thinking goes: If the individual mandate falls, but the rest of the law stands, California still expects to receive a big pile of money to expand insurance coverage. The state has the highest number of uninsured people anywhere, meaning it will get one of the biggest funding boosts. [...]

If California got the necessary waivers from the Obama administration, it could pool those dollars with existing funds to lay a foundation for a single-payer health care system. It’s an approach relatively similar to the one that Vermont is now pursuing.

Please follow the link for more. No guarantees, but it’s a start.

Rep. Jim McDermott’s legislation may enable states to offer single payer healthcare

David Lazarus has a column in the L.A. Times that is very, very, VERY cautiously optimistic about universal coverage making its way to the state level, as long as the federal funding is there. That’s a BIG “as long as.”

Rep. Jim McDermott (D-Wash.) is drafting a bill that would make this happen, but you know how those Republicans can get all obstructiony and stuff, which tends to spoil all those legislatively smart options that would benefit so many Americans.

So, because a national Medicare-for-all plan would never make it through Congress, it’s up to the states to do their own thing, and McDermott’s long shot State-Based Universal Healthcare Act would offer the mechanism for each state to ask for federal funding once they establish their own health care programs:

McDermott’s bill … would allow federal funds for California’s 4.5 million Medicare beneficiaries and 8 million Medi-Cal recipients to be pooled with state tax money for universal coverage. [...]

People in a statewide Medicare-for-all program would no longer pay annual premiums, deductibles or co-payments for private health insurance. Instead, they would pay a percentage of their income into the system, just as wages are taxed for Social Security and Medicare. [...]

Gerald Friedman, an economist at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst, estimated in a recent paper that a national Medicare-for-all system would cost Americans about $570 billion less annually than the amount spent on private plans.

Moreover, gone would be the problem of private insurers charging higher rates or denying coverage to people with preexisting medical conditions. If you pay taxes in the state, you’d be eligible for coverage.

Also gone would be healthcare as an issue between workers and employers. Businesses would no longer be the primary conduit for health insurance, relieving companies of what has become an increasingly costly obligation.

Does this idea appeal to you? If so, you can email McDermott at his website and let him know. He could use the support and encouragement, which is why Lazarus provided the link.

You can read more here.

“If putting everyone on Medicare is socialized medicine, sign me up.”

Today’s L.A. Times letters to the editor, because our voices matter:

The high cost of healthcare

Re “Healthcare’s rising costs,” Editorial, Sept. 29

The Times succinctly states that “Americans can’t afford to wait long for relief” from rising healthcare costs.

I recently had my carotid arteries scanned. The contractor who performed the procedure said he no longer performs diagnostic procedures outside Orange County because the insurance companies are paying him half of what they used to. In the meantime, my premiums have increased 38% over the last three years, my office co-pays have risen and my deductible has climbed to $1,000. You don’t need an MBA to figure out who is receiving the difference.

What amazes me is how many average Americans who, like me, continue to be fleeced by private insurers, are adamantly opposed to a public option for healthcare delivery. Medicare‘s overhead is a far smaller share of costs than private insurers’. If putting everyone on Medicare is socialized medicine, sign me up.

Matt Giorgi

Brea

Healthcare costs are definitely a severe problem, and the more subtle results are disturbing.

In my case, I am a sole-proprietor small business and an Anthem Blue Cross customer. I have increased my deductible to $5,000 to help reduce my monthly payments. Consequently, in my family of four we rarely visit the doctor unless the problem is life or job threatening. In essence, I am paying for catastrophic care. I am sure mine is not the only insured family that suffers through an illness to save money in this economy.

I am in complete support of our state’s and federal government’s attempts to rein in these astronomical medical costs.

Bob Bruton

Torrance

Because U.S. doctors negotiate with insurers, we spend $27 billion a year more on healthcare than Canada

Via Down With Tyranny

Today’s Quickie:

Doctors are spending way too much time having to deal with Big Insurance working out billing and claims, the L.A. Times reports:

The time spent by doctors and their staffs on paperwork winds up costing each physician nearly $83,000 a year, about four times as much as doctors spend in Canada, according to U.S. and Canadian researchers who released their findings in the online journal Health Affairs. [...]

If U.S. doctors had slimmed-down administrative costs similar to those in Ontario, Canada’s most populous province,  they would trim more than $27 billion a year in healthcare spending, the researchers found.

And why would this be?

Canada runs a single-payer healthcare system in which the government pays the bills.

Bingo.

That was today’s Quickie. Was it good for you?

VIDEO: Help buy more air time for Medicare For All ad!

This video has been out there for awhile, so it’s time to give it a boost:

:

Help US buy more radio air time on more progressive stations! To contribute, simply log onto MadAsHellDoctors.Com/DONATE or mail your tax deductible donations to MEDICARE FOR ALL RADIO COMMERCIAL CAMPAIGN, P.O. Box 1824, Corvallis, OR 97339

Vermont House passes single-payer health care bill

Dear USA, watch and learn. One small step toward single payer, one giant step for mankind:

Every Vermonter could sign up for state-financed health insurance under a bill passed by the House on Thursday that would put the state on a path to a single-payer health care system by the middle of this decade.

It now goes to the Senate. It should pass, but there could be some changes to the bill.

One guess what the GOP reaction was:

[Rep. Thomas Burditt, R-West Rutland] quoted V.I. Lenin, leader of the Russian Revolution and founder of the Soviet Communist Party, as saying “medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism,” adding, “I believe those who are promoting ‘universal coverage’ via government-run and government-controlled medicine know this. What they hope is that the public won’t find out the truth. There is nothing compassionate about socialism.

Damn that Big Government for trying to keep Vermonters alive. Who do they think they are, making health care accessible to everyone? Shh, don’t tell  the public, but this is all an evil socialist plot!

Big Insurance, on the other hand, is generous, inclusive… and by that I mean that they’re self-serving profit-grubbers who give new meaning to the term “death panels”.

More details at Boston.com.