Archive for senate judiciary committee

VIDEO: Lindsey Graham called out by Milwaukee police chief during Senate hearing on assault weapons ban

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

lindsey graham gun hearing

Milwaukee police chief Edward Flynn wouldn’t let Lindsey Graham get away with pestering him repeatedly with NRA talking points at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing about Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s (D-CA) proposed assault weapons ban.

Lindsey Graham:

…We absolutely do nothing to enforce the laws on the books…

Flynn:

Just for the record, from my point of view, the point of a background check…

Graham:

How many cases have you made? How many cases have you made?

Flynn:

It doesn’t matter, it’s a paper thing. I want to stop 76,000 people from getting guns illegally. That’s what a background check does. If you think we’re going to do paperwork prosecutions, you’re wrong. 

Feinstein found it necessary to scold Graham who then briefly brown-nosed the chief. But he continued to badger Flynn, who had no problem interrupting L’il Linds with his own points.

Graham:

How many cases have you made for somebody violating the background checks?

Flynn:

We don’t make those cases. We have priorities. We make gun cases. We make 2,000 gun cases a year, senator, that’s our priority. We’re not in a paper chase. We’re trying to prevent the wrong people from buying guns. That’s why we do background checks. If you think I’m going to do a paper chase, then you think I’m going to misuse my resources.

We don’t chase paper. We chase armed criminals.”

Think Progress has more, including:

Graham said that limited resources for police departments is a reason to bolster gun ownership, arguing that citizens would have to take the law in their own hands and protect themselves. “What this police chief is facing, is what every police chief is facing, less money so you may have to defend yourself,” he explained.

Hmm, who does that remind you of? Ah, got it, this guy: Sheriff’s pro-gun radio ads to be paid by taxpayers. “This has nothing to do with public safety and everything to do with self-promotion.”

sheriff guns protect yourself

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

VIDEO- Parent of Newtown victim: “The liberty… to own a military-style assault weapon & high-capacity magazine… is second to the right of my son to his life.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

right to life my ass pro life

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

David Wheeler:

“The liberty of any person to own a military-style assault weapon and a high-capacity magazine and keep them in their home is second to the right of my son to his life.”

“Let’s honor the founding documents and get our priorities straight.”

If you missed this testimony “that the Senate Judiciary Committee should have heard” on last night’s The Last Word, please take a look now. It was heart-wrenching, intelligent assessment and plea that everyone should watch, hear, respect, and remember.

newtown gun victim ben wheeler

It came from David Wheeler, the father of one of the Newtown massacre victims, little Ben Wheeler, at a public hearing held by the Connecticut legislature’s Bipartisan Task Force on Violence and Public Safety. He was not at the Senate Judiciary hearing, something that Lawrence O’Donnell rightly noted. He should have been.

Ben would have been proud.

All these Second Amendment/gun zealots who claim to also support “the right to life” need to watch the video below.

Benjamin Wheeler, 6

Also on last night’s show, Lawrence O’Donnell eviscerated gun hugger Gayle Trotter.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

PhotOH! Gabby Giffords used these handwritten notes for her testimony in Senate gun violence hearings

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

gabby giffords senate hearings gun violence

Earlier today, Paddy posted Gabby Giffords statement at the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on preventing gun violence. If you watched that without tearing up, then watch it again, this time with a box of tissues nearby.

And if that fails to choke you up, check out her handwritten notes for her testimony. They were posted at the Facebook page for Gabby Giffords’ PAC, the Americans for Responsible Solutions:

 gabby giffords notes senate hearing gun violence

Those are the words of a real hero.

“Speaking is difficult but I need to say something.”

cry

“We must do something. It will be hard.” Understatement.

“Be courageous.” Gabby Giffords speaks from experience.

“Thank you!” No, thank you.

H/t: BuzzFeed

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Random observations of the increasingly frustrating Senate gun violence hearing

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

newtown children smaller gun

Some random observations as I watch the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on preventing gun violence:

Aren’t conservatives all about de-regulation? Isn’t that one of their favorite talking points? Regulation is a bad word, a very, very bad word, and federal oversight is akin to a Kenyan, Marxist, commie, fascist dictatorship. Self-regulation is the way to go, don’tcha know, because individual liberty and freedom are paramount, and common sense laws overseeing things like, say, gun sales, are taking away our freedom to kill, dammit!

So as I’m watching the Senate hearing, imagine my surprise when I heard Chuck Grassley say the following.

Via Talk Radio News Service:

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said during a Senate hearing on gun violence today that violent video games must be examined as part of a broad plan to curb gun violence.

The top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee declared that “there are too many video games that celebrate the mass killing of innocent people—games that despite attempts at industry self-regulation find their way into the hands of children.”

So self-regulation doesn’t work? Did I hear that correctly? Grassley wasn’t the only one: Senator Catches NRA Head In Epic Flip Flop.

Watching this hearing, listening to people like Wayne LaPierre, Gayle Trotter, who thinks “guns are the great equalizer for women,” and others who in their arguments ignore the instruments of death and blame everything else, was an exercise in frustration. For example, as Senator Al Franken noted, some seemed to “stigmatize mental illness.” They also stigmatize sensible gun safety measures.

These zealots actually blamed President Obama (we saw that coming) for gun violence because, they claimed, the Department of Justice has “done nothing” and the number of prosecutions of bad guys (criminals) with guns has dropped.

Gee, could that be because Congress has been determined to block the president’s nominees (ATF head, judges, U.S. Attorneys), a practice which has severely impeded our legal system?

And watching these same gun worshipers defend the personal use of high capacity magazines and weapons intended for military use is equally jaw-dropping. Protecting precious life has taken a back seat to ideology and profit, and for that, those whose priorities are upside down should be deeply ashamed.

One Republican, it might have been Grassley, also made the point that the horrific massacre of twenty children Newtown shouldn’t be used as an excuse to introduce new legislation. What he failed to acknowledge is that Newtown was the final straw, one in a string of mass murders. That willful misrepresentation of such an obvious catalyst is inexcusable. As Christopher Coons said, shootings like these occur year after year. Duh.

Mark Kelly, Gabby Giffords’ husband, noted how chaotic these death scenes are, yet gun “enthusiasts” insist that firearm carriers would magically keep their composure and turn into sharp shooting marksmen who would defend bystanders by killing bad guys on the spot. Apparently, they didn’t watch this video proof that carrying a gun won’t protect you in a crisis.

At one point one witness, Baltimore County Police Chief James Johnson, the chairman of the National Law Enforcement Partnership to Prevent Gun Violence, referred to LaPierre’s attitudes as “creepy.” I couldn’t agree more.

If you missed it, Gabby Giffords Statement At Senate Gun VIolence Hearing.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

VIDEO- Reagan’s Solicitor General: ‘I Am Quite Sure That The Health Care Mandate Is Constitutional’

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Ronald Reagan’s former Solicitor General:

“It is improper only if it bumps up against some specific prohibition in the Constitution; and the only prohibitions I can think of that this bumps up against: the Liberty Clauses of the 5th and 14th Amendments, and if that’s so, then not only is Obamacare unconstitutional, but then so is RomneyCare in Massachusetts…”

Say good-bye to 2012, Willard.

Now can we finally get on to some real issues, please, Republicans? Stop wasting everyone’s time.

Where are the jobs?

Via Think Progress:

In a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing today on “The Constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act,” President Ronald Reagan’s former Solicitor General — Harvard Law Professor Charles Fried — tore into the reasoning of Judge Roger Vinson’s decision striking down the Affordable Care Act, saying the issue should be a “no brainer”:

I am quite sure that the health care mandate is constitutional.

[...]

Fried does explain that he is “not a partisan” for the Affordable Care Act, and that he has some doubts about whether it is good policy. But Fried’s position on the law’s requirement that all people carry insurance reflects exactly how the Constitution is supposed to operate. Elected officials are supposed to make policy decisions, not judges who have to ignore entire constitutional provisions in order to impose their policy preferences on the law.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Why Joe Miller must lose to Scott McAdams

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

This will be short and … sour.

Via Roll Call:

Alaska Republican Joe Miller said in an interview Wednesday that he is interested in serving on the Senate Judiciary and Armed Services committees should he beat Sitka Mayor Scott McAdams (D) this November for the seat now held by Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R).

Think about that. Imagining him on the Judiciary Committee alone sends chills down my spine.

In the 19th century, the Committee’s focus included legislation related to criminal justice, the expansion of the judicial system to new territories and states, and judicial salaries. Today, the scope of the Judiciary Committee’s jurisdiction has broadened to include terrorism, human rights, immigration law, intellectual property rights, antitrust law, and Internet privacy. The Committee is also tasked with considering the President’s nominees for federal judgeships, including Supreme Court justices. One of the most important functions of the Committee is to provide oversight of the Department of Justice, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Worried yet?

As for that pesky Armed Services Committee:

Aeronautical and space activities peculiar to or primarily associated with the development of weapons systems or military operations; the common defense; the Department of Defense, the Department of the Army, the Department of the Navy, and the Department of the Air Force, generally; maintenance and operation of the Panama Canal, including administration, sanitation, and government of the Canal Zone; military research and development; national security aspects of nuclear energy; naval petroleum reserves, except those in Alaska; pay, promotion, retirement, and other benefits and privileges of members of the Armed Forces, including overseas education of civilian and military dependents; selective service system; and strategic and critical materials necessary for the common defense.

Comprehensive study and review of matters relating to the common defense policy of the United States.

Is there any doubt at all that getting out the vote will be mandatory in November? Well, it is anyway, but mandatory-er than usual.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Judiciary Committee Approves Elena Kagan’s Nomination

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

MSNBC just broke the news. Elena Kagan has been approved by the Judiciary Committee.

Next stop: Filibuster threats.

UPDATE, via an e-mail alert:

WASHINGTON (AP) Senate Judiciary Committee approves Elena Kagan as fourth female justice on the Supreme Court.

And one more:

The Senate Judiciary Committee voted today to send the nomination of Elena Kagan on to the full Senate, moving her closer to confirmation to the Supreme Court.
The final vote was 13-6, with Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) joining the panel’s 12 Democrats in voting to support the former Harvard Law School dean.
Kagan likely will attract additional Republican votes in the full Senate, which will take up the nomination before the August recess.
President Obama nominated Kagan, currently the U.S. solicitor general, on May 10 to replace the retiring John Paul Stevens.
More soon at http://latimes.com

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email