Archive for safety

What I will not write about today

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

frustrated21

Sometimes I get so frustrated and/or disheartened and/or annoyed by some of the news stories of the day that I can’t bring myself to write about them. Here are a few recent reports that made my blood pressure hit the roof. I am avoiding delving into them at length out of concern for my physical and mental health.

See what I mean? So who’s up for a couple of Margs or a trough of wine?

drunk drink more wine

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Video- Chris Wallace Latest Fox Host To Push Myth Bush “Kept The Country Safe” After 9/11

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Via.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

VIDEO: TX Gov. Rick Perry demands apology over cartoon depicting his disregard for worker safety

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

oops rick perry smaller

The Sacramento Bee is standing by a political cartoon about Rick Perry and the West, Texas fertilizer plant explosion, noting that it was commentary on “Perry’s disregard for worker safety, not an attempt to disrespect the victims.” That seems pretty obvious to anyone who harbors no guilt feelings about their position on deregulation.

Maybe Rick Perry should watch the episodes of “All In with Chris Hayes” in which he reveals that the last safety “inspection of the West fertilizer plant happened in– 1985” and exposes Dick Cheney’s son-in-law who de-regulated the chemical industry. Nobody can seriously suggest that Rick Perry would have insisted on more oversight. Au contraire.

In fact, Gov. Ricky says more inspections weren’t needed:

He said that he remains comfortable with the state’s level of oversight and suggested that most Texas residents agree with him.

Under the circumstances, it appears that Jack Ohman’s cartoon was political commentary based on obvious facts and the truth. And the truth hurts, right Ricky?

Here is an excerpt from Perry’s letter to the Sacramento Bee:

It was with extreme disgust and disappointment I viewed your recent cartoon. While I will always welcome healthy policy debate, I won’t stand for someone mocking the tragic deaths of my fellow Texans and our fellow Americans… The Bee owes the community of West, Texas an immediate apology for your detestable attempt at satire.

It would be more accurate and truthful to say that it is Rick Perry who owes SacBee and Ohman an apology.

Here is an excerpt from the response from the editorial page editor for the Bee:

What he finds offensive is a governor who would gamble with the lives of families by not pushing for the strongest safety regulations. Perry’s letter is an attempt to distract people from that message.

Here is the cartoon in question (which you can also see in the video), and here is Ohman’s blog about the matter.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

VIDEO– “All in with Chris Hayes”: Dick Cheney’s son-in-law de-regulated chemical industry

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Bush deregulator

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

cheney son in law epa chemical plants

Chris Hayes has been all over the West, Texas explosion and the egregious lack of oversight. The last safety “inspection of the West fertilizer plant happened in– 1985.”

Chris:

Two Bush administration officials, Christine Todd Whitman, who was head of the Environmental Protection Agency, and Tom Ridge, who was head of Homeland Security, came up with a plan to deal with the vulnerability. Whitman believed the EPA was already empowered to expand her agency’s oversight of chemical plants under a section of the Clean Air Act, and she and Ridge worked out a deal to do so.

That is until the son-in-law of former vice president dick Cheney walked into the room, a guy by the name of Phillip Perry, who was at the time the general counsel of the White House Office of Management and Budget.  And he made it clear the Bush administration was not going to support granting regulatory authority over chemical security to the EPA.

Basically, the Bush administration, from above, pulled support for that bill because the chemical industry did not want to be regulated by the EPA.

Fast forward a few years to 2007, and Phil Perry, again dick Cheney’s son-in-law, is now over at the Department of Homeland Security as the department’s general counsel.

And what he manages to do in an uncontroversial bill, an appropriations rider, is slip in industry friendly language into the bill that moves the task of regulating chemical plants from the Environmental Protection Agency to the Department of Homeland Security. But– DHS is given none of the tools it would need to actually do that.

So let’s recap. The Bush administration’s own cabinet secretaries come up with plan to regulate these chemical plants. It is stymied by Phil Perry once. The Bush administration sides with the chemical industry when it’s brought before the Congress and then basically in a back room maneuver, Perry does the chemical agency’s bidding by moving the oversight of this from the EPA, which the chemical industry hates, to DHS, which the chemical industry thinks they can more easily manipulate.

Now, go ahead to six years. The West Fertilizer Company is storing more than 1300 times the amount of ammonium nitrate that would normally trigger safety oversight by DHS.

It does appear now not only did DHS literally have no idea that the West Fertilizer Company was storing ammonium nitrate, but according to Congresswoman Betty Thompson, a democrat from Mississippi, DHS did not know the plant existed until it blew up.

Now, here’s what makes this incredible. In 2006, when a bill was introduced in the Senate to make chemical plants safer, a bill that was blocked by Republicans, the young Senator who introduced that bill was this man:

obama 2008 chemical plant regulation

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Fracking could lead to demand for more potentially explosive ammonia factories

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

what the frack sign Via The Tyee.ca

So much madness, so little time.

The last safety “inspection of the West fertilizer plant happened in– 1985.” Because, you know, fertilizer components aren’t flammable and dangerous and don’t require any regulation whatsoever. Nor are ingredients such as ammonium nitrate ever used in, say, domestic terrorist attacks like, oh I dunno, the Oklahoma City bombing.

Nor do they ever explode.

Nor do they pollute the air with noxious fumes when they never explode.

Nor do those explosions that never happen ever kill people.

So, of course, no forward-looking country with clear-thinking leaders would ever consider exposing its citizens to even more noxious ammonia factories. Nor would they encourage any powerful corporations to engage in any undertakings that would rely on chemicals that could easily pollute and ignite the way the plant in West, Texas did.

Grist:

The U.S. could soon be home to a lot more ammonia factories — not a comforting thought after a deadly explosion at an ammonia fertilizer plant in Texas on Wednesday evening. You can blame the fracking boom. [...]

Australian company Incitec Pivot this week announced [PDF] that it will be building a hulking new $850 million ammonia facility in Waggaman, La., just outside New Orleans. [...]

U.S.-based Mosaic announced in December that it may build a $700 million ammonia plant in St. James Parish, La. U.S.-based CHS Inc. said in September that it would construct a $1.2 billion ammonia plant in North Dakota. Also in September, Egypt’s largest company, Orascom Construction, said it would spend $1.4 billion to build a fertilizer plant in Iowa.

Well, erm, okay, but surely ammonia production has a good safety record overall, and the Texas disaster was just an anomaly. Right?

The history of ammonia production and storage is littered with spectacular accidents.

Oh, and there’s this:

The Dallas Morning News reports that the Texas fertilizer plant that exploded Wednesday night told the Environmental Protection Agency and local public safety officials that it presented “no risk of fire or explosion.”

They lied to the EPA and were not in compliance with EPA regulations (EPA regulations do not allow felony violations of 18 USC 1001). If the company was in compliance with EPA regulations, then the 540,000 lbs of the explosive ammonium nitrate, stored at the facility, would not have blown up.

The EPA said the company corrected the deficiencies and filed an updated plan in 2011. It said it now complies with EPA regulations.

Now think about all those impending new ammonia facilities. What could possibly go wrong?

All our posts on the environmental rapes perpetrated by frackers can be found here (scroll).

forward off cliff

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

VIDEO: The last safety “inspection of the West fertilizer plant happened in– 1985.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

chart deaths terrorists v workplace v firearms guns

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Chris Hayes:

Records from the Federal Occupational Safety Administration shows the last agency’s inspection of the West Fertilizer plant happened in– 1985. For a few violations OSHA considered serious, the company was fined, wait for it. $30.

If twenty-eight years seems like a very long time between OSHA inspections for an inherently risky workplace, keep this in mind: According to the New York Times, while the number of inspectors has grown under the Obama administration, OSHA still just has 2400 responsible for overseeing roughly 8 million work sites. Roughly one inspector per 60,000 workers, a ratio that hasn’t changed since 1970

We talked last night about fatalities from terrorism and gun deaths. There’s a category we didn’t mention, which is workplace fatalities. From 2000-2010  3,033 Americans died from terror attacks. During that same time. 335,000 Americans died from the hands of a gun while there were over 60,000 workplace deaths.

Then Rachel Maddow covered it this way:

fertilizer explosion texas

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

How DARE Los Angeles pass laws to “force” more earthquake safety measures?! Saving lives? Pushy, pushy, pushy!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

oyToday’s Los Angeles Times had this headline: San Francisco OKs quake retrofitting for at-risk buildings. It caught my eye because we’ve done a lot of retrofitting here in the Los Angeles area, plus on a personal level, my family and I are huge San Francisco fans and travel there often. We’re even thinking of moving there one day, and it would be reassuring to know it will be made safer.

And after having lived through countless L.A. quakes, I can attest that that kind of added security is more than welcome.

According to the article, property owners would be required to reinforce wood-frame soft-story buildings with parking garages or storefronts on the ground floor built before 1978.

Sounds reasonable. It’s always a good thing to make every effort to be prepared, improve the structural integrity of buildings that people work and live in, and, you know, keep people alive.

Added benefit: More employment.

So as I’m reading this encouraging news, this caught my eye. Before you read the next part, grab some Pepto and a Valium:

Some landlords in Los Angeles remain firmly opposed to the type of retrofitting now required in San Francisco. Dan Faller, president and chief executive of the Los Angeles-based Apartment Owners Assn. of California, said he does not believe the government should force property owners to make upgrades.

They’re telling businesses how to run their business — after the city has already given approval to the building the way it is and after the owner has purchased the building the way it is. If they want to make a requirement like that, make the city pay for it,” Faller said. “Don’t pass a law that forces me to spend $100,000 on my building.”

Damn that Big Government doing what it’s supposed to do!

Why, if I didn’t know better, I’d think that Los Angeles is… concerned! About safety! And lifesaving measures! And planning ahead! And even saving some of the money and effort that would be required to clean up after a disaster! In an earthquake-prone area!

Photo credit: Rolando Otero / Los Angeles Times

Photo credit: Rolando Otero / Los Angeles Times

Jan. 17, 1994: The collapse of the second and third stories onto the first story at Northridge Meadows apartments in the Northridge quake killed 16 people and crushed cars.

What could they be thinking?

face palm oy triple fail gop

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email