Archive for regulation

SCOTUS To Hear GOP Plea To Allow Chemical Poisoning

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Coal Ash Spillcoal ash spill's destructive aftermath

By now we've all heard of the coal ash contaminants that have been wreaking havoc in North Carolina. If all goes as it appears, even GOP Governor McCrory might be going to jail when the dust settles. Carcinogenic-contaminated dust.

Over in nearby West Virginia, we've all heard about the multiple chemical spills by Freedom Industries, polluting the water in that state.

And these are just two of the more recent cases. There have been other chemical waste issues all across the country. And these aren't really accidents in the normal scheme of things. It's not like someone forgot to shut the door. It's worse than that. It's not the absence of adequate regulations. It's intentional.

Why?

Because the state governments have been under GOP anti-regulation delusion. They think that regulating chemical waste and storage is interference and that it affects the businesses' bottom lines. Forget what it does to the workers and the innocents who live in those areas. Just so long as it doesn't interfere with the cost of doing business, the GOP is all for it. Damn the people -- full profits ahead.

Turning their back on the safety of their state-wide constituents, the Republicans are setting course for harming or potentially killing all of us. They want to do away with safety regulations and restrictions over clean air and gas house emissions. Can't you just hear those Neanderthal Republicans? "Regulations... Baaad!!!"

HUFFPO:

WASHINGTON (AP) — Industry groups and Republican-led states are heading an attack at the Supreme Court against the Obama administration's sole means of trying to limit power-plant and factory emissions of gases blamed for global warming.

The court is hearing arguments Monday about a small but important piece of the Environmental Protection Agency's plans to cut the emissions — a requirement that companies expanding industrial facilities or building new ones that would increase overall pollution must also evaluate ways to reduce the carbon they release.

The importance of this case is astronomical -- almost literally. The Republican Party is determined to poison us with deregulation. If they can't stop people from voting, or better yet, voting against them, they seem to be taking another attack,-- just plain kill us. What they overlook in their ignorance is that they're killing themselves at the very same time. See what having no customers does to your bottom line.

air pollution

The air belongs to all of us equally -- and if you're going to pollute my air, you better be prepared for the consequences. As global warming and the greenhouse gases' various other effects are felt, we can't sit by and wait until it too late. Hopefully the SCOTUS will rule that way as well.

The Government has used eminent domain to confiscate property and condemn areas -- for the greater good.  The most common uses of property taken by eminent domain are for government buildings and other facilities, public utilities, highways, and railroads; however, it may also be taken for reasons of public safety. Isn't that what we're talking about here?

Maybe we should start looking at those companies who don't comply with the EPA regulations, which pollute and condemn our health and safety with the same "for the better good" doctrine. Confiscate them and sell them off at public auction, not to be reopened until they meet safety standards.

Monday's case, for which the court has expanded argument time to 90 minutes from the usual 60, stems from the high court's 2007 ruling in Massachusetts v. EPA, which said the agency has the authority under the Clean Air Act to limit emissions of greenhouse gases from vehicles.

Two years later, with Obama in office, the EPA concluded that the release of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases endangered human health and welfare. The administration used that finding to extend its regulatory reach beyond automobiles and develop national standards for large stationary sources.

Hopefully the mentally- and scientifically-corrupted and deficient Republican position will be defeated once and for all by the Supreme Court. It's wishful thinking that the GOP won't continue to attempt to retry and re-litigate this for years to come. But maybe they'll succumb to the dangers they have wrought upon all of us before any more innocents become afflicted or victims of global warming and chemical spills.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Guns In School -- Sparks, Nevada Added To The Tragedy List

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

breaking news

Early reports from the tragic shooting in a Sparks, Nevada middle school.

A 13-year-old witness told the Reno Gazette-Journal that he saw a boy in a Sparks Middle School uniform shoot a teacher.

The witness, Kyle Nucum, (see video below) said that he heard a "pop" when he was outside of the school, and that a teacher came to investigate. When they approached the shooter, the boy shot the teacher.

Two people are dead and two boys are in critical condition after a shooter opened fire at Sparks Middle School in northern Nevada this morning, according to police.

More to follow.

Are we still waiting to consider gun regulations?

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

3/4 of Senate GOP want to bar any new legislation that would help workers, regulate workplace conditions

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

stfu omg

Our own David Garber previously posted "Tom Coburn Isn’t An Idiot, He Just Plays One In The Senate":

Senator Tom Coburn, the firebrand senator from Oklahoma has his priorities on backwards. He believes in punishing the worker bee to get to the queen — in this case the Affordable Care Act. Silly man. Stupid Man. Dangerously idiotic man.

Here’s what Tom Terrific is doing. He doesn’t like the Affordable Care Act. So he’s going to be placing a hold on an administration executive nomination, in this case Katherine Archuleta, nominated to head the Office of Personnel Management....

It’s about pettiness. It’s about poor sportsmanship. It’s about “If I can’t pitch, I’m taking my baseball home and then nobody can play.” It’s attitude. Childish at that.

David's post was just the tip of the proverbial iceberg. Check out what Coburn and Rand Paul are up to now, but first take a swig of anything alcoholic and/or pop a Tums. Think Progress:

More than three-quarters of the Senate Republican caucus signed onto legislation introduced Wednesday by Sens. Tom Coburn (R-OK) and Rand Paul (R-KY) that could render it virtually impossible for Congress to enact any legislation intended to improve working conditions or otherwise regulate the workplace. Had their bill been in effect during the Twentieth Century, for example, there would likely be no nationwide minimum wage, no national ban on workplace discrimination, no national labor law and no overtime in most industries. [...]

Coburn and Paul’s bill appears to be an attempt to restore the constitutional regime that prohibited child labor regulation and other such nationwide regulation of the American workplace. [...]

What is somewhat surprising, however, is the sheer breadth of support for Coburn and Paul’s discredited view of the Constitution within the Senate Republican Caucus. According to Coburn’s press release, their bill is cosponsored by “Senators Ayotte (R-NH), Barrasso (R-WY), Blunt (R-MO), Boozman (R-AR), Burr (R-NC), Chambliss (R-GA), Coats (R-IN), Corker (R-TN), Cornyn (R-TX), Crapo (R-ID), Cruz (R-TX), Enzi (R-WY), Fischer (R-NE), Flake (R-AZ), Graham (R-SC), Grassley (R-IA), Hatch (R-UT), Heller (R-NV), Inhofe (R-OK), Isakson (R-GA), Johnson (R-WI), Lee (R-UT), McCain (R-AZ), McConnell (R-KY), Moran (R-KS), Risch (R-ID), Roberts (R-KS), Rubio (R-FL), Scott (R-SC), Sessions (R-AL), Thune (R-SD), Toomey (R-PA), Vitter (R-LA), and Wicker (R-MS).”

See how deeply these right wing extremists care about small businesses? Growing businesses? Employees? Jobs? Job safety? Equal rights? Equal pay? Health and welfare? Democracy? You? They say they do, they campaign like they do, but all they really care about is profit and power on the backs of ordinary working Americans.

We simply don't matter. At all. They convince people to donate to them and then vote them into office. Then once they're elected, this is how they want to treat you and your families... which leads me to get down on my knees and plead to you to register, to vote, and to help others do the same, in a huge way.

These self-serving, duplicitous skunks don't want to just "rebrand" their party (or as I like to call it, "destroy"), they want to rebrand the U.S. Constitution. They will have failed at both. "Dangerously idiotic" indeed.

But what do they care, as long as they appeal to their base. What a perfect word to describe anyone who would support them: base.

opposite world

backwards

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

The Heart of Darkness: The River of America's Violence Runs Through Newtown

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

in guns we trust Via chubbychicocharms.com smaller

Your Daily Dose of BuzzFlash, via my pal Mark Karlin:

In front of me on my desk is a March 9, 1992, copy of Newsweek. The cover photograph shows a student who had been shot being rushed to emergency care underneath the headline, "Kids and Guns: A Report From America's Classroom Killing Grounds." [...]

That was more than 20 years ago, but nothing really has changed... In those 20 years, more United States citizens have been killed with guns to the point that the death toll on 9/11 looks like a footnote in the annals of murder.

There was an assault weapons ban for 10 years, but the NRA made sure that it was phased out during the Bush administration. [...]

As a nation, we have historically always been in search of killing the "enemy": Native-Americans, Mexicans, Blacks, "geeks" in Vietnam, drone killings of civilians in Afghanistan and elsewhere. It's an endless list.  It's a list of the "other," a list of anyone an angry male has a grievance against.  In the last few years, more than a few Tea Party members have advocated armed revolt and killing of "liberals."  [...]

We glorify the violence of "how the West was won." We cheer for lone gun men in movies who mow down mobs of bad guys. Our teens wallow in the murder and mayhem of video games.

Most of all we see the rabid hatred that leads to violence in the faces and bilious statements of the gun guys who fear the government, who fear a non-white majority, who fear just about anything that psychologically threatens their male prerogatives and sense of manhood.

And then we hear from the hunters, but there's virtually no one whom I have known who wants to take away hunting rifles.  [...]

Nations create their own destinies. The United States expanded to the West via a right to violence based on a sense of entitlement.

We need to accept that, as a nation, we need to end our destructive love affair with the power to decide who shall live and who shall die.

Please read the entire post here.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Cliff Notes- Happiness is not a warm gun

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

My dear friend and mentor, Cliff Schecter, has a weekly column; hence, because Cliff has given me permission to share his work with you, I’ll give you the latest edition of what I call Cliff Notes.

He skewers better than a chef at Smokey Joe’s BBQ. He has comedic insights that rival those of our mutual friend, the hilarious Lizz Winstead. He’s sharper than the point on Sarah Palin’s pin head.

Here are a few excerpts from his latest, with permission. Please read the whole thing, because he has way more than I’ve included here:

Columbus, OH - It happened again recently. We don't know all the details, but what we do know is this. A young man named TJ Lane walked into high school - here in my home state of Ohio - approached a table full of kids and started shooting.

By the time the smoke cleared, three kids were dead. [...]

His parents, both charged with domestic abuse and other violent behaviour in the past, seemingly helped nurture a disturbed and dangerous kid.

But it's also been reported that the killer's grandfather - from whom Lane accessed the gun used - had so many weapons lying around that he couldn't figure out a gun was missing until afterwards. Read that sentence again.

Teaching a child that violence solves everything and giving him access to an arsenal. That should make his family criminally liable [...]

Because, make no mistake, it's a love affair with guns by an obsessive and loud minority and the resulting lax regulation, which are key reasons these things just don't happen on a regular basis in any other Western country. [...]

I have a question I'd like to proffer to the arms-dealer lobby, also known as The National Rifle Association (NRA). Not their members, who strongly support common-sense gun control measures, unless you want to disbelieve numerous polls (part of a Bilderberg conspiracy of yet-unknown proportions), including one by died-in-the-wool Republican Frank Luntz. But their leadership, who Lawrence O'Donnell Jr rightly called"the merchants of death".

At what point does this senseless violence (not to mention man-on-gun love) become simply unacceptable? [...]

When do we look at the recent Today Show gun sting and say it's probably a bad idea to allow anyone - and by that I mean, you, me or the Unabomber - to buy weaponry that can pierce armour or take down a helicopter without a background check? [...]

Regarding our politicians and the need for first-world gun regulations like background checks - an issue on which I have worked the past few years - I give you a recent study by scholar Paul Waldman. Waldman's work took apart long-held myths, like that the NRA's money and endorsement impacts elections (the NRA endorses all-but-certain winners and spreads its money too thin for any measurable impact in a given race) and that they were responsible for the national Republican victories in 1994 and 2000 (hint: they weren't). [...]

There will be more victims like those in Chardon. But a combination of activism by survivors, reports like Waldman's and demographics will not be kind to the gun industry in the coming years.  [...]

Happiness is not a warm gun.

Cliff Schecter is the President of Libertas, LLC, a progressive public relations firm, and the author of the 2008 bestseller The Real McCain.

Follow him on Twitter: @Cliffschecter

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Stop the presses! The GOP is pro-choice (when it comes to light bulbs)!

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

To anyone who thought that Republicans are not pro-choice, boy are your faces gonna be red. After all the endless political battles, we discover that the GOP is VERY open to the right to choose. Don't we all feel silly now?

Via The L.A. Times:

A spending bill needed to prevent a federal government shutdown would block enforcement of new energy-efficiency rules for light bulbs, letting old-style incandescent bulbs stay around a bit longer.

The provision was a high priority of congressional Republicans who have portrayed the rules as a symbol of regulatory excess.

“This is an early Christmas present for all Americans,'' said Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas). "It restores the freedom, at least temporarily, for you to choose the light bulbs you want to illuminate your home.''

What? No way!  Thank GOD they're giving us our freedom back, because big bad ol' America, Democrat Style, was out to get our 3-ways!

Yes, the liberal fascists and their evil plan to force everyone to phase out old incandescents over three years was about to destroy this very nation, our very democracy, our very LIVES, and then along came the Republicans to save the day and stop the worst piece of green legislation EVER in the history of EVER!  Damn you, Dems, damn you for supporting such an idea:

Energy legislation signed by President George W. Bush in 2007 called for phasing out the old incandescents over three years, starting with 100-watt bulbs Jan. 1, in favor of more efficient lighting.

Oops.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

"The 'free market' harmed the average American (remember us?)."

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Today's L.A. Times letters to the editor, because our voices matter:

Pondering the need for the EPA

Re " 'Too dirty to fail'?," Opinion, Oct. 21

Lisa Jackson is quite correct. When will our current politicians realize that the Environmental Protection Agency was created because a previous generation of "job creators" so poisoned America's air and water that no amount of corporate or lobbyist money could prevent Congress from passing laws to stop the abuse?

We need the EPA. Not to mention the SEC, the FAA, the USDA, the FDA and all the other federal agencies that were created when the "free market" harmed the average American (remember us?).

John Nachreiner
Redondo Beach

***

Eliminating the EPA, as the Republicans seem wont to do, will send us back to the days when the Cuyahoga River caught fire, air stung the eyes and groundwater caused cancer and birth defects. And all this in the name of jobs.

Hey, there was no EPA in the 1930s. How was unemployment back then? Can we also go back to the 1950s, when everybody had work and the top marginal income tax rate was more than 90%? President Eisenhower was a Republican.

Wait, wasn't the EPA created by a Republican? Now they don't like anybody's ideas, including their own.

Derek Lovett
Torrance

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare