


Mike Hoyt, executive editor of the Columbia Journalism Review, has an op-ed in the L.A. Times that discusses the power of newspapers and questions how they have used and will use that power.
Honest, responsible investigative journalism is imperative to a healthy democracy, and newspapers often provide the most thorough, most effective reporting that has and can change our lives. See: Watergate.
However, that power is all too often abused. See: Murdoch, Rupert.
While good journalists inform us of misuse and abuse of power, bad ones often practice it. With any luck, the News Corp. scandal will encourage the former and rid us of the latter.
In a strange way, Murdoch has done newspapers — those beleaguered products of the past — a large favor. He has reminded us all of their singular power. Even in their weakened form compared with a few years ago, newspapers are simply better than any other part of our vast and rapidly changing media system at the job of digging and finding things out. [...]
All newspapers have power, if they report in any depth at all. Even small weeklies in small communities can have great power within their communities. They should use it.
But for what? One lesson of the great scandal unfolding in Britain is that newspapers can choose to use their power for bread and circuses, like the News of the World, and to accumulate more and more power. That works, at least until it doesn’t. Or they can use their power for public service — to explain, to encourage and shape honest debate, and best of all, to expose the abuse of power of any kind, even of other news outlets. In the end, the public will appreciate that, and perhaps repay the kindness with loyalty.
Please read the whole thing here.
Well then Chris Christie must be the most powerful man in the U.S.
AMSTERDAM, Netherlands, May 20 (UPI) — People with power don’t have to respect the basic rules of social behavior the way most other people do, Dutch researchers said.
Study leader Gerben Van Kleef of the University of Amsterdam said the powerful have fewer rules to follow, and live in environments of money, knowledge and support, while people without power live with threats of punishment and firm limits. For many people, acting rudely reveals power.
In the study, test subjects saw two videos showing a man at a sidewalk cafe — one in which he put his feet on another chair, dropped cigarette ashes and ordered a meal brusquely, and one in which he behaved politely. Those who saw the rude behavior were more likely than those who saw politeness to say he was likely to “get to make decisions” and able to “get people to listen to what he says.”
In another study, Van Kleef and colleagues had people come to the university and interact with a rule follower (polite and acted normally) and a rule breaker (arrived late, threw down his bag on a table and put up his feet.) After the interaction, people said the rule breaker had more power and was more likely to “get others to do what he wants.”
Taegan has two posts up that seem to complement each other. The first is a Maine poll that tells us how “liberal” Olympia Snowe is, and because of that, voters want to dump her:
A new Public Policy Polling survey in Maine finds just 33% of Republican primary voters say they would support Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME) for re-election next year while 58% prefer a generic “more conservative candidate.”
Key findings: 58% of primary voters think she’s too liberal to 37% who think she’s ideologically where she should be.
And by “liberal” they mean more reasonable.
Then next item lets us in on how the old guard GOP are phasing themselves out, and impatient, inexperienced members are replacing them:
Aaron Blake: “Already, there are 16 brand new senators and more than two-fifths of the Senate has served less than one term. Given the retirements we’ve seen so far, as much as half of the next Senate could be members in their first term or having just won their second term. And for a Senate so staid in tradition, it could be an interesting time. Younger members generally have less patience than their more seasoned colleagues and have already been pushing for the slow-acting chamber to pick up the pace. And the new setup will put many of these new members in heretofore unthinkable positions of power.“
And by “unthinkable” they mean tea baggy.
We need more progressives in unthinkable positions of power. Stat.
Commenters: We have guidelines for comments. Please read them here. Thanks!
The Political Carnival T-Shirt

Modeled by @suzannegypsy
Suzanne Kulperger
Please donate to The Political Carnival
using the Paypal 'Donate' button below.
Have you watched
a Blunt today?
Would you like to donate to The Political Carnival monthly? You can on our Support TPC page.
Lt. Col Barry Wingard is the lawyer for Gitmo detainee Fayiz Al-Kandari. For their ongoing story + related topics, please click on the link below:
Kuwaiti Citizen Detained at Guantanamo since 2002
Translate The Political Carnival via Google
The Political Carnival is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com.
Photographs on The Political Carnival site (please read):
Photographs from other sources sometimes appear on TPC for humorous or illustrative purposes. As it is not our intention to use these images in any inappropriate manner or to infringe upon any rights held by others, anyone holding legal rights in the use of these images who wishes to have them taken down please contact us immediately requesting such removal, with which we will comply promptly.