Archive for police officers

VIDEO: Hey GOP Rep. Peter King, if Boston police officers are heroes, then stop cutting public sector jobs!

my hero smaller

The entire segment can be found here.

Rep. Peter King (R-NY):

The Boston police department is an outstanding police department, the FBI, homeland security, ATF, they're all working on this, the president is leading it, No, this is not a time for Democrat or Republican politics. I think the president is putting in place, putting in motion the counter-terrorism and anti-terrorism units we have in our country that have been developed over the last 11 1/2 years and they're going to do an outstanding job. I have no doubt of that whatsoever.

1. "Democrat" is not an adjective. "Democratic" is.

2. If the Boston Police Department did such a great job, then why does the GOP want to keep cutting budgets that would provide for more "outstanding police departments"? Oh, that's right. They're "union thugs." And King is a hypocrite.

3. ATF? ATF? They're "working on this"? Anyone seen the director?

tweet kristof atf block

4. Wait. Did he actually admit that President Obama *gasp!* leads?

5. This is no time for politics, says King. Oh really? Then what's up with this? Rep. Peter King (R-NY) implied what now? “Pressure cooker bombs described in Al Qaeda magazine.” Nothing prejudiced or premature about that at all. Appealing to your base, are you? Some-body is looking for more do-na-tions! Have dark skin or a "funny" name? You're guilty. Next!

Oh, and if you really don't want to play politics, rehire all those police officers you and your party fired.

Christian right punishes Tennessee university nondiscrimination policy by trying to abolish university police

sign gay get over it

The Christian right really, really doesn’t like gay people. They would rather endanger the entire population of Tennessee’s Vanderbilt University by preventing its police force from making arrests than allow gays to have the same rights as everyone else.

While simultaneously claiming their FREEDOMS were being infringed upon. You can stop laughing now. Or crying. Or pulling your hair out.

So clearly, the only solution was to punish the school by proposing a bill abolishing the only real protection they have at a time when campus gun violence is rising.

Safety and security isn’t the priority. Discrimination is.

See how conservatives are helping Republicans to reinvent themselves? It’s the new and improved GOP! They’re the reachy-outiest ever!

Via The Nashville Scene:

Evangelicals led by the Tennessee Family Action Council’s David Fowler say Vanderbilt’s policy is an affront to our freedoms because it would force conservative Christian clubs to accept gay people as members if any should ever wish to join for reasons not easy to imagine. That’s right, Vanderbilt’s nondiscrimination policy actually discriminates against conservative Christians. So the state should sanction Vanderbilt by essentially abolishing its police force. We’re not making this up.

At a press conference, Vanderbilt Police Chief August Washington couldn’t seem to stop saying the word “unbelievable.”

Unbelievable.

freedom my ass 2

VIDEO: Lindsey Graham called out by Milwaukee police chief during Senate hearing on assault weapons ban

lindsey graham gun hearing

Milwaukee police chief Edward Flynn wouldn’t let Lindsey Graham get away with pestering him repeatedly with NRA talking points at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing about Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s (D-CA) proposed assault weapons ban.

Lindsey Graham:

…We absolutely do nothing to enforce the laws on the books…

Flynn:

Just for the record, from my point of view, the point of a background check…

Graham:

How many cases have you made? How many cases have you made?

Flynn:

It doesn’t matter, it’s a paper thing. I want to stop 76,000 people from getting guns illegally. That’s what a background check does. If you think we’re going to do paperwork prosecutions, you’re wrong. 

Feinstein found it necessary to scold Graham who then briefly brown-nosed the chief. But he continued to badger Flynn, who had no problem interrupting L’il Linds with his own points.

Graham:

How many cases have you made for somebody violating the background checks?

Flynn:

We don’t make those cases. We have priorities. We make gun cases. We make 2,000 gun cases a year, senator, that’s our priority. We’re not in a paper chase. We’re trying to prevent the wrong people from buying guns. That’s why we do background checks. If you think I’m going to do a paper chase, then you think I’m going to misuse my resources.

We don’t chase paper. We chase armed criminals.”

Think Progress has more, including:

Graham said that limited resources for police departments is a reason to bolster gun ownership, arguing that citizens would have to take the law in their own hands and protect themselves. “What this police chief is facing, is what every police chief is facing, less money so you may have to defend yourself,” he explained.

Hmm, who does that remind you of? Ah, got it, this guy: Sheriff’s pro-gun radio ads to be paid by taxpayers. “This has nothing to do with public safety and everything to do with self-promotion.”

sheriff guns protect yourself

VIDEO: “We have never cut government jobs when we were trying to save the economy. Until this time.”

see ya smaller

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Rachel Maddow poignantly addresses who exactly the people are who Republicans insist on firing, on laying off, on eliminating sources of steady work, on denying employment, income, and therefore health care and education opportunities. Those people for whom many on the right show such obvious disdain are public sector workers who have (or had) jobs as real as any private sector workers have (or had).

Yet the GOP has reveled in slashing “government workers” as if they are something less than, as if their jobs aren’t really jobs at all, as if there is something inherently inferior about what they do to get by.

And by get by I mean feel secure, and by feel secure I mean also offer the rest of us a degree of security by way of the services they provide to this country.

But busting unions and privatizing America is the goal of those on the right. Their priority? Profits over people. Power. Livelihoods and economic “certainty” be damned. Oh, and of course, denying President Obama any victories ever at the risk of assuring him a legacy of *gasp!* success (too late).

An appreciation by Rachel Maddow:

We have never cut government jobs when we were trying to save the economy. Until this time.”

“Good luck, officer, see you around!”

We lionize and celebrate the people who teach us our multiplication tables and fix our streets and keep us safe at night and rescue us from fires. We lionize and celebrate them justly as we should, and then in record numbers, we can them, [!] hurting them and hurting us as a country. Not every public sector worker’s gonna win the Medal of Valor like those eighteen heroes did at the White House today.

“But there is reason to appreciate them, both in the heroic individual specific, and in the aggregate, for what they do for us every day.

public sector job losschart graph public sector jobs bush chart graph public sector job loss Obamachart public sector job loss presidents

Privatizing cops: Because of budget cuts, “even police protection is more accessible to those with cash.”

privatization

Economic experts, and the president of the United States, have been emphasizing stimulus spending, not austerity, to get us out of the Big Recession mess BushCo created. But Republicans have insisted on cut after cut after cut.

All those Big Bad Government Jobs that the GOP keeps wailing about? Those include police officers, the very men and women who, you know, protect us from the “bad guys with guns.” So cities and towns all over America are slashing their police forces because of deep budget cuts, the ones that have proved disastrous time after time.

The result isn’t pretty, but it’s what Republicans strive for: Privatization. It’s creeping up on us and that’s just what those on the right want: They salivate over crushing unions (a major source of funding for Democrats) and before we realize what’s been happening, they’re transforming the valuable public services we treasure and so badly need and depend on into profit-making machines that cater only to those who can afford them.

Welcome to GOP CorporateWorld.

Via the L.A. Times:

As police focus more on responding to crime rather than preventing it, private detectives and security firms are often taking on the roles that police once did, investigating robberies, checking out alibis, looking into threats.

Swell. Because of those pesky budget cuts, people are now turning to detectives, security firms and the *gasp!* Internet for protection, investigative talent, and more.

Of course, not everyone can afford private police help.

ding ding dingGet the picture?

It’s another facet of how income inequality is playing out in America — as cities are forced to cut their budgets, even police protection is more accessible to those with cash.

ding!

Samuel Walker, emeritus professor of criminal justice at the University of Nebraska at Omaha and the author of 13 books on policing:

Inequality has always been present: Millionaires hire bodyguards, rich neighborhoods pay for private security patrols. But this budget crisis makes the difference even more pronounced

ding clang

Remember the uproar over Blackwater aka Xe aka Academi, the private military company and security consulting firm? Wiki:

[It is] currently the largest of the U.S. State Department‘s three private security contractors. Academi provided diplomatic security services in Iraq to the United States federal government on a contractual basis.[1]

That uproar was for a reason. This is not to say that private security firms will become havens for Blackwater-type thugs, that isn’t my point. Privatization is my point.

Remember the uproar by Republicans over any kind of federal oversight ever in the history of ever?

Me too.

Can you afford $150 an hour? I can’t. If trends like this continue, we the people, we the little guys, are screwed.

This cannot end well.

Dorner’s “rampage must be stopped, but so too should the rampant gun violence threatening the rest of us.”

do not shoot  dorner tee

Today’s L.A. Times letters to the editor, because our voices matter:

Re “‘A tragic misinterpretation,’” Feb. 9

I sympathize with the extreme stress officers in the Los Angeles Police Department are under right now with one of their former colleagues allegedly on a murderous rampage. But I do not see how this assault on two innocent women in a truck that doesn’t really fit the description of the wanted vehicle can be explained away.

Police are supposed to protect us from harm, and stress is part of the job. The barrage of bullets fired at a car containing two women, not a large man, is ample evidence that the police were seriously out of control. If this incident hadn’t taken place at 5 a.m., there would probably have been more victims.

I sincerely hope that Christopher Jordan Dorner is found quickly and that there are no more injuries or deaths. We need to be able to trust our police, and this kind of incident doesn’t foster trust.

Denise Frey

Santa Barbara

***

“Trigger happy” was my immediate response. But on further consideration, my thought is that perhaps it is the LAPD that should be subjected to gun control.

Chief Charlie Beck’s description of the officers’ “incredible stress” as easily leading to a “not difficult to imagine” mistake in almost assassinating two newspaper delivery women is in fact totally unimaginable to this member of the civilian population.

Richard Geist

Rancho Mirage

***

I’m sorry, but this was not a tragic misinterpretation. It was a lack of planning, leadership, training, observation and, above all, a total absence of respect for constitutional rights and due process.

Unfortunately, that tends to be an expectation for our police in this day and age.

Jon Phillips

Torrance

***

Re “$1 million is offered to find Dorner,” Feb. 11

Of course Dorner needs to be caught, but when L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa wants to end this “reign of terror” and the city offers a $1 million reward for information leading to Dorner’s capture, a huge double standard is revealed.

What about the reign of terror taking place in parts of the city where gangs have power and innocent lives are frequently lost? It is deeply saddening that only when one of their own is threatened do we see this level of mobilization by the police.

Of course this rampage must be stopped, but so too should the rampant gun violence threatening the rest of us. We’re all in this together.

Jeffrey Wade

San Diego

DC cop allegedly threatened to shoot Michelle Obama

.(AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

Um, yikes. Apparently the First Lady was in no “legitimate danger” whatever that means. And what exactly would “illegitimate danger” be? And why isn’t it legitimate danger if someone who is supposed to protect citizens instead of offering specifics on how he’d assassinate the president’s wife?

Via WaPo:

A D.C. police officer who worked as a motorcycle escort for White House officials and other dignitaries was moved to administrative duty Wednesday after he allegedly was overheard making threatening comments toward Michelle Obama, according to several police officials.

The police department’s Internal Affairs Division is investigating the alleged comments and notified the U.S. Secret Service Wednesday, said the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to give details of the investigation. [...]

During that conversation, the officials said, the officer allegedly said he would shoot the First Lady and then used his phone to retrieve a picture of the firearm he said he would use.

Anyone recall threats like these occurring with this much frequency when GW Bush was in office? Me neither.

And now, because we have to:

We need to raise funds so we don’t have to worry about expenses for the next three months, both for site upkeep and our own mounting bills.

We so appreciate the generosity of those who are able to help out. We also totally understand if you can’t. And our fundraising goal is way, way less than nearly every site we know of, because we know our readers are not wealthy.

To those who are able to help out, please remember, without your donations, we have no Political Carnival.