Archive for Pakistan

From Dep’t. of Under-reported, Under-Appreciated Very Important Items: Pres. Obama will renew his push for nuclear treaty

obama nuke security

Um, this is kind of important. It’s also very under-reported and under-appreciated. In fact, other than Rachel Maddow, I can’t remember a single person at any cable news outlet that pays much attention to President Obama’s relentless efforts to rid the world of nuclear weapons.

Remember this? Anyone? Bueller?

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

President Obama, 2009:

As a nuclear power as the only nuclear power to have used a nuclear weapon, the United States has a moral responsibility to act. We cannot succeed in this endeavor alone, but we can lead it. We can start it. So today I state clearly and with conviction America’s commitment to seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons. [applause] I’m not naive. This goal will not be reached quickly. Perhaps not in my lifetime. It will take patience and persistence. But now we, too, must ignore the voices who tell us that the world cannot change. We have to insist, yes we can.”

Now the president is renewing that push for a nuclear treaty at the United Nations. Per The Hill, progress on a treaty has been stalled due to Pakistan’s opposition:

Administration officials and arms control activists believe they now have a new window for action. They point to increased cooperation on the UN Security Council and the beginning of John Kerry’s tenure as secretary of State as reasons for optimism. [...]

[Daryl Kimball, the executive director of the Arms Control Association] said progress on Fissile Material Cut-Off Treaty (FMCT) would depend on cooperation from Pakistan, which harbors fears of archrival India having more access to fissile material. The five permanent members of the UN Security Council might hold side talks with India and Pakistan in April to try and move the treaty forward, he said. [...]

Kerry is seen as a potential facilitator in those talks because of his long-standing relationship with Pakistan. [...]

Kimball said that if Pakistan won’t agree to let the treaty talks proceed, another option would be for other nuclear powers to jointly declare that they will collectively observe a moratorium on fissile material production. The United States, Russia, France and Great Britain have already acknowledged they’ve stopped producing fissile material, and China is believed to have ended it as well.

Maybe it’s finally time to get this news around, whaddya think?

Cartoons of the Day- Malala Yousafzai

Via.

Videos- Rock Center: Inside the Situation Room- Getting Bin Laden

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

This is the first three, there are five all together, you can see the other two here. I didn’t want to bog down the site completely.

VIDEO: Did Michele Bachmann leak classified information or was she just, you know, being Michele?

H/t: Mediaite for the video.

Gawker has an interesting question that could use a good answer:

Did you hear Michele Bachmann at Tuesday’s Republican debate saying that terrorists have made six different attempts on Pakistan’s 15 nuclear sites? That’s not information that’s ever been made public! Which raises the question: did Bachmann just leak classified information to a national audience?

Uh, yikes? Or was she just providing another “a woman told me Gardasil causes retardation” moment? In which case, she was lying, so it’s a lose-lose for her. For us.

This elected representative is actually on the House Intelligence Committee. Oxymoron much?

As for whether she committed the ultimate no-no, I report, you deride.

Yochi J. Dreazen at The National Journal:

[N]o U.S. official has publicly said that all of the sites were vulnerable to militant attack or confirmed that any of them had previously come under any form of jihadist attack.

But Jeffrey Goldberg at The Atlantic disagrees:

I have to cordially disagree with Yochi’s conclusions here. The joint Atlantic/National Journal cover story on Pakistan’s nuclear program, written by Yochi’s colleague Marc Ambinder and by yours truly, contains the information that Yochi suggests is material declassified on stage by Bachmann.

Either way, the controversy itself drives home the point that Michele Bachmann is a walking gaffe factory who has no business holding office and who hasn’t a prayer (no pun) of becoming president.

US official: al-Qaida’s No. 2 leader, confidant of Osama bin Laden, killed in Pakistan

So who killed him, and how?

AP:

Next update:

Of course, if President Obama had anything to do with this, it’s important to remember, he’s no GW Bush.

By the by, how many number twos and number threes are there? Or do they just keep killing the same guy over and over again?

Either way, good riddance.

WaPo has the same headline here.

UPDATE, via AZCentral:

The Libyan national who was the network’s former operational leader rose to al-Qaida’s No. 2 spot after the U.S. killed al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden during a raid on his Pakistan compound in May. [...]

The official would not say how al-Rahman was killed. But his death came on the same day that a CIA drone strike was reported in Waziristan.

U.S. Suspends Millions in Pakistani Military Aid

I’m hoping they now know where the Pakistani nuke stockpile is and are keeping an eagle eye on them ’cause that was one of the stated reasons for not doing this.

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is suspending and, in some cases, canceling hundreds of millions of dollars of aid to the Pakistani military, in a move to chasten Pakistan for expelling American military trainers and to press its army to fight militants more effectively.

Coupled with a statement from the top American military officer last week linking Pakistan’s military spy agency to the recent murder of a Pakistani journalist, the halting or withdrawal of military equipment and other aid to Pakistan illustrates the depth of the debate inside the Obama administration over how to change the behavior of one of its key counterterrorism partners.

Altogether, about $800 million in military aid and equipment, or over one-third of the more than $2 billion in annual American security assistance to Pakistan, could be affected, three senior United States officials said.

(snip)

American officials say they would probably resume equipment deliveries and aid if relations improve and Pakistan pursues terrorists more aggressively. The cutoffs do not affect any immediate deliveries of military sales to Pakistan, like F-16 fighter jets, or nonmilitary aid, the officials said.

Cartoon of the Day- Pakistan



Via.