Archive for opportunist

VIDEO: Charlie Crist tries to convince us he’s a real Democrat. Compare to tweets, video of the “old” Crist.

The other day I posted this: Charlie Crist to join the Democratic Party. On three… 1… 2… Meh! I was greeted with some rather unkind remarks on Twitter for that opinion. “He’ll fall in line! We should be welcoming him in!” they bellowed. (Well, as much as anyone can “bellow” on Twitter.)

But I did welcome him in, just not enthusiastically. Why? Because I don’t trust him; he comes off as just a tad opportunistic. I repeat:

He has a mixed record on gay issues. He supported school vouchers and a constitutional amendment for school prayer, was rated A- by the NRA, “indicating a pro-gun rights voting record.” Here is his past history on more issues. He’s fine on some things, but he’s such a flip-flopper… that his political gymnastics simply leave me cold.

If he ran for Florida governor, would he be an improvement over Rick Scott? Just about anybody would be. So welcome to the party, Charlie, but all I can muster up at this point is a rather muted “meh.”

Just now Crist was on “Hardball” where Chris Matthews was grilling him on what kind of Democrat he’d really be. Here’s what he said about his transformation:

“The party’s changed.” So when asked if he has changed, he answered by saying it was all the GOP leadership’s fault (because of their positions on deportation, voter suppression). He said that the turning point for him was 2 or 3 years ago when he became an independent. “It became uncomfortable” for him to stay in the Republican party.

Indeed, because he couldn’t win a Senate primary against Marco Rubio.

He went on to say he’s a “live & let live kind of guy… compassionate, kind.  Do unto others, reach out, we’re all in this together.”

And he claims he’s absolutely “fine with” unions and no longer supports school vouchers. “I’m a public school kid,” says he… now.

On immigration, he told Chris Matthews that he’s in favor of a pathway to citizenship because his grandfather was an immigrant. Matthews asked him, what about the tough stuff like enforcement? His answer: “I don’t know. I’ll be guided by my heart, my upbringing, common sense.”

Matthews, listening to these responses and sounding a little incredulous, said, “That’s quite a switch.”

Crist ended the segment by sharing that he’s “more comfortable with the Democratic party than he was in the Republican party or being an Independent.”

And after that aired, BuzzFeed’s Andrew Kaczynski linked to the following:

Link

Link

So IMHO, Charlie Crist will have to do more to convince me he’s a “real Dem” than to say he’s a “live & let live kind of guy guided by his heart.” The last time someone tried to convince everyone he was a moderate, he won one debate and then lost a presidential election.

The video was just posted. Here you go:

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Charlie Crist to join the Democratic Party. On three… 1… 2… Meh!

Link

Now watch Democrats drool and slobber all over him. Sorry fellow Dems, but I won’t be one of them:

(CNN) – Former Florida Gov. Charlie Crist, who served his state as a Republican then sought office as an independent, tweeted Friday night that he switched his party affiliation to Democrat. [...]

I’ve had friends for years tell me, ‘You know Charlie, you’re a Democrat and you know it,‘” Crist told the Tampa Bay Times newspaper.

The question is, what kind of Democrat? Color me skeptical.

He has a mixed record on gay issues. He supported school vouchers and a constitutional amendment for school prayer, was rated A- by the NRA, “indicating a pro-gun rights voting record.” Here is his past history on more issues. He’s fine on some things, but he’s such a flip-flopper, such an opportunist, that his political gymnastics simply leave me cold.

If he ran for Florida governor, would he be an improvement over Rick Scott? Just about anybody would be.

So welcome to the party, Charlie, but all I can muster up at this point is a rather muted “meh.” At best.

VIDEO– Christie hearts Obama: Bromance or opportunism?

Here are a couple of short videos that show a new (temporary?) friendship appearing to blossom:

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

It was nice to see Chris Christie gush over President Obama. It’s nice to see they’re BFF during these very stressful, very painful, very difficult days. Putting politics on pause is healthy, coming together is necessary and beautiful and can only make the healing process easier.

But everyone around me is asking the same questions I am. What’s in it for you, Gov. Christie? Here’s what he said about a week ago:

The president “doesn’t know how to lead!” He’s just some dufus “community organizer… looking for a clue.”

Here’s what he said yesterday:

“I’ve got a job to do here in New Jersey that’s much bigger than presidential politics… If you think right now I give a damn about presidential politics, then you don’t know me.”

See? He doesn’t care one little bit about presidential politics. He doesn’t give a damn, says he. He certainly would never tour New Jersey’s storm damage, at least not with Mitt Romney. He’s got a job to do!

And yet he toured with the president. And yet he’s all over the president, the man he’ll have to rely on to help rebuild his state. And suddenly he doesn’t seem to have the highest opinion of his own candidate, the man he’s officially supporting.

Call me cynical, but IMHO, he’s reaching across the aisle all the way to his re-election bid, or even farther, to a presidential run in 2016.

Or maybe he really is putting politics aside in order to help the people of his state. I hope that’s it.

Why must we continue “providing Paul Ryan space to proclaim his “moral courage” in his never-ending attack on Medicare?”

Today’s L.A. Times letters to the editor, because our voices matter:

In defense of Medicare

Re “GOP is back with a revised Medicare overhaul,” March 17

Let’s remember that Republicans were against Medicare when it was established in 1965, and they’ve been opposed to it ever since.

Let’s also remember that the payroll tax we pay 45 years later is 1.45% despite the fact that for years medical costs have risen much more.

Couple that with the shifting demographic of retiring baby boomers and the fact that Medicare paid for the healthcare of a generation of Americans who paid relatively little into the system, and is there any doubt as to why the system is in trouble?

Slashing benefits or ending the system as we know it aren’t the only alternatives — we pay ever-increasing premiums to insurance companies so they can deny us coverage on the flimsiest of excuses — so why not “man up” and increase the tax for Medicare to more realistically cover its costs? It is by far the most efficient portion of our healthcare “system.” Let’s keep it that way.

Hardy Hayes
Camarillo

***

The Times correctly points out that typical voters “overwhelmingly support keeping Medicare as is” and “favor … taxing wealthy Americans … to bring the budget into balance.” It is also true that the Medicare program is not in deficit.

So, when there is so much else within the federal budget to redline (perhaps immoral, senseless wars, for example) why is it we must continue providing Rep.Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) space to proclaim his “moral courage” in his never-ending attack on Medicare? Sadly, Ryan missed the history that compelled the creation of Medicare: healthcare costs were sending the elderly to the poorhouse and, consequently, into the arms of the state for their support.

Geoffrey N. Lachner
Mission Viejo

***

Ryan is quoted as saying: “And I really think the politics, if we help push it, will turn to rewarding the people who are bold in taking on the problems, and penalizing the people who don’t.”

Nowhere is the GOP’s doctrine of selfishness more evident than in this statement.

By Ryan’s own admission, he’s revealing that the true motivation for his double-down gamble on destroying Medicare is simply to create an opportunity to further his political career.

Matthew Singerman
Newbury Park

VIDEO: Professor Gingrich was “often absent” and “spent little time teaching history.”

This is a must-watch video.

Taegan has a link to the Wall Street Journal story about Newton Leroy Gingrich’s stint at University of West Georgia, way back when he supposedly taught history:

“In addition to seeking the college presidency, Mr. Gingrich was often absent as he pursued political goals. He embarked on an effort to moonlight as a paid consultant. And, it turns out, he spent little time teaching history.”

He’s never had another professorship, and he hardly spent any time actually, you know, teaching. “He was always too big for his britches…. He’s all over the place… disorganized…”

Some historian. Some professor. Some candidate.

PLEASE CONSIDER DONATING so we can keep posting:

 

If everyone who stopped by just dropped some spare change in the pretty yellow PayPal bucket, we could wrap this thing up today and devote the extra time to outing the lies the RWNJ’s are raining on our heads.

You can donate at any time by using the PayPal donate buttons in the sidebar or above, or if you need a snail mail addy, feel free to email thepoliticalcarnival@gmail.com.

In addition, if anyone wants to sponsor us for three months with an ad in the sidebar, please email Paddy. Since it’s an election year, any ad will be getting increased views.

Please, though, never forget that we truly appreciate you guys with or without the donations. Every single day.

Heritage Foundation’s Haiti Cover-Up

By GottaLaff

(via)

My pal Allen McDuffee has a post up about “Rush’s own party that’s looking for opportunities in Haiti.” And then scrubbing the word “oppotunities” from the Heritage Foundation’s website. Not appalled enough yet?

Here’s a sample:

The post, written by one of its fellows, Jim Roberts, showed one of the more calloused reactions from within the Beltway.

Here was the original introduction which has since been removed:

In addition to providing immediate humanitarian assistance, the U.S. response to the tragic earthquake in Haiti earthquake offers opportunities to re-shape Haiti’s long-dysfunctional government and economy as well as to improve the public image of the United States in the region.

Forget relief. Opportunities are to be had, according to Roberts.

There’s your tease. Here’s the whole story.