Archive for ooo gayness is bad – Page 2

Top UK cardinal accused of “inappropriate” and “intimate” behavior with priests. #FamilyValues

Via adammclane.com

Via adammclane.com

You’ve heard of Rock the Vote, you’ve heard of rock the boat, but have you heard of rock the church?

WaPo:

LONDON— On the same day as his last public blessing Sunday, Pope Benedict XVI confronted the threat of a fresh scandal within the church hierarchy, with Vatican officials informing him of new allegations that Britain’s most senior Roman Catholic cleric had engaged in inappropriate behavior with priests.

In Britain, the accusations against Cardinal Keith O’Brienhead of the church in Scotland and one of this nation’s most strident opponents of gay rights—were already escalating into a national controversy. The controversy revolved around a report first published Saturday night on the Web site of Britain’s Observer newspaper, saying that four men – three current and one former priest — had denounced O’Brien earlier this month for engaging in “inappropriate” and “intimate” behavior. Through a spokesman, O’Brien denied the charges and was said he was seeking legal counsel. [...]

[O]ne of the alleged victims claimed O’Brien had instigated a “relationship” with him in the 1980s that resulted in the need for long-term counseling. Another of the men said O’Brien had initiated “inappropriate contact” during nightly prayers, according to the paper.

O’Bigot O’Brien has referred to marriage equality as a “grotesque subversion of a universally accepted human right” and has let it be known that he thinks gays are immoral.

But “inappropriate, intimate” behavior with men of the cloth works for him. During prayer time. Got it.

family values my asshypocrite definition smaller

And don’t get me started on Roger Mahony.

UPDATE: O’Brien resigned.

VIDEO: Alaska Republicans think the idea of civil unions for gay couples is funny, burst out laughing

separate but equal gay marriage civil unions

The Republican-led House Majority Caucus in Alaska thinks civil rights are a real knee-slapper, especially for those icky gay people who have– ew!– sex and stuff. Because that’s what this is all about: gay sex. Not lasting relationships, not commitment, certainly not equal rights, but– ew!– sex.

Towleroad has the appalling video:

Alaska’s Republican-led House Majority Caucus really gave had themselves a good laugh on Friday, when Mark Miller from the Juneau Empire asked if their upcoming initiatives include civil unions or domestic partnerships to same-sex couples.

Miller:

I’m looking at a recent Public Policy Polling survey of Alaska that found that only 30 percent of respondents believe there should be no legal recognition of gay couples’ relationships in Alaska. I was just curious, would the caucus support the idea of having domestic partnerships or civil unions open to same-sex couples?

(giggles, laughter)

House Leader Lance Pruitt:

“…We focused on the things that really allow people to have a great lifeWe didn’t have a discussion here about what happens inside your home. We had a discussion here about whether you can make money, whether there’s a great economy, and whether or not you’re going to have the opportunity to live in Alaska with a great future. Now, your discussion on that, we didn’t talk about that. I’ll be straight, we didn’t talk about that particular issue… It wasn’t something that came up in our discussion.

Ohhh, I see, they want to “allow people to have a great life”… unless they’re gay.

In case you didn’t catch the eleventy times Pruitt mentioned it, civil unions JUST DIDN’T COME UP.

And as he suggested (subliminally), he’ll “be straight,” see, because, in case you may have thought otherwise, HE’S NOT GAY.

Are Republicans trying to become obsolete, or are they truly so dense that they cannot recognize what’s happening to their own party? The GOP can’t stop losing, and a big, thick, juicy, new, improved Civil War is infecting the Republican Party.

Maryland trolley company halts wedding rides after marriage equality law

gay trolley

It’s nearly 2013, yet some people can’t seem to stop living in the past. And by past I mean 2012. Same-sex marriage is about to become legal in Maryland, but discrimination trumps equality and apparently, income. Specifically, the owner of Discover Annapolis Tours has decided to forgo $50,000 a year because his “Christian convictions” somehow make him believe that icky gay people getting hitched will somehow affect straight couples. Or something.

He’d rather shut down a source of income and avoid legal hot water (and legal gay married people) than allow any loving couple– gay or straight– to ride on his Straight Love and Lifelong Monogamous Commitment Only wedding trolley cars. Waving good-bye to revenue works better for him than allowing married gays and lesbians to enjoy a wedded bliss jaunt on his anti-gay rights, anti-civil rights wedding vehicle.

 

Via the L.A. Times:

 

ANNAPOLIS, Md. — A company whose old-fashioned trolleys are iconic in the city’s wedding scene has abandoned the nuptial industry rather than serve same-sex couples. [...]

While most wedding businesses across the country have embraced the chance to serve same-sex couples, a small minority has struggled to balance religious beliefs against business interests.

Frank Schubert, the political strategist who ran campaigns against same-sex marriage in Maryland and three other states, said, “The law doesn’t protect people of faith. It simply doesn’t.”

Protect them from what exactly? Gay cooties? Same-sex couples’ magic ability to abruptly turn opposite sex partners gay?

Discover Annapolis Tours owner Matt Grubbs:

“The law exempts my minister from doing same-sex weddings, and the Knights of Columbus don’t have to rent out their hall for a gay wedding reception, but somehow my religious convictions don’t count for anything.

Don’t be silly. Your religious convictions count for a lot! Like seeing some people as less equal than others, f’rinstance.

Prospective client Chris Belkot responded to Grubbs:

“It is your right to run your business any way you see fit, but let’s be honest here, you drive a trolley up and down a street. Not exactly God’s work.

Amen.

Justice Scalia: Outlawing “homosexual sodomy” is a no-brainer

Looky here what Salon posted, and if you do, make sure to have some Valium nearby:

At a book reading and lecture at Washington’s American Enterprise Institute this week, the 76-year-old associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States and self-described “textualist” entertained the crowd by rattling off a litany of his top judicial no-brainers. 

The death penalty? Give me a break. It’s easy. Abortion? Absolutely easy. Nobody ever thought the Constitution prevented restrictions on abortion,” he said. “Homosexual sodomy? Come on. For 200 years, it was criminal in every state.” And then he went to bed that night and slept like a baby.

Easy peasy no-brainers? Well, sure, because Scalia’s clearly an expert in brainlessness.

Scott Brown, Elizabeth Warren’s opponent in the Massachusetts Senate race, picked Scalia as one of his favorite Supreme Court justices, pass it on. And then remember that little fun fact in November.

“Robot” Mitt Romney to gay group: “I didn’t know you had families… I don’t really care what you tell your adopted daughter.”

A few years ago, Willard M. Romney met for about twenty minutes with Julie Goodridge and other plaintiffs in a Massachusetts marriage equality case. But see, he was endorsing a constitutional amendment that would ban same-sex marriage, and to make things worse, it was clear that he wasn’t even all that familiar with their landmark case.

The group he met with did everything they could to explain to him how equal rights were a good thing, and how they and their families would be protected as a result, as in, you know, “family values.”

His reaction? “Romney sat stone-faced and almost entirely silent.” Then he cut the meeting short. Pretty abruptly. In that way he has.

Via Boston.com.  Go read. Go read. Go read.

It was like talking to a robot. No expression, no feeling,” recalls David Wilson, one of the plaintiffs in the case who met with Romney that day. “People were sharing touching stories, stories where you’d expect recognition in the other person’s face that they at least hear what you’re saying — that there’s empathy. He didn’t even shake his head. He was completely blank.”

Occasionally Romney would say something.

“I didn’t know you had families,” remarked Romney to the group, according to Wilson.

Then Willard gave an “inaccurate, insensitive answer” to a question, that stunned Julie Goodridge:

“I looked him in the eye as we were leaving,” recalls Goodridge. “And I said, ‘Governor Romney, tell me — what would you suggest I say to my 8 year-old daughter about why her mommy and her ma can’t get married because you, the governor of her state, are going to block our marriage?’”

His response, according to Goodridge: “I don’t really care what you tell your adopted daughter. Why don’t you just tell her the same thing you’ve been telling her the last eight years.” [...]

He completely lacks empathy,” says Goodridge, speaking this time about her own experience meeting the governor. 

Psst! Willard! Her daughter was not adopted. You completely missed the “biological daughter” part of the conversation.

In 2003 the Log Cabin Republicans (an LGBT Republican group) held an event, and Willard was there. Here’s what he did in response to a “good to see you here” greeting by one of the attendees:

Gorton can’t recall the governor’s exact response, but he recalls Romney making a limp-wrist motion and replying with an affected stereotypical lisp. This was, assumed Gorton, an attempt to be funny and charming.

Please go read. Go read. Go read. There’s a lot more where this came from.

I’ll stop right here, because if I provide commentary, it won’t be pretty, so I’ll just keep my inappropriate words to myself.

2011 VIDEO: Gay veteran after convo with oblivious Romney: “He’s not getting MY vote… Absolutely I was definitely offended!”

Via Mansur Gidfar at Upworthy, we have a 2011 video of a very oblivious Willard M. Romney talking marriage equality (or in Mitt’s case, inequality) with a no-longer undecided Vietnam War veteran. And it all played out for the cameras at a New Hampshire photo op-gone-wrong. See, the vet was a gay newlywed who believes in things like, you know, equal rights.

Bob Garon asked Romney if he supported the repeal of the New Hampshire same-sex marriage law. He didn’t think Willard’s answer was satisfactory. Some excerpts:

“Ohhh, I guess the question was too hot.”

“I also learned something in New Hampshire is right. You have to look a man in the eye to get a good answer. And you know what, Governor? Good luck.”

“He’s not getting my vote. He told me that I’m not entitled to constitutional rights. I think a man and a woman and a man and a man should be treated equal! What the hell’s the difference?”

“I was undecided, but I’m totally convinced today that he’s not gonna be my president!”

“Take your ‘No way, Jose’ back to Massachusetts.”

Q: Why do you feel so strongly about that?

Bob Garon:

“Because I’m gay! Alright? And I happen to love a man just like you probably love your wife!”

“I went and I fought for my country … and I think my spouse should be entitled to the same entitlements as if I was married to a woman. What the hell’s the difference?!… Absolutely I was definitely offended!”

 Oblivious Willard strikes again.

Lawmaker thinks gays a threat to children, crashes boat into children; Mormon-owned TV station won’t air gay-themed sitcom

Via Slap Upside the Head

Today I ran across two stories that tell one story: Homophobia.

The first would be funny if it weren’t so tragic. The Gay Star News is reporting about a homophobe named Don H. Dwyer, Jr., a Maryland lawmaker, who thinks Teh Gay is very, very bad for children. Yet he managed to get drunk enough to crash his boat into another one, injuring four children himself:

The smash was so severe that Dwyer’s boat sunk in the river. [...]

Dwyer, a Tea Party Republican, has in the past suggested that homosexuals were a threat to children and that same-sex marriage would lead to homosexuality being taught in schools.

There were five kids in total, four were hurt including one five-year-old who had to be hospitalized. The two adults in the boat were fine.

So who’s the threat to kids again?

The next story involves an LDS Church-owned station, KSL, that is refusing to air NBC’s “The New Normal.” The L.A. Times is reporting that NBC will find a new outlet in Salt Lake City for the show, which is about two gay men who want a baby and meet a woman who agrees to be their surrogate.

Or as I like to call it, family values. Apparently, the Mormon Church sees it differently.

Would a President Romney feel it necessary to ban gay-themed TV shows, too?