Archive for oil

100 Years Ago This Summer, the Great War Began - Has Putin Taken Us Back?

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

obamaputin

Noted historian Jon Meacham proposed just that, going even further to speculate that we are once again, as a country, purportedly Leaders of the Free World now, re-engaged in The Big Game.

And Putin never looked happier.

No progressive wants to hear this. It's an arguable victory for the hopeful Military Industrial Complex fiends, never mind a clear throwback to Ron Ron Reagan's Star Wars daze.

steve-King-Of-Kings-210x300

Maddow, per usual, had a revelatory conversation with Nina Kruscheva about the Regressive Right and Putin headlines.

However, Putin isn't making it easy to try to have a different viewpoint from Fvx Nation and give the guy a slim chance. No progressive wants to be on the same side of the soapbox as Limpbaugh, Hannity and Coulter, either.

And lawd knows that soon we will all have another stellar new media site to muddy up with lots of liberal traffic … La Palin is launched … an Online News Channel.

Of her own.

Like Op-rah.

But more like the Anti-Oprah.

 

Have a gander at Here Ya' Go GOP-Tea … Pay For Palin

Putin

Can we blame Putin for that too? I don't know why not, they have so much in common and she can practically see him undressing from her vaunted A-las-kan porch. And you know as the General Election gets closer, the Regressive Right wants Putin to be as scary a foe as possible … the GOP think they win every security and defense contest.

From Ronan Farrow's messnbc daily roster.

Let's prove the fools wrong. Can you imagine Ted Cruz making foreign policy decisions with Putin also a president he has to interact with?

Dr. Seuss ain't going to cover those situations, Cruz. Or *GASP* Palin herself, there are already PAC's and this channel is nothing but publicity.

mr.tweetumsputin

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Afternoon-Evening Links

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

links Vietnam China

Vietnam anger rises over South China Sea

Spain replays Muslim-Christian wars - for fun

North Korea: Sanctions, luxury and aid

Turkey mine disaster: Three face charges over deaths

Mexico arrests criminal gang "Los Rojos" boss

The Lab;: A unique insight into the world of Israeli arms dealers selling weapons and experience around the world

Israel and Palestine: Two states and the extra step

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Overnight: Life in a North Dakota Oil- and Gas Boomtown (BBC)

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

This 'mini-documentary' (it's only 8:45) gives you an excellent overview of what life is like in the North Dakota oilfields in a short time. Be glad you don't live there.

"Men here are 100% worse...they're animals."

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Exxon-Mobil CEO Suing His Own Company To Stop Fracking -- At Least In His Neighborhood

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

fracking

Whatever happened to "what's good for the goose is good for the gander?" For that answer you really shouldn't be asking ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson. His company is invading the US with natural gas fracking operations -- the more the merrier. So how is it that he's just became the highest-profile anti-fracking activist in the world? He's now party to a lawsuit to stop fracking -- at least in his own neighborhood.

The CEO who made $46 million in salary last year is concerned that the fracking operation that's taking place in his multi-million dollar housing neighborhood - he has 86 acres so it's a large neighborhood - will lower the value of his home. And why would fracking bother Tyrannosaurus Rex? Well, the noise, the pollution and the traffic to name a few.

According to Credo Action:

Even though he is the CEO of one of the largest fracking companies in the world, Tillerson is suing to block a fracking development near his Texas horse ranch because it would create a "noise nuisance and traffic hazards."

Didn't he care when this was happening in other people's backyards?  Evidently not.  So this is only a case of me, me, me.  He only cares when it affects him.

So it might be with some great surprise that T-Rex Tillerson has joined a massive anti-fracking lawsuit -- essentially suing his own company. To tell you what's at stake here, enjoy this clip from Chris Hayes and anti-fracking documentary filmmaker Josh Fox:

The outcome of this and many similar lawsuits might not stop fracking from taking place -- but when you've got a deep-pocketed CEO like Tillerson and his bevy of high priced lawyers biting the same hand that feeds him, you realize there may be some good to come out of this -- in a trickle down sense. Maybe for once, trickle down policy will actually work for the good of the masses, not just the rich.

Here's hoping Exxon-Mobil takes it in the gas hole. And no lubricant will be necessary -- they've already dipped their probes in oil. I don't mean to be crude -- yes, a pun.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Where's The Windfall For The US With The Keystone XL Pipeline?

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare
Keystone XL Map

Keystone XL Map

There's so much talk about the Keystone pipeline -- should it be built from our northern border, dissecting the country in half like the Mississippi River?

Well, that's a long route and any pipeline carrying any product has certain risks. The largest being the spills. But it also means jobs in the short run - a few years. And the number of workers being employed are generally in the construction and oil business. But how many jobs? That's hard to say. The 1,700-mile Keystone XL is estimated to employ somewhere in the vicinity of 20,000 people according to Politifact. They also say the actual number might be half of that, or even less.

But how many people will be potentially affected by a possible spill of this dirtiest of crude? Millions. So do a little math, actually very little, and you'll see that there's high risk and not so great a reward.

Okay, let's assume it gets built and then the flow of this dirty liquid goes off without a hitch. Just think of all the crude that we'll be refining and having for our own use.

SCREECH.

Our own use? Un-uh. It's not for consumption in the US. It's for exportation. And the receipts for those sales doesn't go to the US market. Oh, no. It goes to Canada, the "owners" of the dirty raw crude. We're just the risk-taking conduit.

We are NOT GUARANTEED a single drop of that US refined oil. Not one. We can be the highest bidder and keep the fuel here, but we face competition from all over the world.

So we get to take the risk, we do get to spike a bit of employment -- but 20,000 jobs doesn't seem to be a huge comfort compared to the millions looking for work. It's better than nothing -- if you don't take into consideration that oil pipelines leak all the time. We're facing the disaster of all times if we're not lucky. And for what? For Canada to reap the profits for a drop in the bucket for us?

Truth is we're already showing an abundance of fuel here in this country. So much so that we're growing the exports of our domestic fuel every year. That means we producing more than we're selling here in the states. CNN Money Reports:

In 2008 the country exported 1.8 million barrels a day of refined products, according to EIA. By 2012 that number jumped to 3.2 million barrels.

Does it make sense to put our country at risk over the dirtiest oil we can find when we're refining enough of it here to have excess and making a profit selling it. Do we really need to build a pipeline when we have roads that are falling apart, bridges crumbling and airports that are referred to as "third world" quality? Wouldn't we make more money here with an improved infrastructure which wouldn't add nearly the risks of the dirty oil flowing dissecting our county? It used to be we lived east or west of the Mississippi. Soon it could be do you live east or west of the Keystone oil disaster.

leaky oil pipeline

The pipeline might be worth it -- but to Canada, not us. We shoulder the risk and they take all the profit. The honchos there say they're going to continue to frack and pull up their dirty shale oil. Good for them. They have ports on both of their coasts. If they need to refine their dirty oil, let them build refineries and pollute their air, not ours. Maybe they'll even hire some Americans to go up north and help them learn how refineries work.

Let Canada build their own pipelines to them and use tankers like everyone else. Why do we have to take the risk of catastrophe for a temporary, two year building gain? After it's done, we'll have an eternity of potential danger to humans, wildlife and our native lands. And for nothing but Canadians making profits.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Friday Links

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare
Photos Charles Koch: Bo Rader/ZUMA; David Koch: Sonia Moskowitz/ZUMA / motherjones.com

Photos Charles Koch: Bo Rader/ZUMA; David Koch: Sonia Moskowitz/ZUMA / motherjones.com

The Koch Brothers Left a Confidential Document at Their Last Donor Conference

Anti-Government Militia Threatens To Kidnap Montana Judge - Calls It A "Citizens Arrest"

Sen Jay Rockefeller Slams Capitalism, Tells Stunning Truth

Fracking is depleting water supplies in America's driest areas, report shows

A Cowboy Fights to Protect the Wilderness, and Our Nation’s Wild Horses

Washington Post unearths Chris Christie's '94 political ad that caused a defamation lawsuit.

Unconstitutional & Unintimidated in Wisconsin!

Joe Biden and the Corvette: A Love Story

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Keystone XL ? 'Yes, it would impact the climate' says State Dept.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare
Photo: ecowatch.com

Photo: ecowatch.com

The repost.us service is no longer available so we have removed that code from The Political Carnival.

Here is the original post on Environment News Service

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare