Archive for nuclear safety

Ex-regulator: All 104 nuclear reactors in US have a safety problem that can’t be fixed. They should be replaced.

no nukes smaller

I am a staunch non-fan of nuclear energy. Not only is it dangerous as hell, not only do I live relatively close to two reactors situated in earthquake country, but what really irks me is how we have no safe place to store all that extremely dangerous nuclear waste. Gregory B. Jaczko has a thing or two to say about a nuclear thing or two.

Via the New York Times:

All 104 nuclear power reactors now in operation in the United States have a safety problem that cannot be fixed and they should be replaced with newer technology, the former chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission said on Monday. Shutting them all down at once is not practical, he said, but he supports phasing them out rather than trying to extend their lives. [...]

[I]t is highly unusual for a former head of the nuclear commission to so bluntly criticize an industry whose safety he was previously in charge of ensuring.

Jaczko said he would have spoken up sooner, but he only just came to his conclusions “recently.” One of those conclusions is that we’ve been putting Band-Aids on major problems. Well, there’s that. Follow the link for more.

You want to know how you can trust his judgment? The nuke industry hates him:

Dr. Jaczko resigned as chairman last summer after months of conflict with his four colleagues on the commission. He often voted in the minority on various safety questions, advocated more vigorous safety improvements, and was regarded with deep suspicion by the nuclear industry.

ding ding ding

Obama Hints at Approval of Keystone XL Pipeline at SF Fundraiser, Blames Middle Class Priorities

tar sands oil handful

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Yesterday I posted a video: AR pipeline rupture foreshadows devastating environmental impact, but Exxon won’t pay taxes to cleanup fund, and before that I covered the lunacy of the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline (scroll) over and over again.

As you can see from the Maddow Show video above, so did Rachel. Please watch the entire segment, and then call or write your Congress members and the White House.

And with that, your Daily Dose of BuzzFlash at Truthout, via my pal Mark Karlin:

While President Obama didn’t address the Keystone XL Pipeline directly at a San Francisco fundraiser on Wednesday, he did give a hint that political reality – or his perception of it — will compel him to approve it. 

At the home of a pro-green, anti Keystone XL Pipeline billionaire, Obama set up an excuse for approval:

He said, “The politics of this are tough.”

“[T]he thing that I’m going to have to try to work to persuade the American people a little more convincingly on is this notion that there’s a contradiction between our economy and our environment is just a false choice,” Obama said at a San Francisco fundraiser.

“If we invest now, we will create jobs, we will create entire new industries; other countries will be looking to catch up, they will be looking to import what we do,” Obama said at one of two fundraisers supporting Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee efforts to retake the House next year.

Obama’s remarks came at the home of billionaire Tom Steyer, a major supporter of green energy and climate initiatives who is planning to play an active role in the 2014 elections.

Obama said earth’s temperature probably isn’t the “number one concern” for workers who haven’t seen a raise in a decade; have an underwater mortgage; are spending $40 to fill their gas tank, can’t afford a hybrid car, and face other challenges.

The remarks of the president didn’t mention Keystone, but given the recent State Department Report — written with input from pipeline consultants — that gave the project a green light, Obama appears to be preparing even a billionaire opponent for the inevitable: approval of the southern leg of the Keystone XL Pipeline because of “the politics.” [...]

Oddly, Obama called for Congress and others to educate the middle class and America about climate change, but except for some remarks in his recent State of the Union, the president himself has done little to dispel the myths about the so-called positive aspects of the pipeline.

For example, it will only create a few thousand short-term jobs more or less.  Furthermore, the tar sand extraction process in Canada is what will cause the devastating impact on carbon release, not the pipeline itself.  It is the Keystone XL Pipeline that will facilitate, at a lower transportation cost, the transfer of this heavy oil to Houston thus making it profitable to proceed with its environmentally disastrous production. Furthermore, the oil is not directed at lowering US gas prices.  It will be sold on the world spot market to the highest bidders, whoever will provide the biggest profits to the oil companies.

Yesterday, BuzzFlash at Truthout posted the commentary: “President Obama: If ‘XL Pipeline Is Harmless to Environment’ as Your State Department Claims, Then Explain Exxon-Mobil’s Tar Sands Pipeline Rupture-Evacuation in Arkansas”

Please read the entire post here.

maddow oil tar sands

Officials rejected some fixes to crippled San Onofre nuclear generators

Nuclear Power Option

Back in March of 2011, I posted “Memo: Workers at San Onofre nuclear plant fear retaliation for reporting problems.”

In February of this year, I posted “New radioactive waste leak found at nuclear site, and clean-up could be halted by sequestration.”

And in a couple of other posts, I’ve repeated that we should remember to expect the unexpected:

The word “expect” keeps popping up, and that ambiguity is what makes many of us a little wary. That’s because the 9.0 magnitude was also not expected. The combo of a huge quake and a tsunami was not expected. Experts say they don’t expect a quake larger than 7.0 near the San Onofre nuclear plant, nor do they expect one bigger than 7.5 near Diablo Canyon, despite the fact that new fault lines are discovered from time to time, not to mention the proximity to the San Andreas Fault.

This breaking news bulletin from the L.A. Times just landed in my inbox:

A report on the root causes of problems at the San Onofre nuclear plant shows that officials considered making design changes to the plant’s new steam generators before they were installed but rejected some fixes in part because they would require further regulatory approvals.

Some of the generators began malfunctioning a year after they were installed, and the nuclear power plant has been shuttered for 14 months. The closure has already cost San Onofre’s operators, Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric, $470 million.

Ratepayers across the region are already shouldering some of those costs and could be on the hook for hefty future repair bills.

For the latest information, go to www.latimes.com.

So public safety and security got tossed aside because regulation was, you know, an imposition. What a pain! The result? Hundreds of millions of dollars worth of bills and putting a whole bunch of us in harm’s way.

Ain’t nuclear energy grand?

From Dep’t. of Under-reported, Under-Appreciated Very Important Items: Pres. Obama will renew his push for nuclear treaty

obama nuke security

Um, this is kind of important. It’s also very under-reported and under-appreciated. In fact, other than Rachel Maddow, I can’t remember a single person at any cable news outlet that pays much attention to President Obama’s relentless efforts to rid the world of nuclear weapons.

Remember this? Anyone? Bueller?

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

President Obama, 2009:

As a nuclear power as the only nuclear power to have used a nuclear weapon, the United States has a moral responsibility to act. We cannot succeed in this endeavor alone, but we can lead it. We can start it. So today I state clearly and with conviction America’s commitment to seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons. [applause] I’m not naive. This goal will not be reached quickly. Perhaps not in my lifetime. It will take patience and persistence. But now we, too, must ignore the voices who tell us that the world cannot change. We have to insist, yes we can.”

Now the president is renewing that push for a nuclear treaty at the United Nations. Per The Hill, progress on a treaty has been stalled due to Pakistan’s opposition:

Administration officials and arms control activists believe they now have a new window for action. They point to increased cooperation on the UN Security Council and the beginning of John Kerry’s tenure as secretary of State as reasons for optimism. [...]

[Daryl Kimball, the executive director of the Arms Control Association] said progress on Fissile Material Cut-Off Treaty (FMCT) would depend on cooperation from Pakistan, which harbors fears of archrival India having more access to fissile material. The five permanent members of the UN Security Council might hold side talks with India and Pakistan in April to try and move the treaty forward, he said. [...]

Kerry is seen as a potential facilitator in those talks because of his long-standing relationship with Pakistan. [...]

Kimball said that if Pakistan won’t agree to let the treaty talks proceed, another option would be for other nuclear powers to jointly declare that they will collectively observe a moratorium on fissile material production. The United States, Russia, France and Great Britain have already acknowledged they’ve stopped producing fissile material, and China is believed to have ended it as well.

Maybe it’s finally time to get this news around, whaddya think?

The world didn’t end — yet

nra end of world mayans cartoon

Via.

No, I’m not about to write about another idiotic doomsday prediction. To be honest, I have no patience for those, except for a few of the truly clever jokes about the bizarrely hilarious Mayan scenarios that my Twitter pals concocted.

Instead, here’s part of an editorial from the L.A. Times that hit home. If America doesn’t take these genuinely scary– and real– possibilities seriously, then our priorities are more screwed up than I thought:

[D]espite our apparent obsession with global catastrophe, we’re surprisingly reluctant to confront the complications of actual, documented threats to our planet. Science and observation seem to indicate that real planetary crises will come more quietly and slowly but just as sadly — and perhaps more so because by that time we will have had years, if not decades, of legitimate warning. The effects of climate change may not be as dramatic as the reappearance of Satan on Earth, but they are a lot more imminent. Scientists around the planet have urged political leaders to counter the threat with a variety of conservation measures, some of which we have pursued, some of which we’ve ignored. Meanwhile, global temperatures are already up, ice masses are melting, polar bears are being stranded on diminishing frozen habitats.

Nuclear annihilation, which would happen a lot faster and with a more cinematic bang, continues to be a possibility as more countries seek nuclear weapons or the material to make them. Reining in nuclear proliferation — and controlling those weapons that already exist — is complicated and controversial but surely worth fighting for.

After I read that, I came across an article about a completely unrelated subject, the Benghazi hearings, again in the L.A. Times:

[W]ith a number of GOP lawmakers not showing up for the hearings, it appeared that an issue that has been a major focus of conservatives’ efforts since fall may be losing steam. [...]

The Republicans rejected arguments by administration officials and their Democratic supporters that part of the problem was the tight budget for diplomatic security, which House Republicans reduced last year. They called instead for a shift of money from lower-priority items.

At an afternoon hearing, the chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.), said the problem was “misplaced priorities.” She said the department was “lavishing” money on projects such as …  efforts to slow climate change.

Yes, climate change is now a “misplaced priority, a lower-priority item.” At least according to some House Republicans. Oh those clever conservatives, they’re too smart for us, because they’d never fall for hoaxy bunk like that. But I wonder how many of them secretly fell for all that end of the world twaddle.

Then again, if they believe what Norquist, Ryan, Limbaugh, et al. dish out, they’ll believe anything.

laughing no jokes

Please read the rest here.

And for your listening pleasure, my Twitter pal Marc Dawson, lead singer and bass player for the legendary pop/rock band The Grass Roots, just tweeted me this link to his song, Waiting For The End Of The World. His new CD? Glad you asked, go here.

VIDEO- Mitt Rommey and Seinfeld have something in common: Pitching “nothing”

Just as Jerry Seinfeld and George Costanza pitched a show about nothing, so is Willard M. Romney pitching an entire campaign to American voters centered around absolutely nothing. Hopefully, unlike Seinfeld’s and Costanza’s fictional TV series, nobody’s buying it.

There’s plenty of fiction in the products Romney’s trying to sell us, and there’s also plenty of nothing. He refuses to offer details about his budget plan, he suggests the U.S. should “kick the ball down the field” in his comments about how to deal with ongoing crises in the Middle East at his $50,000 a plate fundraiser, and at that same event, he has nothing to say to 47% of America because it’s not his job “to worry about those people.”

He’s got nothing.

He did give us one thing that was a pretty stupid “something,” and that was to instruct Iran and Hezbollah on how they could smuggle a dirty bomb into Chicago and hold America hostage, which could ultimately leave many Americans with… nothing.

Of course, we voters did get something from what he said in those secret tapes, and that something was  his profound ignorance about this, which was astounding: He did not know the difference between a dirty bomb and a nuclear bomb.

Rachel Maddow takes it from there:

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

“The United Nations of Wrong,” indeed.

“A new list of problems” for Romney, indeed.

“They target poor people for taxes” indeed.

“This was not a misstatement, it was a blunt statement” indeed.

“Boom!” indeed.

Japan to end nuclear power by 2030s

I wish the first words in the headline were “The United States,” but I’m relieved to see Japan’s pledge to phase out nuclear energy by 2039 at the latest.

Via the L.A. Times:

The Japanese government announced a dramatic turn in its energy policy Friday, vowing to make the densely populated island nation nuclear-free by the 2030s. [...]

The new blueprint calls for investing almost $500 billion over the next two decades to expand renewable sources like wind and solar power, the NHK broadcast network reported.

And no longer in the L.A. Times online post, but from my morning paper:

A 40-year limit has been set on operation of existing plants, meaning the last one would have to shut by 2039, but officials hope to close it earlier.

Expanding renewable energy sources is exactly what we should be doing, but the GOP has decided that’s too Kenyan. They prefer to take long, luxurious crude oil soaks while having their toesies massaged by Exxon CEOs.

And while they’re basking in the lovely green glow of leaking radiation, someone should remind them to expect the unexpected:

The word “expect” keeps popping up, and that ambiguity is what makes many of us a little wary. That’s because the 9.0 magnitude was also not expected. The combo of a huge quake and a tsunami was not expected. Experts say they don’t expect a quake larger than 7.0 near the San Onofre nuclear plant, nor do they expect one bigger than 7.5 near Diablo Canyon, despite the fact that new fault lines are discovered from time to time, not to mention the proximity to the San Andreas Fault.

But no, Republicans care more about profit than the health and well-being of their fellow Americans, so what do they do? They pass the No More Solyndras Act.

How’s that for forward thinking?