Archive for neener nanner

Susan Rice as next National Security Advisor. “It’s definitely happening.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

so there

Since The Cable is subscription only, Taegan is my go-to on this story:

Insiders with ties to the Obama administration tell  that U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice has become the heir apparent to National Security Advisor Tom Donilon — a post at the epicenter of foreign-policy decision making and arguably more influential than secretary of state, a job for which she withdrew her candidacy last fall amid severe political pressure.”

Said one source: “It’s definitely happening.”

Yes it is, despite all of this:

tv benghazi

Honestly, at this point, even if I were inclined to dislike and distrust Susan Rice, I’d still be doing back flips over this, simply because of what the GOP has put her through. They are the ones I increasingly dislike and distrust, and they have done nothing to alter my perceptions and everything to heighten them.

Once again, Republicans have made utter horse’s asses of themselves over a fantasy-scandal. May it continue to backfire in their sour little faces.

Congratulations, Susan Rice. Feel free to gloat.

neener nanner tv

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

President Obama’s victory margin grows, while Romney is stuck with, yes, 47%

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Link

A few days after Election Day, I posted this graphic depicting Mitt Romney’s ironic 47% popular vote:

Then, few days ago, there was this Moment of Irony: Full circle: Mitt Romney likely to finish at– ta daa!– 47 percent.

Today we’re finding out that President Obama is widening his lead to 51%, and Willard is still stuck at 47%.

Since President Obama is winning by a bigger margin than GW Bush did, and Bush declared a “mandate,” then using that same logic, couldn’t Obama say the following, but with more conviction? Especially because a majority of voters agree with the president’s tax policy as opposed to disagreeing with Bush’s very, very unpopular ones:

Via First Read:

Cook Political Report’s David Wasserman: Obama’s national lead over Romney continues to expand as votes keep on coming in. It’s now Obama 50.9%, Romney 47.4%. That’s a bigger (and more decisive) margin than Bush’s victory over John Kerry in 2004 (which was Bush 50.7% and Kerry 48.2%). What’s more, the president’s lead has grown to close to 3 points in Ohio, 4 points in Virginia and 6 points in Colorado. One doesn’t win Colorado by six points without winning swing voters; there isn’t a big-enough Democratic base to make that argument.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Full circle: Mitt Romney likely to finish at– ta daa!– 47 percent

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Poor Willard, he’ll never live this video down (nor this photo).

A few days after Election Day, I posted this graphic depicting Mitt Romney’s ironic 47% popular vote:

But it just got even more ironic. Via Greg Sargent:

When all the votes are counted, could Mitt Romney really end up achieving perfect poetic justice by finishing with 47 percent of the national vote? Yup. Dave Wasserman of the nonpartisan Cook Political Report says new votes in from Maryland put Romney at 47.56 percent. He predicts with certainty that with all of New York and California counted, Romney will end up below 47.5 percent of the vote.

Rounded, of course, that would put the final tally at 51-47.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

PhotOH! Republicans agree, 332 is a landslide + Mitt Romney’s ironic 47% popular vote

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Via Google

Drat that pesky 47%, right Willard? Meantime, enjoy this Moment of Foxenfreude:

Via

Video Moment of Gloat here.

And there’s this:

H/t: Greg Ostravich

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

VIDEO– A gift to Obama supporters: “Here it is. Your Moment of Gloat.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Beautiful.

All those delusional pundits huddled in their Fox-hole predicting a Romney win are now licking their wounds, playing the blame game, claiming Superstorm Sandy gave President Obama a boost, ignoring the consensus of reliable polls, and insisting on remaining in their bubble as the world passed them by. Now, instead of admitting that their extremist agenda alienated voters, they are scratching their heads wondering what could have possibly gone so wrong.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Team Romney’s response, “fed up” with attacks on Mitt’s business record: “Oh yeah? Well… well… you lie!”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email


pics on Sodahead

How old are the people running Willard Romney’s campaign, five? Seriously, according to Buzzfeed, this is how they’re dealing with Team Obama’s accusations that the Republican was an “outsourcing pioneer“:

In a conference call Monday morning, senior staff said Romney’s surrogates would stop shying away from the word “lie” in responding to Democrats’ attacks on his business record, and plan to go on TV to call Obama a “liar,” the source said.

“They are very fed up with these attacks,” said the source.

The pushback comes after a week of hand-wringing among GOP elite, who worry that Romney is letting Obama’s attacks — which seek to undermine the very rationale for the Republican’s candidacy, his private sector experience — gain traction without any serious effort to rebut them.

We’re sick of fretting and whining! Waaah! So, okay then, see, Mr. President’s campaign, since you dare to call Willard an outsourcer (which is true), well… well… we’ll show YOU! We’ll… umm… we’ll… we’ll call you a liar! Ha! So there!

Gee, that’s original. And classy. Nobody’s ever done that before, how novel:

Hey Mitt, know why the Obama campaign’s attacks are gaining traction? Because there is so much evidence to support the claims, and so much evasion on your part. So rather than provide facts to rebut what everyone already knows to be true, you’re going to offer a juvenile response without ever providing specifics about anything.

By the way, where are those tax returns?

So, Willard “Mitt” Romney, when you’re on the defensive, whenever the truth hurts, whenever you have no credible response, simply call the President of the United States names. How respectful, mature and, oh yes, presidential.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Graph: Unemployment rate since 1989 by president. Hint: Advantage Dems.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Via.

A picture’s worth 1,000 (plus)… votes.

Yes, I’m five.

H/t: @jkarsh

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email