Archive for needless deaths

BP still hasn’t paid billions of dollars in fines, other payments to Gulf Coast, environmental groups

suck it bp

If you have an ounce of logic in you, then you know that the longer we wait to repair what BP destroyed, the more difficult it will be to fix their mess. BP accepted criminal liability in the 2010 gulf oil disaster and was supposed to pay a $4-billion fine.

And tests confirmed, and Hurricane Isaac exposed, that globs of oil found on Louisiana beaches after Hurricane Isaac came from the 2010 BP spill. The area is still suffering the consequences of BP’s negligence and they should be falling all over themselves to rectify that.

BP has pleaded guilty to manslaughter and environmental crimes, because:

BP we care

USA Today:

Saturday marks the third anniversary of the spill in 2010, but only a small fraction of the billions in fines and other money owed by BP has trickled in for use on restoration projects, environmental groups say.

Local, state and environmental groups are banking on money from several sources

However, BP is proud to use their money to pay people to go on the Tee Vee Machine and say reassuring things like this:

bp adbp ad smaller

And they lavish us with ads like this repeatedly force ads like this down our throats:

Here’s what’s really going on:

Gulf Coast groups say the region is still struggling.

Environmental groups say an unusually high number of sick dolphins are washing up on shore. They’re also finding tar balls on beaches, particularly after big storms.

USA Today has all the gory details.

If you really want to get your blood boiling, read this via the Government Accountability Project:

On April 19, 2013, GAP released Deadly Dispersants in the Gulf: Are Public Health and Environmental Tragedies the New Norm for Oil Spill Cleanups? The report details the devastating long-term effects on human health and the Gulf of Mexico ecosystem stemming from BP and the federal government’s widespread use of the dispersant Corexit, in response to the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill. [...]

Conclusions from the report strongly suggest that the dispersant Corexit was widely applied in the aftermath of the Deepwater Horizon explosion because it caused the false impression that the oil disappeared. In reality, the oil/Corexit mixture became less visible, yet much more toxic than the oil alone. Nonetheless, indications are that both BP and the government were pleased with what Corexit accomplished. The report is available here: Part One, Part Two, Part Three

“We will clean this up. We will make this right.”

We won’t hold our breath.

Mapping the Dead: Gun deaths since the Newtown massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School

gun deaths since Newtown map via HuffPo

The Huffington Post has tracked gun-related deaths in the United States since the Newtown massacre. Click here for a jarring interactive map of those who have died. The above map is a screen grab that just doesn’t have the same impact.

Here is Jason Cherkis’s post, One Nation Under The Gun: Thousands Of Gun Deaths Since Newtown.

And here are the faces of those whose lives were cut short by someone who thought it was important to “rack up” casualties, which is why he chose children as his targets:

newtown children smaller gun

Lanza kept a chilling 7-by-4-foot spreadsheet with 500 names as part of research into mass killings in the past. A source, who requested anonymity, said Lanza kept tabs on the number of casualties each killer racked up and the precise make and model of the weapons used.

“They don’t believe this was just a spreadsheet. They believe it was a score sheet,” said the source, who heard the details at a police seminar in New Orleans. [...]

Detectives believe Lanza targeted an elementary school because he considered it a “point of least resistance,” and he could rack up the greatest number of kills.

guns enough smaller

How the NRA Helps Arm Child Soldiers and Enables Deadly Local Wars

nra

Your Daily Dose of BuzzFlash at Truthout, via my pal Mark Karlin:

Yes the gun lobby has enabled the arming of child soldiers — even younger than 10-years-old –and the deadly raging of local militia wars around the world.  No, the National Rifle Association (NRA) is not selling small arms to militias; it is not recruiting child soldiers and giving them guns to fight for “rebel” forces around that commit atrocities; it does not directly sell firearms and weapons to rebel nations that commit massacres of its own people.

But the National Riffle Association has for years held up the United States endorsement of the international Arms Trade Treaty, which would provide a legal framework for limiting the profiteering of weapons that create killing fields, particularly in poorer nations.  [...]

Around the globe, over a billion children live in countries impacted by armed conflict that is fueled by small arms and conventional weapons. These children are at grave risk of being abducted and trafficked, used as soldiers and sex slaves, forced from their homes, attacked at school. [...]

Amazingly, the Obama White House has not yet taken a position on the next round of treaty negotiations that begin on March 18th.  If you counter that the treaty is not yet written so why should the president take a position at this time, then know this: “a round of treaty talks last July ended when the United States stepped away from the negotiating process,” according to Amnesty International.  The political factor behind the US walking away was, at a political level, the NRA. [...]

But the NRA… is claiming … that the Arms Trade Treaty would lead to door-to-door confiscation of guns in the United States. [...]

[T]he NRA has successfully kept the floodgates open for arms being supplied to outlaw governments, militias, mass rapists, and the coerced and vast child soldier market. [...]

One doesn’t need to dig deep to know that Wayne La Pierre, chief honcho and for the NRA, is the oracle of mendacity, the chief flamer thrower of these incendiary deceptions.

Meanwhile, child soldiers are forcibly recruited and trained to become numbed robotic killers, women are raped by armed “rebels” and rogue national armies, and civilians wantonly killed – all by killers armed so that the NRA can raise funds and enhance gun manufacturing profits by promoting lies that the Arms Trade Treaty would result in gun confiscation in the US. [...]

[T]he NRA supports “the bad guys.”

Please read the entire post here.

VIDEO: NRA tells African Americans they need guns to protect themselves from government

fear scared of things I don't understand animated gif

Earlier I posted RNC Chair Reince Priebus now wants to play hero with minorities GOP hasn’t wanted to touch with a 10-foot car elevator. He’s falling all over himself to ingratiate Republicans to African American and Latino voters, among others.

Maybe he should start by texting his BFFs at the NRA to STFU instead of telling African Americans: You’ll Need Guns To Protect Yourselves From The Government:

“No one wants to fight for their protection, they want the government to do it. The same government who at one point hosed us down with water, attacked us with dogs, and wouldn’t allow us to eat at their restaurants, and told us we couldn’t own guns…”

“David Gregory wears make-up and has a spray-on tan, and he was able to get his hands on an illegal magazine.” [David Gregory, NBC not charged for possession of gun magazine, but blasted by DC Attorney General]

“This is self-preservation. It’s about natural rights.”

Guy telling me to get rid of my guns when I need them the most isn’t my friend, isn’t looking out for my best interests, and doesn’t speak for me or the community that I’m part of.”

That “natural rights” line has become a (laughable) talking point that is tweeted to me by gun nuts regularly.  I didn’t realize how unnecessary (and clearly unnatural) laws were, nor that firearms were a gift from Mother Nature. Who knew we were born with guns in our cold dead baby hands? Apparently, some men believe they were born with them in their pants, but that’s another post for another day.

Think Progress:

Gun violence kills 30,000 Americans each year and disproportionately impacts communities of color. … The gun-homicide “rate for black males is 2.4 times as high as that of Latino males, and it is 15.3 times as high as the rate for non-Hispanic white males.” In 2008 and 2009 gun homicide was “the leading cause of death among black teens, and the rates of gun-related deaths are highest for black male teens.”

Teens living in dangerous communities, where guns are often easily accessible, are stuck in a cycle of violence…

Here’s what shows up on the NRA’s YouTube page under the video:

nra YouTube  video comments

“Guns are not… absolutely necessary, outside of war or law enforcement by law enforcement personnel.”

guns v cars

In my previous post, Cars v. guns, there was an OregonLive.com, letter to the editor, that said, in part:

At first, James Johnston’s letter (Feb. 9) troubled me. Because cars kill more Americans than guns do, he reasoned, cars should be banned before guns are. Come on.

Cars are intended to be safe, whereas guns maim and kill by design. Still, his syllogism may offer a solution to the gun control debate. Although we’ll never ban cars nor, alas, guns either, we can and do regulate both to be as safe as possible.

That letter was followed by this one:

In 2009, the last year I could find data on this, the numbers in Oregon and Washington were: Oregon deaths from guns: 417, motor vehicles: 394; Washington guns: 623, cars: 580, according to an analysis by the Violence Policy Center.

The cars vs. guns wrangling continues as you can see below, via today’s L.A. Times Calendar section. The Times doesn’t post the Calendar letters online so I cannot provide a link:

The car-gun argument

My heart bleeds as much as Dan Baum’s does, maybe more ["One of the Gun Guys," Feb. 17]. Like Baum, I earnestly seek to engage in rational, calm discussion about gun control. Put aside for a moment that, though well-regulated car ownership and use are not constitutionally protected. What I wish to understand is how, in the first instance, there is any basis on which to compare the societal worth of cars and guns in the context of gun control.

Cars are absolutely necessary to modern commerce and society. As any number of gunless societies have proved, guns are not necessary, much less absolutely necessary, outside of war or law enforcement by law enforcement personnel.

Terry Sternberg

West Hills, CA

VIDEO: GOP Rep. Gunn (yes Gunn) invites gunmakers to MS because they’re “under attack in anti-2nd Amendment states.”

Gunn on guns

MSNewsNow.com – Jackson, MS

The firearms puns just keep on coming. Mississippi House Speaker Philip Gunn says he welcomes gunmakers to his state with “open arms.” Bygones, but when it comes to connecting Republicans and bad jokes, it’s becoming more and more difficult to resist.

But back to Gunn: He feels a little put-upon on behalf of those poor, victimized gun manufacturers, so he’s inviting them to relocate to Mississippi where apparently they’re pro-Second Amendment… as opposed to other states, see, that are anti-Second Amendment, see.

Yes, in GOP minds like his, if you don’t approve of serial massacres of children and other innocents and would like to see common sense safety measures put in place to prevent future ones, you’re anti-Second Amendment.

(CNN) Mississippi House Speaker Philip Gunn has invited gunmakers such as Colt to relocate to his state from others including Connecticut, where firearms have been a controversial issue since a school shooting there last December left 20 students and six adults dead.

The gun industry in Connecticut is being attacked and “demonized” because of national politics, Gunn said in a letter this week to Colt’s Manufacturing Company CEO Dennis Veilleux.

He also invited gunmaker Magpul Industries Corp. of Colorado to relocate to Mississippi. Gunn, a Republican, said firearm manufacturers are “under attack in anti-Second Amendment states.”

He’s not only a job creator, he’s a gun creator!

weeee smaller

U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) called the proposal “preposterous.”

Connecticut residents support the Second Amendment and responsible gun ownership, “far from demonizing firearms products made here,” Blumenthal said in a statement.

“This preposterous pitch to companies with long, successful histories in our state shows the need for national standards and statutes to reduce gun violence,” the senator said. “Competition among states for less protective laws is a race to the bottom that should be avoided. The poison of illegal gun trafficking respects no state boundaries and threatens to cause more horrific tragedies like Newtown and the 1,900 gun violence deaths that have occurred since then.”

That pretty much says it all. Simply moving business to other locations would not prevent guns from being moved back and forth between states, nor would it prevent gun violence, nor would it protect anyone’s constitutional rights (those would be the same constitutional rights that are not being violated, by the way).

So grow up, gun zealots. Face facts. Dip a toe into the real world. Wouldn’t that be novel?

VIDEO: “What I didn’t know was that this text would go unanswered.” NRA has “elevated right to bear arms above the right to life.”

gun violence family death Sami

“What I didn’t know at the time was that this text would go unanswered.”

“My family deserves a vote. We all deserve a vote.”

Demand a Plan:

Watch Sami’s powerful story, and call Congress TODAY: Tell them to support common sense gun laws that will save lives by keeping guns out of the hands of dangerous people.

Tell your lawmakers that you are calling because we need a plan to end gun violence NOW. We can prevent future tragedies by passing common sense legislation that will:

  1. Require criminal background checks for ALL gun sales, including private sales
  2. Ban assault weapons, including high-capacity magazines
  3. Make gun trafficking a federal crime

And here’s a relevant L.A. Times letter to the editor, because our voices matter:

Re “O.C. shootings leave four dead, many questions,” Feb. 20

Your headline claims there are many questions concerning the latest community gun massacre. Indeed, some folks interviewed expressed surprise and shock. Why? This was just a another day in the armed encampment we call the United States.

Thanks to the National Rifle Assn., every area has folks armed and ready to shoot. Guns are a common way to resolve conflicts. Have a problem with your spouse, co-workers or employer? Reach for a gun.

The NRA has succeeded in elevating the right to bear arms above the right to life. Is this the type of nation our Founding Fathers intended to create?

Frank Ferrone

El Cajon

And finally, I just received this email from Mayors Against Illegal Guns:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
February 22, 2013

NEW COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF MASS SHOOTINGS REVEALS PREVALENCE OF MASS SHOOTINGS, ROLE OF ASSAULT WEAPONS AND STRONG CONNECTION BETWEEN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND GUNS

57% of Shootings Involve Domestic Violence; Fewer than 1% of Gun Murder Victims Killed in Mass Shootings; Assault Weapons Put the “Mass” in “Mass Shooting”

Mayors Against Illegal Guns today released the findings and full data set behind a mass shooting analysis updated to reflect the latest FBI data. The updated release includes a 25% increase in incidents — to a total of 56 over the last four years, more than one per month —strengthening conclusions about where mass shootings occur, what weapons are used, and what other factors are at play.

Among the key findings:

In at least 57% of the incidents, the shooter killed a current or former intimate partner or family member.

Less than 1% of gun murder victims were killed as part of incidents with four or more victims.

Assault weapons or high capacity magazines were used in 23% of the incidents, and when they were used, more than twice the number of people were shot and 57% more were killed.

No more than one quarter (23%) of the shootings occurred in public spaces that were so-called ‘gun-free zones.’

“Mass shootings capture the public’s attention – and we should pass the common-sense reforms that will help to prevent these tragedies from occurring – but we should also remember that 33 Americans are killed every day, and very often by an intimate partner,” said Mark Glaze, director of Mayors Against Illegal Guns. “These findings challenge some of the conventional wisdom about mass shooting and highlight the areas in which further attention and research are needed.”

The full analysis and data set is available here

The facts and stats are on the side of supporters of common sense safety measures, but gun manufacturers and the NRA prefer profits and power to saving lives.