Archive for natural gas

Fracking could lead to demand for more potentially explosive ammonia factories

what the frack sign Via The Tyee.ca

So much madness, so little time.

The last safety “inspection of the West fertilizer plant happened in– 1985.” Because, you know, fertilizer components aren’t flammable and dangerous and don’t require any regulation whatsoever. Nor are ingredients such as ammonium nitrate ever used in, say, domestic terrorist attacks like, oh I dunno, the Oklahoma City bombing.

Nor do they ever explode.

Nor do they pollute the air with noxious fumes when they never explode.

Nor do those explosions that never happen ever kill people.

So, of course, no forward-looking country with clear-thinking leaders would ever consider exposing its citizens to even more noxious ammonia factories. Nor would they encourage any powerful corporations to engage in any undertakings that would rely on chemicals that could easily pollute and ignite the way the plant in West, Texas did.

Grist:

The U.S. could soon be home to a lot more ammonia factories — not a comforting thought after a deadly explosion at an ammonia fertilizer plant in Texas on Wednesday evening. You can blame the fracking boom. [...]

Australian company Incitec Pivot this week announced [PDF] that it will be building a hulking new $850 million ammonia facility in Waggaman, La., just outside New Orleans. [...]

U.S.-based Mosaic announced in December that it may build a $700 million ammonia plant in St. James Parish, La. U.S.-based CHS Inc. said in September that it would construct a $1.2 billion ammonia plant in North Dakota. Also in September, Egypt’s largest company, Orascom Construction, said it would spend $1.4 billion to build a fertilizer plant in Iowa.

Well, erm, okay, but surely ammonia production has a good safety record overall, and the Texas disaster was just an anomaly. Right?

The history of ammonia production and storage is littered with spectacular accidents.

Oh, and there’s this:

The Dallas Morning News reports that the Texas fertilizer plant that exploded Wednesday night told the Environmental Protection Agency and local public safety officials that it presented “no risk of fire or explosion.”

They lied to the EPA and were not in compliance with EPA regulations (EPA regulations do not allow felony violations of 18 USC 1001). If the company was in compliance with EPA regulations, then the 540,000 lbs of the explosive ammonium nitrate, stored at the facility, would not have blown up.

The EPA said the company corrected the deficiencies and filed an updated plan in 2011. It said it now complies with EPA regulations.

Now think about all those impending new ammonia facilities. What could possibly go wrong?

All our posts on the environmental rapes perpetrated by frackers can be found here (scroll).

forward off cliff

Mining sand for fracking is turning Wisconsin farmland owners against each other

Several months ago I posted Let’s get the truth about fracking, and if you haven’t watched Gasland yet, please do that asap.

Fracking is causing even more problems these days, this time in Wisconsin, eastern Minnesota, northeastern Iowa, and northwestern Illinois.  Those are states in which sand formations are most prevalent, sand that the oil and gas industries need in their endless quest for profits by way of hydraulic fracturing (fracking). 

But in Wisconsin, it’s pitting farmland owners who prioritize employment and royalties for land usage against those who are distraught over the potential negative health problems due to elevated concentrations of small sand particulates from airborne dust, along with concerns about high water usage required for fracking, and, of course, the usual environmental damage.

Via the L.A. Times:

The rapid expansion of sand mining through the quiet of western Wisconsin has raised fears among some residents and hope in others, often pitting neighbors against one another, just as fracking has done elsewhere [...]

High-volume hydraulic fracturing involves shooting millions of gallons of water, sand and chemicals underground to crack shale formations and unlock oil and gas. The sand props open the fissures, and hydrocarbons flow through the porous sand up the well.

Residents worry about winds blowing around the sand from outdoor piles, resulting in respiratory problems from inhaling the dust.

One cattle farmer and anti-mining activist said, “Individual rights end when you start affecting others’ health and welfare.”

The companies that build the plants that process the sand pay tens of thousands of dollars in property taxes. Supporters feel that the payoff for Wisconsin is jobs, and for the country, cheap energy. They seem to be ignoring this “payoff”:

Western Wisconsinites worry that airborne dust, or crystalline silica, as it is known, can lead to a potentially deadly respiratory ailment called silicosis. Research has shown the dangers crystalline silica poses on the job to miners and even to workers at fracking sites. But little is known about its effect on people who live near mine sites.

Critics want the air around mines monitored, but so far, only one air monitor has gone up in Chippewa County. In fact, air quality around mines is barely monitored, in part because of budget cuts at the state’s Department of Natural Resources.

Good old Scott Walker and his GOP minions. Austerity first! Did they think about all the water needed for fracking, including to wash sand? They should. Additionally, in rural areas, mines can be built next to homes or schools.

But money talks… at least to some Wisconsinites.

One mining supporter “declined to specify how much he makes off his lease, he said it was more than $10,000 a month.”

A cranberry farmer, in tears, said this:

Fighting this just seems so hopeless… The companies just have so much money. They can just buy everybody. It seems like nothing can stop them. There’s got to be better ways than this.”

All of our posts on fracking can be found here.

Frickin’ frack

In today’s Los Angeles Times, there were side-by-side articles (that I can’t link to because the L.A. Times site makes them impossible to find, so I went elsewhere) that were noteworthy. One talks about how the price of electricity will likely rise, despite all that cheap natural gas the industry loves to frack about.

And the next discusses how a new study on the polluting effects of gas drilling (fracking) is being done by the Department of Energy.

Follow the links. Here’s a tease:

A plunge in the price of natural gas has made it cheaper for utilities to produce electricity. But the savings aren’t translating to lower rates for customers. Instead, U.S. electricity prices are going up.

Electricity prices are forecast to rise slightly this summer. But any increase is noteworthy because natural gas, which is used to produce nearly a third of the country’s power, is 43 percent cheaper than a year ago. A long-term downward trend in power prices could be starting to reverse, analysts say.

“It’s caused us to scratch our heads,” says Tyler Hodge, an analyst at the Energy Department who studies electricity prices.

And:

PITTSBURGH — A new study being done by the Department of Energy may provide some of the first solid answers to a controversial question: Can gas drilling fluids migrate and pose a threat to drinking water?

You already know how we feel about fracking (scroll). When will this country figure out that no matter how cheap gas may be, if the population dies off, there will be nobody around to put money in drillers’ already full pockets?

Analyst: Congress poised to mandate gas ‘fracking’ chemical disclosure

Don’t know what “facking” is? Then please go here. If nothing else, scroll to the Jon Stewart interview.

Frackin’ good news:

EPA is pressing drilling services companies for information on chemicals they use during hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” an increasingly common practice for tapping onshore natural gas. [...]

Fracking involves high-pressure injections of chemicals, water and sand to break apart rock formations and enable trapped gas to flow. The technique has helped enable a boom in development of gas from shale rock formations in several states — such as Pennsylvania — but is bringing concerns about water contamination along with it.

“Concerns”? When you turn on your kitchen faucet, and fire shoots out, that’s more than a “concern”.

EPA is conducting a broad study of the practice and will hold the next two public hearings Sept. 13 and Sept. 15 in Binghamton, N.Y.

The American Petroleum Institute doesn’t “feel that there’s a need for federal comprehensive oversight of this.”

Of course they don’t. That would be like, you know, regulating. It’s far more lucrative to keep poisoning Americans so they can make a big fat profit, continue to be totally irresponsible, and ignore the rape of our land and the illness/deaths of those they stomp all over on a daily basis.

The industry has warned that new federal mandates could make some drilling projects uneconomical.

Like I said.

Federal judge: Stop all oil, gas drilling on Chukchi Sea in Alaska; environmental laws not followed

Boo. Hoo:

A federal judge on Wednesday stopped companies from developing oil and gas wells on billions of dollars in leases off Alaska’s northwest coast, saying the federal government failed to follow environmental law before it sold the drilling rights.

The judge said that Minerals Management Service didn’t analyze the effects of natural gas development on the environment. Gee, that rings a bell.

Gasland” anyone?

[U.S. District Judge Ralph] Beistline enjoined all activity under the lease sale pending additional environmental reviews.

I love this judge. This is a good judge. This is a judge who clearly knows what he’s doing.

Three exploratory wells were supposed to be drilled in the Chukchi Sea this summer. Darn. Big Oil/Gas will have to find other pristine areas to devastate.

If something were to go wrong up there where the water is icy, the nearest Coast Guard base is over 1000 miles away, and deep water ports and airports are nowhere to be found, it would be nearly impossible to clean up.

Of course, Beistline must be a liberal activist judge who hates America. I’m nearly sure of that.

VIDEO: Jon Stewart interviews “Gasland’s” Josh Fox

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Josh Fox
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor Tea Party

If you do nothing else this week, go to On Demand and watch HBO’s Gasland.

Josh Fox talks about the toxic materials from hydraulic fracturing that are turning up in people’s water supplies.

If you enjoy drinking flammable water, then you probably won’t appreciate Gasland.

U.S. fines BP for “false” reporting of gas production on Native American land

False reporting is clearly a pattern and practice of these thugs. Is there anything “real” about BP?  Yes, there is something. They are true to their criminal negligence, they are true to their murder of Mother Earth, they are true to their lies and deception:

The Department of Interior on Wednesday slapped BP America Inc. with a $5.2-million civil penalty for submitting “false, inaccurate or misleading” reports regarding natural gas production on Southern Ute tribal land in southwestern Colorado.

It was believed to be the largest civil fine the department has levied since penalties were authorized by federal law in 1982.

The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement (they’re the ones that replaced the scandal-ridden MMS) were the ones who laid the fine on BP.

[T]he company’s reports included incorrect royalty rates, sales prices and production data related to the leases. All of those factors are used to compute the amount of royalties BP owed to the tribe. [...]

Collectively, [BP] racked up 25,949 violation days across the leases it held on Southern Ute land…

BP may appeal the fine. Good luck with that.

Remember my first sentence, the one in which I said BP had a pattern and practice of false reporting? I’m not alone:

[F]ederal officials said was a pattern of behavior by BP that seemed to disregard the importance of filing accurate monthly reports. [...]

[A]ccording to Michael R. Bromwich, director of the ocean energy management bureau, led the government to conclude “that BP’s continued submission of erroneous reports was knowing or willful.

So I guess that “it was all a big misunderstanding” rationale is out of the question. Pity.