Archive for national security

Susan Rice as next National Security Advisor. “It’s definitely happening.”

so there

Since The Cable is subscription only, Taegan is my go-to on this story:

Insiders with ties to the Obama administration tell  that U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice has become the heir apparent to National Security Advisor Tom Donilon — a post at the epicenter of foreign-policy decision making and arguably more influential than secretary of state, a job for which she withdrew her candidacy last fall amid severe political pressure.”

Said one source: “It’s definitely happening.”

Yes it is, despite all of this:

tv benghazi

Honestly, at this point, even if I were inclined to dislike and distrust Susan Rice, I’d still be doing back flips over this, simply because of what the GOP has put her through. They are the ones I increasingly dislike and distrust, and they have done nothing to alter my perceptions and everything to heighten them.

Once again, Republicans have made utter horse’s asses of themselves over a fantasy-scandal. May it continue to backfire in their sour little faces.

Congratulations, Susan Rice. Feel free to gloat.

neener nanner tv

Why I didn’t watch the Sunday talk shows today

yell at tv

I made the mistake of turning on “Meet the Press” today. I lasted about seven minutes before screaming at the Tee Vee Machine and turning it off. The entire seven minutes was similar to what happened here: “Does this open the president up for criticism? Will critics have new ammo? Well, will they, huh? Huh?” #LibrulMediaMyAss

All I heard was Benghazi Benghazi Benghazi, criticism of the president over the Boston bombings, and then more hyperventilating about anything else that ever existed within the vast political scope of all things Obama. BAD Obama. FAILURE Obama. INEPT Obama. LEAD FROM BEHIND Obama. BLAME Obama.

I’m fine with healthy, constructive criticism, but this is out of control. There is no more news. News died when it was swept into the greedy, self-serving world of commercialization. What we have now is any excuse to create controversy, to even create a non-existent news story, in order to ramp up the ratings.

What better way for corporate-owned media to achieve higher Nielsens for their beloved corporate sponsors than to bash Obama, ignite passions, beat the drums for war, and scare viewers so that they’ll glue themselves to the screen to catch the next BIG, SCARY CHYRON!

chyron syria cnn

chyron syria abc

But back to the Benghazi Noise Machine. Today, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) claimed that President Obama’s administration is threatening and intimidating witnesses, but he couldn’t even back up his claim:

But hey, that’s okay, people watched, some pointed and laughed, and some even mistook his warped opinion for fact. Key word: Watched. What more could a news program hope for? Oh wait, that was Fox, not news.

I previously posted a video of a segment in which Chris Hayes said this on his “All In” show:

“Question mark.” You know, there is this thing we do in cable news. Sometimes magazines do it too. You want to grab someone’s attention but the thing you want to say is just too irresponsible to get away with or stand behind. So, for example, maybe I want to say, in discussing Lindsey Graham’s demagoguery in constitutional due process, “Lindsey Graham, comma, Constitution hater.” So no, instead what we would say is, “Lindsay Graham, Constitution hater?” Since you are asking a question, you don’t have to stand behind what you are asserting.

And then, as if on cue, MSNBC displayed a chyron only a few minutes ago that read, “Lame duck already?” Since they asked, allow me to respond: “Idiotic question chyron?” Question mark?

chyron blitzer dept of jihad

chyron fox question scott brown

“Does this open the president up for criticism? Will critics have new ammo? Well, will they, huh? Huh?” #LibrulMediaMyAss

bias liberal media my ass smaller

When I opened my Los Angeles Times this morning, I saw an article about how the Boston bombing is affecting policy on student visas. The Times is reporting that Homeland Security will be tightening oversight for foreign students entering the U.S.

One of the friends, Azamat Tazhayakov, 19, was allowed to reenter the U.S. on a student visa even though he was no longer attending the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, where Dzhokhar Tsarnaev also studied.

Congressional Republicans have questioned how the government has dealt with visa security issues. In a three-page letter this week, Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) asked Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano for details about student visas and how Tazhayakov was able to reenter the U.S.

In a statement this week, the Homeland Security Department said that Tazhayakov entered the United States on Jan. 20 using a student visa with an expiration date of Aug. 30. Customs, which is part of Homeland Security, had not been notified that Tazhayakov had left school on Jan. 4, so he was permitted entry.

An hour later I was watching MSNBC, and the anchor substituting for Alex Witt was asking her guests about this very topic. And by “asking her guests” I mean falling all over herself to get them to slam President Obama. Here is how she posed her questions (paraphrased, but not all that much):

“Does this open the president up for criticism? Will President Obama be under fire for this? Will his critics have new ammo? Well, will they, huh? Huh?”

Okay, I made up that last question. Here is how it sounded to me:

Ooo! THIS is exactly what I needed to create some controversy, because so far, this show has been really dull. If ratings dip while I’m covering for Alex, I’m toast!

SO. Guests! WTF is up with Obama? Shouldn’t he be in a big ol’ pot of hot water for this? Isn’t the bombing all his fault anyway? Well, isn’t it? Let’s make this into more of a story, stat! Is his goose finally cooked? Will you go on the record saying that his presidency a big fat epic FAIL now? Boyoboy was he negligent, right? RIGHT?

I cannot WAIT to hear your answers to my leading questions! GO!

BENGHAZI! Oh, sorry, that just slipped out.

1. Note to Ms. SubbingForAlex: You must be more than aware that nobody needs to encourage anyone to clobber the president. He has been barraged by smears since he announced his run back in 2007. He’s been blamed for everything from Bush’s recession to personal bad hair days since forever. So stirring that pot is overkill to say the least.

2. What happened to objectivity in the media? Oh, sorry, did I say “objectivity”? My bad.

3. Not everything has to be hyped up to entertain viewers. Sweartogod.

4. Did you, or anyone, ask questions like those when GW Bush was in office and lied us into a fraudulent war?

Now, I’m sure this host is a very nice person, professional, and just trying to do her job by keeping the conversation interesting and lively, but come on.

By the way, in their statement, part of what the Homeland Security Department said was, “At the time of reentry there was no derogatory information that suggested this individual posed a national security or public safety threat.” I didn’t hear that mentioned.

VIDEO: Obama, Netanyahu press conference, including admonishing NBC’s Chuck Todd for asking too many questions

chuck todd netanyahu obama presser

As I watched the Obama/Netanyahu Press Conference Moment of More-Than-Chuck-Todd-Bargained-For live, I noticed tweets flying by saying things like:

“Chuck Todd. Sigh.”

I know. I caught that. Hope msm is listening (Hear that FOX?) Todd’s pissing me off again tho”

#ChuckTodd such an a**hole!

Seems Chuck overstepped just a tad by jamming in more questions than was allotted to each reporter. The responses he got were in fun, but made the point.

President Obama:

Chuck, How many you got? Do you guys do this in the Israeli press? You say you get one question and then you add like five? You see how the young lady from Channel One, she had one question, she was very well-behaved, Chuck?”

Netanyahu

“These are Talmudic questions — they have iterations.”

Todd:

“I thought I had four questions. Passover starts in a couple days, I get four questions, right?”

Netanyahu:

“Look, and this is not a kosher question, but don’t hog it.”

Chuck, to Netanyahu:

“My question to you was going to be, why do you believe the Israeli people have not embraced President Obama the same way they’ve embraced our last two U.S. presidents?”

President Obama:

“So you had to get a polling question in there right at the end. Chuck. I mean you’re just incorrigible.”

Then there was Todd’s question about why peace talks have stumbled during the president’s first term. Here is the president’s answer:

“Look, the opening premise to your question was, having failed to achieve peace in my first term, then I must have screwed up somehow… My commitment was not to achieve a peace deal in my first year, or my second year, or my third year, that would have been nice. What I said was, I was not gonna wait to START on the issue until my second term, because I thought it was too important, and that’s exactly what I did.”

so there

Here are the opening remarks:

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

From Dep’t. of Under-reported, Under-Appreciated Very Important Items: Pres. Obama will renew his push for nuclear treaty

obama nuke security

Um, this is kind of important. It’s also very under-reported and under-appreciated. In fact, other than Rachel Maddow, I can’t remember a single person at any cable news outlet that pays much attention to President Obama’s relentless efforts to rid the world of nuclear weapons.

Remember this? Anyone? Bueller?

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

President Obama, 2009:

As a nuclear power as the only nuclear power to have used a nuclear weapon, the United States has a moral responsibility to act. We cannot succeed in this endeavor alone, but we can lead it. We can start it. So today I state clearly and with conviction America’s commitment to seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons. [applause] I’m not naive. This goal will not be reached quickly. Perhaps not in my lifetime. It will take patience and persistence. But now we, too, must ignore the voices who tell us that the world cannot change. We have to insist, yes we can.”

Now the president is renewing that push for a nuclear treaty at the United Nations. Per The Hill, progress on a treaty has been stalled due to Pakistan’s opposition:

Administration officials and arms control activists believe they now have a new window for action. They point to increased cooperation on the UN Security Council and the beginning of John Kerry’s tenure as secretary of State as reasons for optimism. [...]

[Daryl Kimball, the executive director of the Arms Control Association] said progress on Fissile Material Cut-Off Treaty (FMCT) would depend on cooperation from Pakistan, which harbors fears of archrival India having more access to fissile material. The five permanent members of the UN Security Council might hold side talks with India and Pakistan in April to try and move the treaty forward, he said. [...]

Kerry is seen as a potential facilitator in those talks because of his long-standing relationship with Pakistan. [...]

Kimball said that if Pakistan won’t agree to let the treaty talks proceed, another option would be for other nuclear powers to jointly declare that they will collectively observe a moratorium on fissile material production. The United States, Russia, France and Great Britain have already acknowledged they’ve stopped producing fissile material, and China is believed to have ended it as well.

Maybe it’s finally time to get this news around, whaddya think?

PhotOH! Toy “security check point” bombs on Amazon (no pun intended)

From Sign of the Times Department:

toy security check point

We don’t know when or if this item will be back in stock.” What? It wasn’t popular enough to bring back? The kiddies and their parents just weren’t that into it? Gee, can’t imagine why.

Maybe because they didn’t include a “Private Interrogation Room Playhouse,” handcuffs, or optional action figures gawking at the potential terrorist when an optional alarm buzzer (batteries not included) sounds when optional metal bomb parts trigger it? They also left out shoe bomb accessories and lawsuit forms.

No wonder it’s wasn’t a big seller.

Security increased “immediately” at Los Alamos National Lab in New Mexico

los alamos logo

Today I was reading a little blurb about the nuclear security chief, Tom D’Agostino, resigning when something caught my eye. Via the Seattle Times, it starts out with…

The man who has led the nation’s nuclear-security agency since 2007 is stepping down next month after presiding over a 20 percent increase in the agency’s budget but also some management missteps that have raised questions about the agency’s ability to carry out its mission.

Tom D’Agostino announced Friday he is leaving the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), which funds and oversees work at the Sandia and Los Alamos national labs in New Mexico. The research centers employ about 20,000 people in the state. He was appointed to the post by President George W. Bush.

True to form, the article went on to say that he wants to spend more time with his family. But that’s not what caught my eye.

This was:

His announcement came the same day the agency ordered higher security at the Los Alamos National Laboratory.

To which I responded:

 

All I could dig up was this, from the AP:

[T]he lab said that the National Nuclear Security Administration has directed it to increase security immediately, meaning vehicles and visitors will be subject to extra checks.
    
Lab spokesman Kevin Roark said lab officials never discuss the reasons behind security alerts. He did say the order was exclusive to Los Alamos, and not all of the nation’s nuclear facilities.

Just thought it was worth a mention.