Archive for murder

Video- The Daily Show: Nancy Grace & the Jodi Arias Trial

Never understood why Grace is so popular.

VIDEO– BLUNT: The Senate “decided to do nothing.” We’ve had enough gun violence. “Vote them out.”

blunt bug for blog posts

Blunt is a lot like letters to the editor. YOUR take, short, to the point.

You have a voice, now use it.

Special thanks to all who contributed.

For more information about how to contribute to a video Blunt, follow this link.

It’s your turn. Go.

Shannyn Moore: Don’t just suffer the darkness, make light. “Is that the opposite of terrorism? Selfless humanity?”

martin luther king darkness light love hate

Friend of the blog and friend of mine Shannyn Moore has kindly given us permission to cross-post her excellent op-ed from the Anchorage Daily News:

Media saturation and outrage fatigue. That’s the kind of week it’s been.

There were so many stories — from all over the country and world in such terrible detail. There seemed nothing to do but watch as horror after horror unfolded. When was the last time I heard “Breaking: Good News?”

As summer draws near, we watched the U.S. Senate — including both of our senators — fail the victims of past and future gun massacres. On Patriot’s Day blood spilled on the streets of Boston, limbs lost, lives lost. We saw a deadly explosion at a fertilizer plant in West, Texas, the victims literally vaporized under a mushroom cloud.

An Elvis impersonator is accused of sending poison to the president and a congressman — and it didn’t even make the front page.

We learned that pressure cookers aren’t just for canning salmon. The manhunt for heartless terrorists unfolded relentlessly, bit by bit, in our living rooms. It’s no wonder so many of the ads during the 24-hour cable news broadcasts are for anti-depressants, anti-depressant boosters, sleep aids and blood pressure medications. Maybe a news week like this can actually make you sick. I like to believe our brains are wired to feel empathy for our fellow humans in peril and pain and to help if we can. I dare say it’s our better nature.

So let’s remember the volunteer firefighters in Texas, well aware of the danger posed by a burning fertilizer plant, who stayed to help evacuate a home for the elderly.

Is that the opposite of terrorism? Selfless humanity? We see a lot less of that in the news. I wouldn’t mind a few more minutes of real heroes on TV rather than seemingly endless hours of speculation by people who went to high school with fanatical zealots whose grandest ambition was to kill children with bombs.

Growing up in Homer, I felt like there were a lot of horrible things that happened. I remember what houses burned down, whose parents got divorced, car wrecks, boats sinkings and grievous illnesses. Many of these surfaced as prayer requests during church services.

Pop Moore had a saying about most of these situations. “It’s not a problem — it’s just a situation that we have to find a solution for.”

When a house burned down, we went through our toys, books and clothes and packed a few boxes. Mom and Pop did the same.

We made casseroles and delivered them to grieving families. We showed up at funerals.

We went to spaghetti feeds and pie auctions for people who needed money for medical treatments. Once Pop bought a pie for $100 and donated it back — it sold again and he and the other bidder split the pie.

In those days, it seemed that bad news had a process — there were things to be done on a scale that people could handle. There seemed to be a balance.

I’m not sure we humans are built to consume the abundance of grief and pain, tears and fears brought to us from near and far by a vast media machine. But what can we do about it?

Without the ability to respond with individual action we become simple rubber-neckers at the misfortunes of others. It shouldn’t be enough just to be relieved that whatever is happening isn’t happening in our town.

I’m not proposing we unplug the giant media machine. I would never urge people to bury their heads and assume it’s all being taken care of. Often, we have only two meaningful ways to react: We can give money, or we can take our responsibilities as citizens a little more seriously — by voting and holding our leaders accountable — so may we prevent a tragedy. We can’t undo a killing explosion in Texas but we can push the people we elect to make sure we have smart zoning laws and money for safety inspections. That requires a focus and discipline that’s not as easy or as satisfying as baking a pie.

Maybe it’s a simple as trying to balance the bad we know is out there with the good we can do right now. Like picking up the trash that someone else tossed, volunteering at the soup kitchen or sorting extra clothes into boxes for the needy. Maybe many small acts of GOOD, efforts that don’t really take much effort, are better for us than anti-depressants, sleep aids and blood pressure meds.

The night of the Boston bombing, New York City lit a message for Boston. It was a quote from Martin Luther King Jr.: “Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that.”

Dr. King went on to say, “Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.”


Shannyn Moore can be heard weekdays from 6 to 9 p.m. on KOAN 1020 AM and 95.5 FM radio. Her weekly TV show airs at 3 p.m. Saturdays and Sundays on ABC affiliate KYUR Channel 13.

Video- Ann Coulter Defends Meghan McCain Murder Joke: “Everyone Laughed When They Read It”



Via.

WTF Moment: Sen. James Inhofe to #Newtown families: Gun debate has nothing to do with you.

wtf moment

Yesterday, President Obama was in Connecticut speaking on common-sense measures to reduce gun violence:

“What’s more important to you, our children or an A grade from the gun lobby?”

“Shouldn’t we make it HARDER, not easier for domestic abusers to get their hands on a gun?”

“If you believe those killed by guns deserve a vote.. Stand up. Stand up.”

All great points. He also quoted Newtown victim, six-year-old Dylan Hockley‘s mom, Nicole:

Every night I beg for him to come to me in my dreams so that I can see him again. And during the day, I just focus on what I need to do to honor him and make change.” Now if Nicole can summon the courage to do that, how can the rest of us do any less?

Now wouldn’t you think Nicole Hockley and others who were directly affected by the Sandy Hook massacre (or any other mass shooting, for that matter) might be relevant to the gun debate we’re having in this country? After all, they are voluntarily and passionately lobbying Congress members to expand background checks, get tougher on gun trafficking and increase school safety.

Which brings me to Senator James Inhofe who is one of the 14 senators below who have threatened to block gun safety legislation:

gop senators filibuster gun laws 2

Now Inhofe is revealing exactly how delusional and cold-hearted he really is. Via HuffPo:

“See, I think it’s so unfair of the administration to hurt these families, to make them think this has something to do with them when, in fact, it doesn’t,” Inhofe said.

When it was suggested that the families of Newtown victims actually believe the gun debate pertains to them, Inhofe said, “Well, that’s because they’ve been told that by the president.

Yes, President Obama made them do it. They are clearly incapable of thinking for themselves, of feeling so much pain that they are driven to act on behalf of their slain loved ones, of drawing obvious conclusions, and taking action on behalf of their murdered family members in order to help prevent this from happening again.

blame obama

Think Progress:

The Oklahoma senator has an A+ rating from the NRA and Gun Owners of America. He has taken at least $19,800 from the former since 1998.

If I go on, I won’t be able stop at simply referring to Inhofe as an insensitive, gun-sucking, self-serving, cowardly prick. I’ll stop now.

VIDEO: Pres. Obama on common-sense measures to reduce gun violence, Hartford, CT + the Senators who will block them

guns letter filibuster gopgop senators filibuster gun laws 2Via @navyvet50 and @catonahill

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

“What’s more important to you, our children or an A grade from the gun lobby?”

“Shouldn’t we make it HARDER, not easier for domestic abusers to get their hands on a gun?”

“If you believe those killed by guns deserve a vote.. Stand up. Stand up.”

This broke my heart. The president quoted Newtown victim, six-year-old Dylan Hockley‘s mom, Nicole:

Every night I beg for him to come to me in my dreams so that I can see him again. And during the day, I just focus on what I need to do to honor him and make change.” Now if Nicole can summon the courage to do that, how can the rest of us do any less?

And this:

… A mom I met from suburban Chicago whose son was killed in a random shooting. This mom told me,  “I hate it when people tell me that my son in the wrong place a the wrong time. He was on his way to school!” He was exactly where he was supposed to be! He was in the right place at the right time, and he still got shot! The kids at Sandy Hook were where they were supposed to be!… They were also exercising their rights.

Thank you President Obama, for  kicking ass on gun safety measures. I was in tears. Now PLEASE do the same on behalf of Social Security and Medicare.

And while you’re at it, kick the asses of the 15 Republicans who have now pledged to filibuster Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s gun safety bill. Here’s the text of the letter:

March 22, 2013

Dear Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid,

We, the undersigned, intend to oppose any legislation that would oppose on the American people’s constitutional right to bear arms, or on their ability to exercise this right without being subjected to government surveillance.

The Second Amendment to the Constitution protects citizens’ right to self-defense. It speaks to history’s lesson that government cannot be in all places at all times, and history’s warning about the oppression of a government that tries.

We will oppose the motion to proceed to any legislation that will serve as a vehicle for any additional gun restrictions.

  1. Rand Paul (Ky.) (ring leader)
  2. Mike Lee (R-Utah)
  3. Ted Cruz (R-Texas)
  4. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.)
  5. Sen. Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.)
  6. Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
  7. Sen. Richard Burr (R – NC)
  8. Sen. Daniel Coats (R – IN)
  9. Sen. Jerry Moran (R – KS)
  10. Sen. Pat Roberts (R – KS)
  11. Sen. James M. Inhofe (R – OK)
  12. Sen. Ron Johnson (R – WI)
  13. Sen. James E. Risch (R – ID)
  14. Sen. Mike Crapo (R – ID)

There is a fifteenth name, but I can’t seem to find it. If you do, please let me know and I will add it.

newtown children smaller gun

Infographic: Comparing speed bumps and gun background checks

gun background checks

For once, NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre has a point:

guns background checks v speed bumps

Via an email from Mayors Against Illegal Guns:

You might have seen NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre on Meet The Press last Sunday, where he said gun background check system was “a speed bump” for law-abiding citizens and “does nothing to anybody else.”

I’m not often in agreement with Wayne, but this is actually an extraordinarily apt metaphor. Like speed bumps, background checks are a simple, commonsense measure that don’t inconvenience law-abiding citizens and have a proven track-record saving lives. For most gun buyers they take less time than ordering a cup of coffee, and they bring felons, the seriously mentally ill, and other dangerous people to a dead stop. If anything, the background check system should function more like speed bumps and apply to all gun buyers alike — whether they are purchasing from a gun dealer or a private seller.

The attached infographic and fact sheet provide some more details, and please don’t hesitate to get in touch if you have any additional questions.

Mark Glaze
Director
Mayors Against Illegal Guns

The infographic he referred to is at the top of this post. Here is the fact sheet:

On NBC’s Meet The Press on March 23, 2013, NRA executive vice president Wayne LaPierre compared gun background checks to speed bumps: “ [A background check] is a speed bump for the law-abiding. It slows down the law-abiding and does nothing to anybody else.

Speed bumps are in fact an excellent metaphor for gun background checks — but  LaPierre is wrong about their  value. Both speed bumps and background checks save lives, and neither imposes much burden on people going about their business. If anything, the background check system should function more like speed bumps do: they apply to everyone equally.

Car accidents and guns kill tens of thousands of Americans every year.

  • 33,687 Americans were killed in car accidents in 2010. Faster driving is associated with more fatalities, so simply by slowing drivers down, speed bumps prevent accidents and save lives.
  • 32,672 Americans were killed with guns in 2010, and firearm homicide is the second leading cause of injury death among Americans aged 15-24. Because felons and other dangerous people are at a higher risk of committing gun violence, federal law prohibits them from buying guns. Background checks enforce this law –– by screening prospective gun buyers and blocking sales to those who are prohibited.

Both speed bumps and background checks are proven life-savers.

  • Children who live within a block of a speed hump are 60 percent less likely to be hit and injured by a car on their street than children that do not.
  • Each year, the background check system blocks 150,000 gun sales to dangerous people prohibited by law from having them — more than 2 million sales blocked since the system’s inception in 1998. And states that require background checks for all handgun sales have 48 percent less gun trafficking, 17 percent fewer firearm aggravated assaults, and 38 fewer women shot to death by an intimate partner.

Neither speed bumps nor background checks are a burden

  • Speed bumps don’t keep drivers from getting where they want to go. Communities have decided that the minor inconvenience of slowing down near schools, parks and other places with lots of pedestrians is well worth the lives it saves.
  • Background checks don’t keep gun buyers from getting any firearm they want. A check takes about 90 seconds to complete. Most people don’t mind waiting a couple minutes to save a lot of lives.

Drivers can’t avoid speed bumps. But anyone can avoid a background check.

  • While background checks are required for dealer sales, almost anyone can buy a gun from an unlicensed “private seller” with no background check, no questions asked. An estimated 40 percent of gun transfers happen this way. Treating sales by licensed and unlicensed sellers equally and requiring background checks for all buyers would keep guns out of the wrong hands.
  • If federal law required a background check for private sales, sellers and buyers would meet at a licensed gun dealer to get their check, rather than a parking lot or other public place. This isn’t burdensome either – because there are 58,344 gun dealers in the U.S., nearly twice the number of post offices and four times the number of McDonald’s locations. A Mayors Against Illegal Guns analysis found that 98.4 percent of Americans live within 10 miles of a gun dealer.

We know a lot about speed bumps –but not nearly enough about gun violence.

  • The federal government has subjected speed bumps and other ‘traffic calming’ interventions to tens of millions of dollars of rigorous evaluation to determine that they work, and to use them effectively. Over the last decade, this has produced a dramatic national decline in traffic – related deaths.
  • Under pressure from the gun lobby, the U.S. government has withdrawn almost all public support for research on ways to prevent gun-related deaths and injuries – including the background check system.

Footnotes available at the link.