Archive for Medicare

“So the White House can’t get even a basically Republican budget passed.”

grand bargain social security 2

I expressed my disappointment over President Obama’s alleged proposed cutbacks to Social Security and Medicare in my previous post, Sen. Bernie Sanders: “Having [Obama] go back on his word will only add to the rampant political cynicism…”

I also provided a way to contact your Senators.

And with that, your Daily Dose of BuzzFlash at Truthout, via Mark Karlin: 

Obama either continues to believe in the now inexcusably naïve notion of “bi-partisanship” or he is, as some will argue, at heart a fiscal corporate neo-liberal Wall Street true believer [...]

The NYT, which clearly received the leak about the Obama budget from White House sources, is reflecting an Oval Office viewpoint that the president is compromising in order to win over “moderate” Republican votes.  Say what? Earth to planet Obama: have you learned nothing from continually starting negotiations with the Republicans letting them advance to 10 yards of their goal – and them allowing them to walk over into the end zone for a victory twist and shake?

If you want to know the low threshold of weakness Obama is negotiating from, read the viewpoint of his aides, as reported in the NYT:

Neither the president nor senior aides privately hold much hope that Republican leaders — Mr. Boehner and Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Senate Republican leader — will compromise. So Mr. Obama’s strategy of reaching out to other Senate Republicans reflects a calculation that enough of them might cut a budget deal with the Democratic Senate majority. If that happens, the reasoning goes, a Senate-passed compromise would put pressure on the House to go along.

Uh, so the White House can’t get even a basically Republican budget passed – with some crumbs of federal spending.  They have to, as they see it, concede grovel and pray.

Bill Clinton said a long time back: “We [Democrats] have got to be strong. When we look weak in a time where people feel insecure, we lose.  When people feel uncertain, they’d rather have somebody who’s strong and wrong than somebody’s who’s weak and right.”

Doesn’t Obama run the danger, in his budget and many of his legislative proposals of appearing both weak and wrong?

Or is it that he actually believes in what he is proposing? [...]

[H]istory will judge him – and the seniors, unemployed, and poor who watch helplessly — as President Obama thrusts a stake through the heart of the New Deal, while perpetuating a system of systemic oligarchy.

Please read the entire post here.

Sen. Bernie Sanders: “Having [Obama] go back on his word will only add to the rampant political cynicism…”

grand bargain social securitychained cpi social security

Hey, remember this? V.P. Biden “flat guarantees” no changes in Social Security, which “effectively takes Social Security off the table.”

So this happened: Obama budget would cut entitlements in exchange for tax increases:

President Obama will release a budget next week that proposes significant cuts to Medicare and Social Security and fewer tax hikes than in the past, a conciliatory approach that he hopes will convince Republicans to sign onto a grand bargain that would curb government borrowing and replace deep spending cuts that took effect March 1. [...]

Obama proposes, for instance, to change the cost-of-living calculation for Social Security in a way that will reduce benefits for most beneficiaries, a key Republican request that he had earlier embraced only as part of a compromise. Many Democrats say they are opposed to any Social Security cuts and are likely to be furious that such cuts are now being proposed as official administration policy. [...]

Overall, the budget request reflects Obama’s stark shift in strategy over the last month, as he has adopted a far more congenial posture toward the opposition

“Millions of working people, seniors, disabled veterans, those who have lost a loved one in combat, and women will be extremely disappointed if President Obama caves into the long-standing Republican effort to cut Social Security,” Sen. Bernard Sanders (I-Vt.), who caucuses with Democrats, said earlier this week, after reports surfaced that Obama might include the change in his budget.

“In 2008, candidate Barack Obama told the American people that he would not cut Social Security. Having him go back on his word will only add to the rampant political cynicism that our country is experiencing today.”

“Disappointed” indeed.

Why does President Obama still not grasp that Republicans do not like him  (maybe he does), refuse to compromise (maybe he doesn’t), and will continue to do everything they can to obstruct sensible Democratic plans and to make mincemeat of his legacy? They’ve always wanted him to fail, and they continue to want him to fail. They’re doing whatever it takes to make that happen. As has always been the case, they have no intention of working with him, only against him, the well-being of the rest of us be damned.

Why does he still insist on bargaining from the center and moving right instead of starting from the left and moving center-left? Well, for one thing, as I’ve always said, he’s no liberal, as I made clear in this post:

…President Obama’s willingness to cut Social Security benefits? Or his strong consideration of signing off on a disaster-in-waiting (see: State Dep’t. draft report looks promising for backers of Keystone XL pipeline)? Or his indefinite detention of detainees at Guantanamo Bay? Or his stance on wiretaps? Or his reluctance to go after Bush, Cheney, and company for lying us into a fraudulent invasion of a sovereign country and torturing prisoners? Or allowing nearly all of the Bush tax cuts to remain in place? Some liberal.

It’s one thing to be realistic and understand where a deal will likely end up. It’s another to break promises, to doom any chances of keeping the programs intact that those on the left (and most voters) hold dear and rely upon, and to cater far more to those on the right.

The GOP was going to reject Democratic ideas regardless of what the president came in with, so why not begin negotiations with a more Progressive stance and one that is more popular overall?

Here’s an idea, why not eliminate the payroll tax earnings cap? Oh, and there’s this. The sequester was designed to force Democrats into supporting a Grand Bargain.

The following chart is from StrengthenSocialSecurity.org. Please follow the link to see how proposed changes would also affect veterans, and so much more.You can find more charts and information here, too.

chart social security chained CPI

The important thing to know is that this change would cut the benefits of all beneficiaries, including current retirees, disabled workers, and others–even after politicians promised repeatedly that any changes to Social Security would not affect current beneficiaries. The COLA cut is a real threat to the financial security of every American who does currently or will rely on Social Security.

And please read Why Social Security Recipients Shouldn’t Be Shackled With The Chained CPI. More here.

The always astute Dave Johnson (@dcjohnson) had this to say in an email:

The Obama budget is going to offer “Grand Bargain” cuts in Social Security and Medicare, hoping to get Republicans to offer tax increases. We are heading into a retirement crisis. The 401K experiment didn’t work. Companies have pulled back on pensions. And the squeeze that has been on regular people for decades means that people also do not have the savings they need to get them through old age. And all the money went to the top. The last thing the country needs is cuts in essential services for the elderly.

Who Could Have Predicted:

“If the president believes these modest entitlement savings are needed to help shore up these programs, there’s no reason they should be held hostage for more tax hikes. That’s no way to lead and move the country forward,” Boehner said in a statement.

If they say they are offering to ”protect”  the oldest and poorest from this, then what does this mean is going to happen to the rest?

Want to try to make a difference? Contact your Senators here. I just did.

grand bargain social security 2

VIDEO: Alan Grayson delivers #CancelTheSequester petition signed by 300,000 to John Boehner’s office

alan grayson sequester petition

Go Alan Grayson!

The GOP lives for austerity and strives for cuts to and the eventual elimination of successful programs that so many Americans depend on. Their watchword: Privatize. Their goal: Union busting (Read: Ending Democratic fundraising) and destroying their own government. Their prize: Money and power. They salivate over the prospect of profiting off of the misfortune of others, the needs of their fellow citizens, the public programs that have worked better than their for-profit corporate schemes.

Austerity hasn’t worked overseas, it hasn’t worked here.

Via AusterityNut.com

Via AusterityNut.com

Alan Grayson:

“…End the sequester.”

Washington does not normally see 300,000 people speak as one. I am your legs today, and to some extent I’m your voice, but I’m not the one who matters. What matters is that we work together… In numbers there is strength.”

“…They’re gonna have to listen.”

alan grayson sequester petition 2

Via Wired For Change:

Now we have to make sure that everyone, including the White House, knows that the American people reject all benefit cuts to Social Security, Medicare or Medicaid.  

In an effort led by Alan Grayson, 31 members of Congress have pledged to vote against legislation that cuts Social Security, Medicaid or Medicare benefits. 

Let’s make sure the White House knows we reject all benefit cuts to Social Security, Medicare or Medicaid.

If 100,000 of us sign this petition, Alan Grayson will deliver it to the White House.

cancel the sequester

“Like NRA who scares the Bejesus out of elected officials when we talk gun control, rich do same with loop holes”

gutting

Another guest post is by our pal and regular TPC contributor, David Garber:

 WHO’S GUTTING WHO?

Here’s the headline currently on Huffington post: “Obama: ‘We’re Probably Not Gonna Get A Deal’ If GOP Insists On ‘Gutting’ Medicare, Social Security, Medicaid”

Okay, on the surface, that sounded reasonable until I focused on the word, Obama’s word, ‘Gutting’. Wait a minute — that should be touching, not gutting. Stop way before gutting. The holy trinity cannot be touched. Period.

Why are we even discussing this? Has Obama lost sight of his victory from last November? Here we are, just beginning his second term, and he’s out trying to strike a grand bargain. Why? Is America clamoring for one? Maybe, but not the one Obama or the Republicans are talking about.

What we the people are looking for is a deal on immigration reform and gun control. And jobs.

But do you know what we need even more? An overhaul to the tax system. We want a fair and efficient system — with more revenue for the Dems and less government for the Repubs. And you want to know how easy that is to accomplish? Very.

Don’t let the liars in Washington fool you. Or the shortsighted news readers on the TV and radio. Overhaul is as simple as a stroke of the pen.

How? Simply slash the outrageous tax breaks for the super rich. Before you tune me out, just consider this:

  • No more yacht write-offs (how many people do you know that have a yacht? You pay taxes to cover their write-off).
  • No more private jet write-offs (again, how many people do you know that have private jets? You’re paying for their write off with your taxes).
  • No more corporate off shore stashing of profits to avoid taxes (you have to pay taxes, why shouldn’t they?).
  • No more subsidies to oil companies thus giving them billions in profits with unfair write-offs like off-shore banking. (You’re paying for it with your taxes).
  • No more tax breaks to companies for outsourcing jobs. (Yes, we give a break if a company hires workers in a foreign land as opposed to a legal worker here in the states.)
  • No more giving free money to banks (too large to fail or jail) thus giving them even larger corporate writeoffs for managing the money they’ve been loaned).

Do you realize we give big banks interest-free money and let them keep it and call it profits? Yup, and they’re not even encouraged to use it for customer loans or service. It’s OUR TAX MONEY. Yet go in and try to get a loan. Good luck.

If a big bank needs cash to stay afloat, force them to use that money for loans to individuals and small businesses, or else the bank must return the money within two years WITH a punitive interest payment for the use of the money. If you borrowed money, whether you used it or not, you’d have to pay the piper. Why not JP Morgan/Chase or Citibank?

Implement these suggestions and watch how quickly financial institutions start giving out home mortgages to those who qualify or start up capital for small businesses to get launched. Need new equipment to modernize your small company? The banks will loan it because if they don’t, they will have to pay interest. Watch the economy jump then. Big banks will become smaller and new banks will start up and carry those who leave the big established financial institutions for those who care about their customers. No depositor will be losing money. Nor will the banks unless they’re unscrupulous, in which case, leave them. There will be options.

What’s holding us back are loopholes that should never have been in existence in the first place. Their purpose has long since retired — along with the crooks who wrote them into the tax codes.

And just like the NRA who scares the Bejesus out of our elected officials when we talk any sort of gun control, the rich do the same if you threaten their loop holes.

Politicians think only the rich put money into their campaigns so the poor and middle class don’t matter. Ask Karl Rove how that went. Our vote is what they need even more than money. And our vote counts just as much as the millionaires’ or business tycoons’.

So demand what’s important — our elected representatives start representing us — the poor and middle class. The rich don’t need our help. Obama and Congress should be talking about gutting — but gutting the tax system, not our security nets.

The Holy Trinity, Medicare, Social Security and Medicaid cannot be tampered with. They’re not the problem. We can even improve them and cut our taxes at the same time — hear that, Republicans, tax cut — if you stop protecting your rich cronies and do your job.

Congress, we can remove you — and we will. We’ll gut you (with our votes) like Jack the Ripper — a sacrifice that’s more important than gutting 99% of the public. Dump the Chump!

For the past 25 years, David Garber has been serving as the show runner and or writer on some of television’s biggest hits… Saved By The Bell, Power Rangers, 227, Bill Cosby Show and many other network series. His writing and producing have also netted David two very prestigious awards:the PRISM AWARD and the TV CRITICS AWARD – TV SPECIAL OF THE YEAR. Currently he’s authoring a short story series called “A Few Minutes With…”

Cartoons of the Day- Paul Ryan’s Budget

ryanbudget

ryanbudget2

ryanbudget3

Via.

VIDEO: The “breathaking dishonesty” of Paul Ryan and his “LaLaLand fantasy budget”

ryan budget ridic

I would like to thank the Nation’s Katrina vandenHeuvel for making the following excellent point and doing so in about a minute:

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Katrina:

Paul Ryan is no apostle of fiscal rectitude.

With all due respect to Ezra, you’re hearing Paul Ryan, who is cruel and clueless, and this is LaLaLand fantasy budget proposal, being treated seriously by someone like Ezra Klein, who is treated seriously inside the Beltway. For too long… inside the Beltway has had a a fixation, an obsession, with the deficit. We now see the deficits dwindling

The danger is that Paul Ryan, bringing this out, is gonna shift the playing field so it moves even further to the right.

Ezra Klein then says Ryan deserves to be taken seriously because he’s the House Budget Chairman. Well, newsflash, Ezra, per my November 2012 post “Global warming skeptic set to chair House Science Committee“(the following was true as of then):

Marco Rubio is unsure how old the Earth is. He is a member of the Senate’s Commerce, Science, & Transportation Committee.

Michele “Man-Made Climate Change is ‘Manufactured Science” Bachmann sits on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

The soon-to-be forgotten moron on climate change, Todd “legitimate rape” Akin, sits on the Science Committee, as does Paul Evolution, Embryology and Big Bang Theory are “lies straight from the pit of hell, Climate Change is a Hoax” Broun.

And via Amanda Terkel at HuffPo:

Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), a skeptic of man-made global warming, is set to take over the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology in the 113th Congress.

Should we take those people seriously too?

Here is the entire segment, all of it worth watching:

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Yes, Paul Ryan is proposing that Congress make the very same cuts to Medicare that he previously ranted and raved about during the 2012 elections. No hypocrite, he!

Ezra Klein:

Keep two numbers in mind… 59 and zero. 59% of Paul Ryan’s cuts, 59%, so almost 6 out of 10 dollars that he cuts… come from health care mostly for the poor [Medicaid, Obamacare, some Medicare cuts affecting the working class and the poor].

The “zero” is taxes. He doesn’t raise a dollar in taxes.

The experts I’ve spoken to don’t think that is mathematically possible.

Joy Ann Reid:

He doesn’t mind spending federal money, as long as it’s on the rich.

Ari Melber:

Just ’cause it has numbers in it doesn’t make it a budget. Right? My lottery ticket is not a budget just ’cause it’s a bunch of numbers on the page.

He’s not a deficit hawk, he’s a health care hawk.

This was a terrific segment. Please watch it all the way through.

lala land

NOTE: Apologies for the mistake on Katrina vandenHeuvel’s name, which I clearly do know. I’m, literally half asleep and let my fingers do the walking for me. It’s been corrected.

The five biggest lies about “entitlement” (ahem, earned benefits) programs

ryan kill medicare entitlements earned benefits

My Twitter pal Michael Hiltzik does it again. In his newest L.A. Times column, he dissects the five biggest lies about Social Security and Medicare, pointing out that the truth seems to elude far too many people who have big microphones.

Hiltzik first states a fact that everyone should know, but right wing talking points have obliterated: that the very word “entitlement” is a lie, saying “Social Security and Medicare got that name because workers became ‘entitled’ to those benefits by paying into the system. In recent years, however, the term has become distorted to signify benefits people are entitled to without earning them.”

Glad we got that out of the way, because it drives me nuts.

Now on to the lies. He begins with the January 1 change in the Social Security payroll tax, which lowered the average household income by about $80 a month. Lie No. 1: The payroll tax hike is killing the retail economy:

Blaming the payroll tax, however, ignores the whole story. First, on Jan. 1 the tax wasn’t hiked; it was restored to its 2010 level, after a two-year “holiday”… But the holiday was always a wretched idea, in part because of what everyone knew would happen when the old rate reappeared —people treated it as a pay cut…. The payroll tax break, by contrast, went only to those who pay into Social Security. So it left out 5.7 million state and local workers (mostly teachers).

Then on to the second whopper, Lie No. 2: “Entitlement” benefits for millionaires and billionaires are a costly problem:

The lie here is the assertion that a significant portion of benefits goes to multimillionaires. In fact, their share of benefits is minuscule. That’s because there aren’t very many of them, and they don’t get more than the maximum old-age benefit… They account for about 14 hundredths of one percent of all Social Security outlays.

Lie No. 3: Social Security and Medicare are $60 trillion in the hole:

It’s a calculation of funding gaps projected out to the limitless future and then converted to present value — meaning what the cost would be if we had to pay it all today.

Lie No. 4: You’re paying too much (or too little) for your benefits:

This is a double-barreled lie, based on the misconception that Social Security and Medicare are retirement funds. They’re not; they’re insurance programs. What you recover depends on your personal circumstances, but the point is they’re there when you need them.

Lie No. 5: Medicare, Social Security — it’s all the same:

[I]t’s misleading to lump these two programs together as if they have the same issues amenable to the same solutions.

social security bernie sanders

I sliced and diced Michael’s column up, so please link over and read the entire thing.