Archive for media coverage

VIDEO– Obama: “I have complete confidence in Eric Holder.” But when Turkish Prime Minister spoke, media cut away.

via Yahoo @maxzimberMarine umbrellas ObamaVia Yahoo’s @maxzimbert: Marines provided umbrellas during a rainy press conference.

As you can see, earlier today President Obama and Prime Minister Erdogan held a joint press conference. And as you can see from the video, the president is standing by his Attorney General.

But there was a lot in that presser we didn’t get to see, because this happened:

tweet boehlert turkish pm Obama CNN

MSNBC often cut away, too, as did CNBC, per the tweets I received. Here are a few of them, plus a couple responding directly to Media Matter’s Eric Boehlert’s tweet. I’ll start with my own:

Dear MSNBC, CNN: So Turkish prime minister’s words don’t count? Now the presser is over, all we got was commentary from talking heads.

Here are the tweets I managed to copy and paste as they whizzed by:

Disrespect to other countries

Do they think we care nothing about anyone not from US? They are wrong.

Because, you know, Turkey is SO unimportant on the world stage right now..bordering on Syria and such..*mutter*

This is making me angry.

Wouldn’t it be nice if there were a 24 hour News network that had the capability of covering these long Press–oh, wait.

 MSNBC & Andrea Mitchell doing same. It’s rude and she should be called on it.

Does she not understand Turkey’s interest in Assad stepping down?

What does it matter what he has to say? He’s only one of the key players in solving the Syrian quagmire.

And then, the pièce de résistance. Andrea Mitchell turned to David Gregory (of all people) for commentary, leading off with this question (slightly paraphrased, she added one other adjective that I can’t remember):

“Is the president too passive and ____, as he’s been criticized for?”

How objective. How fair and balanced.

How insulting.

VIDEO: Saturday Night Live mocks the Benghazi hearings

snl benghazi hearing

Via the Blaze.

We all know what a bad joke the multiple Benghazi hearings have been. Even though the GOP Benghazi hysteria was debunked by Rachel Maddow, it continues. And continues. And continues.

Today the Sunday talkers couldn’t wait to get their cameras rolling and their giddy hosts frothing, because, yes, it’s all about ratings, not news. When the news was commercialized, it went the way of the BetaMax, instead giving a platform to right wing witch hunts, scandals that do not exist, and hosts who don’t seek honest answers, just headlines.

Bill Maher tried to put “Benghazi!!!!!” mania into perspective, but objectivity is falling on deaf show host and Republican ears.

Enter Saturday Night Live.

SNL’s “Darrell Issa” brought out just-convicted murderer “Jodi Arias” to testify. Yes, they went there.

“Rep. Elijah Cummings”:

“Everyone knows this is just a partisan witch hunt, and a chance to attack the president and Secretary of State Clinton.”

“Arias”:

“Who do you think did it?”

“Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC)”:

“Well we know who did it, it was Ansar al-Sharia.”

“Arias”:

“Well if you know who did it, why are you holding these hearings?”

Watch the entire video. That was just a teaser.

Bill Maher puts “Benghazi!!!!!” mania into perspective

bill maher

There are times when Bill Maher makes me cringe, times when he makes me laugh, times when he makes me think, times when he makes me scream, and times when he makes me proud.

Neither of these tweets made me cringe, but they made me do everything else on that list:

tweet maher benghazi impeach

bikini graph animated gif

tweet maher susan rice benghazi

Of course, anyone with a functioning brain knows this is all about Hillary Clinton 2016, and of course, destroying President Obama. But all the GOP Benghazi hysteria was debunked by Rachel Maddow. For one, Congress had the revised talking points for months.

tv benghazi

VIDEO: GOP Benghazi hysteria debunked. For one, Congress had the revised talking points for months.

maddow benghazi who changed talking points impeach

tv benghazi

Yesterday I posted PhotOH! What will be on your TV Machine Sunday morning. Hint: BENGHAZI!!!!!!!

It’s only Saturday, but Alex Witt led off the second hour of her broadcast (I missed the first hour, but I can only imagine… ) questioning the Obama administration’s honesty about Benghazi and whether or not the manufactured controversy would affect Hillary Clinton’s possible run for president.

Yes, she did that, because see, she’s objective and fair and balanced, see, and apparently looking to boost her ratings by stirring the pot. So it appears that it’s not only Republicans who are hoping that this “scandal” sticks.

I’m watching now, and she just said, “We now know that there were 12 different drafts” and asked “what this does to the Obama administration’s credibility.” That was followed by a clip of Rand Paul saying Hillary Clinton should never hold high office again, to which Witt wondered aloud if this will “haunt” Hillary.

Perhaps she should have watched her colleague Rachel Maddow’s show last night:

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Rachel Maddow:

Who changed the talking points? The intelligence community talking points for the administration officials in the immediate aftermath of the attack, they were sent around to the FBI, and the state department, and the White House. The e-mail chain showing the initial draft of those talking points, and the revision process, that e-mail chain was sent to members of Congress a couple months ago in February while they were considering the nomination of the new CIA director.

So Congress has had the talking points and how they were changed and by whom for a couple months now, showing the revisions, showing how they happened.

ABC published them today for the public as if they were a smoking gun, and all the Republicans in Congress who already had these things and have had them for months reported to be outraged by what was in them, shocked, , impeach, impeach!

They have had them for two and a half months now, and they never said anything about them before. Just today they decided it was a smoking gun, even though this has been long answered.

tv impeach

Here is the entire segment:

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

PhotOH! What will be on your TV Machine Sunday morning. Hint: BENGHAZI!!!!!!!

tv benghazi

This is is the image that flashed into what’s left of my mind as I thought about writing up this week’s Media Bias Sunday Talk scoreboard. It may not even be necessary to put in the effort, because you and I both know every show will feature John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Darrell Issa, or (un)reasonable facsimiles thereof.

And we all know that this is as much about future President Hillary Clinton as it is about current President Barack Obama.

Either way, I Photoshopped that TV screen as a preview to my guest list preview, should I decide to post something about the Sunday shows.

And here’s something else we can anticipate: a future TV screen that will undoubtedly look a little something like this:

tv impeach

enough is enough

Why I didn’t watch the Sunday talk shows today

yell at tv

I made the mistake of turning on “Meet the Press” today. I lasted about seven minutes before screaming at the Tee Vee Machine and turning it off. The entire seven minutes was similar to what happened here: “Does this open the president up for criticism? Will critics have new ammo? Well, will they, huh? Huh?” #LibrulMediaMyAss

All I heard was Benghazi Benghazi Benghazi, criticism of the president over the Boston bombings, and then more hyperventilating about anything else that ever existed within the vast political scope of all things Obama. BAD Obama. FAILURE Obama. INEPT Obama. LEAD FROM BEHIND Obama. BLAME Obama.

I’m fine with healthy, constructive criticism, but this is out of control. There is no more news. News died when it was swept into the greedy, self-serving world of commercialization. What we have now is any excuse to create controversy, to even create a non-existent news story, in order to ramp up the ratings.

What better way for corporate-owned media to achieve higher Nielsens for their beloved corporate sponsors than to bash Obama, ignite passions, beat the drums for war, and scare viewers so that they’ll glue themselves to the screen to catch the next BIG, SCARY CHYRON!

chyron syria cnn

chyron syria abc

But back to the Benghazi Noise Machine. Today, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) claimed that President Obama’s administration is threatening and intimidating witnesses, but he couldn’t even back up his claim:

But hey, that’s okay, people watched, some pointed and laughed, and some even mistook his warped opinion for fact. Key word: Watched. What more could a news program hope for? Oh wait, that was Fox, not news.

I previously posted a video of a segment in which Chris Hayes said this on his “All In” show:

“Question mark.” You know, there is this thing we do in cable news. Sometimes magazines do it too. You want to grab someone’s attention but the thing you want to say is just too irresponsible to get away with or stand behind. So, for example, maybe I want to say, in discussing Lindsey Graham’s demagoguery in constitutional due process, “Lindsey Graham, comma, Constitution hater.” So no, instead what we would say is, “Lindsay Graham, Constitution hater?” Since you are asking a question, you don’t have to stand behind what you are asserting.

And then, as if on cue, MSNBC displayed a chyron only a few minutes ago that read, “Lame duck already?” Since they asked, allow me to respond: “Idiotic question chyron?” Question mark?

chyron blitzer dept of jihad

chyron fox question scott brown

“Does this open the president up for criticism? Will critics have new ammo? Well, will they, huh? Huh?” #LibrulMediaMyAss

bias liberal media my ass smaller

When I opened my Los Angeles Times this morning, I saw an article about how the Boston bombing is affecting policy on student visas. The Times is reporting that Homeland Security will be tightening oversight for foreign students entering the U.S.

One of the friends, Azamat Tazhayakov, 19, was allowed to reenter the U.S. on a student visa even though he was no longer attending the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, where Dzhokhar Tsarnaev also studied.

Congressional Republicans have questioned how the government has dealt with visa security issues. In a three-page letter this week, Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) asked Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano for details about student visas and how Tazhayakov was able to reenter the U.S.

In a statement this week, the Homeland Security Department said that Tazhayakov entered the United States on Jan. 20 using a student visa with an expiration date of Aug. 30. Customs, which is part of Homeland Security, had not been notified that Tazhayakov had left school on Jan. 4, so he was permitted entry.

An hour later I was watching MSNBC, and the anchor substituting for Alex Witt was asking her guests about this very topic. And by “asking her guests” I mean falling all over herself to get them to slam President Obama. Here is how she posed her questions (paraphrased, but not all that much):

“Does this open the president up for criticism? Will President Obama be under fire for this? Will his critics have new ammo? Well, will they, huh? Huh?”

Okay, I made up that last question. Here is how it sounded to me:

Ooo! THIS is exactly what I needed to create some controversy, because so far, this show has been really dull. If ratings dip while I’m covering for Alex, I’m toast!

SO. Guests! WTF is up with Obama? Shouldn’t he be in a big ol’ pot of hot water for this? Isn’t the bombing all his fault anyway? Well, isn’t it? Let’s make this into more of a story, stat! Is his goose finally cooked? Will you go on the record saying that his presidency a big fat epic FAIL now? Boyoboy was he negligent, right? RIGHT?

I cannot WAIT to hear your answers to my leading questions! GO!

BENGHAZI! Oh, sorry, that just slipped out.

1. Note to Ms. SubbingForAlex: You must be more than aware that nobody needs to encourage anyone to clobber the president. He has been barraged by smears since he announced his run back in 2007. He’s been blamed for everything from Bush’s recession to personal bad hair days since forever. So stirring that pot is overkill to say the least.

2. What happened to objectivity in the media? Oh, sorry, did I say “objectivity”? My bad.

3. Not everything has to be hyped up to entertain viewers. Sweartogod.

4. Did you, or anyone, ask questions like those when GW Bush was in office and lied us into a fraudulent war?

Now, I’m sure this host is a very nice person, professional, and just trying to do her job by keeping the conversation interesting and lively, but come on.

By the way, in their statement, part of what the Homeland Security Department said was, “At the time of reentry there was no derogatory information that suggested this individual posed a national security or public safety threat.” I didn’t hear that mentioned.