Archive for massacre – Page 2

"Contrary to rhetoric, gun-free zones are not the problem." Oh, and gun retailers support background checks.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

debunking myths smaller

Here is an email I just got from Mayors Against Illegal Guns. Debunking myths is a hobby of mine, so I had to share:

I want to bring to your attention to an updated analysis we're releasing that shows there have been nearly two mass shootings per month in the United States between January 2009 and September 2013. The survey can be found here.

Using FBI data and media reports, our report describes the more than 90 mass shootings that have occurred in this nearly five-year period. The FBI defines a "mass shooting" as any incident where at least four people were murdered with a gun. The survey's findings reveal a different portrait of mass shootings in America than conventional wisdom and previous media coverage might suggest:

  • Mass shootings represent a small share of total U.S. firearm homicides. Less than 1 percent of gun murder victims recorded by the FBI in 2010 were killed in incidents with four or more victims.
  • Military-style assault weapons or high-capacity magazines were used in at least 15 percent of the incidents. These incidents resulted in an average of 151 percent more people shot and 63 percent more deaths than in other incidents.
  • There is a strong connection between mass shooting incidents and domestic or family violence. In at least 57 percent of the cases, the shooter killed a current or former spouse or intimate partner or other family member.
  • Contrary to rhetoric, gun-free zones are not the problem. In all, 67 percent of mass shooting incidents took place wholly in private residences, while no more than 15 percent took place entirely in public places that were so-called "gun-free zones."
  • Those who serve and protect us are frequently the victims of mass shootings. In 14 percent of the shootings, law enforcement or military officers were targeted in the shooting or killed or injured responding

Oh, and there's this from Think Progress: NRA Tried To Stifle Study Showing Gun Retailers Support Background Checks.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

This week, 12 kids were shot, and children as young as 7 years old took guns to school.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

gun boy child smaller

My old pal @KagroX (David Waldman) wrote up a stomach-turning post at Daily Kos. Here's an excerpt:

Twelve [kids] were accidentally shot this week, including four three-year-olds, three five-year-olds, and kids aged eight, 10, 11, 14 and 16. In addition, one college student was accidentally shot by another (who was, of course, just trying to make his gun "safe" at the time), and another found herself the uninjured victim of a home invasion shooting (of which there were a total of six). Ten guns were found in schools this week as well, in Kansas City, MO; Clarksburg, WV; Shreveport, LA; Chattanooga, TN; Knoxville, TN; Mobile, AL; Nashville, NC; Paramus, NJ; Providence, RI, and; Hawthorne, FL. That's a rough week.

Read that again: At elementary, middle and high schools, ten guns were found. This was during the same week, by the way, that yet another gun massacre took place at the Washington D.C. Navy yard. And let's not forget this WTF Moment: Republican staffer reportedly left loaded gun in Missouri state Capitol public restroom. Welcome to GunFAIL XXXVI.

You may recall that the brilliant KagroX has also been documenting shooting after shooting and was the one who brought us the following Twitter hashtags:

#protectingthefamily

#butwegrewuparoundguns

#responsible

#youdontunderstand

#AmericanTradition

#selfprotection

#JustATool

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

If media could quickly uncover information about #NavyYard shooter, an in-depth background check would have also

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Stop Handgun Violence sign Massachusetts gun shows background checks

Today's Los Angeles Times letters to the editor, because our voices matter:

Re "Gun laws for mentally ill not so easy," Sept. 22

The instant background check on Navy Yard gunman Aaron Alexis is no replacement for an in-depth universal background check. If the media were able so quickly to uncover information about Alexis' troubled history, an in-depth background check would have also.

Gun advocates use the fact that the shooter purchased his gun legally with a background check to show that additional laws would be ineffective. In fact, the instant, inadequate background check that Alexis passed is a result of the gun lobby's efforts to limit gun restrictions.

William J. Chartier

Los Angeles

***

Guns make us safe. I feel safe here in America. I feel sorry for the Europeans, who live on a continent overrun by hordes of unarmed people.

The proper use of guns keeps the death rate from disease down. Guns should be part of every nation's health plan.

Guns are good.

Barry Carlton

El Cajon

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Live Streaming Video- President Obama Speaks at the Memorial for Victims of the Navy Yard Shooting 5:00p EDT

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

over

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Video- NRA’s Wayne LaPierre on Navy Yard Shooting: ‘There Weren’t Enough Good Guys With Guns’

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Wow. Should have asked him how many guns he recommend the Navy Yard should have had. Via.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Gun Watch: "If a disease were killing us at this rate, we would be using every tool to do something about it."

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

cartoonists against gun violence shoe

A University of Kansas professor was put on leave after a tweet to the NRA. Please use that as the backdrop for today's Los Angeles Times letters to the editor, because our voices matter:

Re "Police warned Navy about shooter," Sept. 19

As journalists dissect the mental health of the individual responsible for the Washington Navy Yard shooting, I want to challenge us to stop focusing exclusively on blaming individuals. Trying to assign a motive is to miss the point.

Gun violence is an epidemic in this country. This issue is not about politics or the 2nd Amendment, it's about public health. In Los Angeles County, guns are the second-leading cause of death for young men. If a disease were killing us at this rate, we would be using every tool to do something about it.

To those who say gun laws have no effect, research shows that of the 10 states with the strongest gun safety legislation, seven have the lowest rates of gun deaths. And the gun issue is not just about the mass shootings; more than half the young people who commit suicide with a firearm got that gun from their home.

Gun laws alone will not solve this, but they are a critical component of the systemic change that is required. There is a package of gun violence prevention bills on Gov. Jerry Brown's desk right now. We can choose not to accept gun violence as part of our lives.

Kaile Shilling

Los Angeles

The writer is the director of the Violence Prevention Coalition of Greater Los Angeles.

***

What needs to be explored is why gunman Aaron Alexis, who had mental health problems and a record of strange behavior, was able to buy a gun and receive security clearance. This is a more significant reflection on our society than on Alexis.

When as a society are we going to become more adept at providing psychiatric assistance to those who are suffering? I believe the 13 deaths in Washington on Monday represent a systemic, societal problem.

In a separate article, a close friend of Alexis asked a question that deserves an answer: "Why didn't they get him help?"

Karl Strandberg

Long Beach

***

Guns don't kill people. People who are able to get guns because the National Rifle Assn. refuses to accept universal background checks, which could keep guns out of the hands of mentally disturbed people and others who shouldn't own firearms, kill people.

Jeffrey Teets

Lakewood

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

University of Kansas professor on leave after tweet to NRA

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

turnabout is fair play

A professor apparently "disrupted the learning environment" at the University of Kansas with a tweet.

The NRA has disrupted America with its gun lobbying, but they're not "on leave." Wayne LaPierre has disrupted politics with his frequent, public, vile spew, but he's not "on leave." The consequences of their words and actions, all that shilling for the gun industry, have been tragic.

Mass murderers disrupt (read: end) lives but they're still out there, able to slaughter crowds with their semi-automatic weapons. The consequences of their actions have been tragic.

But a journalism professor didn't shoot a gun, he shot off his mouth and swiftly got silenced. He is now on indefinite administrative leave.

The NRA is still out there selling deadly firearms, and very little is being done to deny them their voices.

WICHITA, Kan. (AP) — A University of Kansas journalism professor was placed on indefinite administrative leave Friday for a tweet he wrote about the Navy Yard shootings which said, "blood is on the hands of the #NRA. Next time, let it be YOUR sons and daughters."

David W. Guth, an associate professor of journalism, made the comment on Twitter after Monday's shootings in Washington, D.C., in which 13 people died, including the gunman. The tweet didn't attract much attention until Campus Reform.org posted a story Thursday, sparking a social media backlash that's spilled over into some state lawmakers calling for his dismissal.

Now personally, I don't agree with Guth's approach at all, but the point of this post isn't about the content of his tweet, it's about the backlash. Why isn't there an equally swift, equally effective response to those who actually contribute to cutting lives short?

Guth, who on Thursday told The Associated Press in a phone interview that his tweet "got a conversation going — that was exactly what I wanted to do," agreed Friday that the university's action was appropriate in light of email threats he and others at the university had received.

There are now calls for his dismissal, specifically by Kansas Senate Majority Leader Terry Bruce, a Republican who has received $2,500 in campaign contributions from the NRA since 2004.

And an NRA spokesman self-righteously declared, "This is hate speech. It is disgusting and deplorable. It has no place in our society."

But assault style/military style weapons with high capacity magazines that make it easy to mow down crowds but are unnecessary for hunting or personal protection do have a place in our society. Those aren't disgusting or deplorable at all. In fact, they're hunky dory.

Got it.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare