Archive for massachusetts

Elizabeth Warren Has Divined and Deployed Her Life's Work

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

YellenWarrenw212h202
We all get grrrreat liberal email, amidst the junk, but it's especially exciting when something new about our amazing Elizabeth Warren, the Senator from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, is waiting to be opened.

This morning it was Howard Dean in tandem, a good pairing for progressives. The active and admirable group, Democracy for America, is turning ten.

Hi Sherry -- I just wanted to make sure you had a chance to read the inspiring email that Sen. Elizabeth Warren wrote to DFA members below. I'm so thrilled with what we've built together over the last 10 years. With your critical support now, we can super-charge our people-powered legacy and elect more "Elizabeth Warren Democrats" to Congress -- the kind of leaders who will take our country back from the banks and billionaires.
- Howard

DFA has perhaps not embraced the absolute most progressive candidate for every round of their online grassroots inspired 'Dean Dozen' ... but they've come mightily close and have helped elect 801 Dems besides Elizabeth Warren who would collectively and individually freak the be-jeebus out of Sarah Palin and her Lipton Brigadiers.

chickfil-a

An arugula munching crowd that in toto would send Rush Limpbaugh dashing for enough manufactured hysteria to keep him in leather ass-less chaps for years. [Long running Free Range joke, The Rushbot has a purported fondness for frolicking in asslesss leather chaps while high. ;) ]

Warren's own message was typically optimistic and energizing.

DFA fought shoulder-to-shoulder with me to defeat Scott Brown in 2012, but that's not the only way they've had my back. Over the past year, they've made my fight for the middle class their fight -- and they have doubled down on leveling the playing field for working Americans, fighting with energy and passion.

When I introduced my very first bill, the Bank on Students Loan Fairness Act,more than 50,000 DFA members signed a petition supporting it. Together, we fought back against cuts to Social Security, helping President Obama decide to drop "chained CPI" from his budget completely.

elizabeth-warren-quote_zps20fa81d0

For sheer enjoyment, plus the splendid edification(!)some great audio of Warren from a recent discussion of where the middle class is headed in the Twenty Teens … 'to hell in a highly gussied hand basket' would be the Jeopardy answer. The Young Turks get the sincere tip of the hat, for Roaring Warren!

ifwallstreet

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Who Does America Really Want In 2016?

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Clinton Warren

A few days ago, Huffington Post reported that Hillary Clinton was on the unofficial campaign trial and in her speeches she was sounding more and more like Massachusetts Democratic Senator, Elizabeth Warren.

Today, CNN is reporting that Veep Joe Biden gave a speech on Friday in South Carolina where he was channeling the words and themes of Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren.

When you think of it, the two announced "unannounced" Democratic candidates for the highest office in America are Clinton and Biden. Yet where are they getting their talking points? Hmm, Senator Elizabeth Warren.

Why not cut out the middle man, or woman?

Think about it. Who really is the voice of the Democratic party for 2016? It could be Clinton or Biden. But are they really just Charlie McCarthys and EW is Edgar Bergen? More and more it's becoming quite clear that the Clinton baggage of the trumped up Benghazi campaign are meant to embarrass her and turn off voters over a Hillary C run in 2016.

And let's face it. Much of her allure is not strictly her experience. Forget being First Lady. It's a ceremonial position. If it wasn't, it would be an elected or appointed position. Her years of being a Senator and being Secretary of State are very important, valuable experience. So she's got that hands down. But she comes, sadly with a lot of baggage. And now the upcoming Benghazi hearings will tarnish her very stellar reputation more -- even if everything she did was  by the book, according to Hoyle.

What really sets her aside from all of the potential Republicans running for the top office is that she herself is a woman. Go poo-poo that all you want, but it's true. And if you are honest with yourself and realize that, consider this-- so is Elizabeth Warren. No one, not even Clinton, knows more about big business, Wall Street and all of the consumer rip-offs that the public faces daily. No one. Clinton's not even on the same page. She's too often rubbing shoulders with big money. She's, as they say, "beholden.'"

That puts a bit more focus on Joe Biden should Hillary falter. And let's face it. Joe's more often the punch line to a joke than a serious contender to lead this country. He's a good man, but we need a great leader. And Joe's two specialties before he was elected Veep were putting his foot in his mouth and  foreign relations. Right now, even with Syria, Russia, Ukraine, Iran and other hotbed spots around the world, the US citizenry is more interested in what's happening here with our economy - jobs, minimum wage, income inequality, unemployment benefits, and equal pay.

Where else should we be looking if those are the biggest issues? There's really only one answer. And she's available -- just not pushing. Even when asked point blank, she's got the standard answer down -- she's not looking for the Presidency but rather what she can do as a senator.

Why settle for second best, Clinton and Biden? Why not go to the horse's mouth -- Warren. Both Clinton and Biden are trying to channel her and her thoughts. Why not just get the real thing, the real McCoy? Perhaps it's time for a few more Democrats to start thinking about a draft Warren movement while there's still time. We could do a lot worse and I'm not sure Clinton or Biden would be any better for America, nor any more electable.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) holds big lead over Scott Brown (R-Bqhatevwr)

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

scott brown tweet  bqhatevwr

Hey, did you hear the one where Scott Brown of Massachusetts is now pretending to be from New Hampshire so he and his truck can run for the U.S. Senate? He blew it big time when he lost badly in Massachusetts back in 2012. Just ask Senator Elizabeth Warren.

Ooo! Ooo! And remember how Scott Brown was really, really proud to be from Massachusetts? Me too! Ari Melber, take it away:

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Now Scott Brown is running against Senator Jeanne Shaheen, and he has fewer than eight months to overcome her double digit lead, as well as convince New Hampshire voters-- to quote former witch, Christine O'Donnell-- "I'm you."

So far this appears to be their resounding response: Bqhatevwr.

Via American Research Group:

If the 2014 election for US Senate were being held today between Scott Brown, the Republican, and Jeanne Shaheen, the Democrat, for whom would you vote - Brown or Shaheen? (names rotated):

chart Jean Shaheen v Scott Brown 2014

Among registered voters who are undecided about how President Obama is doing his job (they account for only 9% of those registered), Shaheen has a huge lead, 73% to Brown's 7% (20% are undecided).

The breakdown goes a little something like this: Brown appeals more to GOP voters and men (Wait, aren't the two synonymous?), but Shaheen is preferred by independents and women.

More here.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

You Won't Believe What This Cop Did -- And His Chief Defends Him

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

cop

I mean you can't make sh*t like this up. And of course, it happened in my native Massachusetts, so there's no doubt in my mind it's true. We produce police corruption like it was baked beans.

The details are simple. A cop is on his phone, illegally working a security detail. He's swearing and using the "F-bomb" incessantly. A nearby neighbor sitting on his porch across the street was offended by the language so he approached the cop and asked him to please watch his language. The cop did what you'd expect. He swore at the guy, called him names and told him to scram.

The citizen returned to his own house, sat on his porch and heard more foul language. He took out his iPhone and recorded the cop. The cop saw this, then came over and arrested the citizen sitting on his own porch for wiretapping.

If that wasn't enough, the phone was confiscated by the police and held by them as evidence. Two days later, the recording on the phone is discovered erased-- while in police custody. They cops are now blaming the arrested man who didn't even have access to his phone. This evidence, by the way would have supported the accused man's case.

This is Beantown Madness, and not the kind that comes with a Red Sox World Championship.

Watch for yourself.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

2016's True Dream Presidential Ticket For The Dems - No Hillary

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Sanders Warren

There is a potential Democratic ticket that's being floated around that has Hillary Clinton nervous. Not because she doesn't think that she can win the general election if she gets the nomination, she fears the primary battle. A really hard fought primary battle.

If you flip back to 2006, Hillary was, as she is now, considered to be a shoo-in for the nomination. It was a done deal. Her inaugural dinner menu was already being planned.  And we all know how that turned out for her. The bruising primary battles with Barack Obama showed she had backbone and strength. She was a good candidate. Obama was better, plain and simple.

Now we're approaching 8 years from her prior "inevitability." And whispers in the wind are that there's someone who might run who could conceivably capture the Democratic nomination. And coupled with his name is a running mate. Someone who's most compatible and would give the Democrats a dream ticket without the Clinton baggage.

The "potential candidate" is not a Democrat. He is an Independent. And his name is Senator Bernie Sanders (I - Vermont).

Take a moment to digest this. TIME MAGAZINE has:

Sanders, who is the longest-serving Independent in congressional history, would have to officially register as a Democrat before he could run in the 2016 Democratic presidential primary. But he says he hasn't yet made up his mind for sure if he’ll run, and he has time yet. One thing he is sure of: He’d make a better President than Hillary Clinton.

You  may ask who or why? Anyone in the political circles, Republican or Democrat, knows that Bernie is a man who speaks his mind and is filled with common sense more that a a need to fall in line with political dogma from either party. He's got America on his mind -- something the two major parties seem to clash over time after time -- and with disastrous results. Bernie just calls it as he sees it. And he sees it with compassion and practicality.

Sanders caucuses with the Democrats so his pick wouldn't be a far-fetched bit of chicanery. His reason for running he puts this way:

Clinton, he says, “is a very, very intelligent person, no question about it. But, I don’t know what her political future is, whether she’s going to run. I don’t know what she’s going to say. But, if you talk about the need for a political revolution in America, it’s fair to say that Secretary Clinton probably will not be one of the more active people.”

Senator Sanders knows what he's talking about. Clinton is a really well-rounded pick, but she's very willing to make compromise at the expense of Democratic policy. She's worldly, bright, articulate and an insider's insider. Is that what we want though? No one is more beholden to big money than the Clintons -- on either party's radar.

Here's the kicker to the Sander's potential for running. It paves the way for Senator Elizabeth Warren to run as Veep. If Hillary runs, the Dems won't put up an all-female ticket. Sad but true. And nobody, and I mean nobody comes close to standing up for consumers and against Wall Street's onerous practices than EW. In second place would be Bernie S. Together America wins.

Time will tell, but there's more and more chatter. Despite it being an all-New England ticket, it's most formidable. It's early and with Hillary playing games as she did in 2006 hemming and hawing about her running, she may be tricking herself once again. This time there's a potential juggernaut ready to take her on. If she announces she's running and Bernie still steps to the plate, look for one of the most amazing presidential primaries in the last hundred years.

Unlike the Republicans who have nobody running who can win the general election, the Democrats could have two major players, each qualified and each good for America. And if Democrats go with the fresher face of Bernie Sanders, he's less controversial, he's brilliant and he's got Elizabeth Warren at his side to groom for the Presidency after Bernie's 8 years.

Don't say I didn't warn ya!

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Once Again Sen. Warren Proposes Help To Consumers And Students

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Warren

Well, when it comes to consumer protections and forward thinking plans on how to make life better for all of us, there's now really only one voice. It's not Obama. It's not Boehner. It's not even a man. It's a woman who's becoming more a more of a hero every day to Democrats and Independents, and a seemingly unstoppable force against Republicans. She's Elizabeth Warren. Not even Hillary Clinton scares the GOP as much as she does.

She's been fighting Wall Street for us, trying to keep down runaway profits that don't, as the Republicans like to say, "trickle down" to working-class people. The GOP call them "job creators," but in reality they are money grabbers and thieves. Simon Legrees.

Yesterday EW, as the Senator is being called these days, announced a proposed bill to help the underwater fiscal lives of recent graduates of colleges and universities. And she's also allowing millionaires to take advantage of their preferential financial status and give a little back to those starting out, those who will someday lead these big financial institution and raise up civilization as a whole.

Her plan is quite simple -- a surtax -- yes a tax -- on earnings over $1Million. It's a modification to the Buffet rule. If you never heard of the Buffet rule, it that's because Republicans vetoed it. Think Progress:

The Buffet rule is named after billionaire Warren Buffet and would establish a minimum tax on income in excess of $1 million. The measure, which never got out of Congress, raises approximately $50 billion in revenue and ensures that millionaires do not pay lower tax rates than middle-class families.

Right now the government gives tax breaks to the highest earners but puts the burden on the lower wage earners. Millionaires and billionaires, pay lower taxes, if they even pay any, than middle class workers.

Warren's proposed bill will put those surtaxed revenues toward student loans which make trillions for the US treasure coffers. The onerous and usurious student loan rates in effect up until last year's reduction (which EW was a moving force in getting passed) are still in force. Unless they can be refinanced to current rates (not allowed under current rules), the older loans are going into default and students are crumbling under their weight. All Warren wants is to help people pay back the money they borrowed at today's lower rates, giving graduates more of a fighting chance to make it. It's win-win for America and our future. If you can refinance a house or a car, why not a student loan?

If you want to hear the future voice of America, Senator Warren of Massachusetts is the voice we need to listen to.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Will FBI's Win Streak Stop At 150-0 Or Does Their Cheating Continue?

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

FBI Badge

"Nobody is supposed to be above the law in this country," says Rachel Maddow. "Even the FBI." That sounds pretty solid in my book. Yet a few months ago the New York Times reported about 150 FBI shooting incidents which the Bureau internally reviewed and found that all 150 incidents were wholly justified. None were found to be accidental, negligent or criminal. None. 150 cases heard and all 150 determined to be "good" shootings.

That's amazing. A perfect record. In professional football if you go 16-0 you go down in the record books. In the modern NFL football era, it's only happened twice, and they only have 16 regular season games. In baseball it's never happened. Not in the NBA either. Or Hockey. Add basketball to the list of an elusive perfect seasons. When you play more than a handful of games, perfection is just not something that happens. Not even once.

So how is it the FBI has a perfect 150-0 record? Watch Rachel Maddow discuss this below. And what's even more interesting than the perfect record itself is the secrecy and conspiracy necessary to make this happen. Arresting innocent people so their visas expire allowing the government to expel witnesses to FBI shootings from our shores to keep them quiet. Taking innocent people and unarmed people and blowing them away or deporting them to Russia where they disappear, just so they can't testify against the FBI. If you think this is another installment of Robert Ludlum's Jason Bourne adventures, it's not -- so far. But Hollywood can't be very far behind with a film treatment of this expose. They may start with the Boston Magazine story which comes out in a few days: The Murders Before The Marathon.

If you can't wait to read it or rather watch it revealed by none other than Massachusetts resident, Rachel Maddow, here you go.

WARNING: But be prepared for some graphic, disturbing images... and some moral outrage.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare