Archive for legislation

Sen. Pat Toomey: Gun bill failed because GOP “did not want to be seen helping the president do something he wanted to get done.”

gop obstruction smaller

Because of his support of gun safety legislation, Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA) has watched his approval ratings soar. They are now at the highest they’ve ever been, as opposed to say, Kelly Ayotte’s. According to a Qunnipiac Poll, 85 percent of Pennsylvanians approved of his and Senator Manchin’s gun background check proposal.

You know what at least 85 percent of Americans should DISapprove of? This, via the Times Herald:

“In the end it didn’t pass because we’re so politicized. There were some on my side who did not want to be seen helping the president do something he wanted to get done, just because the president wanted to do it,” Toomey said.

In subsequent comments, he tried to walk that remark part-way back by noting he meant to say Republicans across the nation in general, not just those in the Senate.

“The toughest thing to do in politics is to do the right thing when your supporters think the right thing is something else,” Toomey said.

Hey America, open your eyes. This is what the GOP is all about: Obstruction, hate, and self-interest. They care nothing about what we want, they ignore the polls and the wishes of many of their constituents because of their disdain for President Obama.

Gee, I wonder what about him they find so distasteful… I can’t imagine, because he’s compromised, he’s put forward many of their own plans and ideas, so think… think… what could it be?

obama one of these things is not like the others different

Hey Republicans, how’s that GOP reachy-outy, makeovery, reinventiony thing workin’ for ya?

Video- Senators Manchin. Toomey Plead For Their Gun Law

Via.

VIDEO: Bernie Sanders Writes Law to Break Them Up: 10 Largest Banks Bigger Now Than Before Taxpayer Bailout

banks too big to prosecute sanders v holder

Your Daily Dose of BuzzFlash at Truthout, via my pal Mark Karlin:

As Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont)  charges in a news release issued from his Senate office:

The 10 largest banks in the United States are bigger now than before a taxpayer bailout following the 2008 financial crisis when the Federal Reserve propped up financial institutions with $16 trillion in near zero-interest loans and Congress approved a $700 billion rescue for banks that some considered “too big to fail.” Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. now says the Justice Department may not pursue criminal cases against big banks because filing charges could “have a negative impact on the national economy, perhaps even the world economy.”

“We have a situation now where Wall Street banks are not only too big to fail, they are too big to jail,” Sanders said. “That is unacceptable and that has got to change because America is based on a system of law and justice.”

[...]

As a result of this Obama administration economic injustice and the threat that letting the same rip-off artists who caused the American economy to collapse continue to run even bigger banks and financial entities, Sanders and his staff penned a bill. It’s a short piece of legislation that gets right to the point in Section 3:

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, beginning 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall break up entities include on the Too Big To Fail List, so that their failure would no longer cause a catastrophic effect on the United States or global economy without a taxpayer bailout.

[...]

If you want your dose of restoring economic accountability and justice to America, watch the Sanders/Sherman news conference on the law that would break up the too big to fail banks, [in the video above].

Please read the entire post here.

Quote of the Day- John Boehner Style

foreplay

GAK. Brain bleach, STAT. Via Taegan.

“Slow down. Slow down. How about a little foreplay?”

— House Speaker John Boehner, quoted by ABC News, joking that with bipartisan conversations on immigration reform taking place it’s too early to talk about specific legislation.

Quickie- Sen. Schumer Asks Gun Retailers To Stop Sales As Congress Debates

schumerstoned

What is Chuck smoking? He thinks they’ll do it voluntarily? Let’s see, sternly worded letter versus oodles of cash…

NEW YORK — Sen. Charles Schumer says retailers that sell assault weapons should stop offering them for purchase while Congress discusses gun regulation legislation.

Schumer on Sunday released a letter he sent to major retailers asking for a voluntary moratorium.

The New York Democrat says consumer demand for guns has gone up in the weeks since the December mass shooting in Newtown, Conn.

Schumer says Congress is debating the issue, and if measures get passed that limit these type of weapons, it won’t help if more of them have recently been sold.

Lockdown: My son’s personal account, and today another one amid shooting at a grade school

WTF is happening in this country? It seems as if there are insane gunmen gone wild on a daily basis, shooting up schools, malls, theaters, you name it. My son’s personal account of one of these crises is below.

So is it time to “have a conversation” about responsible gun regulation yet? Because apparently there is no waiting period for Fox personalities to convulse when someone like, say, Bob Costas expresses an opinion.

But back to the latest of many rampages.

Today I woke up to this breaking news: Connecticut grade school shooting: 1 death reported amid lockdown. An AP news alert just popped up on my cell saying that 26 were shot dead including 18 children. This story came on the heels of the lockdown at Cal State Fullerton where my son, a student there, endured what I’m calling “quiet chaos,” as is confirmed by this L.A. Times report:

As the night wore on, many students became restless and hungry.

Many students and staff who remained in other buildings on campus, such as the library and dorms, began to walk off the campus, though they were not officially released.

“It’s just getting to the point where they’re hungry and they’re letting themselves out,” Fullerton Police Sgt. Jeff Stuart said. He said police did not have enough personnel to keep people inside the buildings.

Not enough police, huh? Must be because of all those layoffs of all those union “thugs.”

That report is absolutely true, as you will see below. Students were left to their own devices, unattended, vulnerable, and many simply wandered around until they found a spot where they felt safe and comfortable. Security was a big question mark. Finally, after several hours, some, including my son, simply left. Others who were in locations closer to the search hid under desks in the dark, doors barricaded, per Facebook reports that my son read. Those closer to the “action” stayed until well after 11 p.m. and were escorted out by SWAT teams.

But the overall impression was one of quiet chaos. Nobody outwardly panicked. Rather ambiguous announcements came over loudspeakers, emails were sent out (that were left unread by many, often because phone batteries died), and procedures were deficient. The word “lockdown” wasn’t used, the word “shelter” was. Shelter as in overhang? As in out of the rain? Student’s weren’t sure. Who, if anyone, was able to lock classroom doors from the inside? Nobody seemed to know. Was the university prepared? Well, it had pretty good security, but it didn’t communicate specifics that students needed, nobody went looking for them, and “shelter” meant something to those in charge, but apparently not to the kids… who didn’t know what to do.

My son had a class from about 3 to 6 p.m. in a second story room that opened to an outdoor walkway. The door wasn’t locked, and the professor may or may not have had a key. See, he only comes for one class once a week, the room is shared with other classes, so the door remains open, and there is no obvious locking mechanism like a deadbolt that a student or teacher could work. So the only obvious way to “lock out” would be with a key.

My son’s class was about to take a break at about 4 when an announcement came over the speaker: “If you’re currently ‘sheltering,’ stay where you are. If you are outside, then evacuate campus immediately.” It didn’t say why. Nobody had any idea. A few people went outside, looked over the railing, milled around. Nobody saw anything, so they went back inside to “shelter,” not sure what to do next. Then a few people received campus email on their cell phones.

The professor left the room since it was break time. People wondered what was going on. Within a few minutes, some got personal messages or looked up news sites on their phones and discovered there were a number of armed robbers (“attempted murderers” per TV news reports) on the loose and some had ended up near or on campus.

Here is a chronicle of the school emails that my son finally found in his inbox after the fact:

4:18: This is University police dept. Please shelter in place until further notice. There is a possible dangerous suspect on campus in the Langsdorf Hall area. We will update you as soon as possible. 

Students shared that email with the class.

4:41: From university police department and the university administration: If you are sheltering in place, remain sheltering in place. If you are outside a building, please exit the campus immediately. (The loudspeaker announcements were duplicates)

My son found these to be ambiguous: “So if you go outside, can you then leave? Can I put myself in the position to leave that way? Can I go outside so that I can ‘exit the campus?’”

6:41: Campus update. If you are off campus, please stay away until further notice. Tonight’s classes are canceled. If you are sheltered in place, please remain calm and stay where you are. If you are outside of a building, please exit the campus. Police are searching the campus for a possible robbery suspect.

Three hours after the first message, the very unambiguous word “lockdown” was finally used:

7:15: President of  the university: To reiterate, if you’re inside a university building, on lockdown please remain until you are notified by campus police that you should evacuate. If you are outside, evacuate campus immediately.

7:21: Update: Police are continuing their search. If you are on campus continue to remain calm, sheltered in place, and we will keep updating you as soon as possible. Tonight’s classes have been canceled.

8:47: CSUF update: We appreciate your patience. Police are continuing their search of the campus. Continue to shelter in place. We will update you as soon as possible.

10:53: University update. Police are beginning to clear building occupants. Please remain in place until directed by police or audio announcement. Thank you for your patience.

11:52: CSUF important message. All building are now clear and occupants are free to leave. Please take care in leaving the campus. We apologize for the lateness but we want to make sure everyone is released to go home.

My son got home at 8:30.

Son:

After the first message, I felt this way: In the past, messages like this have always been a test. Now that it wasn’t, I was alarmed, and I thought of the Cal State San Bernardino shooting. I’m at a Cal State school. Is this a related emergency?

So it appeared that the university was getting messages out, but what they tried to communicate was confusing. Specifics would have greatly helped, and so would clearer wording.

Now for a more disturbing sequence of events that my son experienced. He was texting me throughout all of this, but his battery was low, so for awhile we exchanged short messages like, Son: “In class. Scary.” Me: “Are you safe?” Son: “I hope so.” Me: “I love you.” Son: “I love you too.”

As the news broke over the loudspeaker, the professor seemed a bit “confused” (son’s word) and pretty apathetic. Here are my son’s observations:

He’s very work-oriented and wanted to get through as much of the school work as possible, he’s pretty obsessive about that. He didn’t say much, so people asked him whether they should stay or leave. He said, “It seems like we fall under ‘sheltered,’ so let’s switch gears and get back to the material… Can we switch gears now and continue our discussion?” He almost seemed annoyed or impatient each time the speaker would announce, interrupting him. He seemed inconvenienced. “Get on with it.”

I just wanted to leave. I couldn’t believe people were going to talk about class material or that they could even concentrate on that when all I could think about was my safety.

Everyone carried on as if we were not affected. After one of the alerts, people were asking if they should leave. The professor asked, “Do you want to go to the 3rd floor, would you feel safer if we did that?” As this happened, an announcement said to stay where we were, so we stayed.

They stayed… in an unlocked room with a door exposed to the outdoors and to the rest of campus.

The class carried on, I wasn’t really listening. An announcement would come on occasionally. At the end of every semester, students fill out evaluations of professors, and as we do this, there’s a rule that the professor has to leave. So he said, “I’m gonna leave, you can hand your evaluations in.”  And he left. Everyone just went along with it, I was uncomfortable, but I filled it out. The class waited, not knowing if it was safe to leave.  The professor didn’t seem to realize how serious the situation was.

Finally the class decided to leave (it was about 5:45) to go home, knowing the next class was canceled. We got downstairs, heard another announcement, and decided to stay in an indoor hallway and figure out what to do. Someone went outside to talk to the campus police who told us the street was blocked off and the campus was surrounded by police. We couldn’t access certain parts of campus or the street.

We waited, tried to figure out what to do. Someone opened a laptop to catch some news clips. Then we saw someone in the hallway from another class who invited us to join them in classroom that had a door that locked. It wasn’t clear that we should all be locked down. People were outside, in hallways, not sure what they were supposed to do. I was scared, others didn’t seem to be, and we were asking what to do. 

The person’s class was having a potluck, so why not? We ate a little and watched YouTubes, since the teacher in that class was welcoming, calm, and had settled everyone in after the initial startling news. Finally, four of of us decided to leave.

Campus police stopped us on way to our cars telling us we had to get to our cars by walking all the way around perimeter of campus. We ended up going back to class to ask for ride to our cars.

We were about to leave, but then another student came in and said police heard shots fired nearby; get back into the classroom.

I was even more scared. Eventually, students said uni-cops would escort people from classrooms, check IDs, and so the whole class left as a group hoping to find a cop to escort them. Outside, there was nobody around, so we walked to our cars in a safe area. I got a ride to my car.

The morning after the lockdown, the Counseling Department Chair sent an email inviting students to process the night’s events. My son didn’t see it until evening.

We have a lot to learn about how to handle emergencies like these, including communicating clearly, subscribing to email alerts, reading emails on a regular basis, and most important, remembering that life is all too short.

And one other lesson: There is no bad time to have a “conversation” about guns and mental health care.

Families of victims & survivors of Virginia Tech shooting join Mayors Against Illegal Guns to “demand a plan” from presidential candidates

 I get emails:

                                                                                               FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE        

FAMILIES OF VICTIMS AND SURVIVORS OF THE VIRGINIA TECH SHOOTING JOIN MAYORS AGAINST ILLEGAL GUNS TO “DEMAND A PLAN” FROM THE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES TO FILL GAPS IN NATIONAL BACKGROUND CHECK SYSTEM THAT ALLOW DANGEROUS PEOPLE TO ACCESS GUNS

 Mayors Against Illegal Guns Launches Interactive Map Showing States Still Fail to Submit Millions of Mental Health Records to the National Do-Not-Sell Database – Even After Latest Series of Mass Shootings

48,000 Americans Will Be Murdered with Guns in the Next President’s Term – If Washington Fails to Act – www.DemandAPlan.org

            Sixty-seven family members of victims and survivors of the 2007 Virginia Tech shooting today sent a letter to President Obama and Governor Romney demanding they develop a plan to fix the broken U.S. background check system that regularly allows guns to be sold to dangerous people, including the shooters at the Virginia Tech and Tucson mass shootings. To highlight the continued failure of states to report mental health records to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS), the bipartisan Mayors Against Illegal Guns coalition simultaneously launched an interactive map revealing how many mental health records states have reported and how far behind some states are compared with the best-performing states. Twenty-one states and the District of Columbia have shared fewer than 100 records with NICS. The map is available at http://www.demandaplan.org/fatalgaps and a full copy of the letter is available at http://www.demandaplan.org/vtletter.

In their letter, more than five dozen Virginians affected by the shooting ask the presidential candidates whether they support measures requiring a criminal background check for every gun sale and how they will work to ensure that all records of prohibited purchasers are included in the national background check system. According to a recent poll by Frank Luntz for Mayors Against Illegal Guns, 74 percent of NRA members and 87 percent of non-NRA gun owners support requiring criminal background checks of anyone purchasing a gun. In 2007, Seung Hui Cho shot and killed 32 people at Virginia Tech after passing two gun background checks because Virginia state agencies never shared his mental health records with the national database of prohibited gun purchasers. After the shooting, Virginia substantially improved its reporting and now boasts the highest mental health record reporting rate in the nation.

The letter is part of a larger campaign by survivors of gun violence and the 700-member Mayors Against Illegal Guns coalition to demand that the presidential candidates offer specific plans explaining how they would address the fact that 48,000 Americans will be murdered with a gun in the next president’s term if they fail to take action. More than 150,000 supporters have signed their petition, available at www.DemandAPlan.org.

“The families of the victims and survivors of Virginia Tech have waited long enough for our nation’s leaders to spell out concrete plans to prevent gun violence,” said Mayors Against Illegal Guns Co-Chair and New York City Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg. “More than 40,000 background checks for gun sales and permits are run every day in this country – but the system can’t save lives if states don’t hold up their end of the bargain and report the records of seriously mentally ill people who are not allowed to buy them. The system is broken. Every missing record is a tragedy waiting to happen and it’s time for Washington to compel all states to submit the records that are necessary to make the system work. Our public safety depends on it.”

            “One of the missing records in the system could have prevented the Virginia Tech shooter from getting his hands on a gun that killed 32 people,” said Mayors Against Illegal Guns Co-Chair Boston Mayor Thomas M. Menino. “In the five years since the massacre at Virginia Tech, the Commonwealth of Virginia has done its part to step up reporting to NICS – other states should not wait for the same kind of tragedy in their own communities before making it a priority to keep guns away from those who shouldn’t have them. The family members and survivors of the Virginia Tech, Tucson and Aurora shootings – and all Americans – deserve immediate action to prevent these tragedies and the 34 American gun murders that tear apart communities every day.”

The interactive map, based on the most recently released FBI data, allows users to see how many mental health records their state has reported and how their state is doing relative to the top-performing states, after controlling for population. The number of gun background checks conducted in each state in 2011 is also included to show how many checks were run against the incomplete database. Twenty-one states and D.C. have reported fewer than 100 mental health records – putting their communities at significant risk: Alaska, Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Vermont, and Wyoming.

                The map builds upon the Mayors’ 2011 report “Fatal Gaps: How Missing Records in the Federal Background Check System Put Guns in the Hands of Killers” – a first-of-its-kind analysis revealing how millions of records identifying seriously mentally ill people and drug abusers never enter the NICS database because of lax reporting by states and federal agencies. The 50-state analysis also identifies factors that have helped some states successfully share their records with the federal database.