Archive for iowa

Rep. Steve “put the Leftist genie back in the bottle” King decides not to run for Senate

steveking

Iowa’s GOP Rep. Steve King will not be running for the U.S. Senate, because, says he, he wants to focus on legislation in the House rather than spending time campaigning. He must feel that all those House recesses give him enough time to ask for plenty of donations and share his obnoxious extremist drivel, so who needs to move on up and exert all that effort when there’s a majority in the House who see things his way?

Dem Senator Tom Harkin won’t be running for re-election, and Republicans don’t have a candidate yet.

Just for fun, here is a walk down TPC’s Steve King Memory Lane:

Rep. Steve King: Multicultural college “victims’ groups… feel sorry for themselves,” have roots in communism.

Crackpot Rep Steve King Still Calls ACA “Unconstitutional.”  

Rep Steve King (R-IA): Immigrants Are Like Dogs, You Want Only ‘The Pick Of The Litter’

Rep. Steve King doesn’t think America’s economic stability is worth $8

Steve King: Babies In Garbage Cans Prove Health Reform Is Unconstitutional

Rep. Steve King: Obama “Nationalized Your Skin and Everything Inside It”

Rep. Steve King: “Every time we give amnesty for an illegal alien, we deport a liberal

Rep. Steve King Implies That President Obama Is A Racist

Rep. Steve King accused Humane Society of taking meat off our tables

And just for good measure, he defended Todd Akin’s “legitimate rape” comments.

Wouldn’t he have made a swell U.S. Senator? After all, he’s such a stellar Congress member now! No? Does this mean you’re not disappointed? Hey, me neither!

CNN has King’s full statement. Here are some excerpts:

I have said from the beginning this decision requires “the head, the gut, and the heart” to line up together. I have done due diligence and evaluated the race from a statewide, objective perspective. I have talked with hundreds of supporters…and some detractors. [...]

My analytical part, the head, tells me the race is winnable and must be won in 2014 or a generational opportunity could be lost. I have said a race for the Senate is “a slight up hill battle”. It is, but it’s “no hill for a climber”.

The question I am answering today is, “What is my duty?” I believe my duty is to utilize the honor of serving Iowans in Congress by maximizing my effectiveness. I owe it to all Iowans and Americans to give you my best effort and best judgment.

We have in front of us in Congress a series of potent issues which will redirect the destiny of our state and nation. Among them are a farm bill, ObamaCare, debt and deficit, immigration, and tax reform. If I step away from these responsibilities while campaigning in an effort to multiply leverage in the Senate, what becomes of our nation in the mean time?

This week, I made a simple device to put toothpaste back in the tube. But a device to put the Leftist genie back in the bottle is not so simple. The best tool we have now is the majority in the U.S. House which functions mostly to keep the Leftist genie in the bottle. I cannot, in good conscience, turn my back on the destiny decisions of Congress today in order to direct all my efforts to a Senate race for next year, while hoping to gain the leverage to put the genie back in the bottle in 2015. [...]

Accordingly, I will not be a candidate for the United States Senate in 2014. … I anticipate being on the ballot for reelection to the U.S. House, Fourth District of Iowa.

If you’re still laughing at “my best effort and best judgment,” “if I step away… what becomes of our nation?” and “put the Leftist genie back in the bottle,” you’re not alone.

genie in bottle aladdin

If you’re a judge who ruled to legalize same-sex marriage in Iowa, GOP wants to cut your salary

tit for tat

A unanimous 2009 Iowa Supreme Court decision on legalizing same-sex marriage resulted in three justices losing their jobs. Then in 2012, there was an effort to remove another Justice, but that didn’t work out. In 2016, three other justices’ terms expire, and Iowa House Republicans are now trying to cut their pay in retaliation for their ruling that a law limiting marriage to a man and a woman was unconstitutional.

The Sioux City Journal:

[A] group of House Republicans attached an amendment to a judicial branch budget bill that would reduce the salaries of the four remaining justices who were part of the groundbreaking Varnum v. Brien decision from about $163,000 annually to $25,000, the amount legislators are paid.

Rep. Larry Sheets (R) said, “If the justices are going to behave like legislators, they ought to receive lawmakers’ pay.”

Bush v. Gore and Citizens United must have slipped Rep. Sheets’ mind, or does he want to cut their pay, too?

A Democratic senator called the proposal “ridiculous” and “almost certainly unconstitutional.”

Let’s recap: Some bigoted Republicans disagreed with a state Supreme Court ruling, so they acted like toddlers, kicked out as many justices as they could in order to replace them with more “agreeable” ones, and now want to drastically cut the pay of those who remain. And they did that because the justices did their job, reviewed both sides, and came to a sound legal decision that loving couples should not be prevented from committing to each other emotionally and lawfully.

How’s that GOP outreach thing going, Iowa?

Fracking could lead to demand for more potentially explosive ammonia factories

what the frack sign Via The Tyee.ca

So much madness, so little time.

The last safety “inspection of the West fertilizer plant happened in– 1985.” Because, you know, fertilizer components aren’t flammable and dangerous and don’t require any regulation whatsoever. Nor are ingredients such as ammonium nitrate ever used in, say, domestic terrorist attacks like, oh I dunno, the Oklahoma City bombing.

Nor do they ever explode.

Nor do they pollute the air with noxious fumes when they never explode.

Nor do those explosions that never happen ever kill people.

So, of course, no forward-looking country with clear-thinking leaders would ever consider exposing its citizens to even more noxious ammonia factories. Nor would they encourage any powerful corporations to engage in any undertakings that would rely on chemicals that could easily pollute and ignite the way the plant in West, Texas did.

Grist:

The U.S. could soon be home to a lot more ammonia factories — not a comforting thought after a deadly explosion at an ammonia fertilizer plant in Texas on Wednesday evening. You can blame the fracking boom. [...]

Australian company Incitec Pivot this week announced [PDF] that it will be building a hulking new $850 million ammonia facility in Waggaman, La., just outside New Orleans. [...]

U.S.-based Mosaic announced in December that it may build a $700 million ammonia plant in St. James Parish, La. U.S.-based CHS Inc. said in September that it would construct a $1.2 billion ammonia plant in North Dakota. Also in September, Egypt’s largest company, Orascom Construction, said it would spend $1.4 billion to build a fertilizer plant in Iowa.

Well, erm, okay, but surely ammonia production has a good safety record overall, and the Texas disaster was just an anomaly. Right?

The history of ammonia production and storage is littered with spectacular accidents.

Oh, and there’s this:

The Dallas Morning News reports that the Texas fertilizer plant that exploded Wednesday night told the Environmental Protection Agency and local public safety officials that it presented “no risk of fire or explosion.”

They lied to the EPA and were not in compliance with EPA regulations (EPA regulations do not allow felony violations of 18 USC 1001). If the company was in compliance with EPA regulations, then the 540,000 lbs of the explosive ammonium nitrate, stored at the facility, would not have blown up.

The EPA said the company corrected the deficiencies and filed an updated plan in 2011. It said it now complies with EPA regulations.

Now think about all those impending new ammonia facilities. What could possibly go wrong?

All our posts on the environmental rapes perpetrated by frackers can be found here (scroll).

forward off cliff

Former Michele Bachmann chief of staff to break silence on “alleged” violations, improper payments

bachmann money

ruh roh smallerThe Office of Congressional Ethics has been investigating the Bachmann campaign for “alleged intentional” violations. There was an ethics probe into her campaign, allegations that her people deny, of course, because ‘Chele and her staff would never EVER do anything that would mar her “family values” image. Not ever.

John Avlon at the Daily Beast:

Former staffers tell The Daily Beast that investigators have allegedly asked about allegations of improper transfer of funds and under-the-table payments actions by Bachmann’s presidential campaign

The Bachmann campaign’s national political director, Guy Short, and her onetime Iowa campaign chairman, state Sen. Kent Sorenson have been the focus. Investigators have been curious about what she knew about their actions and when she knew it.

You may recall that Sorenson left Bachmann’s campaign to join Ron Paul’s. Oh snap.

Now a GOP operative and former chief of staff to Bachmann, Andy Parrish, will corroborate allegations from former Bachmann aide and Florida pastor, Peter Waldron. Waldron is saying that the campaign hid payments to Sorenson in violation of Iowa Senate ethics rules that forbid members from getting paid by presidential campaigns.

Via the Minneapolis Star Tribune:

GOP operative Andy Parrish, a former chief of staff to U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann, is expected to tell an Iowa Senate ­ethics panel that her 2012 presidential campaign made improper payments to its state chairman. [...]

The investigations are part of a growing web of legal problems facing Bachmann, including a lawsuit by former staffer Barbara Heki alleging that Sorenson stole a proprietary e-mail list of Iowa home-school families from her personal computer. Those allegations also are the subject of an ongoing police investigation in Urbandale, Iowa. [...]

Parrish’s willingness to go public against his former employer and political mentor is likely to send shock waves through Minnesota GOP circles, where both he and his attorney are well-known figures.

uh oh

VIDEO- Iowa Sec. of State, tea partier: Tell “your friends and neighbors that you love voter ID” because Dems will “cheat”

jim crow smaller jimmy

Think Progress:

At a social conservatives’ conference this week, Iowa’s Secretary of State argued that Republicans need to pass voter ID in order to advance their top policy goals, including banning abortion and same-sex marriage.

Presenting tea partier and Iowa Secretary of State (and elections official!) Matt Schultz, who spoke at the Iowa Faith and Freedom Coalition. He got out there and pushed for– ta-daa!– voter ID. Because, see, by disenfranchising all the ickiest, leftiest voters, you can finally ban abortions and marriage equality.

He also accused all those icky, lefty Democrats of cheating in order to win elections. But oops! Remember when it was Republicans who got busted for voter fraud? And when Mitt Romney's WI co-chair said that Romney would have “absolutely” won state with Voter ID law? And when former McCain senior strategist Steve Schmidt said, “Voting fraud, that doesn’t really exist… It’s part of the [Republican] mythology”?

Me too!

Of course, Tea Party Matt had no proof, no evidence, no facts to support his accusations, because there is no proof, evidence, or support for what he said since voter fraud is rarer than getting struck by lightning:

Schultz:

There are a whole lot of issues that we care about, abortion, gay marriage, a whole lot of social issues that we care deeply about. But you have to start caring about voter ID and election integrity as well, because if you don’t have that, you’ll never be able to make a difference in any other issue you care about. Never. Because they will cheat! They’ll cheat. And we need to make sure we stop them. So what do I need you to do? I need you start telling your friends and neighbors that you love Voter ID. You love Voter ID.

That's right, folks, tell your friends that you heart Voter ID! Suppressing the vote is the only way to win! (If you're a Republican, that is.)

tell a friend

More gun negligence: Man shoots off tip of finger which then hits mother

 

itchy trigger finger ouch

tweet Kagro X gunsLink

Mother: “Honey, next time you clean your gun, please be more careful! Your finger just hit me smack in the face!”

Son: “Sorry, ma. I didn’t think it was loaded.”

Mother: “You’re grounded!”

Son: “Again? But I wanted to watch the replay of Wayne LaPierre’s testimony on CSPAN!”

Mother: “Go straight to your room! But first, get your finger off the floor. Company’s coming!”

Per the Des Moines Register, my little dramatization wasn’t all that far off. A 22-year-old Des Moine man did, indeed, shoot off the tip of his own finger while cleaning what he thought was an unloaded gun. And his finger flew across the room and hit his mom.

These gun “accidents” are not accidents at all. They’re negligence. Gun Guy said he pulled the trigger to make sure his firearm was in good working order, which then fired the round that shot off the tip of his own index finger which in turn collided with his poor mom.

They were lucky. The bullet could have killed one of them.

Kinda puts the term “itchy trigger finger” in a new light.

VIDEO: GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley: “Nothing can be done to your body without your permission.” If only…

small government my ass

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Circumventing the legal rights of women is the pro-forced birth method du jour, as you can see from the above video.

No War on Women, huh?

war on women gop woman's body abortion

“Indiana Republicans up the ante: forcing women to have *two* vaginal ultrasounds.”

GOP Alabama Rep. Mary Sue McClurkin: “When a physician removes a child from a woman, that is the largest organ in a body.”

VIDEO: GOP may want to talk about it less, but the War on Women is “coming to a state near you.”

CHART: Abortions are legal, but not accessible.

New Mexico bill would criminalize abortions after rape as “tampering with evidence”

VIDEO– Happy 40th Roe v. Wade! Lizz Winstead: “It’s our bodies, our choice, our lives. Hands off!” Marco Rubio disagrees.

Poll-itics: 70% would NOT like to see Roe v. Wade overturned, but that doesn’t stop states from making access to care impossible

VIDEO: Women’s rights under attack by anti-abortion extremists

Despite murder threats by anti-abortion extremists, new clinic aims to serve Kansas women.

Here we go again: Paul Ryan is cosponsoring another fetal personhood bill

However, every now and then, it’s amusing to see a top Republican senator inadvertently embrace Roe v. Wade:

Chuck Grassley:

“First of all, nothing can be done to your body without your permission… It’d be a violation of the constitutional right to privacy if that were to happen.”

He didn’t mean female bodies, clearly, considering Indiana is trying to force women to have *two* vaginal ultrasounds” without permission.

Nevertheless…

CHARITON, Iowa —During a town hall on Wednesday, the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee embraced the reasoning behind the landmark 1973 Supreme Court decision legalizing a woman’s choice to get an abortion, although he did not appear aware of the significance of his statement. [...]

The constitutional right to privacy that Grassley refers to is not explicitly stated in the Constitution, but Roe concluded that it is one of the liberties protected by the Fourteenth Amendment, which provides that states many not “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”