Archive for investigations

Darrell Issa “chooses to investigate trivia rather than substance… Nuclear power isn’t worth these risks.”

Today’s L.A. Times letter to the editor, because our voices matter:

Re “A lone wolf at nuclear agency,” Column, April 29

Michael Hiltzik highlights what’s wrong with nuclear power regulation, and it has nothing to do with Rep. Darrell Issa‘s (R-Vista) investigation of U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman Greg Jaczko. Issa chooses to investigate trivia rather than substance.

Rational businesspeople weigh risks and benefits and always consider potential consequences. The unpredictability of nature, design, equipment failure, terrorism and human error all add to the risk posed by nuclear power plants. Chernobyl and Fukushima have displayed the potential consequences of nuclear power.

Nuclear power isn’t worth these risks when considering alternatives such as solar, wind and natural gas. It would appear that most of the benefits lie in the profitability reaped by utilities, while the risks fall on people.

Berton Moldow

Laguna Woods

VIDEO: Eric Schneiderman “wants Wall St. held FULLY accountable for the damage they caused”

Via :

Meet Eric Schneiderman – he’s our best shot at making sure banksters pay for the crimes they committed on Wall Street – crimes that have led to millions of Americans losing their jobs, homes, and livelihoods.

Crimes that SO FAR – have gone unpunished.

Earlier this week – Schneiderman – who is New York’s Attorney General – was kicked off a panel of state officials from around the country who are working with the Obama administration to come up with a one-time settlement for banksters to pay up for their crimes. Once that settlement gets paid – then everything else gets swept under the rug – no further lawsuits – no jail time – no nothing – the crime of the century gets forgiven.

The number being floated around is a $25 billion fine – to be shared by ALL the big banks on Wall Street. In other words – pocket change for banksters. But Schneiderman doesn’t like the idea – that’s why he was kicked off.

As Attorney General of New York – and thus the lead police chief of Wall Street – Schneiderman has the power to bring whatever investigations he wants against banksters – and he plans to do just that. He’s already launched investigations into Wall Street giants like Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and Bank of America. And he wants Wall Street held FULLY accountable for the damage they caused – and not just a slap on the hand.

So why is the Obama Administration NOT on Schneiderman’s side? And how much longer will the American people put up the banksters skirting the law?

Darrell Issa reveals list of investigations

I’ve pretty much hated this guy for a while, but this ridiculous list just seals it.

In investigating the impact of regulation on job creation, the committee plans to ask why the economy hasn’t “created the private sector jobs the president has promised,” and he’s calling in business leaders to explain “about the government regulations that are doing the most harm to job creation efforts.”

“The committee will examine how overregulation has hurt job creation and whether the administration intends to try and abuse the regulatory process to implement regulations that Congress would reject,” according to an outline of committee hearing topics.

The committee will also delve into international affairs in new depth, examining corruption in Afghanistan and the WikiLeaks disclosures. Issa plans to request testimony from National Security Adviser Tom Donilon to discuss whether the Obama administration has a strategy for combating the leaking of such sensitive information, and he also will call on constitutional experts to discuss how the government can stop organizations from leaking documents of a sensitive nature.

Issa is also pushing a broad investigation of the foreclosure crisis, but he wants to dig deeper into the role of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – conservatives have long complained that these government-backed housing giants have escaped scrutiny. The committee will also dig into the administration’s foreclosure mitigation program, calling the Federal Housing Administration’s chief and non-government experts. Issa and Cummings have agreed that foreclosures should be the topic of one of the committee’s first hearings.

Issa also wants to study why the financial crisis commission couldn’t reach consensus last year. He’d like to call Phil Angelides and former Rep. Bill Thomas (R-Calif.), the chair and ranking member of the committee, to determine if there was any agreement on the panel in relation to the cause of the meltdown.

The Food and Drug Administration is also going to get a good look, especially in the wake of Issa’s outspokenness about a recall of Motrin.

Motrin? Whodafcuk even knew Motrin was still around?

End The Game Playing: Special Comment by my 72-year-old friend

My impassioned 72-year-old Twitter pal, who goes by the name 42bkdodgr, would like to share his feelings about the incessant and very destructive games the GOP plays while at our country’s expense. I am more than happy to oblige.

But first, a personal note from 42bkdodgr:

Many of you may wonder why I chose to use the “ 72 year old friend” as the introduction to my Special Comments. I selected the moniker so readers could see that from my age and life experiences I give a different perspective to the issues of today.

Now for his Special Comment:

End The Game Playing

For the past couple of weeks I’ve been angry and depressed from what I have seen taking place since the  mid-term election. It’s not that the Democrats are no longer the majority party in the House, or that they have lost several seats in the Senate that has upset me, it’s been the Republicans reaction to the election.

The Republicans feel they have a mandate from the American people that will allow them to repeal all of Obama’s major accomplishments during his first two years in office, such as Health Care Reform and Financial Reform.

They are wrong and they know it, as such bills can’t be repealed because of Obama’s veto power.  Instead of stating the good points in both bills and areas where they can be improved, all their rancor and ranting is increasing hate and fear and further dividing our country.

So what has me angry, and I believe also many Americans, is the political gamesmanship our politicians have been playing in the last few years, and I truly believe the American public wants to see it end.

Since the election, the Republican leadership in the House seems more interested in doing a series of investigations ( witch hunts) of the Obama administration on such issues as HCR, Financial Reform, Joe Sestak ” job offer”, or proposing to shut down the government rather than  offering ideas on how to resolve the country’s economic woes (except for their mantra of tax cuts for corporations and the rich).

So when I read and hear what the Republicans intend to do in the House and the Senate, it greatly upsets me as I see more games playing and nothing meaningful happening in Congress in the next two years to move this country forward.

I believe American public– I know I am– is tired of:

* no bipartisanship between Republicans and Democrats

* seeing one Senator, like Senator Kyl, holding up the vote on the START Treaty, or Senator Bunning preventing a vote on extending Unemployment Insurance earlier this year.

* Senate rules requiring 60 yea votes before a bill can be moved out of committee and brought to the floor for debate.

* seeing riders being added to bills that are unrelated to the main bill, that could effect the passage of an important bill. I call it the ” got you” riders.

I believe the public would like to see each bill stand on its own merits, and if there is disagreement by either political party regarding the passage of a bill, let them filibuster. This way we can return to the policy of majority vote rules. Let the American public see what their representatives really support and stand for on each bill.

This country can’t afford to have our politicians continue to play their political games and expect this country to move forward in the 21st century.

Many thanks again for another thorough, relevant piece, 42bkdodgr. You often say what many of us are thinking and feeling, and we thank you for your unique perspective.

Darrell Issa’s possible investigations

The New York Times lists several possible investigations that Darrell Issa could undertake when he becomes the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. He’s threatened to do 280 of them:

“I want seven hearings a week, times 40 weeks.”

Some of these, per the Times, we can expect, others would actually be productive.

I’ll provide the list, but hop over to the Times to read the details:

INVESTIGATIONS WE CAN EXPECT

–White House job offers.

“Friends of Angelo.”

–ACORN.

–”New Black Panthers.”

Climate science.

BP oil-spill response.

Economic stimulus.

White House Political Affairs Office.

–Czars.

INVESTIGATIONS WE COULD REALLY USE

Federal contracts.

The Civil Service.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Defense spending.

Food Safety.

–Transparency.

–Veterans Health.

–Loan Guarantees.

–Agency Performance.

–Congress Itself.

Investigate “Obama’s Watergate”? Nah, Darrell Issa was only kidding.


Omg, thank GOD Darrell Issa is so reasonable! I must kiss his ring NOW! Who says the GOP is nothing but a crazed posse out to get President Obama? How can we ever show enough gratitude? Whew! That was a close one! Darrell’s the bestest ever!

Rep. Darrell Issa, poised to chair the panel with the power to investigate the Obama administration, is ready to drop the issue he once called an “impeachable” offense and “Obama’s Watergate.”

Six months ago, the California Republican was hammering President Barack Obama for offering Rep. Joe Sestak an administration job in exchange for dropping out of the Pennsylvania Democratic Senate primary, and was using his role as House Oversight and Government Reform ranking member to keep the matter in the news.

Issa thought an investigation like that might look like a partisan witch hunt. Gee, ya think?

See? All that crazy, irrational blather about subpoenas and investigating and impeachment was just a big joke. Isn’t Issa funny? What a card! Who knew? Comparing Obama to Nixon and his profoundly unethical and illegal Watergate antics was just some piddly little punchline intended to induce laughter.

Don’tcha just LOVE Darrell? Why, he’s a regular Bill Maher Pauly Shore.

Of course, going after President Obama for, well, anything and everything else in the whole wide world wouldn’t appear partisan and witch hunty at all:

Issa said in an early Wednesday conference call that he “absolutely” plans to beef up the committee’s use of subpoenas when he takes on the expected role of chairman in January. Specifically, he wants to grant all 74 inspectors general in the executive branch with the subpoena power to investigate any federal program. Currently, only one has such authority.

That whole first part of my post? About Darrell Issa being reasonable, and the kissing his ring thing? I was only kidding, too.

GOP plans wave of White House probes

I cannot live thru another one of these inquisitions. Go here to see the utterly vapid list of crap they want to “investigate”.

If President Barack Obama needed any more incentive to go all out for Democrats this fall, here it is: Republicans are planning a wave of committee investigations targeting the White House and Democratic allies if they win back the majority.

Everything from the microscopic – the New Black Panther party – to the massive –- think bailouts – is on the GOP to-do list, according to a half-dozen Republican aides interviewed by POLITICO.

Republican staffers say there won’t be any self-destructive witch hunts – but they are clearly relishing the prospect of extracting information from an administration that touts transparency.

And a handful of aggressive would-be committee chairmen – led by Reps. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) and Lamar Smith (R-Tex.) – are quietly gearing up for a possible season of subpoenas not seen since the Clinton wars of the late 1990s.

Issa would like Obama’s cooperation, says Kurt Bardella, spokesman for the ranking Republican on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. But it’s not essential.

“How acrimonious things get really depend on how willing the administration is in accepting our findings [and] responding to our questions,” adds Bardella, who refers to his boss as “Questioner-in-Chief.’