Archive for invasion of privacy – Page 2

“How about a law mandating that every one of those people who voted to outlaw abortions adopts… abandoned children?”

Welcome to Virginia, Washington DC, United States
This travel blog photo’s source is TravelPod page: The Never Ending Journey to Washington DC!

 

Today’s L.A. Times letter to the editor, because our voices matter:

No, Virginia

Re “2 antiabortion bills pass,” Feb. 15

What’s going on in Virginia? It seems impossible that two bills practically outlawing abortion passed by 63-36 and 66-32 votes in the Virginia House.

If the Legislature is so concerned with abortion, why not also require that the man who impregnated the woman needing the abortion undergo a vasectomy? Or how about a law mandating that every one of those people who voted to outlaw abortions adopts a couple of abandoned children? I know my suggestions are about as absurd as Virginia’s bills, but I’m angry.

Lyenll Marshall

La Palma

(Guttmacher Institute)

“I challenge all social conservatives, and the Catholic hierarchy, to pay the appropriate medical premium surcharge for all unwanted children.”

Today’s L.A. Times letters to the editor, Part 2, because our voices matter:

Churches in our bedrooms

Re “Bishops dismiss Obama’s birth control revision,” Feb. 12, and “Key Republican vows to fight birth control mandate,” Feb. 13

The bishops of the sex-scandal-ravaged Roman Catholic Church have no standing to talk about “grave moral concern.”

The government’s edict has nothing to do with religious freedom. The Catholic Church and other religious institutions have the freedom to deny choice to their members, but they cannot ignore the law and try to take away choice from other people. They can turn down all of the tax dollars they get for any of their programs.

How dare they try to force their religion on the rest of us, all the while claiming it takes away their freedom of religion. They ignore my freedom of religion.

They are an outrage, as are all people who clamor for a smaller, less intrusive government yet have no problem with the government coming into our bedrooms.

Barry Greenfield

West Hollywood

***

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Tenn.) and the Catholic bishops certainly believe they occupy the moral high ground. However, the Republicans‘ social conservatism is in direct opposition to their fiscal conservatism.

The facts show that preventing a single unwanted pregnancy saves thousands of dollars. Without birth control, this additional cost burden falls on the insurance companies and then to all of us. Those of us who use birth control subsidize those who don’t.

I challenge all social conservatives, and the Catholic hierarchy, to pay the appropriate medical premium surcharge for all unwanted children. They should put their money where their principles are; only then will their elevated stand be taken seriously.

J.H. Benson

Altadena

VIDEO- Santorum backer: “Back in my days, they’d use Bayer aspirin for contraception. The gals put it between their knees…”

This contraception thing, my gosh, it’s [so] inexpensive. You know, back in my days, they’d use Bayer aspirin for contraception. The gals put it between their knees and it wasn’t that costly.”

I have a feeling his wife habitually puts his Viagra between her knees to avoid any overtures from this pathetic little anachronistic schmuck (<– no pun).

This man, with his hefty political donations, is influencing the GOP primary.

So, Ricky Santorum, any comment on your sugar daddy’s reminiscence?

H/t: @wayneradcliffe

VIDEO: Darrell Issa’s “hearing” on women’s health. Pelosi: “Where are the women? …Duh!” Democratic women boycott.

Republicans have a perverted idea of what “fair and balanced” means. They also can’t seem to discern between a so-called “war on religion” and a very obvious “war on women.” And did I mention they’re a bunch of hypocrites?

I’ll let these videos speak for themselves. I’m too angry to do much more than sputter right now:

“This is an issue about women’s health.”

“Five men are testifying…”

“Where are the women?”

“Imagine, having a panel on women’s health and then not having any women on the panel, duh!”

“What is it that men don’t understand about women’s health and how central the issue of family planning is to that?”

“I think the fact that they did not allow a woman on the panel is symbolic of the whole debate as to who is making these decisions about women’s health and who should be covered.”

And what happens when there’s a “Duh” moment like this? Think Progress tells us that and more:

Reps. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) and Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC) walked out of the hearing in protest of his decision, citing frustration over the fact that the first panel of witnesses consisted only of male religious leaders against the rule. Holmes Norton said she will not return, calling Issa’s chairmanship an “autocratic regime.”

Republicans backed birth control mandates before they didn’t

Let’s see now, The Bush administration advanced the Solyndra loan guarantee for two years, GW Bush said that the bailout plan was necessary, and ta-da! Bush never challenged a mandate similar to the Obama administration’s requiring Catholic hospitals and universities to offer their employees contraceptive health benefits.

But that doesn’t stop Republicans from accusing President Obama of policies Bush initiated waging a “war on religion.” The hypocrisy is blatant and a way of life for the GOP. Oh, and then there’s that whole “blame Obama” thing.

Today’s L.A. Times:

Twenty-two states have laws or regulations that resemble, at least in part, the Obama administration’s original rule. More than a third had some Republican support, a review of state records shows.

In six states, including Arkansas, those contraceptive mandates were signed by GOP governors.

In Massachusetts in 2006, then-Gov. Mitt Romney signed a healthcare overhaul that kept in place a contraceptive mandate signed by his Republican predecessor. Now the GOP presidential candidate is calling the Obama rule an “assault on religion.”

At the federal level, President George W. Bush never challenged a similar federal mandate imposed in 2000.

The state laws were the product of a campaign by women’s groups and others that began after insurers started covering Viagra for men.

Apparently it’s mandatory for men to be able to function properly in order for them to achieve their, well, goal. However, another very worthy goal would be to prevent unwanted pregnancies and abortions.

Recap: It’s a GOP priority for men to do boink their brains out, but providing their partners with easy access to contraception is so religiously incorrect that anyone who supports it deserves the wrath of someone else’s god. Got it.

If Men Got Pregnant, Congress Would Have Made Abortion Legal and Contraceptives Diverse

Your Daily Dose of BuzzFlash at Truthout, via my buddy Mark Karlin:

It’s been said that if men got pregnant – instead of women – the Congress would have long ago made abortion legal and contraceptives plentiful and diverse. [...]

The efforts to control a woman’s body are once again heating up, particularly in red states with large legislative majorities. In Oklahoma, the most recent initiative to treat women as chattel for the pleasure of men is Senate “Personhood” Bill 1433 [...]

Constance Johnson, a state senator in Oklahoma… introduced an amendment to Oklahoma SB 1433 [...]

In short – and to put it bluntly – Johnson would outlaw masturbation by making it illegal to commit “any action in which a man ejaculates or otherwise deposits semen anywhere but in a woman’s vagina [which] shall be interpreted and construed as an action against an unborn child.”

While it may seem like a somewhat squeamishly comical legislative amendment, it does provocatively dispel the double standard at play in the predominantly GOP male war on women’s bodies.  [...]

Senator Johnson is justifiably disgusted at the efforts of male legislators to make the biology of being a woman illegal [...]

Making zygotes into people is just another way of putting women in a cage, while allowing men to roam free. [...]

NOTE: The Congress has not made abortion legal. In fact, it has made it less available and removed government funding for Medicaid abortions, for example. Remember that it was the Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade that made abortion legal, not Congress.

You can read the whole post here.

Rachel Maddow’s excellent op-ed adventure

Rachel Maddow has an op-ed in the Washington Post today about the war on birth control. Actually, it seems more like a war on women, but since men are affected by attempts to withhold women’s access to contraceptives, too, it’s broader than that. IMHO, it’s a war on sanity.

Conservatives are using revivals of their favorite Golden Oldies controversies (contraception, the evils of Planned Parenthood, abortion rights, “personhood”) as wedge issues because they’re running out of ideas and plans (assuming they had any to begin with) that have any credibility, like, say, pertaining to the economy or national security. President Obama has pretty much taken the wind out of their sails on those issues, at least for now.

So back(wards) they travel in time, going all anachronistic on us about on women’s reproductive rights. Rachel has an impressive knack for educating and clarifying, even enlightening, when offering her own perspective. I, for one, am glad to see her have an opportunity to broaden her reach to a print audience in addition to her TV viewers.

Here’s a sample, but hop over and read the whole thing here.

After Mississippi rejected “personhood” and its threat to contraception, after Colorado rejected it twice, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum and Ron Paul attended (Paul by satellite) a Personhood USA candidates forum in South Carolina. All signed a pledge to pursue “personhood” at the federal level. Mitt Romney did not attend the event, but when asked on Fox News before the Mississippi vote last year whether he would have supported such a measure as Massachusetts governor, he replied, “Absolutely.”

This is critical context for understanding the national media scrum over health insurance and contraception. [...]

Time will tell on the political impact of this fight, but the relevant political context here is more than just a 2012 measure of Catholic bishops’ influence on moral issues. It’s also this year’s mainstream Republican embrace of an antiabortion movement that no longer just marches on the anniversary of Roe v. Wade to criminalize abortion; it now marches on the anniversary of Griswold v. Connecticut, holding signs that say “The Pill Kills.”