Archive for Hurricane Sandy

GOP Rep. Peter King on Marco Rubio: “To have the balls to come in and say, ‘We screwed you, now make us president?’”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

rubio water I'm you

Remember when GOP Rep. Peter King bashed his own party over Hurricane Sandy and halted donations to House Republicans? Me too!

New York GOP Rep. Peter King smacked down his fellow Republicans for having a “reality problem.” He was furious over their failure to provide funding relief via a Hurricane Sandy bill, adjourning without permitting said aid. King even called on New Yorkers to stop all donations to GOP House members. Of course, these are the same compassionate conservatives who love to boast about being “pro life.”

Now, according to Politicker, King’s none too thrilled that Florida Senator Marco Rubio “has been raising cash on Wall Street after voting against the Sandy bill.”

Ruh roh. I sense some new ranting coming on in 3… 2… 1…

“Being from New York we’re not supposed to be suckers,” Mr. King told Politicker this morning. “It’s bad enough that these guys voted against it, that’s inexcusable enough. But to have the balls to come in and say, ‘We screwed you now make us president?’

oof3

That’s funny, Dems have been saying the very same thing about other opportunistic potential Republican candidates, but we’re fine with zeroing in on Rubio for now. We’re inclusive that way.

King went on to say that Rubio should be cut off from donations, as should any Congress member who “threw a knife in the back in New York” by voting “no” on the Sandy bill.

Why yes, yes he/they should. Thank you for the suggestion Rep. King. We’ll be sure to spread the word.

And that concludes another episode of Republicans Eating Their Own.

Republicans eating their own smaller

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Another day, another GOP hypocrite

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

pro life hypocrisy Via Sodahead

In today’s L.A. Times, there was an article about the Senate approving $50.5 billion in Superstorm Sandy aid. Wow, Senate, that only took… months.

But aside from the obvious outrage-worthy content in the piece, there was one quote that caught my eye:

A number of Republicans unsuccessfully sought to offset the aid with cuts to other federal spending.

We have a habit here of throwing money at things under an emergency category and then later finding out, one, it wasn’t an emergency where the money went, and number two, it was misspent and not effective,’’ said Sen. Dan Coats (R-Ind.).

Via Wiki:

From August 15, 2001 to February 28, 2005, Coats was the United States Ambassador to Germany.[11][12] As ambassador during the lead up to the Iraq war, he pressured the German government not to oppose the war, threatening worsened US relations with Germany.[13]  [...]

In 2007, Coats served as co-chairman of a team of lobbyists for Cooper Industries, a Texas corporation that moved its principal place of business to Bermuda, where it would not be liable for U.S. taxes. He successfully blocked Senate legislation that would have prevented a tax loophole, worth hundreds of millions of dollars to Cooper Industries.[16]  [...]

Coats is affiliated with the Fellowship, an informal association of Christian lawmakers.[25]

So he supported invading and destroying Iraq, a war that was kept off the books, a war that wasn’t paid for or “offset,” a war that was put on a credit card and threw “money at things” and then we “later found out, one, it wasn’t an emergency where the money went, and number two, it was misspent and not effective.”

And he supported those infamous Romney-style offshore tax havens that have cost our economy a pretty penny.

And he claims to be oh so Christian, yet voted against helping fellow Americans whose lives were devastated by a natural disaster. Pro-life my ass.

Hypocrisy, thy name is Coats.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Video- Soledad O’Brien Thumps GOP Congressman Over His Opposition To Hurricane Sandy Relief

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Via.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

“We have a totally dysfunctional Congress”: Special Comment by my 72-year-old friend

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

dysfunctional

My impassioned 72-year-old  friend (who is now 75, but who’s counting?), who goes by the Twitter name @42bkdodgr, would like to share his feelings about Congressional Republican buffoons and their penchant for obstructionism. I am more than happy to oblige.

But first, a personal note from 42bkdodgr:

Many of you may wonder why I chose to use the “72 year old friend” as the introduction to my Special Comments. I selected the moniker so readers could see that from my age and life experiences I give a different perspective to the issues of today.

Dysfunctional

In the last few years,  I have written several Special Comments hoping the Republican moderates would regain control of the  Party and move it back to the middle. But alas, my hopes haven’t come true. In fact the Republican Party has moved further to the right.

In today’s Congress there are very few moderates, if any. They have either decided to leave Congress on their own, or lost a primary race to a teabagger candidate or to a more conservative candidate. So now we have Republicans in Congress who have more allegiance to an individual than to the oath they took when sworn into office.

During the two years the Republicans controlled the house, we saw them bring bills to the floor that covered abortions, religion, marriage, guns; but zero JOBS bills.  It seems a jobs bill is the least important item on their agenda, unless it’s their own.

President Obama and Democrats in Congress, are dealing with a group of people who believe the word “compromise” is a dirty word. As one teabagger congressman said,  “Compromise is when they come over to our side”.

I was hoping that after President Obama’s decisive victory in November things would change, but I was wrong again.

The first bill entered in the House by the 113th Congress came from Michele Bachmann, for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), followed shortly by a  fetal personhood  bill cosponsored by Paul Ryan.

Both individuals have to know these bills will never be passed. The personhood bill has many legal issues that have to be addressed before it even can be brought to the floor for discussion.

So it appears it’s the same old thing with this new congress, everything related to religion and Women Rights, but for a JOBS bill, as they say in Brooklyn, “fugetboutit”. I also expect obstructionism will continue in the Senate for the next two years.

In addition, Republicans in the House also seem totally insensitive to the needs of the people. It took a public outcry from members of their own party to even pass a $9 billion assistance bill passed in the opening days of the 113th Congress, to help Americans suffering from Sandy Hurricane flood damage. This amount is only a portion of a $60 billion bill approved by the Senate for Sandy Relief funds.

The reason, given by the Republican leaders  of the House for not passing the full Relief Bill during the 112th Congress was that it wasn’t fully paid for. One has to wonder where these Republicans were when they passed unfunded bills for the Bush tax cuts, two wars, and a Medicare drug bill. The effect of those bills help create the debt level that Republicans suddenly seem so concerned about.

Now the Republicans are using a new tactic on President Obama: objecting to any name they hear who may be considered for a Cabinet position, before it’s even announced. This type of tactic has never been used in the past. It’s another type of obstructionism to prevent the Obama administration from functioning.

Now we await the fight over raising the debt ceiling to pay for the costs Congress already approved, while they try to hold the country hostage over how to cut spending.

The Republicans seem intent in driving their already poor approval rating down to zero. The Republican actions  have already and will only continue to create further divisions between the parties, while also creating a further  divide in the our nation.

We have a totally dysfunctional  Congress and I begin to wonder if these divides can ever be completely healed.

We need a Congress that works together, to settle their differences, regardless of who is president, or we will continue in our dysfunctional manner for many more years to come.

Many thanks again for another thorough, relevant piece, @42bkdodgr. You often say what many of us are thinking and feeling, and we thank you for your unique perspective.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Video- Jon Stewart Trashes Republican Congressmen on Aid Vote

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Jon in fine form.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Another Vitter pill: David Vitter calls Harry Reid an “idiot”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

tweet vitter reid idiot

This from the genius who favors corporations over sexual assault victims; who wants to defund Planned Parenthood; who was subpoenaed by the D.C. Madam and who has a diaper fetish.

So much for Republican “family values” and “civility.”

Via First Read:

Louisiana Sen. David Vitter (R), upset with Harry Reid saying Hurricane Katrina was “nothing in comparison” to Hurricane Sandy and the devastation caused to the New York-New Jersey-Connecticut area, lashed out on the social network calling the Senate majority leader an “idiot.”

Yes, that’s exactly how to respond when you disagree with someone. Reason and logic? Pfft! Common decency? Fugetaboutit. What a fine, genteel individual David Vitter is. A real role model. Stay classy, Vit.

Pot. Kettle. Idiot.

vitter pill

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

The terrible, horrible, no good, very bad GOP dissension-slash-implosion

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

gop terrible horrible no good very bad year

Without even trying, I ran into four– count ‘em, four!– different articles about how the Republican party is completely full of… dissension. They are imploding before our very peepers, and the whole wide world is watching.

Here are the four pieces I stumbled upon. Enjoy!

First, via my morning L.A. Times, an analysis by Paul West that he titled, Republican Party divide increasingly a matter of region. In it he writes about how the southern states, where the GOP base is entrenched, is increasingly divided from the rest of country:

The budget battles rocking the capital have exposed a deepening fault line within an already fractured Republican Party: the divide between the GOP’s solid Southern base and the rest of the country. [...]

Few would dispute that the battle over the fiscal cliff and internecine sniping over Superstorm Sandy aid left Republicans in Washington deeply divided at a time when the party is still trying to recover from a presidential election defeat that many did not see coming.

do go on 1

Why sure! Who am I to refuse a fascinated cat? That brings us to the Washington Post:

There are early signs of division within the Republican Party over how to approach the upcoming debate over raising the federal debt ceiling.

On Friday, a top Senate Republican signaled that members of his party should be prepared to play hardball and be willing to accept the kind of consequences in each previous fight they’ve threatened but managed to avoid.

But other Republicans counseled caution, warning that pressure from the business community and the public to raise the $16.4 trillion federal borrowing limit renders untenable any threats not to do so and will weaken the GOP’s hand if their stance is perceived to be a bluff.

do go on 3

Of course! There will be no cliff hangers in this post. Next up, the New York Times:

From Mitt Romney’s loss on Election Day through the recent tax fight that shattered party discipline in the House of Representatives, Republicans have seen the foundations of their political strategy called into question, stirring a newly urgent debate about how to reshape and redefine their party.

At issue immediately is whether that can be achieved through a shift in tactics and tone, or will instead require a deeper rethinking of the party’s longtime positions on bedrock issues like guns and immigration. [...]

The coming legislative battles are certain to expose even more division in the party. And with establishment Republicans and Tea Party activists at times speaking as if they are from different parties altogether, concern is spreading throughout the ranks that things could get worse before they get better. [...]

But a changed tone alone may not do enough to smooth over the very real disagreements in the Republican Party. And it is not clear how the intraparty combatants can meet in the middle.

All together now: Aww.

aww tiny violin poor you

But wait! There’s more!

do go on 2

Well, okay, if you insist. We’ll wrap it up with this. Roll Call reveals that the Boehner coup attempt was larger than first thought. Can you spell i-m-p-l-o-s-i-o-n?

A concerted effort to unseat Speaker John A. Boehner was under way the day of his re-election to the position, but participants called it off 30 minutes before the House floor vote, CQ Roll Call has learned.

A group of disaffected conservatives had agreed to vote against the Ohio lawmaker if they could get at least 25 members to join the effort. But one member, whose identity could not be verified, rescinded his or her participation the morning of the vote, leaving the group one person short of its self-imposed 25-member threshold. Only 17 votes against Boehner were required to force a second ballot, but the group wanted to have insurance.

Bonus! Conservatives Annoyed by Christie!

All in all, 2013 promises to be an interesting, if not schadenfreude-filled year in politics.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email