Archive for GOP hypocrisy

VIDEO: MSNBC’s Chuck Todd (yes, Chuck Todd) calls out Marco Rubio on his #IRS hypocrisy

rubio water SOTU response 2013

Think Progress:

NBC’s Chuck Todd challenged Sen. Marco Rubio’s (R-FL) claim that the Obama administration has created a “culture of intimidation” in which “everything is about politics and destroying your opponent and dividing the American people for your electoral gain,” pointing out that the Rubio’s own PAC is actively fundraising from the ongoing scandals in Washington.

Shorter Rubio: It’s okay when I do it:

Chuck Todd:

Your PAC put out an email raising money on the IRS issue… That’s campaigning, that’s politics, too.

Rubio:

…But here’s the point. I’m trying to get a petition of American citizens and Americans who support us in this endeavor so that we can rally people together to work against these sorts of abuse of power. That’s different from going around and saying I am going to put on my website every single day, every donor to the Obama campaign. I’m going to attack that individual, a private citizen by name, and I’m going to try to create this culture where people feel intimidated as they oppose me. Those are two very different things I’m talking about.

Shorter Rubio: I’m not an evil French gay commie Kenyan Marxist Democratic boogey man, so it doesn’t count.

IOKIYAR.*

Wait. Who’s that man in the video wearing the Chuck Todd disguise?

*IOKIYAR

Think Progress has more, including the fundraising email.

“Blame Congress” for IRS procedures. “But don’t look to Congress to fix anything. Its members benefit.”

blame stick figures

Today’s L.A. Times letters to the editor, because our voices matter:

Re “Anger widens as IRS details emerge,” May 14

While members of Congress want to know more about the IRS targeting of conservative 501(c)(4) groups, they should look no further than themselves for the blame.

I tried to read the tax code regarding just what a “social welfare” group is, and my head almost exploded. The IRS didn’t write these rules, Congress did. If there isn’t clarity in the IRS procedures, blame Congress. But don’t look to Congress to fix anything. Its members benefit from the spending these tax-exempt organizations do. If anything, this loophole should be closed.

Shirley Conley

Gardena

***

Yes, the IRS and Associated Press scandals smell bad. But I wonder if one reason the members of one political party spend so much time spewing out self-righteous rants about the other party’s possible screw-up of the day — rather than working on vital legislation — has something to do with being in perpetual campaign mode brought on by their refusal to compromise on meaningful campaign finance reform.

Jack Cooper

North Hollywood

***

Re “Journalists’ records secretly collected,” May 14

It would be helpful for the AP if Republicans had not filibustered the proposed reporter shield law in 2008. This legislation would have specifically prohibited the kinds of abuses being visited upon the AP.

When the bill was in the House, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Vista), now in high dudgeon over the matter, was one of only 21 representatives to vote against protecting reporters’ sources.

Kevin P. Smith

Newbury Park

What’s the matter with Wisconsin… Republicans?

what's the matter with wisconsin

There’s a new Marquette University Law School poll that is mind-boggling, unless Republican amnesia is behind the responses, in which case it makes total sense.

The Journal Times is reporting that part of that stellar GOP ticket that lost to President Obama in a landslide is now  leading the field for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination in Wisconsin. To add insult to injury, Gov. Scott Walker came in third. Hillary Clinton was the Dem fave, with V.P. Biden coming in second:

27 percent of Wisconsin Republican voters and independents who lean Republican support Ryan, while 21 percent support Florida Sen. Marco Rubio. Walker received support from 16 percent.

This would be the same Paul Ryan who decided not to decide” whether or not to run for president in 2016.

This would be the same Paul Ryan who continues to use the derogatory “anchor babies” term.

The same Paul Ryan who cosponsored another fetal personhood bill. Which was after he and his former BFF Todd Akin co-sponsored their own personhood bill.

The same Paul Ryan who only last month had only a 35% approval rating among all likely U.S. voters, down 15 points from 50% in August just after Mitt Romney chose him as his running mate.

The same Paul Ryan who still wants to kill Medicare and whose “LaLaLand fantasy budget” was a laughingstock, because it catered to the same 1% that his old “Kill Medicare” did, yet said explaining his tax plan math was too time-consuming.

The same Paul Ryan who said, “We’re not going to give up on destroying the health care system…”

The same Paul Ryan who said that he thinks he can get Obamacare repealed. After 37 times, you’d think he’d finally realize that it just ain’t gonna happen.

The same Paul Ryan who refused to answer any questions.

The same Paul Ryan who “may have improperly used funds raised for his re-election effort in Wisconsin.

The same Paul Ryan who showed up all over “Rape Pregnancy Is Something God Intended” Mourdock’s Facebook page.

The same Paul Ryan whose hypocritical stimulus funding story makes front pages of most WI papers.

The same Paul Ryan who walked out on a local reporter for pressing him on taxes.

The same Paul Ryan who opposed the First-Responders Bill.

The same Paul Ryan who out and out lies.

And who can forget his “phoniest piece of baloney” photo op at a soup kitchen?

What’s the matter with Wisconsin?

paul ryan cartoon pumping ayn weightsVia.

VIDEO: Holder to Issa (who voted against media shield Law): Your conduct “is unacceptable. It is shameful.”

please,just shut up

So many stories to report, so little time. Here’s something that’s been eating at me for awhile now, and someone whose work I respect and admire feels the same way. Richard (RJ) Eskow:

Apparently it never occurred to Attorney General Eric Holder that the Associated Press might be “too big to fail.” If it had,then his Justice Department probably never would have investigated it. [...]

That policy has led to extraordinary prosecutorial passivity in the face of overwhelming evidence. There’s certainly no sign that the Justice Department has ever sought the phone records or emails of America’s top bankers.

Bam.

Then as I was poking around, I came across this from TPM:

Attorney General Holder at a House Judiciary Committee hearing:

“I am not going to stop talking now… It is inappropriate and too consistent with the way in which you conduct yourself as a member of Congress. It is unacceptable. It is shameful.”

He said that to the very same Darrell Issa who voted against a media shield law only a few years ago. BuzzFeed:

Republicans In Congress Killed A Media Shield Law That Would Have Protected The Associated Press

The defeated bill would have required approval from a federal court before reporters’ phone records were subpoenaed. Darrell Issa, who condemned the AP subpoena Monday voted against it. [...]

Issa didn’t mention that he voted against a measure that would have protected the AP from the DOJ’s subpoena in 2007. Issa was one of 21 House members who opposed the Free Flow of Information Act of 2007, a measure that would have forbidden federal investigators from compelling journalists to give evidence without first obtaining a court order. The bill included a section that specifically forbid subpoenaing journalists’ phone records from “communication service providers” to the same extent that the law protected the journalists themselves.

Timing is everything:

The White House asked Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., to reintroduce reporter shield legislation, White House officials told CNN on Wednesday.

Another day, more Republican hypocrisy to share. Hence my earlier post, More candidates for jail in IRS “scandal?” In 2011 GOP Congressmen demanded the IRS audit AARP.

More candidates for jail in IRS “scandal?” In 2011 GOP Congressmen demanded the IRS audit AARP

IRS tea party cartoon HorseyVia David Horsey

GOP ask IRS to go after AARP April 2011Link, April 2011

GOP ask IRS to go after AARP 2011Link, December 2011

One more time: It’s important to clarify to those who miss the point more often than not, that this isn’t about defending the IRS. It’s about the hypocrisy of some on the right.

And there’s a whole lot of hypocrisy on the right to draw from; this is only the latest. The Hill, April 2011:

Republicans on the House Ways and Means Committee asked federal tax authorities Friday to look into AARP’s finances. [...] Democrats say Republicans are simply trying to punish the seniors’ lobby for putting its considerable weight behind healthcare reform.

Above are screen shots of two letters, one from April 2011, one from December 2011, from Republicans requesting the audit.

To repeat, House Republicans called for an IRS probe into AARP when it supported passage of the Affordable Care Act aka Obamacare. So who’s going to jail for that scandal?

Boehner:

“The IRS admitted to targeting conservatives, even if the White House continues to be stuck on the word ‘if.’ My question isn’t about who is going to resign. My question is who’s going to jail over this scandal?”

H/t: Hugh Kaufman

hypocrisy meter 2

The hypocrisy of GOP outrage over the IRS targeting conservative groups

Via aaateeshirts.com

Before I write another word about this, it’s important to clarify to those who seem to consistently miss so many similar points, that this isn’t about my defending the IRS. I’m not. It’s about the hypocrisy of some on the right.
 
Take Joe Scarborough for example. He asked the IRS to target the NAACP ten years ago. Now he’s objecting, on Twitter, to the IRS targeting conservatives:

@JoeNBC:

 
scarborough tweet IRS hypocrisy
 

Then there was GOP Senator Susan Collins who was outraged, outraged, by the IRS targeting conservative groups:

Senator Susan Collins, a Maine Republican, yesterday called for a more aggressive response from the administration, calling on Obama to personally condemn the IRS action.

“This is truly outrageous and it contributes to the profound distrust that the American people have in government,” Collins said on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

She termed it “absolutely chilling that the IRS was singling out conservative groups for extra review. And I think that it’s very disappointing that the president hasn’t personally condemned this and spoken out.”

But ten years ago, she and Joe asked the IRS to target the NAACP. Here’s the article mentioning the letter from Sen. Collins and  former Rep. Scarborough to the IRS, asking them to target the NAACP titled, “IRS audit of NAACP was asked“:

Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.’s chief fundraiser asked the Internal Revenue Service to investigate the NAACP’s tax-exempt status shortly after the 2000 presidential campaign, questioning whether the civil rights organization had inappropriately sought to influence the election. [...]

The other lawmakers included: Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, Sen. Susan M. Collins of Maine, Sen. Strom Thurmond of South Carolina, Rep. Jo Ann Davis of Virginia, Rep. Larry Combest of Texas and Rep. Joe Scarborough of Florida, now an MSNBC personality. Like Ehrlich, all are Republicans.

Did I mention that the IRS audited Greenpeace at the request of an ExxonMobil-funded group?

As I type this, Rev. Al Sharpton is reporting on this very thing. Good.

“Republicans have shown they’re only capable of outrage when a Democratic president is in charge.”

benghazi jon stewart daily show

Today’s L.A. Times letters to the editor, because our voices matter:

Re “Lawmakers hear official’s account of Benghazi events,” May 8

After failing to connect President Obama to any real scandals, Republicans have resurrected the 8-month-old attack in Benghazi, Libya. This, while also taking a shot at Hillary Rodham Clinton, a potential presidential candidate.

Conservatives claim their outrage stems from the fact that four Americans died in the attack. Yet they cannot muster similar outrage over the nearly 4,500 dead U.S. servicemen and women in Iraq or the 3,000 dead from the 9/11 attacks.

These Republicans have shown they’re only capable of outrage when a Democratic president is in charge.

Ted Stulz

Anaheim Hills

***

It seems politics are driving Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Vista), the chairman of the House committee that conducted the Benghazi hearing, and his fellow Republicans over the attack.

Why didn’t House Democrats hold similar hearings when they came to power after the 2006 midterm election? No reason to — we were all Bushed out going into the elections in 2008. Today the GOP appears to be trying to bushwhack Hilary Clinton in 2016.

Ken Johnson

Pinon Hills