Archive for George Bush

V.P. Biden: “We don’t want to blow it like the last administration did in Iraq, saying ‘weapons of mass destruction.’”

"WMD? Nope, no weapons over there ... maybe under here?"

“WMD? Nope, no weapons over there … maybe under here?”

Rolling Stone is running Doug Brinkley’s interview with Vice President Joe Biden, and for those of us who barely have time to breathe, The Week has seven fascinating highlights: Vice President Biden talks Syria, gay marriage, and why he and Obama are “simpatico.”

One of those highlights goes a little something like this:

Now, I love John McCain — I just went out to do an event for him. We used to be close friends, and we’re trying to get that back a little bit. Campaigns have a way of causing those things to wane…. But here’s where we are with regard to Syria: With all the credibility we’ve gained in the world, we don’t want to blow it like the last administration did in Iraq, saying “weapons of mass destruction.”

Vice President Biden is a wise, wise man.

But apparently, the Obama administration still doesn’t want to look back, only forward, when it comes to considering prosecuting BushCo for war crimes. And that is not very wise.

Another Sunday. More outrage to report.

ignoring you talk

In what seems like another lifetime ago, our old pal and brilliant colleague Cliff Schecter used to write a Friday “Cliff’s Corner” post at AMERICAblog that always started out with, “Another week. More preposterousness to report.”

As I said in a previous post, I am tempted to take it from there on a weekly basis: Another Sunday. More outrage to report. I can’t and won’t watch all the Sunday talk shows, and sometimes I refuse to watch any of them. However, today I caught some of “This Week” and a few minutes of the”Meet the Press” panel.

Big mistake on my part.

I listened as the commentators praised George W. Bush for (paraphrasing) being a terrible president but a (not paraphrasing) “good man.” A good man? Really? To repeat, a “good” man would not have:

  • Ignored clear warnings in a memo about the impending 9/11 terrorist attacks, resulting in the single largest loss of life from a foreign attack on American soil
  • Tortured people
  • Lied us into a fraudulent war or invaded a country that never attacked us
  • Embraced people like Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, Condi Rice, FEMA director Mike Heckuva Job Brownie, Scooter Libby, Alberto Gonzalez, John Yoo, Jay Bybee, to name a few.
  • Joked about WMDs while troops were dying in his illegal war
  • Ignored Katrina victims
  • Lied about the link between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda

I left out a few items from the other post because some of his policies were not due to his being an unethical guy, but because he is a Republican and disagrees with Democratic positions. I can’t hold that against him personally; that doesn’t necessarily make him a “good” or “bad” man. Torture, on the other hand…

Moving on. I then wasted minutes of my day that I’ll never get back watching as most members of the panels lit into President Obama and their criticisms were virtually unchallenged. That despite the inaccuracies and misinformation being thrown around. And their TV audience was, again, being fed propaganda and opinion as if it were fact.

The most positive– come to think of it, the only positive– thing that was said about the president was that he killed it last night at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner and should think about a career in stand-up comedy.

To recap, Bush is a “good man,” President Obama is a good comic.

Nearly every week I post about media bias and how Sunday after Sunday, Republican talk show guests (often conservative) outnumber Democratic ones, and how real Progressives are rarely represented at all. Today the split was more even, but there were still very, very few authentically liberal liberals. Maybe one.

And week after week, propaganda and lies are disseminated, and Americans who rely on these shows receive a limited, and often biased, view of current events.

bias liberal media my ass smaller

What else would we expect from Karl Rove?

the ugly bush stain

As usual, Karl Rove has no concept of reality, truth, or common decency:

“George W. Bush’s flaws are greatly overshadowed by his virtues, starting with his moral clarity.”

- Karl Rove, writing in the Wall Street Journal, via Taegan

Hey Turdblossom, if Bush had any moral clarity whatsoever, he wouldn’t have hired you, relied on you, or befriended you.

He also wouldn’t have:

  • Ignored clear warnings in a memo about the impending 9/11 terrorist attacks, resulting in the single largest loss of life from a foreign attack on American soil
  • Tortured people
  • Lied us into a fraudulent war or invaded a country that never attacked us
  • Created the worst economy since the Great Depression
  • Cut taxes for the wealthy, showing utter disdain for the 99%
  • Appointed right wing ideologues to the Supreme Court and other federal courts
  • Embraced people like Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, Condi Rice, FEMA director Mike Heckuva Job Brownie, Scooter Libby, Alberto Gonzalez, John Yoo, Jay Bybee, to name a few.
  • Joked about WMDs while troops were dying in his illegal war
  • Ignored Katrina victims
  • Lied about the link between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda
  • Authorized warrantless wiretapping

And that’s just for starters.

George W. Bush’s Presidential Library Is a Fraud: He Was Installed in a Right Wing Putsch

bush crying library speech

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Your Daily Dose of BuzzFlash at Truthout, via my pal Mark Karlin:

Of Thursday’s dedication of the George W. Bush presidential library, NPR headlines an article that details how President “Obama’s Bush Library Speech Leaves Iraq And More Unspoken.” [...]

[I]t’s hard not to underscore that the George W. Bush presidential library is really a fraud.

After all, Bush was never elected president….

The coup was openly revealed in Scalia’s infamous stay of a state-mandated recount (Bush, by the way, as governor of Texas signed a bill that would have made a recount in Florida automatic if the vote were as close in Texas as it officially was in the Sunshine State) …  In short, Scalia is saying that if Bush lost after a recount it would hurt his reputation as president since the Supreme Court would install him in the White House no matter what the voters decided in Florida. (Remember that Al Gore won the national popular vote by more than 540,000 votes.) [...]

There is so much evidence related to the stolen election of 2000, all of which amounts to sophisticated voter theft strategies that would make a banana republic proud. [...]

Last week according to the Sydney Morning Herald, Bush said that he has no regrets about his presidency [...]

Thieves rarely have regrets unless they get caught.

It is ironic that President Obama praised his predecessor at the library dedication, when Obama’s State Department  is claiming that the Venezuelan election to replace Chavez is suspect.

Please read the entire post here.

VIDEO: “There is no reason to overthink the Bush presidency, people. It was just as bad as you thought.”

bush weenie

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Chris Hayes nails it. Again:

In her column this week, Miss [Jennifer] Rubin compared George Bush’s record as president to that of Barack Obama: “Unlike Obama’s tenure, there was no successful attack on the homeland after 9/11.”

Right, if you don’t count the biggest terrorist attack ever in the history of terrorist attacks on American soil which took place on George W. Bush’s watch, then, well, then there were still the anthrax attacks of 2001 which remain unsolved to this day.

But maybe those also fall under this mysterious First Year Immunity Rule that Bush apologists wold really like us all to operate under when it comes to evaluating George Bush’s record on terrorism.

And when it comes to the economy, they would please like you to forget that George W. Bush was still at the wheel in the back half of 2008 for that whole Worst Financial  Crisis in 80 Years thingy.

Jennifer Rubin, for one, counting Bush’s 7 1/2 years of job growth and prosperity? 7 1/2 years, you think to yourself, that’s not quite how long he was in office. She is not lying about his presidency, she is just carefully editing out the bad parts.

But there is a third technique being employed by those seeking to resurrect George W. Bush’s image this week, and this particular defense by George W. Bush’s own former staffers and loyalists might just be its most damning indictment of his presidency yet. It’s the argument… not that he made the right decisions, but that he made decisions, and that is what made him a good president.

There is no reason to overthink the Bush presidency, people. It was just as bad as you thought.

What I will not write about today

frustrated19

Sometimes I get so frustrated and/or disheartened and/or annoyed by some of the news stories of the day that I can’t bring myself to write about them. Here are a few recent reports that made my blood pressure hit the roof. I am avoiding delving into them at length out of concern for my physical and mental health.

  • ‘Thanks W!’: RNC Asks Supporters To Sign Thank You Card For Bush– Reince Priebus is so grateful for GW Bush that he’s circulating a thank you card. Thanks for what? Ignoring a daily brief that reported that an al-Qaeda strike could be “imminent”? Allowing thousands to be killed by terrorists? For getting us into a fraudulent war so that thousands more would die? For sinking our economy? For war crimes such as torturing other human beings? For being an all-around dick?

See what I mean? So who’s up for a couple of Margs or a trough of wine?

drunk wine health

Let’s play Captionary! Pres. Obama, Barbara Bush edition

captionaryobama barbara bush

This photo is screaming for your snarkitude. It was taken at the dedication ceremony for the George W. Bush Presidential Center in Dallas, which is reason enough to for anyone to register disgust.

Maybe Bar’ was surprised to learn her son didn’t use up all the Popsicle sticks, paste, glitter, and dry macaroni that she’d provided for him to decorate his new Lie-Bury, to, you know, supplement his other artistic endeavors.

As for President Obama’s facial expression, it must have dawned on him where he was and who he was honoring. For example, what must he have been thinking when Bush made remarks like these:

From the day I asked Dick to run with me, he served with loyalty, principle and strength.  I’m proud to call you friend.

History is going to show that I served with great people

In democracy, the purpose of public office is not to fulfill personal ambition. … But in the end, leaders are defined by the convictions they hold. And my deepest conviction, the guiding principle of the administration, is that the United States of America must strive to expand the reach of freedom.

I believe that freedom is a gift from God… And ultimately freedom lights the path to peace. Freedom brings responsibility.

One of the benefits of freedom is that people can disagree. It’s fair to say I created plenty of opportunities to exercise that right. But when future generations come to this library and study this administration, they’re going to find out that we stayed true to our convictions.

That we expanded freedom at home by raising standards at schools and lowering taxes for everybody. That we liberated nations from dictatorship and freed  people from AIDS. And when our freedom came under attack, we made the tough decisions required to keep the American people safe.

Here’s how he kept us safe: VIDEOS- Osama bin Laden Watch: The so-called “vigilance” of George W. Bush.

Please leave your captions in Comments. You guys never disappoint, so have at it.

The original image is at CNN.