Archive for gas drilling

Cartoonaroony– A toast: “To fracking!”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

frack off smaller

Clay Bennett is one of my all-time favorite editorial cartoonists. He says so much with so few, if any, words, and his drawing style is fantastic. I say this as a cartoonist myself, a discerning one who greatly appreciates Paddy’s daily posts of so many excellent artists.

He nailed it in this image that appeared in my L.A. Times on fracking, a topic I write about regularly (scroll). If corporations are people, my friend, let them guzzle tap water in the form of chemically induced flames that spew from faucets where fracking is prevalent, as is depicted in the excellent film Gasland.

Cheers:

fracking cartoon Clay Bennett

As one commenter at the Times Free Press noted:

patriot1 said…

We haul bottled water from our municipal water supplies around the country in trucks getting 6 mpg of diesel at cost of about $4 per gallon. More fracking needed for more fuel.

A reminder:

Fracking — “hydraulic fracturing,” technically speaking — involves drilling a pipe horizontally into an underground oil- or natural gas-bearing formation and pumping a slurry into the formation at high pressure to liberate the hydrocarbons trapped within.

Let’s get the truth about fracking.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

VIDEO: What the frack? Pennsylvania “butt-naked worker greets” citizen journo

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

what the frack sign Via The Tyee.ca

worker mooning citizen journo

 

Yesterday I posted: VIDEO- #Keystone tar sands pipeline’s toxicity gets personal: “One of them just stood and urinated facing my house.”

Lovely.

In that post I included some reporting by Public Citizen. Citizen journalism in general is more important than ever these days, considering the budget cuts, bias, laziness, and ineptitude of some of the corporate media.

So when a citizen journalist and advocate for clean water, like Vera Scroggins for instance, does actual footwork on a story that the so-called “pros” won’t touch, she is subjected to moments like this:

tweet citizen journo
Vera Scroggins Vera Scroggins:

Taped 5-30-13. This is the Mt. Valley Rd., Williams Compressor Station being built in Liberty Twp., Susquehanna County, Pa.. I was taping on the road and this worker decided to flash me with his butt for some reason !!

@BleuZ00m tweeted:

#Frackenbutthead

#Frackenweenie

#Whatthefrack

H/t: @BleuZ00m

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Fracking could lead to demand for more potentially explosive ammonia factories

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

what the frack sign Via The Tyee.ca

So much madness, so little time.

The last safety “inspection of the West fertilizer plant happened in– 1985.” Because, you know, fertilizer components aren’t flammable and dangerous and don’t require any regulation whatsoever. Nor are ingredients such as ammonium nitrate ever used in, say, domestic terrorist attacks like, oh I dunno, the Oklahoma City bombing.

Nor do they ever explode.

Nor do they pollute the air with noxious fumes when they never explode.

Nor do those explosions that never happen ever kill people.

So, of course, no forward-looking country with clear-thinking leaders would ever consider exposing its citizens to even more noxious ammonia factories. Nor would they encourage any powerful corporations to engage in any undertakings that would rely on chemicals that could easily pollute and ignite the way the plant in West, Texas did.

Grist:

The U.S. could soon be home to a lot more ammonia factories — not a comforting thought after a deadly explosion at an ammonia fertilizer plant in Texas on Wednesday evening. You can blame the fracking boom. [...]

Australian company Incitec Pivot this week announced [PDF] that it will be building a hulking new $850 million ammonia facility in Waggaman, La., just outside New Orleans. [...]

U.S.-based Mosaic announced in December that it may build a $700 million ammonia plant in St. James Parish, La. U.S.-based CHS Inc. said in September that it would construct a $1.2 billion ammonia plant in North Dakota. Also in September, Egypt’s largest company, Orascom Construction, said it would spend $1.4 billion to build a fertilizer plant in Iowa.

Well, erm, okay, but surely ammonia production has a good safety record overall, and the Texas disaster was just an anomaly. Right?

The history of ammonia production and storage is littered with spectacular accidents.

Oh, and there’s this:

The Dallas Morning News reports that the Texas fertilizer plant that exploded Wednesday night told the Environmental Protection Agency and local public safety officials that it presented “no risk of fire or explosion.”

They lied to the EPA and were not in compliance with EPA regulations (EPA regulations do not allow felony violations of 18 USC 1001). If the company was in compliance with EPA regulations, then the 540,000 lbs of the explosive ammonium nitrate, stored at the facility, would not have blown up.

The EPA said the company corrected the deficiencies and filed an updated plan in 2011. It said it now complies with EPA regulations.

Now think about all those impending new ammonia facilities. What could possibly go wrong?

All our posts on the environmental rapes perpetrated by frackers can be found here (scroll).

forward off cliff

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Mining sand for fracking is turning Wisconsin farmland owners against each other

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Several months ago I posted Let’s get the truth about fracking, and if you haven’t watched Gasland yet, please do that asap.

Fracking is causing even more problems these days, this time in Wisconsin, eastern Minnesota, northeastern Iowa, and northwestern Illinois.  Those are states in which sand formations are most prevalent, sand that the oil and gas industries need in their endless quest for profits by way of hydraulic fracturing (fracking). 

But in Wisconsin, it’s pitting farmland owners who prioritize employment and royalties for land usage against those who are distraught over the potential negative health problems due to elevated concentrations of small sand particulates from airborne dust, along with concerns about high water usage required for fracking, and, of course, the usual environmental damage.

Via the L.A. Times:

The rapid expansion of sand mining through the quiet of western Wisconsin has raised fears among some residents and hope in others, often pitting neighbors against one another, just as fracking has done elsewhere [...]

High-volume hydraulic fracturing involves shooting millions of gallons of water, sand and chemicals underground to crack shale formations and unlock oil and gas. The sand props open the fissures, and hydrocarbons flow through the porous sand up the well.

Residents worry about winds blowing around the sand from outdoor piles, resulting in respiratory problems from inhaling the dust.

One cattle farmer and anti-mining activist said, “Individual rights end when you start affecting others’ health and welfare.”

The companies that build the plants that process the sand pay tens of thousands of dollars in property taxes. Supporters feel that the payoff for Wisconsin is jobs, and for the country, cheap energy. They seem to be ignoring this “payoff”:

Western Wisconsinites worry that airborne dust, or crystalline silica, as it is known, can lead to a potentially deadly respiratory ailment called silicosis. Research has shown the dangers crystalline silica poses on the job to miners and even to workers at fracking sites. But little is known about its effect on people who live near mine sites.

Critics want the air around mines monitored, but so far, only one air monitor has gone up in Chippewa County. In fact, air quality around mines is barely monitored, in part because of budget cuts at the state’s Department of Natural Resources.

Good old Scott Walker and his GOP minions. Austerity first! Did they think about all the water needed for fracking, including to wash sand? They should. Additionally, in rural areas, mines can be built next to homes or schools.

But money talks… at least to some Wisconsinites.

One mining supporter “declined to specify how much he makes off his lease, he said it was more than $10,000 a month.”

A cranberry farmer, in tears, said this:

Fighting this just seems so hopeless… The companies just have so much money. They can just buy everybody. It seems like nothing can stop them. There’s got to be better ways than this.”

All of our posts on fracking can be found here.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Wisconsin oil disaster is Canadian firm’s worst since their last worst oil disaster

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

As I have with torture, fracking, and voter suppression, I’ve concentrated a lot on posts about oil disasters, notably the BP cataclysm. These issues are mind-bogglingly huge, affect us as a country  deeply, and are maddeningly frustrating to many of us because they never seem to be resolved properly.

In the same general category as the BP mess are the impending Keystone XL “Tar Sands” Pipeline mess and the current Michigan oil catastrophe. The broken pipeline in Michigan gushed more than 800,000 gallons of heavy crude and was one of the largest and most expensive inland oil spills in U.S. history. CBS:

Officials said 35 miles of waterways and wetlands were fouled and about 320 people reported symptoms from crude oil exposure… Company officials have said some of the oil came from tar sands in the western Canada province of Alberta.

How nice that we are being pressured to allow the Tar Sands pipeline to infiltrate even more areas of our lovely country.

With all that in mind, ta da! We have a brand new environmental tragedy to add to the list! Drill baby drill! USA! USA! Via The L.A. Times:

Enbridge, a beleaguered Canadian oil pipeline company, has spilled more than 50,000 gallons of light crude oil in rural Wisconsin —  shortly after the company said it had implemented safety reforms after a massive 2010 spill in Michigan. [...]

As you can see, Enbridge Inc. is a big Canadian oil supplier to the United States, and they say this latest screw-up has been contained. It came from a 24-inch pipeline that carries more than 300,000 barrels a day, and is Enbridge’s worst spill since the 2010 Michigan disaster.

Enbridge is fast becoming to the Midwest what BP was to the Gulf of Mexico, posing troubling risks to the environment,” [U.S. Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.)] said in a statement. [...]

According to Enbridge company data collected by the Polaris Institute, a Canadian think tank, Enbridge pipelines have spilled 804 times since 1999 and leaked 6.8 million gallons of oil. In response to a U.S. National Transportation Safety Board investigation blasting the company for its actions during the Michigan spill, the company said it had made “numerous enhancements” to safety procedures. [...]

National Response Center data shows that the new Enbridge spill in Wisconsin is the company’s worst in that state.

If their “enhancements” are anything like the BP “enhancements”, fugetaboutit.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Frickin’ frack

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

In today’s Los Angeles Times, there were side-by-side articles (that I can’t link to because the L.A. Times site makes them impossible to find, so I went elsewhere) that were noteworthy. One talks about how the price of electricity will likely rise, despite all that cheap natural gas the industry loves to frack about.

And the next discusses how a new study on the polluting effects of gas drilling (fracking) is being done by the Department of Energy.

Follow the links. Here’s a tease:

A plunge in the price of natural gas has made it cheaper for utilities to produce electricity. But the savings aren’t translating to lower rates for customers. Instead, U.S. electricity prices are going up.

Electricity prices are forecast to rise slightly this summer. But any increase is noteworthy because natural gas, which is used to produce nearly a third of the country’s power, is 43 percent cheaper than a year ago. A long-term downward trend in power prices could be starting to reverse, analysts say.

“It’s caused us to scratch our heads,” says Tyler Hodge, an analyst at the Energy Department who studies electricity prices.

And:

PITTSBURGH — A new study being done by the Department of Energy may provide some of the first solid answers to a controversial question: Can gas drilling fluids migrate and pose a threat to drinking water?

You already know how we feel about fracking (scroll). When will this country figure out that no matter how cheap gas may be, if the population dies off, there will be nobody around to put money in drillers’ already full pockets?

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Is “the Constitution is just another pesky regulation that corporations can ignore…?”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Via frack-off.org

Today’s L.A. Times letters to the editor, because our voices matter:

Upset about fracking law

Re “New law on fracking worries physicians,”April 22

How can it possibly be constitutional for Pennsylvania to pass a law requiring doctors to sign an oath of silence (euphemistically called confidentiality) to know which potentially harmful chemicals are being introduced into the environment? Why should they be prevented from letting patients know the reason for their illnesses? Have we come to the point at which the Constitution is just another pesky regulation that corporations can ignore in their quest for a bigger bottom line?

Shame on the legislators whose affections are being bought by campaign contributions. How naive it is to believe that these legislators are working for the people who elected them. Or, now that corporations are persons, perhaps it’s OK to pass laws for their benefit rather than the people’s.

Cathy Colloff

Toluca Lake

The gas industry must have listened to my dad when he said, “If you can’t help your friends, who can you help?”

Roger Newell

San Diego

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email