Tell ya what Neeners, you go first and throw a party to “celebrate” your 13 y/o’s forced birth event and just drop us a note about what a festive time it was. We’ll wait. Via.
Gabby Giffords’ husband Mark Kelly timed it. It took all of five minutes and thirty-six seconds to complete a background check to purchase a handgun at an Arizona gun store.
Here he is on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace talking about that and more, including warning GOP lawmakers not to filibuster Senate gun safety proposals:
“I would say to Marco Rubio that 94% of his constituents support a universal background check… with Rand Paul, it’s about 83% in Kentucky.
“They should listen to their constituents and certainly shouldn’t be getting in the way of the process, which is to debate the bill and to vote on the bill.”
“I imagine that at some point, if they actually do this, their constituents will hold them accountable for those actions.“
“One thing that is different now is the fact that we had 20 first-graders murdered in a classroom along with six educators. I mean, that’s unacceptable.”
“92% of Americans support a universal background check. And 74% of NRA members. I would hope, at some point, that the leadership of the NRA would just listen to their membership on this issue.“
“It’s crazy that we have this system where responsible owners get a background check, and the option to avoid one is available for anybody who doesn’t want to do it. It’s a crazy system.”
“The system currently works with federally licensed firearms dealers. There is no reason that same system can’t work with the gun show and the private seller.“
As you may recall, a gun store refused to sell Gabby Giffords’s husband an assault weapon because, rather than intending to kill with it, he planned on using it to make a point about gun safety.
At least Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) had the balls to pledge to introduce an amendment to ban the sale of high-capacity ammunition.
Oh, and Harry Reid? How’s that gentleman’s agreement with Mitch McConnell on the filibuster workin’ for ya?
Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) told Fox News that President Obama and former President George W. Bush could have “conceivably been put in jail” for using drugs.
Said Paul: “Look, the last two presidents could have conceivably been put in jail for their drug use and I really think – look what would’ve happened, it would’ve ruined their lives. They got lucky. But a lot of poor kids, particularly in the inner city, don’t get lucky and they don’t have good attorneys and they go to jail for some of these things and I think it’s a big mistake.”
The response prompted host Chris Wallace to note, “Actually, I think it would be the last three presidents, but who’s counting?”
What a maroon. Via.
Sweet Schadenfreude! Via.
The Political Carnival T-Shirt
Modeled by @suzannegypsy
Lt. Col Barry Wingard is the lawyer for Gitmo detainee Fayiz Al-Kandari. For their ongoing story + related topics, please click on the link below:
Kuwaiti Citizen Detained at Guantanamo since 2002
The Political Carnival is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com.
Photographs on The Political Carnival site (please read):
Photographs from other sources sometimes appear on TPC for humorous or illustrative purposes. As it is not our intention to use these images in any inappropriate manner or to infringe upon any rights held by others, anyone holding legal rights in the use of these images who wishes to have them taken down please contact us immediately requesting such removal, with which we will comply promptly.