Archive for fired

The Facebook Picture That Got High School Coach Fired

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Loraine Cook

When I heard this story, I was scratching my head and truthfully, there was an immediate interest to know what kind of picture a person could post on Facebook and find themselves out of work -- fired. Well, you've just seen it. That picture above is all that it took.

Laraine Cook, a former girls' basketball coach at Pocatello High School in Idaho, wasfired from her job in October over a Facebook photo in which her fiance, Tom Harrison, holds her breast. The photo shows Cook and Harrison in bathing suits at a lake. Cook said the photo was snapped during a family vacation in July. As the New York Daily news put it, Harrison, who is a football coach at Pocatello High School, "wasn't flagged for holding," but was "reprimanded" -- short of termination.

Now let's analyze this for a moment. Putting aside the appropriateness of posting such a playful picture, what harm is there for two consenting adults to show some PDA's. (public displays of affection)? Is anyone really going to be irreparably harmed by this photo?

Two teachers, both coaches at the same school as well, are in a seemingly committed, "healthy" relationship. They're engaged. If this picture was skin on skin, they were kissing, would that have been deemed inappropriate? I think not. But this story gets into an area that I can't understand at all. Two people of legal age seem to be involved voluntarily in the same act. So isn't what's right for one, right for the other -- or conversely what's wrong for one is wrong for the other?

Yet here we have two sets of punishments. The male coach gets a reprimand and the female coach gets sh** canned?

Now if you really want a hoot, you've got to hear the opposing side, why she should be fired and why nothing should be done to the guy. And this is from a female attorney. A hint, it's okay to assault someone even from unwanted advances, but it's wrong if the victim posts proof with a picture on Facebook. You gotta see this to believe it.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

The Price of Palin: $15 per Word Spoken During FOX Contract

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

palinpout
I hope she invested wisely 'cause that's probably the last bit of grifting she'll be asked to do for a long time. The whole article is fascinating, so go read it.

Sarah Palin uttered more than 189,000 words over 150 appearances on various FOX broadcasts during her three years as an analyst at the network, or $15.85 per word

With the three-year contract now expired between FOX News and Sarah Palin, there is a wealth of commentary made by the former Alaska Governor and GOP Vice-Presidential nominee to dissect.

Palin, who was paid a reported $1 million per year as a contributor to FOX since mid-January 2010 when FOX announced her signing, may not have made quite the splash her employers had hoped during this three-year period, and would, on occasion go weeks between appearances.

So, did the network get their money's worth?

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Sanford Police Chief Fired Over Handling of Trayvon Martin Case

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Earlier Paddy posted the video of George Zimmerman’s reenactment of his shooting of Trayvon Martin.

Following up on that, Sanford Police Chief Bill Lee was finally fired due to his failure to arrest George Zimmerman after he killed Trayvon.

Via BET:

"After much thoughtful discussion and deep consideration for the issues facing the city of Sanford, I have determined the police chief needs to have the trust and respect of the elected officials and the confidence of the entire community," city manager Norton Bonaparte saidin a statement. "We need to move forward with a police chief that all the citizens of Sanford can support. I have come to this decision in light of the escalating divisiveness that has taken hold of the city."

Trayvon's family welcomed the news.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

New York Times' Stelter: Current TV Fires Keith Olbermann. UPDATE: Keith's statement added

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Via Brian Stelter:

Per Think Progress:

...His ratings fell and his relationship with Current quickly foundered.

Keith had a good show, he's sharp as a tack and knows his stuff. This was about ratings, and who knows what else. He'll be missed.

UPDATE: Statement from Current:

To the Viewers of Current:

We created Current to give voice to those Americans who refuse to rely on corporate-controlled media and are seeking an authentic progressive outlet.  We are more committed to those goals today than ever before.

Current was also founded on the values of respect, openness, collegiality, and loyalty to our viewers. Unfortunately these values are no longer reflected in our relationship with Keith Olbermann and we have ended it.  

We are moving ahead by honoring Current's values. Current has a fundamental obligation to deliver news programming with a progressive perspective that our viewers can count on being available daily -- especially now, during the presidential election campaign. Current exists because our audience desires the kind of perspective, insight and commentary that is not easily found elsewhere in this time of big media consolidation. 

As we move toward this summer's political conventions and the general election in the fall, Current is making significant new additions to our broadcasts. We have just debuted six hours of new programming each weekday with Bill Press ("Full Court Press" at 6 am ET/3 am PT) and Stephanie Miller ("Talking Liberally" at 9 am ET/6 pm PT).    

We’re very excited to announce that beginning tonight, former New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer will host “Viewpoint with Eliot Spitzer,” at 8 pm ET/5 pm PT. Eliot is a veteran public servant and an astute observer of the issues of the day. He has important opinions and insights and he relishes the kind of constructive discourse that our viewers will appreciate this election year. We are confident that our viewers will be able to count on Gov. Spitzer to deliver critical information on a daily basis.

All of these additions to Current's lineup are aimed at achieving one simple goal -- the goal that has always been central to Current's mission: To tell stories no one else will tell, to speak truth to power, and to influence the conversation of democracy on behalf of those whose voices are too seldom heard. We, and everyone at Current, want to thank our viewers for their continued steadfast support.

Sincerely,

Al Gore & Joel Hyatt
Current's Founders

UPDATE: Keith has posted his statement on Twitter:

My full statement:

I'd like to apologize to my viewers and my staff for the failure of Current TV.

Editorially, Countdown had never been better. But for more than a year I have been imploring Al Gore and Joel Hyatt to resolve our issues internally, while I've been not publicizing my complaints, and keeping the show alive for the sake of its loyal viewers and even more loyal staff. Nevertheless, Mr. Gore and Mr. Hyatt, instead of abiding by their promises and obligations and investing in a quality news program, finally thought it was more economical to try to get out of my contract.

It goes almost without saying that the claims against me implied in Current's statement are untrue and will be proved so in the legal actions I will be filing against them presently. To understand Mr. Hyatt’s “values of respect, openness, collegiality and loyalty,” I encourage you to read of a previous occasion Mr. Hyatt found himself in court for having unjustly fired an employee. That employee’s name was Clarence B. Cain. http://nyti.ms/HueZsa

In due course, the truth of the ethics of Mr. Gore and Mr. Hyatt will come out. For now, it is important only to again acknowledge that joining them was a sincere and well-intentioned gesture on my part, but in retrospect a foolish one. That lack of judgment is mine and mine alone, and I apologize again for it.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Radio station abruptly fires reporter after interviews with woman who underwent forced trans-vaginal probes

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

A few weeks ago, I posted a link to a heart wrenching story of a woman who went through several unnecessary forced trans-vaginal probes prior to terminating her pregnancy, an abortion she underwent only because her "baby was ill." The post was titled, 'We Have No Choice’: One Woman’s Ordeal with Texas’ New Sonogram Law.

What Carolyn Jones went through was a crime, and her detailed, very personal, extremely painful story is one of the most important explanations of why these cruel laws should cease to exist.

The Texas Observer has it here.

And if all that isn't bad enough, Texas radio reporter Scott Braddock got fired after airing excerpts from his interview with Jones. The reason given for the decision to let him go didn't make a whole lot of sense to Braddock.

Via Think Progress:

According to Braddock’s former employer, KROI News 92 FM, an all-news radio station based in Houston, Braddock was fired because he filled in for a fellow reporter on KPFT 90.1FM for one hour, thus violating a “non-compete agreement,” which Braddock claims to have never signed. “The contract is on my desk, unsigned,” he said. “It’s a real stretch. I have been looking through it and there is nothing I did that would be a violation.”

As Braddock told ThinkProgress, “The reason for firing me doesn’t add up…I’m a journalist, I don’t take a position on public policy. My job is to put the facts out there…to explore them all and get as many perspectives as possible.” Braddock maintains that although he feels his personal opinions on the sonogram law are irrelevant, he does believe that a serious discussion take place seeing as the law “affects the reproductive rights of every woman in the state.” Braddock said he is “very disappointed” by the radio station’s decision, and referred to his abrupt dismissal as “heartbreaking.”

Listeners are none to thrilled either. Read TP's post for the details.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

ABC News Drops Andrew Breitbart from Midterm Coverage

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Via TV Newser:

Dear Mr. Breitbart,


We have spent the past several days trying to make clear to you your limited role as a participant in our digital town hall to be streamed on ABCNews.com and Facebook. The post on your blog last Friday created a widespread impression that you would be analyzing the election on ABC News. We made it as clear as possible as quickly as possible that you had been invited along with numerous others to participate in our digital town hall. Instead of clarifying your role, you posted a blog on Sunday evening in which you continued to claim a bigger role in our coverage. As we are still unable to agree on your role, we feel it best for you not to participate.

Sincerely,

Andrew Morse

UPDATE: H/t: Greg Sargent and to Oliver Willis for the tweet

And good riddance to that lying, racist scumbag Breitbart. He got what he deserved... almost.

UPDATE: TPM makes a great point.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

From the Dep't. of Say Good Night, Sean: Utah radio station dumps Hannity

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Sean Hannity's getting kicked off a Salt Lake City radio station KSL in October.

Apparently (per the mission statement of Deseret Media), it seems he didn't "disseminate light and knowledge" or promote "integrity, civility, morality, and respect for all people."

Sean Hannity uncivil? Disrespectful? Immoral? Why, this is simply shocking. He's always come across as the perfect gentleman.

The announcement comes after speculation that Hannity's on-air style was not in line with Deseret Media Company's mission statement that calls for civility and other ethical stances.
[...]

Hannity has often been accused of being less than civil by his adversaries.

Those pesky family values just keep getting in the way, don't they Sean? Or maybe you just wore the wrong kind of underwear.

More here, at abc4.com.

H/t: Think Progress

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare