Archive for fashion

There is an actual What Not to Wear to CPAC graphic. Hey freedom-lovers! It’s not the boss of you!

fashion tips

D.C.-based media strategist and CPAC communications director Adrienne Royer has a do/don’t list for all those confused, wishy-washy, tasteless, frumpy, slutty, and/or compliant females (and males) attending the big Conservative Political Action Conference.

Wait a minute, aren’t conservatives supposed to be all think-for-themselvesy? Don’t they thrive on “liberty” and “freedom” and “don’t tell me WTF to do” (except in cases of legal abortions and voting rights, of course)? But that’s not important now. What is important is this:

According to Washington Whispers, Royer “was inspired to make the infographic because interns for her event didn’t know what to wear.” And per Royer, “cocktail dresses and five inch heels” simply will not do!

Men, are you taking notes?

So she concocted this… thing:

what to wear at CPAC via Washington Whispers

Wait. No Uggs? Well, I never! And geez, no halter tops, miniskirts, Crocs, or bedroom slippers? Everyone knows how sexy minis look with a snappy pair o’ Crocs!

crocs

Buzz kill! Way to ruin a perfectly groovy event, Adrienne!

But this was my favorite part:

what to wear at CPAC via Washington Whispers 2

Would I wear it to Walmart? It might be comfortable, but if you look like a slob, DON’T WEAR IT! While you don’t have to pack a 3-piece suit, stay away from jeans, sweats, leggings, shorts, ballcaps & most of all… T-shirts!

That’s it. Deal breaker. There goes my entire wardrobe. Looks like I’m skipping CPAC 2013!

you're not the boss of me

“Ooo! Ooo! Who are you wearing?” “USPS, duh.”

who are you wearing usps

The United States Postal Service has budget issues that could be rectified, as you’ll see in the email below. Doing away with the 75 year pension funding requirement would do wonders, but Republican hatred for unions and their goal to privatize America fuel their obstruction and destruction.

Meantime, the USPS is trying to pull in a little extra cash by introducing a collection of– wait for it– hip, “cutting edge” men’s clothing and accessories. Women’s wear is coming.

No, I’m not kidding. I can see it now, a giddy Ryan Seacrest on the Red Carpet calling out to Bradley Cooper, “Oo! Oo! Who are you wearing?” “Dude… USPS. Who else?”

L.A. Times:

The collection, to be called “Rain Heat & Snow,” will be made through a license agreement with Cleveland-based apparel firm Wahconah Group Inc. The Postal Service will not incur any cost and will collect royalties from sales, according to USPS spokesman Roy A. Betts.

The deal, which Betts said is “in the development and test phase,” will include outerwear, sportswear, casual wear, athletic wear and seasonal wear.

The clothing line, or “smart apparel,” will incorporate electronics like iPods that can be hooked up to, say, a jacket with volume controls on the sleeve.

Now if they can come up with a women’s line of eye-popping designer gowns with plunging necklines and backless backs plus ban-worthy see-through fabrics and thigh-high slits (equipped with discreet Internet hook-ups) and create a little runway buzz and tons of name-dropping, they may be on to something.

Fun fashion news aside, “It’s called the U.S. Postal Service because it is a service, not a corporation.” The following email came to me from CREDO Action. I got a similar one from Color of Change, so it’s good to see different groups are all over this:

The United States Postal Service announced last week that due to budget shortfalls, mail will no longer be delivered on Saturdays starting in August.

It’s true the post office faces financial challenges. But the financial problems are in large part a direct result of an onerous and ill-considered 2006 law called the “Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act” (PAEA) that mandates pre-funding the postal service retiree health care and pension benefits for 75 years — something that no other government agency or private company is forced to do.

The vast majority — 85% — of the budget red ink comes from this pre-funding mandate despite the fact that, according to the post office Inspector General, the pension is over-funded and reserves for retiree health care are far higher than the federal government as a whole, the military and almost all Fortune 1000 companies.1

Tell Congress: Don’t let Republicans kill the post office. Click here to sign this petition automatically.

Even with the declining levels of “snail mail,” the post office still manages to deliver to every household in America a total of 563 million pieces of mail for an incredibly low cost. It does it efficiently, and without a penny of taxpayer money.2

But it’s that very self-sufficiency that drove Congressional Republicans to hatch a long-term plan to destroy the agency by starving it of the ability to maintain services. By forcing the USPS to save an outrageous and unneeded nest-egg, the agency has been increasingly removed from revenues which would help it keep pace with the innovation of FedEx and UPS.

As a result, the post office has closed branches in some of the most rural areas, where it was the only government-affiliated location for miles around.

Rural post offices in particular are important institutions. Closing them, especially in areas with little or no access to broadband internet service, could have a major impact on the communities they serve. And closing them won’t save much money.

Tell Congress: Don’t let Republicans kill the post office. Click here to sign this petition automatically.

Undermining public services is exactly what Republicans have been doing since the Reagan-era, by cutting off normal, healthy revenues for any reason they can find — even if it requires doing something that in any other circumstance would be branded as total lunacy. FedEx and UPS would never be required to meet the same savings requirements as the USPS.

By making the public believe that government services are underfunded and poorly managed, Republicans can force more cuts, and eventually privatize services altogether, handing over public goods to private corporations that enrich a select few at the expense of many.

And if the USPS dies, FedEx and UPS will have been delivered an entire, centuries-old industry at wholesale cost.

But all of this can be avoided by making simple and popular reforms to the postal service like those proposed last year in a bill by Delaware Senator Thomas Carper. His bill would have allowed the USPS to stretch out payments for future retirees for the next 40 years, while recouping $11 billion the government has overcharged the postal service.3

If Congress can’t get its act together and implement these necessary and simple reforms, the postal service will be forced to continue cutting staff and services. Legislators must act now to repeal the PAEA and put the post office back on equal footing.

Tell Congress: Don’t let Republicans kill the post office. Click the link below to sign this petition automatically.
http://act.credoaction.com/r/?r=6996482&p=usps_sat_delivery&id=55073-3929408-8oa51Ux&t=8

Thank you for standing up for the post office.

Jordan Krueger, Campaign Manager
CREDO Action from Working Assets

President Obama’s designer couture pays off for campaign

I remember when they first started this all the right wing mouth breathers were going on about “Elitist, snobby, liberal Hollywood communists.” Heh, 40 mil drowns out all that noise.

(CNN) – While President Barack Obama’s re-election campaign took heat for launching a high-fashion clothing line as a fundraising tool earlier this year, it turns out the move may not have been such a far-fetched idea.

The Obama team’s campaign manager, Jim Messina, recently said the line ultimately brought in “just north of $40 million”–a notable chunk of the more than $644 million raised by the campaign.

With high-dollar pieces created by some of the industry’s top designers, the idea was started by Anna Wintour, editor of Vouge Magazine and a big Obama backer. The line even held runway fashion shows, including an event in February, where more than 500 paying guests showed up to shop for the Obama gear, paying anywhere from $44 for a discounted ticket to $2,500 for a chance to have dinner with the event’s organizers.

Republicans had a field day with the fashion show, held at an upscale chain store in New York City and co-hosted by Wintour and actress Scarlett Johansson. Critics blasted the move as an insensitive nod to luxury during tough economic times.

George W. Bush (the new Marcus?) to Michele Bachmann: “Why are you wearing those gloves?”

Via Politico, screen shot

So there I was, innocently reading my L.A. Times this morning (it actually arrived on time for the first time in days), when what jumped out at me? This:

The book offers some fun political dish, such as when Bush went to Minnesota to headline a 2006 fundraiser for her congressional run. Bachmann’s mother told her she needed to dress like a lady, so she wore a pink suit, pink shoes and pink gloves, and carried a pink purse.

Riding in the presidential limousine, Bush “asked with a crinkly smile: ‘Why are you wearing those gloves?’ I explained, and he said gently, ‘Lose the gloves.’ “

Bachmann still has them tucked in a drawer but has not worn them since.

Gasp! Did Marcus gently tell W to get lost? After all, he was there first as Michelle’s personal stylist.

More importantly, look who Bachmann depended on for fashion tips. I don’t want to begin to imagine who she’d hire for foreign policy advice.

Sasha Obama… fashion plate?

This is so inane.

Stipulated: Sasha Obama is a cute little cherub of a girl, someone we love to watch, full of personality, adorable.

But a fashion icon? Really?

Via Wonkette:

What we really need is for someone to break down the cost of things Sasha Obama wears and where to get them, because she is nine years old. Thankfully, we have The Daily Beast. “The affordability of Sasha’s clothes, according to Mary Tomer, ‘makes Mrs. Obama and Sasha Obama all the more relatable.’ She says that Sasha’s style choices communicate a ‘vibrant and playful — yet entirely unique — American childhood.’” Sasha is very careful to brand herself the right way. Her brand says, “I am a fucking child. You people are disgusting.”

Well, it’s doubtful that mom and dad would permit their little fashionista to say “f’ing”, but I can easily buy the rest.

Video Overnight Thread- Teen Tonic by Pierre Henry + 1960′s Fashion




LOVE the music!!

Rep. Schock burns the belt!

Remember when I posted this photo of Rep. Aaron Schlock, er, Schock?

Hard to forget, isn’t it?

I guess he got a lot of grief for it because, well…

Forget “drill, baby, drill”… he’s into burn, baby, burn. I guess that’s what happens when you’re the “hottest freshman in Congress.”

Now about that shirt…