Saturday Links from The Political Carnival
Republicans are just like pet cats. "Oh, look, another shiny object."
Recently rounds of their Scandalgates include: Solyndra, the IRS, Benghazi, Obamacare, court packing, and now Iran. Those frisky felines just can't find enough distractions from doing their job, legislating. How about financial reform? Immigration? A crumbling infrastructure? Job creation? Illegal voter restrictions? Education funding
Why can't the Republicans accept peaceful means as an answer for settling conflicts? Why must bullets fly? Are they really that heavily into the back pockets of the current day military-industrial complex?
This past Saturday night, a long in the works agreement was finally reached on a first step agreement toward resolving a growing nuclear threat with Iran. Happy, happy, joy, joy! Not to the war-torn tribes of the Republican party.
This agreement is but a first step. Not a treaty. An agreement to outline procedures that could ultimately lead to a resolve of tensions, sanctions and normalization with a huge population in the tension packed Middle East.
Though Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu isn't happy, the rest of the world should be. If we go to war with Iran, all of the middle east will be pulled in and every power around the world (Russia, China, Japan, England) will be drawn into the conflict. This area is the hotbed, the potential flash point of a possible nuclear annihilation of the world. Any chance at peace in that region must be seriously exploited.
So this accord should be looked at in a positive light -- unless you're a Republican. When you're the party of war and conflict, peace becomes your enemy. And if the people of the US have tired of war, you have to keep up the ruse of a threat so you can still hold onto your popularity. That's the talking points now for the Republicans. But what they're really saying is they're against possible peaceful solutions when they can profit so much more by seeing US troops killed and so much blood and money pumped into their war machine.
This agreement is a baby step, the beginning of a long and most arduous journey. But we have to start somewhere, and firing the shot heard round the world isn't the best option. Not when talking, peacefully negotiating and bringing the world together focusing on facts, not rumors, is the result.
The Israeli's who are generally very reliable say Iran is but moments (figuratively) away from nuclear capabilities. But the English and French who gave GW Bush the intelligence that Saddam Hussein had WMD's are just as reliable. And their claims proved false. Do we need a war when we can peacefully approach and confirm the situation?
There are risks here, make no mistake. But when the argument against the first steps are "this is just a smoke screen or diversion from the failed rollout of Obamacare" you have to wonder what planet these critics are from. A diversion? I can't wait until Obama faces responsibility for the next blizzard, earthquake or hurricane that happens upon our shores.
Let's get real here. Rep. Kevin McCarthy, Senators John Cornyn and Bob Corker are leading the charge of talking points that claim this agreement is merely a distraction for Obamacare. This pablum is coming from leaders of the fallen GOP party. This kind of thinking indicates they are all in need a LifeAlert bracelet -- "Help, I've fallen and I can't get up."
If these morons can utilize their talking points, maybe it's time the Democrats start pushing theirs-- play the racial bigotry card against the GOP. Republicans don't want peace because they don't want a Black president to get credit for eliminating chemical weapons in Syria, ending a war in Iraq and shutting down nuclear threats in Iran.
In the '70s, during the Viet Nam era, the popular chant of John Lennon's song became a peace mantra, 'All we are saying, is give peace a chance." Never truer than today. Let's give peace a chance.
November 22, 1963. If you were around back then, you certainly know the significance of that day. Or do you?
We all know that our 35th president was assassinated in Dallas. It's an event that haunts us even today -- nearly fifty years to the moment. It's indelibly imprinted on we survivors -- where we were and how we heard the news.
Yet two other greats died that same day. Within hours of the president. Their loss is hardly mourned, certainly nearly forgotten that it occurred at the same time.
But virtually no one on 22 November 1963 realized—and relatively few realize even now—that that day also saw the departure of the two other major figures, who were also world-shapers in their very different ways.
The two greats that were lost were as far from politics as you can imagine. These two, both men, were visionaries perhaps greater than JFK. Their words were read and their books sold thousands more copies than anything Kennedy wrote, Profiles in Courage included. Their literary works still are great sellers today.
These authors who's passing was glanced over at best, were totally ignored in the big picture despite the fact that they would have made front pages if they had died a day earlier. What is it they say, "Timing is everything?"
The two "ghosts" were C.S. Lewis (The Screwtape Letters, The Chronicles of Narnia, and The Space Trilogy) and Aldous Huxley (Brave New World).
Philosophically and sociologically, they were titans. Their passing deserved a bit of recognition but sadly, a more instantly shocking sense of despair overtook this country. The presidents murder understandably overshadowed the more peaceful and orderly passing of these two pillars of future thought.
Death had moved remorselessly westward to claim his scalps. Lewis died first, in his brother’s arms, a few minutes after tumbling with a crash from his bed at the foot of the stairs at the Kilns, his house outside Oxford, at 5.30pm. He was just a week shy of 65. One hour later—12.30pm in Texas—the 46-year-old President was shot. At the Cedars of Lebanon Hospital in Los Angeles, Huxley’s second wife Laura, leaving his bedside with his request for an LSD injection, found the doctor and nurses in shock watching the news of the assassination; Huxley died, aged 69, at 5.20pm local time, just under eight hours after Lewis.
So perhaps in a few weeks, after we've tired of all of the Kennedy conspiracy specials and commemorations, we'll take a moment and hearken back to two of life's most interesting writers. As this post began, things in life (and death) seem to happen in three's. So here's three quotes from the other two missing greats.
Humility is not thinking less of yourself, it's thinking of yourself less.
The future is something which everyone reaches at the rate of 60 minutes an hour, whatever he does, whoever he is.
There are two kinds of people: those who say to God, 'Thy will be done,' and those to whom God says, 'All right, then, have it your way.'
That men do not learn very much from the lessons of history is the most important of all the lessons of history.
Maybe this world is another planet's hell.
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
Wise men of wordsmiths. Come November 22nd, I'll remember their 50th anniversary of passing. Join me?
Apparently the boy had NOT been doing well in school before this. Just lovely. Via Gawker.
If you are able, if you are so inclined, please donate. We're squeekingly close to out goal and we'd love to get this over with. Every bit helps.
Thank you ahead of time for your consistent kindness and generosity. Without you, there would be no us.
I've gotta say, I find this story ghoulishly amusing. Where to bury the late king of England? Consider this-- he's been resting for the past 528 years, the last 20 of them under a paved parking lot, in Leicester England and nobody gave a hoot. He was, for lack of a better description, spot 22 in a 300 vehicle mall parking lot.
Let me capsulize for you. We're talking about the late, great King Richard III, the same one Shakespeare wrote his famous play about. Not a complimentary overview of his life but hey, he was renowned enough to be immortalize by the bard himself.
During his reign there was a civil war in England known as the War of the Roses. No, not the Kathleen Turner/Michael Douglas/Danny DeVito pic. This one played out for real. The final victory went to Henry Tudor, who defeated the last Yorkist king, Richard III. Henry then married Edward IV's daughter Elizabeth of York to unite the two houses. The House of Tudor subsequently ruled England and Wales. Had Richard III won that war, we might have York style homes instead of Tudor. But that's another story.
According to The World Report:
Richard was deposed and killed in a battle near Leicester in 1485, and quickly buried without a coffin in a now-demolished church in the city, which is 100 miles (160 kilometers) north of London. A skeleton found under a Leicester parking lot last year was identified as the king through DNA tests, bone analysis and other scientific scrutiny.
I guess the discovery of a long-lost ancestor could stir up some emotions, but really now, enough to start of a War of the Roses part Deux? Well, this true tale has the makings of such a battle.
Progress has its obligations, and nothing can take the place of a new parking lot so something has to be done with the old king's remains. The city of Leicester wants to build a museum and capitalize on the money making potential of displaying his majesty's bones, perhaps a little less majestic than in his day of rule.
Richard's closest relatives differ on what should be done.
The government gave Leicester Cathedral a license to rebury the king, but the relatives' group wants him interred in the northern England city of York, claiming it was Richard's wish.
Yes, Richard's wishes must be taken into account. Now who is this close relative and how does he know the late king's wishes? Why, he's:
Michael Ibsen, the 17th great-grandnephew whose DNA was matched to the skeleton found under the parking lot. He said the case "involves the remarkable, and unprecedented, discovery of remains of a king of England of considerable historical significance, who died fighting a battle which brought to an end a civil war which divided this country. The obvious duty to consult widely arises from this singular fact alone."
I guess it doesn't get much closer than a 17th great-grandnephew for knowing Richard's wishes. Hmm, I'll just have to say that the good/bad king didn't leave a will or he would have been taken back to the family plot after the war.
So what's really at stake here other than history? Money.
The University of Leicester, whose scientists led the search for the king's remains, said it was "entirely proper and fitting that the remains of Richard III, Duke of Gloucester, be buried in the magnificent holy setting of Leicester Cathedral, near where his remains had lain for centuries."
Of course. Why not keep him near the parking lot where he was paved over years ago, long after he was forgotten? After all, Leicester was such a fine guardian of the deceased since his passing.
Leicester is hoping for a tourism boost from its association with the king, and is building a 4 million-pound ($6.3 million) visitor center near the spot where his remains were found.
The city is hoping to rake in some money with curiosity seekers willing to pay to see the old king. All that stands in their way is the Plantagenet Alliance (the King's relatives) who are threatening to take this case to court based on the tentative finding that Richard III can stay in Leicester.
The alliance had no immediate comment on the ruling. The Ministry of Justice said in a statement that it would "vigorously contest" the legal challenge (by the family), if it goes to court.
Well, only time will tell. But it just goes to show you that you must always keep your eyes open when you go shopping. You never know when or where you'll be parking your car on top of some king or queen. They say along with royalty comes privileges. Say, come to think of it, King Richard III was the hunchback King. Does that mean his spot in the parking lot was "Handicap Parking Only?"
The Political Carnival T-Shirt
Modeled by @suzannegypsy
Lt. Col Barry Wingard is the lawyer for Gitmo detainee Fayiz Al-Kandari. For their ongoing story + related topics, please click on the link below:
Kuwaiti Citizen Detained at Guantanamo since 2002
The Political Carnival is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com.
Photographs on The Political Carnival site (please read):
Photographs from other sources sometimes appear on TPC for humorous or illustrative purposes. As it is not our intention to use these images in any inappropriate manner or to infringe upon any rights held by others, anyone holding legal rights in the use of these images who wishes to have them taken down please contact us immediately requesting such removal, with which we will comply promptly.